Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Phoenix vajaa
InternetSpaceShips
11
|
Posted - 2016.11.27 03:55:53 -
[1] - Quote
So We are finally there. It has taken years but we have now reached the point of perfect assured destruction NC/PL now have so many supers and TITAN they can drop them risk free. The only powers able to match them are Goons and the Russian Block maybe. 3 Super Powers stuck in a endless arms race for more and more supercapitals.
B-R showed them the possible loss a super capital brawl would inflict. Now no super power will risk a fight where another super power could take the upper hand. It has become a cold war with proxy wars in lowsec. Empires like these can not be conquered they can only fall from within. Also A guy in PL told me their FC's all think NC are their cast off's who are not good enough for PL. And they smell. |

Nat Silverguard
Aideron Robotics
546
|
Posted - 2016.11.27 04:02:54 -
[2] - Quote
okay......
Just Add Water
|

Ralph King-Griffin
Devils Rejects 666 The Devil's Warrior Alliance
19291
|
Posted - 2016.11.27 04:09:38 -
[3] - Quote
we had this thread like 6 months ago. then WWB happened.
no one rules alone no one rules forever
give it time, anarchy is allways only one miss typed word or miss click away
We're Back in Business ,
have your very own Meeny Faced Bastards on call today
=]|[=
|

Nana Skalski
Taisaanat Kotei
21202
|
Posted - 2016.11.27 07:46:54 -
[4] - Quote
Stagnation leads to degeneration. Degeneration leads to weakness. Give them some time and they will fall like Goons. Like old Band of Brothers. Like many others.
Every part of a game helps to tell a story =ƒôò =ƒÜÇ
Where is Angry CONCORD guy when you need him
GëíGïüGëí GÖÑ Osprey
|

Sentient Blade
Crisis Atmosphere Coalition of the Unfortunate
1765
|
Posted - 2016.11.27 08:30:12 -
[5] - Quote
Nana Skalski wrote:Stagnation leads to degeneration. Degeneration leads to weakness. Give them some time and they will fall like Goons. Like old Band of Brothers. Like many others.
http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/Goonswarm_Federation
That didn't work out quite as well as we had hoped. |

Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1264
|
Posted - 2016.11.27 08:44:42 -
[6] - Quote
Sentient Blade wrote:Nana Skalski wrote:Stagnation leads to degeneration. Degeneration leads to weakness. Give them some time and they will fall like Goons. Like old Band of Brothers. Like many others. http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/Goonswarm_Federation
That didn't work out quite as well as we had hoped. Sure it did.
No one if afraid of them anymore. They aren't an invincible coalition that won the game.
So their continued existence isn't a problem. It wasn't a goal to cause goons to collapse. That was more aimed at SMA.
Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."
|

Vigirr
103
|
Posted - 2016.11.27 08:45:28 -
[7] - Quote
Corporations and alliances are in a never end cycle of growing, becoming good, bloating, becoming ****, breaking up and restarting. Lots of people want to join the corp that's already king of the hill only to find that as there's nothing really to fight it gets quite boring resulting in infighting, drama and rage quits.
On top of that the people who want to join a corp at its height of power generally aren't really that useful, not saying they're bad necessarily but they have the wrong attitude. This is the bloating phase and if you want to predict the future you only have to look in the past. As Ralph says, every empire crumbles to nothingness at some point. |

Sentient Blade
Crisis Atmosphere Coalition of the Unfortunate
1765
|
Posted - 2016.11.27 08:47:47 -
[8] - Quote
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:No one if afraid of them anymore. They aren't an invincible coalition that won the game.
You're either extremely foolish or trolling to say that no-one is afraid of Goonswarm. |

Soel Reit
Dambusters 617 Sq
251
|
Posted - 2016.11.27 09:05:07 -
[9] - Quote
OP why don't you build your own alliance with your own supers and titans fleet and dropp on them, mode: "allah akbar"  instead of whining on the forum?
oh yea.... i know why... cuz you are bad and can't do it....... sad face |

Pendra Tahyan
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
11
|
Posted - 2016.11.27 10:38:55 -
[10] - Quote
Sentient Blade wrote:Shae Tadaruwa wrote:No one if afraid of them anymore. They aren't an invincible coalition that won the game. You're either extremely foolish or trolling to say that no-one is afraid of Goonswarm.
Why would you fear something in a computer game. One might respect Goonswarm but to fear them (or any other corporation for that matter) seems detrimental for ones EVE experience.
|
|

Anke Eyrou
Hades Sisters
90
|
Posted - 2016.11.27 10:45:55 -
[11] - Quote
Empires will rise and fall given time, so the game will continue to developas as new entities will rise and challenge the old gaurd.
I expect to get this post deleted or locked. So much for freedom of expression.
|

Skydell
Bad Girl Posse Somethin Awfull Forums
687
|
Posted - 2016.11.27 11:46:51 -
[12] - Quote
In my experience, Bloc's don't fall in EVE. They just go through reformations. |

Valkyrie Harkonnen
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
32
|
Posted - 2016.11.27 15:06:58 -
[13] - Quote
Grrrr Goons
Grrr PL
Grrr Grrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Try EVE Online for FREE with 250.000 extra skill points here!
|

Vigirr
108
|
Posted - 2016.11.27 15:13:20 -
[14] - Quote
Valkyrie Harkonnen wrote:Grrrr Goons
Grrr PL
Grrr Grrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Don't forget the OG's: Grrr M0o and Grrr BOB. |

Esrevid Nekkeg
Justified and Ancient
2624
|
Posted - 2016.11.27 17:51:49 -
[15] - Quote
If there is one constant in RL as well as in game, it is that all empires will fall eventually.
Here I used to have a sig of our old Camper in space. Now it is disregarded as being the wrong format.
Looking out the window I see one thing: Nothing wrong with the format of our Camper! Silly CCP......
|

Valkyrie Harkonnen
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
32
|
Posted - 2016.11.27 18:08:26 -
[16] - Quote
Vigirr wrote:Valkyrie Harkonnen wrote:Grrrr Goons
Grrr PL
Grrr Grrrrrrrrrrrrrr Don't forget the OG's: Grrr M0o and Grrr BOB.
Grrrrrrr
Try EVE Online for FREE with 250.000 extra skill points here!
|

TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
1799
|
Posted - 2016.11.27 18:11:27 -
[17] - Quote
Phoenix vajaa wrote:So We are finally there. It has taken years but we have now reached the point of perfect assured destruction NC/PL now have so many supers and TITAN they can drop them risk free. The only powers able to match them are Goons and the Russian Block maybe. 3 Super Powers stuck in a endless arms race for more and more supercapitals.
B-R showed them the possible loss a super capital brawl would inflict. Now no super power will risk a fight where another super power could take the upper hand. It has become a cold war with proxy wars in lowsec. Empires like these can not be conquered they can only fall from within. Also A guy in PL told me their FC's all think NC are their cast off's who are not good enough for PL. And they smell.
This has been the case for like what, a year or more? Nothing new. All great empires fall at some point. BoB was deemed unbeatable and fell. We were deemed unbeatable and... granted it took literally everyone else combined to make a small dent. PL and NC are far from unbeatable since their fair share of losses in the current northern war. And it will be especially interesting to see what happens in the long run now that all the casino money is gone.
My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!
My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums
|

Dump Rook
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2016.11.27 18:27:41 -
[18] - Quote
Phoenix vajaa wrote: Empires like these can not be conquered they can only fall from within.
For the most part this has always been true for the big empires in EVE, I remember posts along these lines 10 years ago . |

Elenahina
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
1456
|
Posted - 2016.11.27 18:56:27 -
[19] - Quote
Phoenix vajaa wrote:So We are finally there. It has taken years but we have now reached the point of perfect assured destruction NC/PL now have so many supers and TITAN they can drop them risk free. The only powers able to match them are Goons and the Russian Block maybe. 3 Super Powers stuck in a endless arms race for more and more supercapitals.
B-R showed them the possible loss a super capital brawl would inflict. Now no super power will risk a fight where another super power could take the upper hand. It has become a cold war with proxy wars in lowsec. Empires like these can not be conquered they can only fall from within. Also A guy in PL told me their FC's all think NC are their cast off's who are not good enough for PL. And they smell.
If you think this is new, you obviously missed the previous cold war prior to World War Bee.
Eve is like an addiction; you can't quit it until it quits you.
Also, iderno
|

Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1264
|
Posted - 2016.11.27 19:24:07 -
[20] - Quote
Sentient Blade wrote:Shae Tadaruwa wrote:No one if afraid of them anymore. They aren't an invincible coalition that won the game. You're either extremely foolish or trolling to say that no-one is afraid of Goonswarm. Neither, but if we are going to switch this to be aimed at the poster rather than the post, you must be extremely stupid if you can't see how attitudes towards the imperium have changed since WWB.
Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."
|
|

The Devils Cousin
Evian Industries EVIAN NATION
2
|
Posted - 2016.11.28 00:02:50 -
[21] - Quote
Well if you choose to blue every target you can and then blow up anyone who rises to be a slight threat this is what happens
You made your bed
Now lie in it |

Agondray
Avenger Mercenaries VOID Intergalactic Forces
374
|
Posted - 2016.11.28 08:28:35 -
[22] - Quote
omg guys we reached stagnation. #eveisdyingonceagain
seriously though your complaints happen atleast once a year...
"Sarcasm is the Recourse of a weak mind." -Dr. Smith
|

Prince Kobol
2497
|
Posted - 2016.11.28 16:26:24 -
[23] - Quote
Phoenix vajaa wrote:So We are finally there. It has taken years but we have now reached the point of perfect assured destruction NC/PL now have so many supers and TITAN they can drop them risk free. The only powers able to match them are Goons and the Russian Block maybe. 3 Super Powers stuck in a endless arms race for more and more supercapitals.
B-R showed them the possible loss a super capital brawl would inflict. Now no super power will risk a fight where another super power could take the upper hand. It has become a cold war with proxy wars in lowsec. Empires like these can not be conquered they can only fall from within. Also A guy in PL told me their FC's all think NC are their cast off's who are not good enough for PL. And they smell.
To some extent you are right but so what?
It has been like this for years and nothing will change but again so what?
The best thing to do is just leave them to it and play the game you want to play.
I fell into the same trap as yourself and it completely burned me out and I quit the game 2 years ago.
I am now looking to come back and this time am not going to fall into the same trap.
I honestly couldn't less about the Goons, PL, NC or whoever.
I am going to play Eve the way I want to play and to hell with everybody else. |

Jenn aSide
Shinigami Miners Test Alliance Please Ignore
14955
|
Posted - 2016.11.28 16:43:25 -
[24] - Quote
I don't know how long this discussion will last here, and i can't claim to be un-biased because I am (A) within Jump range of PL/NC supers as I type this and (B) PL dropped a freaking NYX on my NAVY VEXOR (on my alt, on June 28, in N-HKSO, too bad we can't link killmails here lol).
But I will say this, it's funny how CCP made all these jump range changes and made jump fatigue with the the goal or ending 'cross map' capital/supercapital dominance....while inadvertently creating LOCAL AREA CAP/SUPER CAP DOMINANCE lol. Now super caps can be dropped on people with impunity with no chance of response from another supercap capable power unless that group tortuously and visibly moves their super caps across the map like space turtles.
Before Jump Fatigue, even PL would have thought twice about dropping a Nyx on a VNI (they might have still done it, but they'd at least think about it lol). Now, no second guessing required. It's ok, didn't want that VNI anyways/already replaced (lol), but really, a NYX.? A NYX??!?!?! |

Frostys Virpio
Yet another corpdot.
3000
|
Posted - 2016.11.28 16:58:51 -
[25] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:we had this thread like 6 months ago. then WWB happened.
no one rules alone no one rules forever
give it time, anarchy is allways only one miss typed word or miss click away
One could argue WWB happened because of something that is no longer available now tho. Who would have fought that war if they weren't externally funded? |

Frostys Virpio
Yet another corpdot.
3000
|
Posted - 2016.11.28 17:05:27 -
[26] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:I don't know how long this discussion will last here, and i can't claim to be un-biased because I am (A) within Jump range of PL/NC supers as I type this and (B) PL dropped a freaking NYX on my NAVY VEXOR (on my alt, on June 28, in N-HKSO, too bad we can't link killmails here lol).
But I will say this, it's funny how CCP made all these jump range changes and made jump fatigue with the the goal or ending 'cross map' capital/supercapital dominance....while inadvertently creating LOCAL AREA CAP/SUPER CAP DOMINANCE lol. Now super caps can be dropped on people with impunity with no chance of response from another supercap capable power unless that group tortuously and visibly moves their super caps across the map like space turtles.
Before Jump Fatigue, even PL would have thought twice about dropping a Nyx on a VNI (they might have still done it, but they'd at least think about it lol). Now, no second guessing required. It's ok, didn't want that VNI anyways/already replaced (lol), but really, a NYX.? A NYX??!?!?!
Human nature create this. The concentration of cap in a few entity because people want to be in the "winning" team makes anyone else a target. The core of the game itself push players toward doing that. Limited range or not, the current super blobs would be dominant. The only difference is between wrecking anything within range or helicopter dicking anything worthwhile given time. You lost your VNI like small corp used to lose their single/few carrier/dread 80LY away if they dared getting it out of a station for too long.
Which one is better is kinda hard to argue IMO. |

Prince Kobol
2497
|
Posted - 2016.11.28 17:21:13 -
[27] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:I don't know how long this discussion will last here, and i can't claim to be un-biased because I am (A) within Jump range of PL/NC supers as I type this and (B) PL dropped a freaking NYX on my NAVY VEXOR (on my alt, on June 28, in N-HKSO, too bad we can't link killmails here lol).
But I will say this, it's funny how CCP made all these jump range changes and made jump fatigue with the the goal or ending 'cross map' capital/supercapital dominance....while inadvertently creating LOCAL AREA CAP/SUPER CAP DOMINANCE lol. Now super caps can be dropped on people with impunity with no chance of response from another supercap capable power unless that group tortuously and visibly moves their super caps across the map like space turtles.
Before Jump Fatigue, even PL would have thought twice about dropping a Nyx on a VNI (they might have still done it, but they'd at least think about it lol). Now, no second guessing required. It's ok, didn't want that VNI anyways/already replaced (lol), but really, a NYX.? A NYX??!?!?!
Your right but what is the answer? Either situation is horrible.
For arguments sakes lets say all Super Caps / Titans / Carriers / Dreads were removed from the game.
I guarantee we would have post after post complaining that there is no counter to x No. of Battleships. Its an impossible fix.
It was said before the Jump Changes that this would happen. You would get areas of space that would be virtually unassailable because of the local Super Cap presence.
With this in mind when I come back I will have nothing to do with null sec in regards to wars etc.
Going to find my own little bit of space and have some fun :) |

Prince Kobol
2497
|
Posted - 2016.11.28 17:23:38 -
[28] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote: Human nature create this.
To be fair it CCP also had a hand in creating this situation.
They created the ships / game mechanics.
Takes two to tango |

The Devils Cousin
Evian Industries EVIAN NATION
6
|
Posted - 2016.11.28 17:40:11 -
[29] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote: Human nature create this. To be fair it CCP also had a hand in creating this situation. They created the ships / game mechanics. Takes two to tango
No they bloody didnt
They did not say blue everyone to make billions
They did not say build super fleets to blob everyone
They did not say kill anyone who is a slight threat
You did this
Not CCP
You guys broke null
How about you all unblue each other n go to war
No you wont, why?
Its called greed
As i said, you made this bed, now lie in it |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
18220
|
Posted - 2016.11.28 17:59:22 -
[30] - Quote
Phoenix vajaa wrote:So We are finally there. It has taken years but we have now reached the point of perfect assured destruction NC/PL now have so many supers and TITAN they can drop them risk free. The only powers able to match them are Goons and the Russian Block maybe. 3 Super Powers stuck in a endless arms race for more and more supercapitals.
B-R showed them the possible loss a super capital brawl would inflict. Now no super power will risk a fight where another super power could take the upper hand. It has become a cold war with proxy wars in lowsec. Empires like these can not be conquered they can only fall from within. Also A guy in PL told me their FC's all think NC are their cast off's who are not good enough for PL. And they smell.
Wow it's almost like this happened before tracking titans were nerfed originally, and then they were un nerfed and now in a shocking twist turn of events that no one could have predicted, it's happened again.
"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."
Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
|
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
18220
|
Posted - 2016.11.28 18:01:09 -
[31] - Quote
The Devils Cousin wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote: Human nature create this. To be fair it CCP also had a hand in creating this situation. They created the ships / game mechanics. Takes two to tango No they bloody didnt They did not say blue everyone to make billions They did not say build super fleets to blob everyone They did not say kill anyone who is a slight threat You did this Not CCP You guys broke null How about you all unblue each other n go to war No you wont, why? Its called greed As i said, you made this bed, now lie in it
The issue here is "Sure, OK. You go first". People with supercaps naturally gravitate to groups that can use them frequently. The more people join those groups, the more cautious other groups have to be. The stable state is to have two overwhelming supercap powers.
"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."
Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
|

Prince Kobol
2497
|
Posted - 2016.11.28 19:10:33 -
[32] - Quote
The Devils Cousin wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote: Human nature create this. To be fair it CCP also had a hand in creating this situation. They created the ships / game mechanics. Takes two to tango No they bloody didnt They did not say blue everyone to make billions They did not say build super fleets to blob everyone They did not say kill anyone who is a slight threat You did this Not CCP You guys broke null How about you all unblue each other n go to war No you wont, why? Its called greed As i said, you made this bed, now lie in it
Woooah slow down there Tiger.
Here is the thing, when you create a game mechanic it is the responsibility of the developer to think how those mechanics will be used and/or abused.
There was already a history of groups getting together long before Supers / Titans were brought into the game. Blobs already existed before Supers / Titans, groups temp blueing each other for their own gain already existed before Supers / Titans were introduced.
Did it get worse, sure but that should of been expected considering what it took to kill a Super. If you introduce a Ship that requires more people to kill it then it only made sense for people to band together.
It also made sense for people to use bigger fleets to protect the very same ships as they became a huge magnet, a prize so to speak.
Did CCP explicitly say to everybody to build massive Super fleets, of course they didn't, just they never said to create large mining fleets or Incursion Fleets.
However since Null Sec Warfare is a group activity, since large fleets already existed, it was obvious that who ever had the larger Super Fleet would have an advantage.
So groups got together to create these Super Fleets.
So yeah, whilst it is not CCP's entire fault, they do have to share a pretty big part of it.
You want people to fight, great, funny enough so does everybody, including those in Goons, PL, NC, etc.
The problem is, and its a major problem, if the game mechanics do not encourage conflict they why should they?
People need a reason to get out of bed at 3am to defend a structure, people need a reason to stay logged on for hours on end to form a fleet, meet the enemy and then suffer 0% TiDi.
Its all well and good you saying We (whoever we are) should fight, but people need a reason to fight, there has to be conflict drivers other then "I don't like this guy, he is a douche bag lets teach him a lesson"
This has been a problem for years and still continues to be a major problem.
Due to the nature of Null Sec Wars, the time it takes to kill objectives, the hours upon hours that have to be spent fighting, you need a major conflict driver.
The game mechanics demands that you have large fleets / 24hr Time Zone coverage etc to wage a war and it very hard to do that without friends.
|

Netan MalDoran
Last Garrison
265
|
Posted - 2016.11.28 19:15:12 -
[33] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote: give it time, anarchy is allways only one miss typed word or miss click away
I see what you did there 
"Your security status has been lowered." - Hell yeah it was!
Falcon's truth
|

Piugattuk
Lima beans Corp
558
|
Posted - 2016.11.28 19:26:18 -
[34] - Quote
Phoenix vajaa wrote:So We are finally there. It has taken years but we have now reached the point of perfect assured destruction NC/PL now have so many supers and TITAN they can drop them risk free. The only powers able to match them are Goons and the Russian Block maybe. 3 Super Powers stuck in a endless arms race for more and more supercapitals.
B-R showed them the possible loss a super capital brawl would inflict. Now no super power will risk a fight where another super power could take the upper hand. It has become a cold war with proxy wars in lowsec. Empires like these can not be conquered they can only fall from within. Also A guy in PL told me their FC's all think NC are their cast off's who are not good enough for PL. And they smell.
Ahhh, no, sure they can field massive power now but like any power they do tend to reach a point where they start to rot internally.
Politics, this is the thing that will bring them down at some point, powers rise, powers fall, the Romans got weak at around the same era the Mongols were on the move, its not stagnation, as they begin to entrench themselves by building an overwhelming force they are also building their own enemies as at some point someone will move against the bloc and since they have been building up such a massive amount of power this same power will be combined with opposing force, eve is way to big to completely control. |

Salvos Rhoska
1605
|
Posted - 2016.11.28 20:54:21 -
[35] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote: It's ok, didn't want that VNI anyways/already replaced (lol), but really, a NYX.? A NYX??!?!?!
Rare Jenn aWhine.
PvE v PvP
Selling CODE licenses! 9.99mil isk!
Bid for unique CODE neon edition special agent certificate!
|

Salvos Rhoska
1605
|
Posted - 2016.11.28 20:59:37 -
[36] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote: people need a reason to fight, there has to be conflict driver
Create your own content. Dont expect CCP to do it for you.
The situation that "no thanks, we are happy farming our own space endlessly, safely, in deadlock, is good for us" is not really an argument against that.
Sure. Peace is good for business, cos stability. But war is better, cos opportunity.
Nothing is stopping you from creating your own conflict driver.
PvE v PvP
Selling CODE licenses! 9.99mil isk!
Bid for unique CODE neon edition special agent certificate!
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
18221
|
Posted - 2016.11.28 22:00:54 -
[37] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Prince Kobol wrote: people need a reason to fight, there has to be conflict driver Create your own content. Dont expect CCP to do it for you. The situation that "no thanks, we are happy farming our own space endlessly, safely, in deadlock, is good for us" is not really an argument against that. Sure. Peace is good for business, cos stability. But war is better, cos opportunity. Nothing is stopping you from creating your own conflict driver. PS: Im probably so gonna regret both these comments tomorrow morning, but drunk-posting must be done.
I am looking forward to all these conflict drives you'll be creating for sure.
"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."
Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
|

Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
821
|
Posted - 2016.11.28 23:02:10 -
[38] - Quote
Wormholes are nice this time of year. For a large part they avoid both capitals as well as the N+1 F1 fleets. Much fun and actual decent fights to be had.
Come on down. |

Soel Reit
Dambusters 617 Sq
251
|
Posted - 2016.11.28 23:26:12 -
[39] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote: Due to the nature of Null Sec Wars, the time it takes to kill objectives, the hours upon hours that have to be spent fighting, you need a major conflict driver.
any suggestion? that's an interesting point |

Lulu Lunette
Savage Moon Society
796
|
Posted - 2016.11.28 23:43:19 -
[40] - Quote
At first I thought OP name was Phoenix Vagina.
@lunettelulu7
|
|

Paranoid Loyd
9841
|
Posted - 2016.11.28 23:49:16 -
[41] - Quote
Lulu Lunette wrote:At first I thought OP name was Phoenix Vagina. Heh, you're not necessarily wrong, it could be an abbreviation of slang.
"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix
Fix the Prospect!
|

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
4640
|
Posted - 2016.11.29 02:53:34 -
[42] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:we had this thread like 6 months ago. then WWB happened.
no one rules alone no one rules forever
give it time, anarchy is allways only one miss typed word or miss click away Sometimes a drunk Fanfest away...
Sugar Von MurdererTits : Jake Warbird gets my vote for most intriguing and attractive male character in Eve.
|

Hiyora Akachi
Advanced Hole Theory
236
|
Posted - 2016.11.29 04:38:10 -
[43] - Quote
Grrrrrrrrrrr goons Grrrrrrrrrrr PL Grrrrrrrrrrr NC. |

Salvos Rhoska
1605
|
Posted - 2016.11.29 06:58:54 -
[44] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:I am looking forward to all these conflict drives you'll be creating for sure. You fundamentally misread and misunderstood.
You create your own conflict driver and content.
Im not going to do it for you.
PvE v PvP
Selling CODE licenses! 9.99mil isk!
Bid for unique CODE neon edition special agent certificate!
|

VCBee 2fast2furious
Aliastra Gallente Federation
29
|
Posted - 2016.11.29 09:59:48 -
[45] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:This thread itself is a conflict driver created by the OP. We are all making our own content in it. Posting is the one true endgame. |

Prince Kobol
2497
|
Posted - 2016.11.29 12:13:37 -
[46] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Malcanis wrote:I am looking forward to all these conflict drives you'll be creating for sure. You create your own conflict drivers and content. I cant do that for you. (Unless ofc, you make me your content) Example: This thread itself is a conflict driver created by the OP. We are all making our own content in it.
Of course you can create conflict drivers, isn't that the point your trying to make, anybody can create conflict drivers.
Its a great Tag Line, one people have been rolling out for years, yet it isn't really true.
There is some much involved in having a Null Sec War it is pretty much borderline insane. I have seen so many people burned out because it stops being a game very quickly and becomes a job.
From FC's to Logistics People, its ridiculous.
So because these people, and when I say people, I am not talking about the leaders of the big groups because in truth they do very little, its the guys underneath, the guys who rarely make the headlines, who do all the major heavily lifting, truly understand the amount of groundwork and preparation required to have a major null sec war and what is really involved, of course they are going to need a really good reason to go to war.
Its fine for you or others to say We create our own content and conflict drivers, but we can only do so using the tools, environment, rules which CCP have set.
That Environment, those tools, the rules mean that you need 24/7 Time Zone Coverage, you need hundreds of pilots, you need Fleets of various compositions, you need logistics, you need FC's, you need a lot of isk, you need outside game communications, you need some form of tool for your pilots to claim back ships, you need a ton of other stuff and all of that requires a lot of hard work and dedicated knowledgeable people who are willing to invest months of their personal time to the cause.
So yeah, there has to be a conflict driver, something which makes sense to fight over for people to do everything and much more then I mentioned above to fight.
|

Warzi zouille
Astroya Guard. Circle-Of-Two
20
|
Posted - 2016.11.29 12:32:43 -
[47] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote: It's ok, didn't want that VNI anyways/already replaced (lol), but really, a NYX.? A NYX??!?!?!
ELITE PEEVEEPEE |

Salvos Rhoska
1606
|
Posted - 2016.11.29 13:11:52 -
[48] - Quote
Good post. Im glad we agree on what constitutes conflict drivers and content.
So there is lack of sufficient incentive to want to wage war, as compared to the effort of doing so.
I get that.
So it has gone from the state of "too big to fall" (which is a misrepresentation of the phrase, but close enough), to "too big to bother".
Barring CCP making dramatic changes, including but not limited to de-valuing NS space equity, or some inspired partisan crusade to wage war for the sake of war itself, a Cold War between blocs is the foreseeable future.
I suppose peace is good for business, less complicated, for less effort and less risk. But I figure there are hawkish elements that dont particularly enjoy that and will get increasingly bored and bothered.
I think its in the nature of things, that when a fractured socio-econo-political environment congeals into large blocs, that points of friction/conflict of interest/interaction are reduced to a lowest common denominator.
I expect we can largely agree that this is not due to CCP (though ofc they can change everything, anyway they want), but due to the mathematical difference in potential of dynamics in a fractured system environment (and commensurate exponential interactivity between them all), as compared to a system of a few homogenized monolithic entities.
Anyone have any suggestions for what CCP can do to change the systemic nature of EVE inorder to encourage war between the blocs, or internally within each bloc?
PvE v PvP
Selling CODE licenses! 9.99mil isk!
Bid for unique CODE neon edition special agent certificate!
|

Mii Lady
Perkone Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2016.11.29 14:42:33 -
[49] - Quote
These threads are an important part of the cycle of EVE. Enough time has passed without serious upset that people are starting to seek something big to change. Personally I want to crush the Russians. Everyone versus the Russians who scourge our game. You know for fun and not racism or anything. Just cus Grr Russians. Besides they love to be the bad guys. |

Lasisha Mishi
Caldari Colonial Defense Ministry Templis CALSF
109
|
Posted - 2016.11.29 14:43:14 -
[50] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:we had this thread like 6 months ago. then WWB happened.
no one rules alone no one rules forever
give it time, anarchy is allways only one miss typed word or miss click away pretty sure this happens every time a great war of eve happens xD
no one thinks anyone can fall.....it will just be a small skirmish and then a giant alliance is dead |
|

Salvos Rhoska
1606
|
Posted - 2016.11.29 15:09:00 -
[51] - Quote
CCPs position, cynically, in all this is difficult.
If they enxourage war between the blocs, it might result in the fall of a bloc and hudreds/thousands of lost subs as understandably upset losers fold out of EVE.
If they dont encourage more warfare, they stand to lose hundreds/thousands of subs of PvP oriented players discontent with the lack of conflict and ship destruction.
Erto, I encourage solutions/thinking along the lines of encouraging internal fracturing in large blocs, such that the larger they are, the harder they are to hold together.
PvE v PvP
Selling CODE licenses! 9.99mil isk!
Bid for unique CODE neon edition special agent certificate!
|

Frostys Virpio
Yet another corpdot.
3000
|
Posted - 2016.11.29 15:50:00 -
[52] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:CCPs position, cynically, in all this is difficult.
If they enxourage war between the blocs, it might result in the fall of a bloc and hudreds/thousands of lost subs as understandably upset losers fold out of EVE.
If they dont encourage more warfare, they stand to lose hundreds/thousands of subs of PvP oriented players discontent with the lack of conflict and ship destruction.
Erto, I encourage solutions/thinking along the lines of encouraging internal fracturing in large blocs, such that the larger they are, the harder they are to hold together.
How do you prevent alliance from forming power bloc when power bloc are not an actual EVE feature? How do you make them harder to work when they are not implemented in the game?
It's like saying voice coms give an advantage to player who use them against player who don't so CCP should make it harder to use. |

Salvos Rhoska
1606
|
Posted - 2016.11.29 16:03:17 -
[53] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:
How do you prevent alliance from forming power bloc when power bloc are not an actual EVE feature? How do you make them harder to work when they are not implemented in the game?
It's like saying voice coms give an advantage to player who use them against player who don't so CCP should make it harder to use.
Thats a good question.
Do you have a suggestion?
As I indicated earlier, my view would be to pursue mechanics that encourage fragmentation. I dont have anything more specific than that at this time.
PvE v PvP
Selling CODE licenses! 9.99mil isk!
Bid for unique CODE neon edition special agent certificate!
|

Prince Kobol
2498
|
Posted - 2016.11.29 16:28:27 -
[54] - Quote
Lasisha Mishi wrote:Ralph King-Griffin wrote:we had this thread like 6 months ago. then WWB happened.
no one rules alone no one rules forever
give it time, anarchy is allways only one miss typed word or miss click away pretty sure this happens every time a great war of eve happens xD no one thinks anyone can fall.....it will just be a small skirmish and then a giant alliance is dead
The biggest issue with WWB is that it came from outside influences. Without the outside finance of IWI it would of never of happened.
You can argue that the failed kickstarter and the attitude of a few inflamed a portion of the community but without IWI isk the war would of not happened.
|

Salvos Rhoska
1609
|
Posted - 2016.11.29 17:39:10 -
[55] - Quote
There are some relatively simple changes that can indirectly encourage fragmentation (although not complete solution in and of themself)
For example, removing Local in NS would be a reasonable start. Sure, Blocs will argue we can utilize this to greater opportunity, but they may also suffer more permeability on their other fringes.
Much of the debate on changes to encourage more fragmentation/granularity in NS is vetoed by Blocs, with the statement "if you change this, we will use our greater power base to exploit it harder than our smaller neighbors".
Probably they are correct in most cases. If they would even bother to capitalize on it, or be able to mobilize forces to do so. Its an inverted Sword of Damocles position, where instead of the power itself being at threat from the sword over their head, they posit that weaker powers are the ones the change will hurt most. Pragmatically, the powers have far more to lose, than their weaker neighbors/antagonists. And quite possibly the nature of their congenial compromise inorder to arrange/align the blocs multiple xonstituent entities, is not as stable as some might think. They might just be looking for a crack of opportunity.
Im not entirely convinced that changes which superficially may benefit a great power more than minors, would pan out that way. As an earlier poster pointed out, these Blocs have their own immense internal logistics and motivation to worry about in regards to other great powers. Its entitely possible that more numerous smaller neighbors could capitalize on such changes, piece by piece, and change the balance of power. As well as fragmenting the informal agreements between the corps/alliances which constitute the Bloc.
PvE v PvP
Selling CODE licenses! 9.99mil isk!
Bid for unique CODE neon edition special agent certificate!
|

So San
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2016.11.29 18:46:03 -
[56] - Quote
CCP please release a BS sized bomber to kill these titans  |

Frostys Virpio
Yet another corpdot.
3002
|
Posted - 2016.11.29 20:03:21 -
[57] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:There are some relatively simple changes that can indirectly encourage fragmentation (although not complete solution in and of themself)
For example, removing Local in NS would be a reasonable start. Sure, Blocs will argue we can utilize this to greater opportunity, but they may also suffer more permeability on their other fringes.
Much of the debate on changes to encourage more fragmentation/granularity in NS is vetoed by Blocs, with the statement "if you change this, we will use our greater power base to exploit it harder than our smaller neighbors".
Probably they are correct in most cases. If they would even bother to capitalize on it, or be able to mobilize forces to do so.
Its an inverted Sword of Damocles position, where instead of the power itself being at threat from the sword over their head, (which is analogous to the weight of great power with commensurate responsibility) they posit that weaker powers are the ones the change will hurt most. Pragmatically, the powers have far more to lose, than their weaker neighbors/antagonists. It is harder to hold a great co plexity together, than a smaller one
Quite possibly, and I would argue probably given the nature of EVE, the nature of their congenial compromise inorder to arrange/align the blocs multiple constituent entities, is not as stable as some might think. Many of them might just be looking for a crack of opportunity to deliver on old grudges or capitalize on opportunity.
Realpolitik.
Im not entirely convinced that changes which superficially may benefit a great power more than minors, would pan out that way.
As an earlier poster pointed out, these Blocs have their own immense internal logistics, politics and motivations to worry about in especially in regards to other great powers. Any weakness invites aggression. (albeit most major battles have historically been the result of "accident" or unexpected escalation rather than deliberate aggression, whixh is telling of the nature of Blocs).
As another poster pointed out, these Blocs are based in informal agreements, without actual in-game concrete structure. This, inversely, means there is no ingame mechanic to prevent fracture at any time. Break from the informal structure is possible at anytime.
Its entitely possible that more numerous smaller neighbors could capitalize on such even small indirect changes, piece by piece, and change the balance of power in its totality. As well as fragmenting the informal agreements/equity between the corps/alliances which constitute the Bloc. Financiers and industrialists may change allegiance for profit from emerging market. PvP core may change allegiance to a more hawkish and thirsty faction. Bloc constituent Corps may decide they are tired of being dictated to and paying fealty/royalty/rent to their suzerain Bloc overlords.
And as this fragmentation occurs, enemy powers weigh their odds, manipulate and encourage it.
The fall of an empire is not only from total war against another empire. It can also be from smaller neighbors chipping at the periphery, to weaken their integrity. It can also be from fracture within, as elements grasp opportunity to profit, gain independence, or settle old grudges.
Thats the kind of EVE we all want, right?
The blocs were formed to get over the hurdle that small group struggle with. If you add struggle, they will team up again to share the additional load. People banding together is what happen when you limit them. They play as team because team > solo. Large team > small team because you amplify the good side of a team to a greater level.
If you want large group to stop being a thing, you have to limit how effective ti is to cooperate and to be really honest with you, this would be extremely Anti-EVE. Even if you were to make it unproductive to work as a team through game mechanics, people would also work around it by establishing out of game mean to cooperate without using the limiting framework of the game. |

Judaa K'Marr
Power-Hug Training Bootcamp
48
|
Posted - 2016.11.29 20:29:07 -
[58] - Quote
They screwed up the rebalance by deleting RR to replace it with massive fax alt spam. To win a super battle still means enough doomsday alpha to kill a super through the reps which means only large groups allowed. Look at co2 dropping their whole fleet against PL, killed nothing except some trash faxes. |

Chainsaw Plankton
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
2323
|
Posted - 2016.11.29 20:40:28 -
[59] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:we had this thread like 6 months ago. then WWB happened.
no one rules alone no one rules forever
give it time, anarchy is allways only one miss typed word or miss click away I mean we had this thread 6 years ago, nap fest, blue doughnut, stagnation, ect...
@ChainsawPlankto
|

Salvos Rhoska
1610
|
Posted - 2016.11.29 21:21:46 -
[60] - Quote
Frostys Virpio:
I explicitly explained I am not against cooperation, on any level of organisation from one to one, to inter-alliance blocs. If that was unclear, I state it now, clearly.
My point is about instituting mechanics which encourage the fragmentation of large entities, as opposed to game external agreements between its elements.
As you point out, Blocs are based on game external agreements. Predicated on mutual interest, these agreements are not always entirely equitable or amicable. They are based on expediency and the current systems of the ingame environment.
The fault lines for fragmentation already exist, whether in equity of the agreement, negative interpersonal relationships between leadership of co-signers, the disparate goals of Corps and their members to the Bloc or any other Corp within it, or just the pure drives for profit or vendetta.
Add to this the influence of opposing Blocs with their vast reserves of resources to subvert/support action agai st their enemy in proxy, the natural opportunism of EVE culture, and that profit is key for finance/production, and the result is even small changes by CCP to this meta can wedge a small crack that can cascade throughout the system, creating fractures and hence more conflict.
PvE v PvP
Selling CODE licenses! 9.99mil isk!
Bid for unique CODE neon edition special agent certificate!
|
|

Ralph King-Griffin
Devils Rejects 666 The Devil's Warrior Alliance
19375
|
Posted - 2016.11.29 23:11:41 -
[61] - Quote
Chainsaw Plankton wrote:Ralph King-Griffin wrote:we had this thread like 6 months ago. then WWB happened.
no one rules alone no one rules forever
give it time, anarchy is allways only one miss typed word or miss click away I mean we had this thread 6 years ago, nap fest, blue doughnut, stagnation, ect... yup, its one of those threads thats just always been there, for as long as ive been reading the forums that thread has been on the front page, op changes, so do the antagonists but its always the same thread.
and welcome back btw, good to see some of the old guard
We're Back in Business ,
have your very own Meeny Faced Bastards on call today
=]|[=
|

Khergit Deserters
Crom's Angels
4731
|
Posted - 2016.11.30 01:18:55 -
[62] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:Phoenix vajaa wrote:So We are finally there. It has taken years but we have now reached the point of perfect assured destruction NC/PL now have so many supers and TITAN they can drop them risk free. The only powers able to match them are Goons and the Russian Block maybe. 3 Super Powers stuck in a endless arms race for more and more supercapitals.
B-R showed them the possible loss a super capital brawl would inflict. Now no super power will risk a fight where another super power could take the upper hand. It has become a cold war with proxy wars in lowsec. Empires like these can not be conquered they can only fall from within. Also A guy in PL told me their FC's all think NC are their cast off's who are not good enough for PL. And they smell. To some extent you are right but so what? It has been like this for years and nothing will change but again so what? The best thing to do is just leave them to it and play the game you want to play. I fell into the same trap as yourself and it completely burned me out and I quit the game 2 years ago. I am now looking to come back and this time am not going to fall into the same trap. I honestly couldn't less about the Goons, PL, NC or whoever. I am going to play Eve the way I want to play and to hell with everybody else. Haven't seen a Prince Kobol post in many months. WB! if you've been away.
Start the bubble machine!
-Lawrence Welk
|

Senshi Feixing
ENL Holdings
0
|
Posted - 2016.11.30 03:45:42 -
[63] - Quote
As a noob with a lot of money and starting my own alliance, these are my opinions:
Who is Goonswarm?
NC is best left alone.
PL...pl....I think I've heard of them before.
The days of supercapitals and dreads mattering seem to be over. I am a 1y/o toon and I have a bunch of carriers and dreads that are just collecting dust in Ignoitton. In fact I was not even here when WWB started or when PL became a dominant power, and to me these big battles and big power blocks have little effect. I just want to mine, trade, and make ISK. Sooner or later these coalitions will fall and that means I am going to be sending my rent check to someone else. And in the off-chance that no one appears to take my money then I'll just take the stuff down and do it myself.
honestly I feel like we are to a point in EVE where the biggest alliances aren't even alliances, rather rental companies who couldn't muster a formidable sub-cap fleet to save their lives.
CCP tried to shake null up a bit by increasing jump range for caps and thusly increasing power-projection capabilities for large alliances. The only problem is there is nowhere left to project power. You're either going to hit a brick wall of super-caps or low-sec.
IDK If this is what the actual situation is, but this is what it looks like to a noob like me.
Please, do educate me :) |

March rabbit
Mosquito Squadron The-Culture
1955
|
Posted - 2016.11.30 05:47:57 -
[64] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:There are some relatively simple changes that can indirectly encourage fragmentation (although not complete solution in and of themself)
For example, removing Local in NS would be a reasonable start. It would be good to get some explanation of why local in NS is important for block stability?
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|

Salvos Rhoska
1610
|
Posted - 2016.11.30 09:20:10 -
[65] - Quote
March rabbit wrote: It would be good to get some explanation of why local in NS is important for block stability?
Its free automatic intel on who is in a system, as to whether friend or foe. Rest can be ascertained through investigating killboards and character/corp history. Can even make some good guesses on what they might be flying atm or whether they might have alts and who they might be.
This is good for NS safety and stability.
Non-blue shows up. Everyone docks up. Instant safety whilst decisions/mobilisations are made on what kind of defense to stage.
I dont mean to say that local is some magic key that would topple Blocs.
I just used it as an example of how indirect changes can affect NS such that they chip away at some of the basis of Bloc stability, ergo, fragmenting it.
Without Local, Corps especially on the fringes of Blocs would be far more vulnerable to raids, especially in terms of relying on the Bloc to defend them. Makes the borders far more permeable and collapses the current intel chains, such that it would be possible for raids to penetrate deep into a Blocs territory before being detected.
PvE v PvP
Selling CODE licenses! 9.99mil isk!
Bid for unique CODE neon edition special agent certificate!
|

Chopper Rollins
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
1673
|
Posted - 2016.11.30 11:08:10 -
[66] - Quote
Nana Skalski wrote:Stagnation leads to degeneration. Degeneration leads to weakness. Give them some time and they will fall like Goons. Like old Band of Brothers. Like many others.
Band of Brothers were asploded by a high level spai pressing butans. Goons were swept by the biggest change to sov mechanics ever and an egomaniac pouring truckloads of RMT/gambling money into artificial enemies. Who are the many others? Burnout and boredom are what usually causes turmoil, what's this rubbish about stagnation, degeneration and weakness? Are you roleplaying? Or some some kind of chef that reads Nietzsche every day and it's wrecked your mind?
Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good.
|

Atomic Virulent
Dark Matter Industrial
169
|
Posted - 2016.12.01 03:08:57 -
[67] - Quote
Now that Rorqs can mine one one in a day expect this 'virulence' (see what I did there??? Eh, Eh???) to spread. Imagine Rancer titan gatecamps. |

Salvos Rhoska
1616
|
Posted - 2016.12.01 12:11:12 -
[68] - Quote
Chopper Rollins wrote: Are you roleplaying? Or some some kind of chef that reads Nietzsche every day and it's wrecked your mind?
Dont hate on Nietzsche :(
Im sure he would have been an avid EVE player.
PvE v PvP
Selling CODE licenses! 9.99mil isk!
Bid for unique CODE neon edition special agent certificate!
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |