| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Spaced Skunk
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.04.26 15:30:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Spaced Skunk on 26/04/2007 15:27:55 Seems good to me ;)
Personally I never saw the point in a damage control on a faction armor tanked ship (if your in structure, if means your most likely fighting impossible odds).
I messed around a little with your setup;
7 Ion II 1 Domination 100MN MWD (Or the best MWD that uses 75CPU you can get) 1 Domination Disrupter 1 TS Web 1 Heavy Cap Injector II - These can fit 5 as opposed to 4 charges the TS one you fit. 2 Centus X Type Large Rep 3 Centus X Hardeners (exp/kin/therm) 1 Corpum Atype EANM 2 Shadow Serp MFS
1 Powergrid Rig 2 Nano Pumps
Will push out more dps, with a slightly stronger tank.
74/77.5/83.8/83.8 emp/exp/kin/therm 1666.35 Rep Ammount
NEEDS 5% CPU FOR TURRET REDUCTION IMPLANT!
|

Spaced Skunk
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.04.26 15:44:00 -
[2]
Originally by: DarkElf
Originally by: Spaced Skunk Seems good to me ;)
Personally I never saw the point in a damage control on a faction armor tanked ship (if your in structure, if means your most likely fighting impossible odds).
I messed around a little with your setup;
7 Ion II 1 Domination 100MN MWD (Or the best MWD that uses 75CPU you can get) 1 Domination Disrupter 1 TS Web 1 Heavy Cap Injector II - These can fit 5 as opposed to 5 of the TS one you fit. 2 Centus X Type Large Rep 3 Centus X Hardeners (exp/kin/therm) 1 Corpum Atype EANM 2 Shadow Serp MFS
1 Powergrid Rig 2 Nano Pumps
Will push out more dps, with a slightly stronger tank.
74/77.5/83.8/83.8 emp/exp/kin/therm 1666.35 Rep Ammount
NEEDS 5% CPU FOR TURRET REDUCTION IMPLANT!
and just 2 points to mention there. altho the t2 injector can carry 5 charges i believe the TS still gives more cap per second over a battle.
and i have had my vindi now in structure 3 times and the dmg ctrl has saves my life. i would not undock without it.
DE
Well its a fine choice between Damage Control or EANM tbh :) I choose EANM ;)
Also t2 > True Sansha for cap injecting.
|

Spaced Skunk
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.04.26 15:58:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Phoenus
Originally by: Eamz
Originally by: Ryysa
Originally by: DarkElf and just 2 points to mention there. altho the t2 injector can carry 5 charges i believe the TS still gives more cap per second over a battle.
nope :)
it does actually, really odd but it does. I keep thinking something must be wrong with this reasoning but think of it like 1 cycle.
t2: 5x12 + 10 / 5 = 14 seconds/boost ts: 4x11.25 + 10 / 4 = 13.75 seconds/800boost
As always, ive probably missed something out.
t2 = (12*5)+10 = 70s for 5 loads | 5*800 = 4.000 |4.000cap / 70s = 57.14 cap/sec
TS = (11.25*4)+10 = 55s | 4*800 = 3.200 | 3.200cap / 55s = 58.18 cap/sec
I believe the above is correct 
How many reloads is that? or is that a single cycle?
|

Spaced Skunk
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.04.26 16:01:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Eamz single cycle
Well I stand corrected then
Just the extra loaded cap 800 always seemed better than the 0.75 second reduced time.
Would it make a difference with 2-3 cycles rather than 1?
|

Spaced Skunk
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.04.27 14:47:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Ryysa Edited by: Ryysa on 26/04/2007 20:38:35 OK.
Regarding the cap, I almost broke my head on this one...
All of it is very circumstancial, and cap/sec doesn't matter much... Basically I plotted a CAP Injected vs Time in seconds graph.
You can't really take average unless you make time REALLY big... at which point you will run out of charges.
I would say, T2 injector ftw because it can carry that 1 extra cap charge :)
Anyhow, here is the graph.
If you run for a very long time, then the TS injector indeed pulls ahead, however, short term, and due to the fact that the extra 1 cap charge is going to be more important than the negligible difference between the speed of the cap you inject, T2 is still ftw.
Basically, it heavily depends when you take the the "sample", for example at 50 seconds the T2 would have higher cap/s, but at 80 seconds the TS would have higher, however at 110 sconds or so, T2 has higher cap/s again...
Oh and, for those who care, the formula in excel looked something like this: (FLOOR(($F2+B$1-(B$1*B$3+10)*FLOOR(($F2+B$1)/(B$1*B$3+10);1))/B$1;1) + FLOOR(($F2+B$1)/(B$1*B$3+10);1)*B$3)*B$2
I am not doing this again -.-
:) Thanks for that, so t2 4tw :)
Also if you look at my setup I posted, would you fit a EANM or a DCUII? I mean, you could always remove a MFS for a DCU maybe?
|
| |
|