EVE Search - Amarr (omg I said the bad word!)

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Amarr (omg I said the bad word!)

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Wizzkidy Demonic Retribution Pure.	Posted - 2007.04.27 08:47:00 - [1] Yo! Don't post much to tbh but I was reading through old blogs and I'm intertested to know if any of the Ammar changes Tux posted about in This blog will come in the first part of Rev 2.0? It seems all too often a blog comes out about changes and then we find the changes won't be coming in until 9 months down the round Tux can you give us a yay or nay as too the ammar changes coming in Rev 2.0 or will it be after? Ammar have been hurting for a long time now Please keep it on topic though (I know what people are like on this forum) and I do not care if you think ammar don't need a boost I do and I think Tux does also Thanks!
DanMck Amarr Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.	Posted - 2007.04.27 10:01:00 - [2] a rough time frame would be nice or even just some details of the change please
Mastin Dragonfly Absolutely No Return	Posted - 2007.04.27 10:33:00 - [3] Don't hold your breath on that one.
Jim McGregor	Posted - 2007.04.27 10:37:00 - [4] Amarr wants what gallente has. Not gonna happen. --- Eve Wiki \| Eve Tribune
Wizzkidy Demonic Retribution Pure.	Posted - 2007.04.27 11:03:00 - [5] Originally by: Mastin Dragonfly Don't hold your breath on that one. Agreed, but can't hurt to ask I'm not asking for exact dates but some kind of "Yes rev 2 will see a small part of the ammar changes" this would be nice to know.
Per Bastet Amarr B.O.O.M	Posted - 2007.04.27 11:06:00 - [6] See the Signature
Kiyano Caldari Pilots Of Honour	Posted - 2007.04.27 11:07:00 - [7] Soon(tm)
Arathian Evasion Amarr The Dapper Bandits	Posted - 2007.04.27 14:09:00 - [8] I'm sure there will be signs to come of Amarr's return to greatness... File Photo of the last time Amarr was decent
Wizzkidy Demonic Retribution Pure.	Posted - 2007.04.27 14:33:00 - [9] Calling Tux....come in Tux...... This is Wizzkidy of Caldari refreshment to bring u a free beer if you tell us anything
John Grimm The Taining corp Knights Of the Southerncross	Posted - 2007.04.27 14:34:00 - [10] Originally by: Arathian Evasion I'm sure there will be signs to come of Amarr's return to greatness... File Photo of the last time Amarr was decent Originally by: Rawne Karrde PVP in EvE is consentual, you agree to it when you login. If you don't like it you're in the wrong game.
mikaelim	Posted - 2007.04.27 14:46:00 - [11] Originally by: Wizzkidy Yo! Don't post much to tbh but I was reading through old blogs and I'm intertested to know if any of the Ammar changes Tux posted about in This blog will come in the first part of Rev 2.0? It seems all too often a blog comes out about changes and then we find the changes won't be coming in until 9 months down the round Tux can you give us a yay or nay as too the ammar changes coming in Rev 2.0 or will it be after? Ammar have been hurting for a long time now Please keep it on topic though (I know what people are like on this forum) and I do not care if you think ammar don't need a boost I do and I think Tux does also Thanks! From said Devblog i get the idea that they don't know yet what to do. The need for a change in some points has been acknowledged but prolly they're still figuring it out. Also it sais solution will totally depend on the nos rework, so nos nerf comes first. From that i guess 6-12 months is realistic. This is a long time but i'd rather wait another year than watching them do something which severely unbalances the game or even worse increases amarr's current issues. Just have a little bit of trust and stop making a post about it everyday(generally - not you personally ofc). We are (as a race) already branded as the major whine-faction and this should stop at some point(coz matari whine much harder i can tell you ). I feel issues with Amarr but nowhere as problematic as the forums would suggest. I have fun killing people in Amarr ships everyday and I am not going to queue this until smb. figures out how to make those ships pwn even more. Not that i don't understand your wish for an estimated timeframe, only i doubt the chance of getting one from an official source by means of this thread.
Wizzkidy Demonic Retribution Pure.	Posted - 2007.04.27 15:03:00 - [12] Originally by: mikaelim This is a long time but i'd rather wait another year than watching them do something which severely unbalances the game or even worse increases amarr's current issues. I personally would not want to wait another whole year for something that has been clearly an issue for some time now. Quote: Just have a little bit of trust and stop making a post about it everyday(generally - not you personally ofc). Yes a lot of threads have been made, but this is what happens when you put out that things are going to change, people want some kind of communication as to what how when where Quote: We are (as a race) already branded as the major whine-faction and this should stop at some point(coz matari whine much harder i can tell you ). I feel issues with Amarr but nowhere as problematic as the forums would suggest. I have fun killing people in Amarr ships everyday and I am not going to queue this until smb. figures out how to make those ships pwn even more. I'm not saying im not having fun, I just wanna know if any of this will be in Rev 2.0 or in the future? Quote: Not that i don't understand your wish for an estimated timeframe, only i doubt the chance of getting one from an official source by means of this thread. Well we can only hope for a responce, as I am growing impatient
Tarminic Black Flame Industries	Posted - 2007.04.27 16:16:00 - [13] I think that all Amarrian ships should have their capacitor increased by 50%. That should do the trick. <sig> IBTL! IBDS! IBTC! 1st in a BoB Post! And other such forum tom-foolery. Join my Corporation!
Sheriff Jones Amarr Space Perverts and Forum Warriors United Cult of War	Posted - 2007.04.27 16:19:00 - [14] Edited by: Sheriff Jones on 27/04/2007 16:15:12 Originally by: Jim McGregor Amarr wants what gallente has. Not gonna happen. What...we WON'T be getting hot, big breasted women in our hangarbays? Say it ain't so, say it ain't so! Lies! Lies! Big breasted Amarr women DO exist!!
Mastin Dragonfly Absolutely No Return	Posted - 2007.04.27 16:59:00 - [15] Originally by: Sheriff Jones Edited by: Sheriff Jones on 27/04/2007 16:15:12 Originally by: Jim McGregor Amarr wants what gallente has. Not gonna happen. What...we WON'T be getting hot, big breasted women in our hangarbays? Say it ain't so, say it ain't so! Lies! Lies! Big breasted Amarr women DO exist!! Just buy them on the slave market. /shrug
Triath Lon Caldari	Posted - 2007.04.27 21:48:00 - [16] Originally by: Arathian Evasion I'm sure there will be signs to come of Amarr's return to greatness... File Photo of the last time Amarr was decent Man, that sure made my day. I'm not Amarr, but i fly Amarr ships exclusively, because "spaceships use lasers for combat" idea from way back when i was a kid.
Dammar Amarr Ephorate	Posted - 2007.04.27 21:59:00 - [17] Originally by: Wizzkidy It seems all too often a blog comes out about changes and then we find the changes won't be coming in until 9 months down the round 9 months would be awesome. Amarr's been waiting longer than that however... Quote: Don't hold your breath on that one. What he said.
Del Narveux Obsidian Angels Enterprises	Posted - 2007.04.27 22:54:00 - [18] They need to boost laser damage by 20-25 percent, across the board, to compensate for amarr ships not getting laser bonuses. Then turn the couple of ones that do have dmg bonus into rate of fire, making them on par with ships like the tempest in terms of double dmg over time. _________________ [SAK] Alumnus--And Proud Of It! -- aka Cpt Bogus Is that my torped sig cloaking your base? Originally by: Wrangler Well, at least we have forum PvP..
Chr0nosX The Good Fellas	Posted - 2007.04.27 23:56:00 - [19] Originally by: Del Narveux They need to boost laser damage by 20-25 percent, across the board, to compensate for amarr ships not getting laser bonuses. Then turn the couple of ones that do have dmg bonus into rate of fire, making them on par with ships like the tempest in terms of double dmg over time. Gank Abaddon or Armageddon would then be overpowered.
Hasak Rain Amarr	Posted - 2007.04.28 00:12:00 - [20] Originally by: mikaelim Originally by: Wizzkidy Yo! Justt have a little bit of trust and stop making a post about it everyday(generally - not you personally ofc). We are (as a race) already branded as the major whine-faction and this should stop at some point(coz matari whine much harder i can tell you ). I feel issues with Amarr but nowhere as problematic as the forums would suggest. I have fun killing people in Amarr ships everyday and I am not going to queue this until smb. figures out how to make those ships pwn even more. Not that i don't understand your wish for an estimated timeframe, only i doubt the chance of getting one from an official source by means of this thread. Uh sorry but this is a race which is suppose to represent a forth of the playable factions in the game. It has been over nerfed for the longest time and not only are they not taking any action but they are giving very sparse feedback. If it is considered "whining" to be upset about the situation and frustrated at CCP for taking their sweet time fixing it, count me in that group. I do agree that many of the issues with Amarr are exaggerated on the forums but there are glaring issues which should have been fixed a long time ago and when people who play Amarr see CCP showcasing things like walking in stations and putting out videos for it, it irritates people playing a broken race that has been given zero feedback to when it (might) be addressed.
Erim Solfara Amarr Tarlos INC	Posted - 2007.04.28 00:17:00 - [21] Whilst the sign to a frosty hell was quite funny, I think the Amarr were last good before the damage mod stacking penalty weren't they? I hate all this stacking nerf crap. It's just pushes you into more well rounded (read: boring and unoriginal) setups. (Assumming you want to stay with racial trends and general convention for that ship). New ship class
Silas Vitalia Khanid Provincial Vanguard Khanid Provincial Authority	Posted - 2007.04.28 00:34:00 - [22] Lasers giving 'heat' damage to modules in correspondence with the new heat features might be a nice temporary boost.... ..On the first day, God created the Amarr. ...on the second day, He created the Amarr Nerf-Bat, and struck upon them
Kiviar Caldari Dirty Sanchez Ltd	Posted - 2007.04.28 01:05:00 - [23] The problem isnÆt really that Amarr are weak. Instead a great deal of it comes from the ability to set very high resists across the board very easily. Lasers currently do enough damage to make up for the fact that they have to go against sixty percent base resist. However, with the ability to pump your EM resist and not waste a slot that something like an ENAM grants you lasers are less effective. Forums are what?
Miz Cenuij OctoberSnow Corp	Posted - 2007.04.28 01:07:00 - [24] Burn in hell Amarian fanboy filth. "Men are going to die.. and im going to kill them".

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.