| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Joe Barbarian
I'm fine and You aren't
Goonswarm Federation
4
   |
Posted - 2017.03.06 15:19:20 -
[1] - Quote
This is my first game changing idea, I'm after some honest feedback and any idea's the community might come up with.
I'm Joe Barbarian, known as "Skyrider Deathknight" to my Highsec Incursion counter-parts. I'm apart of a team of capital incursion runners that run both Null and Lowsec HQ & AS incursion sites.
Some backgound information this is based around HQ sites for now, where there are 3 sites, "TCRC" "NRF" and "TPPH" as all incursion runners are aware there is a higher chance of dying in a TCRC or NRF site than in a TPPH, so we feel that the TPPH needs a revamp with some capital features.
My vision is a TPPH with 2 starting gates (like NCN's in Assaults) Sub-capital gate and a capital gate. Now the capital gate wont unlock until the subcapital fleet clears the first 2 rooms. This capital gate leads directly into the 3rd and final room however when activated by a capital ship the site increases in difficulty.
Some idea's of the escalation:
- Swarms of frigates (which Frigates and Romi's currently track and kill fighters with ease before the sig radius increase)
- Self defences are activated on the tower and it begins to paint / neut / web / ECM multiple targets.
These are just 2 possible idea's that weren't really too much out of the box. There are other idea's that are floating around but would like community feedback on other possible idea's to make Incursions more engaging. |
Mierin Arthie
Enlightened Industries
Goonswarm Federation
12
|
Posted - 2017.03.06 15:25:58 -
[2] - Quote
Give all incursion sites escalation mechanics like wormholes. Not enough risk, even in low and null as it is. |
Salvos Rhoska
2354
|
Posted - 2017.03.06 15:29:48 -
[3] - Quote
If you want more engaging Incursions:
-Make the NPC spawns more randomized and unpredictable. (especially via ewar)
-Increase PvP involvement.
PvE v PvP
<>
Old School Exploration
<>
CODE Licenses
<>
CODE Special Agent
|
Salvos Rhoska
2354
|
Posted - 2017.03.06 15:30:41 -
[4] - Quote
Mierin Arthie wrote:Give all incursion sites escalation mechanics like wormholes. Not enough risk, even in low and null as it is.
This too.
PvE v PvP
<>
Old School Exploration
<>
CODE Licenses
<>
CODE Special Agent
|
Ptraci
3 R Corporation
The Irukandji.
2066
|
Posted - 2017.03.06 15:30:55 -
[5] - Quote
Move all incursions to low/null sec. Get rid of high sec care-bear incursion farming. Risk added. |
Joe Barbarian
I'm fine and You aren't
Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2017.03.06 15:32:59 -
[6] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:If you want more engaging Incursions:
-Make the NPC spawns more randomized and unpredictable. (especially via ewar)
-Increase PvP involvement.
How would you increase PvP involvement? We're out there and we're running sites. Not our fault people wont tackle us. |
Joe Barbarian
I'm fine and You aren't
Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2017.03.06 15:33:46 -
[7] - Quote
Ptraci wrote:Move all incursions to low/null sec. Get rid of high sec care-bear incursion farming. Risk added.
This is about Null sec, please read the title and the actual thread. |
Jenn aSide
Shinigami Miners
Test Alliance Please Ignore
15271
|
Posted - 2017.03.06 15:48:59 -
[8] - Quote
Joe Barbarian wrote:This is my first game changing idea, I'm after some honest feedback and any idea's the community might come up with.
Feedback #1. Post in the right section. |
Salvos Rhoska
2354
|
Posted - 2017.03.06 15:57:32 -
[9] - Quote
Joe Barbarian wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:If you want more engaging Incursions:
-Make the NPC spawns more randomized and unpredictable. (especially via ewar)
-Increase PvP involvement. How would you increase PvP involvement? We're out there and we're running sites. Not our fault people wont tackle us.
Im not sure.
Perhaps move all incursions into LS.
Unfortunately that poops on LS dwellers due to the system penalties.
PvE v PvP
<>
Old School Exploration
<>
CODE Licenses
<>
CODE Special Agent
|
Salvos Rhoska
2354
|
Posted - 2017.03.06 16:01:58 -
[10] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Joe Barbarian wrote:This is my first game changing idea, I'm after some honest feedback and any idea's the community might come up with. Feedback #1. Post in the right section.
GD is general.
Give him some leeway.
PvE v PvP
<>
Old School Exploration
<>
CODE Licenses
<>
CODE Special Agent
|
|
|
Cade Windstalker
1002
|
Posted - 2017.03.06 16:28:23 -
[11] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:GD is general. Give him some leeway, and atleast post ontopic.
Jenn is still correct, topics like this don't belong in GD and are routinely moved out of it.
Joe Barbarian wrote:My vision is a TPPH with 2 starting gates (like NCN's in Assaults) Sub-capital gate and a capital gate. Now the capital gate wont unlock until the subcapital fleet clears the first 2 rooms. This capital gate leads directly into the 3rd and final room however when activated by a capital ship the site increases in difficulty.
Some idea's of the escalation:
- Swarms of frigates (which Frigates and Romi's currently track and kill fighters with ease before the sig radius increase)
- Self defences are activated on the tower and it begins to paint / neut / web / ECM multiple targets.
These are just 2 possible idea's that weren't really too much out of the box. There are other idea's that are floating around but would like community feedback on other possible idea's to make Incursions more engaging.
First off, your idea has the capitals sitting around doing nothing for a while. At least the NCN has both sides running at the same time.
Second problem, you're modeling things after an NCN, the site so annoying that CCP had to physically make it so you couldn't have a solid wall of the things because no one wants to bother running them. Even today some fleets refit to deal with NCNs rather than run them normally and hobble their fleet for the other two, better, sites.
The last problem here is you're trying to make Incursions attractive to people in Null. Even if you increased the rewards to match this increased difficulty it probably wouldn't compete seriously with Carrier/Super/Titan ratting and site running, and Incursions come with a constellation wide cyno jammer effect. This makes them somewhat safer to run, but it screws with Logistics and general operations for Null groups so much that they generally just insta-pop the Mom site as soon as they can to get back to business as usual.
I'm all for more group oriented Null Sec PvE content, but Incursions aren't the carrot to be dangling out for Null players here. |
Salvos Rhoska
2355
|
Posted - 2017.03.06 16:31:06 -
[12] - Quote
Cade Windstalker wrote:Jenn is still correct, topics like this don't belong in GD and are routinely moved out of it.
Jenn's post is not ontopic, regardless of board (which in and itself is a violation of all board rules).
Nor is she an ISD to decide what belongs here or not.
PvE v PvP
<>
Old School Exploration
<>
CODE Licenses
<>
CODE Special Agent
|
Milla Goodpussy
Federal Navy Academy
493
|
Posted - 2017.03.06 17:20:21 -
[13] - Quote
im against it.. just due to knowing how the eve community is and how they'll find some way to exploit it.
its another fozzie idea which will turn out badly like all his other idea's. I would however like incursions to spawn more often in null sec space and adjust the bounties compared to what high sec incursions makes , its ridiculously off balanced, null sec is supposed to make more isk but it doesn't and the incredible lack of spawn rates all over the area is so sporadic that its pathetic..
|
Cade Windstalker
1003
|
Posted - 2017.03.06 18:48:45 -
[14] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Cade Windstalker wrote:Jenn is still correct, topics like this don't belong in GD and are routinely moved out of it. Jenn's post is not ontopic, regardless of board (which in and itself is a violation of all board rules). Nor is she an ISD to decide what belongs here or not. You atleast posted ontopic, as did I. She did not.
One, you're being incredibly pedantic here.
Two, you're not the topic police any more than Jenn and I are the GD thread police.
Three, your repeated attempts to police the thread topic are only serving to derail things further.
On that note if you'd care to has this out further may I suggest we take it to PMs?  |
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
7514
|
Posted - 2017.03.07 05:25:03 -
[15] - Quote
Cade Windstalker wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Cade Windstalker wrote:Jenn is still correct, topics like this don't belong in GD and are routinely moved out of it. Jenn's post is not ontopic, regardless of board (which in and itself is a violation of all board rules). Nor is she an ISD to decide what belongs here or not. You atleast posted ontopic, as did I. She did not. One, you're being incredibly pedantic here. Two, you're not the topic police any more than Jenn and I are the GD thread police. Three, your repeated attempts to police the thread topic are only serving to derail things further. On that note if you'd care to has this out further may I suggest we take it to PMs?
DID SOMEONE SAY THREAD POLICE?!
QUICK CALL ISD wait that's me.
Closed since OP remade post elsewhere.
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
Vice Admiral
Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)
Interstellar Services Department
|
Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari
End of Life
47200
|
Posted - 2017.03.07 05:42:27 -
[16] - Quote
ISD Dorim Bastorlode wrote:Closed since OP remade post elsewhere.
In after the lock? |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |