|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Ci'Fera
Shadowed Command The Explicit Alliance
42
|
Posted - 2017.04.03 14:18:19 -
[1] - Quote
Alia Nadasdy wrote:Question. Why do ships have wings ? A maneuvering thrusters is not ? Why wings in space ?
Typically Aerospace ships are required to fly within atmosphere and wings would greatly help with that function regardless of thrusters.
A wingless 'Aerospace' craft that has serious engine failure in atmospheric flight is subject to sudden impact with the ground aswell.
Also note that these designs do say Concord Aerospace along the nose. |
Ci'Fera
Shadowed Command The Explicit Alliance
43
|
Posted - 2017.04.10 01:10:33 -
[2] - Quote
Just for the sake of it. http://i.imgur.com/njVAIBW.png While not a serious fit it can put out decent damage. |
Ci'Fera
Shadowed Command The Explicit Alliance
44
|
Posted - 2017.04.11 23:12:04 -
[3] - Quote
Chuck Sanussi wrote:these sec related bonuses are BS until you give sec related bonuses to ALL pirate ships.
Nerfing lowsec much?
Its security status of the player, not the system. If you watched the fanfest vids they discussed the possibility of pirate hulls doing similar bonuses |
Ci'Fera
Shadowed Command The Explicit Alliance
44
|
Posted - 2017.04.12 02:31:07 -
[4] - Quote
Murkar Omaristos wrote:Chuck Sanussi wrote:these sec related bonuses are BS until you give sec related bonuses to ALL pirate ships.
Nerfing lowsec much? Looks like someone has an opinion before taking the time to understand the subject matter.
Its the best type of opinion! |
Ci'Fera
Shadowed Command The Explicit Alliance
44
|
Posted - 2017.04.12 08:06:09 -
[5] - Quote
Chuck Sanussi wrote:Ci'Fera wrote:Chuck Sanussi wrote:these sec related bonuses are BS until you give sec related bonuses to ALL pirate ships.
Nerfing lowsec much? Its security status of the player, not the system. If you watched the fanfest vids they discussed the possibility of pirate hulls doing similar bonuses NO SHEET, Sherlock. Well yes, this is the definition of opinion. Yes, I have heard about the possibility of pirate hulls having something similar. Yet, this is not posted. Therefore I am publishing my opinion - These bonuses for concord ships are BS until sec related bonuses are given to all pirate ships. Clear enough now? Not like I care, sometimes people in EVE are like babies. ;)
If you have to come back and specify that you knew all this yet you came here to gripe and reinforce your needless thoughts on the matter knowing full well that this is a 'test' for CCP to offer such bonuses later. Then you really serve no point in the discussion. Mr Watson... |
Ci'Fera
Shadowed Command The Explicit Alliance
44
|
Posted - 2017.04.12 14:25:47 -
[6] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Few small tweaks:
Slightly increased mass for the Pacifier and Enforcer Slightly improved inertia modifier for the Pacifier All the projectile damage bonuses swapped to RoF
Any specific reason for ROF over alpha? |
Ci'Fera
Shadowed Command The Explicit Alliance
44
|
Posted - 2017.04.12 21:42:19 -
[7] - Quote
Mina Sebiestar wrote:Ci'Fera wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:Few small tweaks:
Slightly increased mass for the Pacifier and Enforcer Slightly improved inertia modifier for the Pacifier All the projectile damage bonuses swapped to RoF Any specific reason for ROF over alpha? A tad more dps is my guess.
I would think 5% damage would put out the same as 5%rate of fire? |
Ci'Fera
Shadowed Command The Explicit Alliance
44
|
Posted - 2017.04.13 04:35:10 -
[8] - Quote
Stridsflygplan wrote:Ci'Fera wrote:Mina Sebiestar wrote:Ci'Fera wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:Few small tweaks:
Slightly increased mass for the Pacifier and Enforcer Slightly improved inertia modifier for the Pacifier All the projectile damage bonuses swapped to RoF Any specific reason for ROF over alpha? A tad more dps is my guess. I would think 5% damage would put out the same as 5%rate of fire? 25% RoF = 1 / 0.75 = 1.33 = 33% damage bonus 25% RoF vs 25% Damage = 1.33 / 1.25 = 1.064 = 6.4% more damage
Thats actually good to know! and yes, good call on the Moa fit, What I based it on. :) |
Ci'Fera
Shadowed Command The Explicit Alliance
44
|
Posted - 2017.04.13 20:20:14 -
[9] - Quote
Capqu wrote:BOMB LAUNCHER PLEASE GOD
I would think for the frigate it would be cool if it had a bonus to void bombs, Make it a little more unique than the other bombers. |
Ci'Fera
Shadowed Command The Explicit Alliance
44
|
Posted - 2017.04.15 20:23:11 -
[10] - Quote
Capqu wrote:Ci'Fera wrote:Capqu wrote:BOMB LAUNCHER PLEASE GOD I would think for the frigate it would be cool if it had a bonus to void bombs, Make it a little more unique than the other bombers. NO JUST THE LAUNCHER Momma must have not taught you indoor voices. |
|
Ci'Fera
Shadowed Command The Explicit Alliance
44
|
Posted - 2017.04.20 02:18:24 -
[11] - Quote
Vorll Minaaran wrote:Wonder if the Council Diplomatic Shuttle would get the new Pacifier model too? Yes..it will. |
|
|
|