| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Tar Kovsky
Minmatar
Khumatari Holdings
Ushra'Khan
   |
Posted - 2007.05.06 20:46:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: AonChilo
Sylph Alliance is not aiding CVA against U'K.
Which we can confirm. Originally by: AonChilo
U'K is being helped by various allies including; Establishment, Evoke, Outbreak, Betrayal Under Mayhem, Einherjar Rising. These mentioned U'K friends are all killing Sylph for many weeks now.
In the interest of completeness, I should add that The Establishment and 0utbreak were also red to U'K until Friday, that ENH was red to U'K until about 10 days ago, and that Ev0ke hasn't been in the area in months (at which point they were -surprise- also red to U'K).
Adaptibility is a virtue as long as it doesn't compromise your core principles. Ours are: an end to slavery, support for our friends, and respect to our foes. We supported Sylph for a long time despite repeated requests to abandon them, and even now would not have set them to red if they had not done the same to us first.
|
Tar Kovsky
Minmatar
Khumatari Holdings
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2007.05.07 16:54:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Miss Lear
from now on until CVA have cleaned up this mess, all of northern Providence is more un-free then it ever has been.
Please don't confuse freedom with safety. CVA offers the safety of slavery. The Ushra'Khan offers the freedom that is your birthright -- the freedom to live or die, to succeed or fail, to make your own choices in a difficult universe. Freedom is many things, simultaneously empowering and frightening, but it is decidedly not safe.
Choose freedom. Fly free.
|
Tar Kovsky
Minmatar
Khumatari Holdings
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2007.05.07 17:40:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Grimster
Now that the RP cat is essentially out of the bag, with both the CVA and UK sides requesting "outside" assistance, can we assume that both these alliances are now fair game as 0.0 entities?
I think my ebil slaver foes will agree with me that neither of us is delusional enough to think that we should be "off limits" just because we dress up like elves before getting drunk and making pewpew.
Also, the characterization of CVA as having requested "outside assistance" is somewhat misleading.
As for me, I'm a firm convert to the "Garreck Doctrine" as described by Ginger in his recent devblog: everything we do in EVE is RP. I'm reasonably sure that Seleene doesn't actually run a mercenary outfit in "real life". 
|
Tar Kovsky
Minmatar
Khumatari Holdings
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2007.05.09 04:33:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Hardin
Originally by: Eddie Gordo
I must make it clear, that ALL of the people listed as prior residents agreed to a NDRS policy in Ushra'khan Sov space.
Which therefore gives them carte blanche to operate NBSI in the rest of Providence using 9UY as a safe base of operations 
It would be awfully imperial of us to dictate others' behavior outside of our own home. 
|
Tar Kovsky
Minmatar
Khumatari Holdings
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2007.05.10 16:27:00 -
[5]
All propaganda in EVE is at least partly out-of-character. Otherwise, what would the point be? Whether it's long and impenetrable, or gold-plated and holier-than-thou, or clutched in a bloody fist, we write for entertainment and to influence others in some way.
|
Tar Kovsky
Minmatar
Khumatari Holdings
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2007.05.10 20:25:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Hardin
you no longer have credibility as an anti-pirate force
While I'd agree that it undermines our credibility in that regard, I'd be hesitant to describe this as strictly binary. Even CVA lost a smidgen of their "anti-pirate" cred by flying alongside SNIGG while assisting IAC. (I wouldn't be surprised to hear that one of the reasons you stayed out of the IAC-ISS conflict was precisely because of the forum beatdown you got for the earlier help.)
At this point, only time will tell how we continue to evolve after the resolution of the current battle. But we've never made a secret out of the fact that we rate "anti-slaver" as more important than "anti-pirate".
|
| |
|