Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |

Ventius Ceveros
The Ceveros Cyndicate Primary.
0
|
Posted - 2017.05.07 01:27:11 -
[151] - Quote
Nasar Vyron wrote:Ventius Ceveros wrote:I don't entirely understand, does this upcoming structure transition affect hisec as well, and does this mean that the towers and structures my corp has bought and launched will be wasted? HS Stations - no Towers - yes Expect an NPC buyback for those towers, which is typically the case when an item is made obsolete. Hmm... TCUs. Maybe.
Thank you very much, Nasar Vyron, I'll inform my corp members that the towers will need to come down, and the equipment out there, will the towers and arrays still function? |

Nasar Vyron
S0utherN Comfort Test Alliance Please Ignore
196
|
Posted - 2017.05.07 02:31:37 -
[152] - Quote
Ventius Ceveros wrote:Nasar Vyron wrote:Ventius Ceveros wrote:I don't entirely understand, does this upcoming structure transition affect hisec as well, and does this mean that the towers and structures my corp has bought and launched will be wasted? HS Stations - no Towers - yes Expect an NPC buyback for those towers, which is typically the case when an item is made obsolete. Hmm... TCUs. Maybe. Thank you very much, Nasar Vyron, I'll inform my corp members that the towers will need to come down, and the equipment out there, or will the towers and arrays still function? And are they doing the buy back on BPOs? Because we spent a lot on the Astrahus, EC, tower and array BPOs and all. And please tell me it's optional because i'll not trade them if i can still use them. I think that if they are removing the towers they should reduce the requirements to build a new EC because that's affordable for upstart corps founded by new players with barely anything, so they'll now have to start with an EC intead.
You still have a while on those towers. No need to rush and pull them quiet yet. As far as I know when the Refineries are released the reprocessing/compression arrays will stop working and that's it for now.
CCP will make an announcement when the change forcing all towers to offline goes through. They have not stated that it will be a part of the outpost patch. I highly doubt it will be at the same time.
I was merely stating that they will eventually be made inoperable, that's a certainty. |

Ventius Ceveros
The Ceveros Cyndicate Primary.
0
|
Posted - 2017.05.07 02:37:34 -
[153] - Quote
Nasar Vyron wrote:Ventius Ceveros wrote:Nasar Vyron wrote:Ventius Ceveros wrote:I don't entirely understand, does this upcoming structure transition affect hisec as well, and does this mean that the towers and structures my corp has bought and launched will be wasted? HS Stations - no Towers - yes Expect an NPC buyback for those towers, which is typically the case when an item is made obsolete. Hmm... TCUs. Maybe. Thank you very much, Nasar Vyron, I'll inform my corp members that the towers will need to come down, and the equipment out there, or will the towers and arrays still function? And are they doing the buy back on BPOs? Because we spent a lot on the Astrahus, EC, tower and array BPOs and all. And please tell me it's optional because i'll not trade them if i can still use them. I think that if they are removing the towers they should reduce the requirements to build a new EC because that's affordable for upstart corps founded by new players with barely anything, so they'll now have to start with an EC intead. You still have a while on those towers. No need to rush and pull them quite yet. As far as I know when the Refineries are released the reprocessing/compression arrays will stop working and that's it for now. SMAs and corp hangers should still continue to function as they do now. CCP will make an announcement when the change forcing all towers to offline goes through. They have not stated that it will be a part of the outpost patch. I highly doubt it will be at the same time. I was merely stating that they will eventually be made inoperable, that's a certainty.
so what becomes of my drug lab , Structures like it, and all arrays? |

Nasar Vyron
S0utherN Comfort Test Alliance Please Ignore
196
|
Posted - 2017.05.07 03:00:24 -
[154] - Quote
Ventius Ceveros wrote: so what becomes of my drug lab , Structures like it, and all arrays?
CCP Fozzie wrote: In our May release we plan to end NPC BPO seeding and the building of new Starbase structures for the following Starbase structure groups: Starbase Compression Arrays Starbase Reprocessing Arrays Starbase Assembly Arrays Starbase Labs
Then in our August release we will remove the bonuses from Reprocessing Arrays, Assembly Arrays, and Starbase Labs.
This means that starting in August, Starbase Reprocessing Arrays will only provide a 50% refining yield, Starbase Assembly Arrays will not provide any material or time bonuses to manufacturing jobs, and Starbase Labs will not provide any time bonuses to research, copy, or invention jobs.
So August they will become nearly worthless to use. As far as a removal date, we don't know yet. I would venture to guess before the outpost swap. |

Ventius Ceveros
The Ceveros Cyndicate Primary.
0
|
Posted - 2017.05.07 03:24:14 -
[155] - Quote
Well thank you very much Nasar Vyron, o7. |

Sgt Ocker
What Corp is it
1352
|
Posted - 2017.05.07 10:53:26 -
[156] - Quote
Lothros Andastar wrote:Vladimir Stolichnaya wrote:So we currently have 69 GÇ£ImmenseaGÇ¥ Conquerable NPC Stations to be converted to Ultra Shiney Faction Fortizars And 1335 [Total number built] Player build Outposts that will be converted to Shiney Faction Fortizars
All of which will be 1 of a kind, [ never to be made available again .... ever ] unanchorable prizes.
Can not wait to see the mad land grab to "claim rights" to these stations (especially the "Immensea" stations) Just in time to claim them for day or so before the changes for the sole purpose of scooping them up the next. Just to be sold, traded and horded as shiney bobbles by the stupidly space rich .01%
My .02 cents to CCP Perhaps at some point in time between now and the upcoming changes you pick a random, untold, day to lock those stations down to their current owners. If not, there is going to be a lot less places to call home in 0.0 as stations are carted away to be sold off.
But of course, that will never happen because stuff getting blown up is what pays the bills after all. If you don't want them to be taken, defend them. You have a date for the changeover so focus your defences there. I do so luv it when Goons talk to others about "defending" their stuff, like they know anything about it.
My opinions are mine.
If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - -
Just don't bother Hating - I don't care
It really is getting harder and harder to justify $23 a month for each sub.
|

Oliver Wendel Jones
Falcon Pilots Paradigm.
43
|
Posted - 2017.05.10 11:36:51 -
[157] - Quote
I tried to skim through to find this answer without luck, but what happens to our outpost control towers, defensive anchorables, etc?
|

Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE Mercenary Coalition
3184
|
Posted - 2017.05.11 16:34:54 -
[158] - Quote
Oliver Wendel Jones wrote:I tried to skim through to find this answer without luck, but what happens to our outpost control towers, defensive anchorables, etc?
Wrong structure. POS isn't what's being replaced. Only the three POS modules listed are having special bonuses removed. |

Petrified
Old and Petrified Syndication Soldiers of TIN
446
|
Posted - 2017.05.12 22:40:39 -
[159] - Quote
What happens with the current Outpost Eggs? Do we get reimbursed for them? Will they be converted to rigless faction Fortizars? Why allow outpost eggs to be built still if they cannot otherwise be planted?
Cloaking is the closest thing to a "Pause Game" button one can get while in space.
Support better localization for the Japanese Community.
|

HandelsPharmi
Pharmi on CharBazaar
1842
|
Posted - 2017.05.12 23:36:02 -
[160] - Quote
Petrified wrote:What happens with the current Outpost Eggs? Do we get reimbursed for them? Will they be converted to rigless faction Fortizars? Why allow outpost eggs to be built still if they cannot otherwise be planted?
https://community.eveonline.com/news/patch-notes/patch-notes-for-119.5-release
Quote:Existing copies of Outpost Construction Platforms, Outpost Construction Platform Blueprints, Station Improvement Platforms and Station Upgrade Platforms have been reimbursed in the following fashion:
Station Improvement Platforms and Station Upgrade Platforms have been removed and their owners have been credited with isk equal to their full NPC sale value
Minmatar and Gallente Outpost Platform Blueprints have been converted into Astrahus blueprints
Amarr and Caldari Outpost Platform Blueprints have been converted into Raitaru blueprints
Outpost Platforms have been converted into both 1 Fortizar and 1 Azbel |
|

Petrified
Old and Petrified Syndication Soldiers of TIN
446
|
Posted - 2017.05.13 02:59:26 -
[161] - Quote
HandelsPharmi wrote:Petrified wrote:What happens with the current Outpost Eggs? Do we get reimbursed for them? Will they be converted to rigless faction Fortizars? Why allow outpost eggs to be built still if they cannot otherwise be planted? https://community.eveonline.com/news/patch-notes/patch-notes-for-119.5-releaseQuote:Existing copies of Outpost Construction Platforms, Outpost Construction Platform Blueprints, Station Improvement Platforms and Station Upgrade Platforms have been reimbursed in the following fashion:
Station Improvement Platforms and Station Upgrade Platforms have been removed and their owners have been credited with isk equal to their full NPC sale value
Minmatar and Gallente Outpost Platform Blueprints have been converted into Astrahus blueprints
Amarr and Caldari Outpost Platform Blueprints have been converted into Raitaru blueprints
Outpost Platforms have been converted into both 1 Fortizar and 1 Azbel
Cool beans, thanks for the link and quote. My busy schedule kept me from reading that in detail.
Cloaking is the closest thing to a "Pause Game" button one can get while in space.
Support better localization for the Japanese Community.
|

Joan Andedare
Licence To Kill Mercenary Coalition
15
|
Posted - 2017.05.17 10:55:48 -
[162] - Quote
What is going to happen with the faction POS BPCs and the faction POS-module BPCs? Will they just be removed? |

Fourteen Maken
Karma and Causality
272
|
Posted - 2017.05.18 22:07:21 -
[163] - Quote
have you spoken to anyone in provi about this? it seems only right since they are the ones most affected and judging by the posts in here it looks like the impact could be devastating.
if the idea here is to "adequately compensate" players for the time and resources they invested into their structures you might want to look at this one again. you're not really compensating outpost holders here, you're effectively punishing them and offering them up for content. I wouldn't mind if it affected everyone equally but this has the potential to devastate a uniquely open group of players in nullsec.
please reconsider, or at least run it past some outpost holders to see if there is a fairer way to do this. i think you should have selected a cut off date prior to the announcement to preclude the 'outpost gold rush', but if you're going to go ahead with it maybe you could do both: select a pre-announcement cut off date for all oupost holders and give them a packaged standard citadel in jita so the people who built/currently control the outposts have some reward and a means to rebuild in the aftermath of the change, and also introduce the new faction citadels for whoever controls the space after the changes go live. |

IHaveTenFingers
Lethal Dosage. Violent Society
6
|
Posted - 2017.05.19 03:01:47 -
[164] - Quote
I can't help but feel saddened by these changes. I have issues with both player and npc-originated stations being removed
1) Player-built outposts As the moron who built the D2-HOS station and then lost it less than a week later, I can understand the kind of effort that goes into building these monoliths and how much it sucks when they go away. To turn these into irreplaceable assets is bad enough from a strategic standpoint. I've actually found myself in a position in which I sympathize with the residents of providence because we *all* know what's going to happen there on or around patch day.
Making matters worse, they are poised to be converted into a structure that isn't much better than their non-racial "upwell" counterparts. For something that would effectively become a priceless liability, that's a hard c*** to suck.
I've seen the idea suggested to seed BPCs of "outposts" as top-tier (possibly FW-Only?) loyalty point prizes, and I agree wholeheartedly. I think the sweet spot would be something approximating:
- 2-5 million LP required
- Material cost similar to old outpost costs (~30 bil, if memory serves)
- Capabilities and bonuses around 2x that of a "Large" tier upwell structure
- Extra rig and/or service slots
- Retain Race-specific role of outposts.
- This leaves the gallente station as an oddball. Even more service slots seems like a good plan.
- Nullsec-only to retain their heritage
Not knowing any better, I think the limited-issue faction rigs are a good compensation to upgraded outposts. Their BPCs should be seeded in a similar manner - possibly by more "fringe" corporations like Thukker, SOCT, Intaki, etc...
2) The 68 Immensea stations These stations are not just shinier outposts - they are pieces of history in eve that have existed since before Capsuleers (if you care about lore). I've always felt a sort of ghostly or nostalgic vibe when I dock in one. Storyline elements aside, they represent the anchor points of some of the first big steps that players took into unclaimed nullsec space. Turning the Immensea stations into destructible assets is effectively the same as destroying history for no reason. It doesn't matter how many epic monuments are put up to honor them - they will fade into obscurity and that's just a bummer.
Now, it wouldn't be fair for me to just whine and moan about the removal of Immensea stations without proposing a solution. It might seem like a revolting thought to some, but it's fairly obvious to me how to deal with these. I would suggest that they're converted into a permanent non-conquerable freeport (just like any old NPC station) and that the owners get reimbursed randomly with one of the various outpost-replacements. |

Lothros Andastar
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
312
|
Posted - 2017.05.22 16:24:37 -
[165] - Quote
No more rookie ships in Nullsec makes me cry. |

HandelsPharmi
pharmi on charbazaar
1844
|
Posted - 2017.05.22 17:48:59 -
[166] - Quote
Fourteen Maken wrote:have you spoken to anyone in provi about this? it seems only right since they are the ones most affected and judging by the posts in here it looks like the impact could be devastating.
if the idea here is to "adequately compensate" players for the time and resources they invested into their structures you might want to look at this one again. you're not really compensating outpost holders here, you're effectively punishing them and offering them up for content. I wouldn't mind if it affected everyone equally but this has the potential to devastate a uniquely open group of players in nullsec.
please reconsider, or at least run it past some outpost holders to see if there is a fairer way to do this. i think you should have selected a cut off date prior to the announcement to preclude the 'outpost gold rush', but if you're going to go ahead with it maybe you could do both: select a pre-announcement cut off date for all oupost holders and give them a packaged standard citadel in jita so the people who built/currently control the outposts have some reward and a means to rebuild in the aftermath of the change, and also introduce the new faction citadels for whoever controls the space after the changes go live.
I do NOT want to start any "propaganda discussion"...
As far as I can rememeber, the players and Outpost holders in Providence have fought many times against great alliances / coalitions and have shown their power.
Lothros Andastar wrote:No more rookie ships in Nullsec makes me cry.
Holy ****, I have never thought about this... no free cyno frigs will be available anymore.
BUT on the other side, you can transport cyno frigs with LO in their cargo in the ship maintenance bay of your Capital since this winter. It was just a small patch note. |

Zatar Sharisa
New Eden Heavy Industries Incorporated
39
|
Posted - 2017.05.23 05:10:23 -
[167] - Quote
Valkorsia wrote:Give us a self-destruct button for stations. We'd rather blown them up ourselves than see a dread blob with 50 titan alts from a superpower coalition unanchor faction citadels and whisk off a piece of history as a collectors item.
Not that I actually have a dog in this hunt, but you just hit on my thinking. If the changes paint a bullseye on you, then when the changes hit, blow up the bullseye. Not trying to be a smart alek or anything, it just seems a reasonable resort: gather everyone you can for the moment of change and blaze away, thereby creating your own self-destruct button for the stations.
Maybe I'm just a very wrathful, petty, and vengeful individual though. :D
I now leave you to your regularly scheduled arguments.
I understand about indecision, but I don't care if I get behind. -áPeople livin' in competition. -áAll I want is to have my peace of mind.
"Peace of Mind" -á-- -áBoston
|

Fourteen Maken
Karma and Causality
273
|
Posted - 2017.05.23 21:52:48 -
[168] - Quote
Zatar Sharisa wrote:Valkorsia wrote:Give us a self-destruct button for stations. We'd rather blown them up ourselves than see a dread blob with 50 titan alts from a superpower coalition unanchor faction citadels and whisk off a piece of history as a collectors item. Not that I actually have a dog in this hunt, but you just hit on my thinking. If the changes paint a bullseye on you, then when the changes hit, blow up the bullseye. Not trying to be a smart alek or anything, it just seems a reasonable resort: gather everyone you can for the moment of change and blaze away, thereby creating your own self-destruct button for the stations. Maybe I'm just a very wrathful, petty, and vengeful individual though. :D I now leave you to your regularly scheduled arguments.
the problem is these faction citadels go to whoever owns the system on the day the change hits, meaning some people might think it's worthwhile to capture systems in provi space so they own the citadel on the day the change hits. so the current system owners, won't get the faction citadels and they will likely lose their space. seems a raw deal to me, i don't know enough about nullsec to know what will happen i'm just going on comments in here.
if current owners lose their space and end up with nothing to show for their conquerable stations do you think that's fair? i don't think it's right. |

Zatar Sharisa
New Eden Heavy Industries Incorporated
39
|
Posted - 2017.05.23 22:25:54 -
[169] - Quote
Fourteen Maken wrote:Zatar Sharisa wrote:Valkorsia wrote:Give us a self-destruct button for stations. We'd rather blown them up ourselves than see a dread blob with 50 titan alts from a superpower coalition unanchor faction citadels and whisk off a piece of history as a collectors item. Not that I actually have a dog in this hunt, but you just hit on my thinking. If the changes paint a bullseye on you, then when the changes hit, blow up the bullseye. Not trying to be a smart alek or anything, it just seems a reasonable resort: gather everyone you can for the moment of change and blaze away, thereby creating your own self-destruct button for the stations. Maybe I'm just a very wrathful, petty, and vengeful individual though. :D I now leave you to your regularly scheduled arguments. the problem is these faction citadels go to whoever owns the system on the day the change hits, meaning some people might think it's worthwhile to capture systems in provi space so they own the citadel on the day the change hits. so the current system owners, won't get the faction citadels and they will likely lose their space. seems a raw deal to me, i don't know enough about nullsec to know what will happen i'm just going on comments in here. if current owners lose their space and end up with nothing to show for their conquerable stations do you think that's fair? i don't think it's right.
Hmmm....Yeah, that's pretty much the shaft alright, because I'm assuming there's no way to take them down now? If not, then now I'm starting to understand why some folks are feeling like a big target's been placed on them, and then the people that did it are kicking back in La-z-boy recliners with bowls of popcorn and laughing. I mean these are going to, then, wind up solely in the hands of the big alliances, and anyone popping off with the excuse of "Well, defend them," is either a member of one of those or being seriously disingenuous for some reason or other.
I understand about indecision, but I don't care if I get behind. -áPeople livin' in competition. -áAll I want is to have my peace of mind.
"Peace of Mind" -á-- -áBoston
|

Imane Fatlip
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2017.05.28 17:22:02 -
[170] - Quote
CCPlease, what will be happening with market orders already existing in Player Owned Outposts on patch day when they are replaced by faction citadels? Will they be magically transferred to the new citadel intact? |
|

HandelsPharmi
pharmi on charbazaar
1845
|
Posted - 2017.05.28 18:29:16 -
[171] - Quote
Imane Fatlip wrote:CCPlease, what will be happening with market orders already existing in Player Owned Outposts on patch day when they are replaced by faction citadels? Will they be magically transferred to the new citadel intact?
Otherwise you want a reimburstment of your broker fees? |

Imane Fatlip
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2017.05.28 19:00:38 -
[172] - Quote
yes |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |