| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Chopper Rollins
Far Beyond Triggered
1893
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 15:06:09 -
[1] - Quote
Sure hope making carriers unable to break the reps on a cruiser gang is fixing something. Seems like a dumb fix.
Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good.
|

Chopper Rollins
Far Beyond Triggered
1897
|
Posted - 2017.06.12 07:43:25 -
[2] - Quote
Perkin Warbeck wrote:... But lack of content drivers in null? Please pull the other one. That's what everyone was saying before WWB. Most of the major content in this game has been player driven and not about mechanics at all.
I thought WWB was a combination of the biggest sov mechanics change ever, basically a complete overhaul, and the delivery of a dumptruck load of gambling isk. Witjhout the changes to sov mechanics you could WWB until you were blue in the face and change very little of the map. Entosis sov favours dogpiling and can only be defended by the sov holder.
Making carriers into really tanky battleships better be a major fix, because it's a major nerf.
Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good.
|

Chopper Rollins
Far Beyond Triggered
1897
|
Posted - 2017.06.12 12:50:57 -
[3] - Quote
Perkin Warbeck wrote:The sov changes in themselves didn't 'trigger' the war. It was the players.
As for entosis sov favouring dogpiling? That's just rubbish. So we've moved the complaints about Aegis sov from ceptors and griffins online with everyone being able to 'troll our sov' to nobody can take it and it favours the defender? Yeah, right, can you maybe try that one again?
Without the changes to sov the players could have sat around saying grrgons until the end of time, even with the massive amount of isk just handed out.
The complaints you mentioned about Aegis sov i'm not aware of. Entosis sov allows anyone to attack but only the sov holder to defend, is this not true?
Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good.
|

Chopper Rollins
Far Beyond Triggered
1898
|
Posted - 2017.06.13 05:18:47 -
[4] - Quote
Perkin Warbeck wrote:[I can kill any nerd trying to entosis anybody's sov. Unlees they are blue. I'm told this is not the done thing.
I can't entosis the node for the sov holder but then why would I want to? If they can't summon the energy to undock an atron with an entosis link then what are your paying them for?
-Any entosis link activated by a player not in the defending alliance is counted as attacking. This means that an alliance can not enlist other entities to defend their structures with entosis links.- from the wiki, still current afaik. That last line though, 'what are you paying the sov holder for?', oh my. The mechanic favours dogpiling.
Disclaimer for thread: i trained into archon just in time for the first carrier changes, held off on purchase, got into a mino and chimera for pvp just days before these changes. I don't even want to lawnmower rats for spaec shekels, way to jerk me around ccp. Still not unsubbing tho, maybe they can get this right.
Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good.
|
| |
|