|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
3493
|
Posted - 2017.07.18 16:38:05 -
[1] - Quote
Johan Civire wrote:ic what the OP is meaning of this. Indeed i think let me say this if the citadels are more then 30 days inactive the need to self explode so this clean up the afk bases. Not a bad idea tbh. And or remove all citadels in high sec there is no need for that in high sec.
However like someones already mention the local merc can give it a check and clean it up for you for a price offcourse.
Of course abandoned citadels should be destroyed automatically. Once again, CCP underestimates the player base's penchant for messing with game mechanics.
From common sense view, the strain on CCP's hardware and software would be greatly lessened if citadels that had run out of fuel say, somewhere between 45 and 60 days, were incinerated.
CCP could say the unattended reactors inside the citadels went critical. |
Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
3493
|
Posted - 2017.07.18 23:34:00 -
[2] - Quote
Spookyjay wrote:GIVE THEM FREAKING FUEL BURN. honest to god. I do wonder if the devs and half of CSM even play this game any more. Im pretty sure they just think they do. But they spend so much time in bureaucratic talking about this game they don't really.
You have to realize that a good chunk of the CSM DID think this through. They realized that by littering their space with structures that had zero maintenance cost, but could be fired up at a moment's notice, they could create an impregnable defence.
And that is what is happening in null sec. Now, whether the dev's were complicit it in this plan, or just out-thought by the null sec cartels, that is up for debate. |
Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
3493
|
Posted - 2017.07.19 02:00:20 -
[3] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Spookyjay wrote:GIVE THEM FREAKING FUEL BURN. honest to god. I do wonder if the devs and half of CSM even play this game any more. Im pretty sure they just think they do. But they spend so much time in bureaucratic talking about this game they don't really. tbh, this is something I've suggested. Please don't assume that we're not talking to CCP about things just because we're not yelling about something in public. Though the fuel burn I'd prefer isn't a flat cost. it's a minimum. So if you're running services, it doesn't increase your costs. Just sets a minimum.
These things have been in space for months. They have been creating a problem weeks after they were introduced, and it is only going to get worse. The null sec cartels love them.
And CCP has made it clear that they have other priorities, like the idiotic alliance tourney.
You say that you suggested that they should have a fuel cost. I believe you. But you are not part of the null sec cartel bloc, but the very tiny minority of the CSM that is not run by the cartels.
So to expect your voice to be listened to, sorry, can't see it. |
|
|
|