| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lord Azraiel
   |
Posted - 2004.01.10 03:36:00 -
[1]
This idea came to me when thinking about two friendly corps warring against a common enemy. An option should exist to give other corporations the ok to attack your corporation's pilots. This way, should friendly fire occur in empire space, concord won't come in and wreck shop on your allies.
"I'm comin' for ya, and Hell's comin' with me!" |
Baldour Ngarr
|
Posted - 2004.01.10 03:46:00 -
[2]
 Quote:
This idea came to me when thinking about two friendly corps warring against a common enemy. An option should exist to give other corporations the ok to attack your corporation's pilots. This way, should friendly fire occur in empire space, concord won't come in and wreck shop on your allies.
It's called a declaration of war, and it's already in.
_______
"Soon" is an ancient Icelandic word meaning "some time before the next Ice Age." |
Outlander
|
Posted - 2004.01.10 03:58:00 -
[3]
I think Lord's idea would be a mutual agreement between two corporations that friendly fire is ok. A pact of sorts that both sides would have to agree too that wouldn't count against the 3-war limit which is declared by one side. Both sides would have to agree or this would mess up the 3 war maximum and either side should be able to unilaterally break the pact so it couldn't be exploited.
|
Lord Azraiel
|
Posted - 2004.01.10 17:57:00 -
[4]
What it would be is an ok for one corps pilots to initiate aggression against your corp without concord coming and blasting or sentries. It would not allow you to blast them. They would have to ok you. And it should have 0 wait time to start, but 24 hours to end, so a corp couldn't start one, then end it before the corp blasted them so concord comes and kills them.
"I'm comin' for ya, and Hell's comin' with me!" |
Baldour Ngarr
|
Posted - 2004.01.10 18:28:00 -
[5]
Quote:
I think Lord's idea would be a mutual agreement between two corporations that friendly fire is ok.
I'm entirely aware of that. We have a mechanism that works perfectly well for that process. It's called a declaration of war, and it's already in. There's no law that says the corp you declare war on has to be an enemy.
Quote:
A pact of sorts that both sides would have to agree too that wouldn't count against the 3-war limit which is declared by one side.
Well, tough. The limit is three.
_______
"Soon" is an ancient Icelandic word meaning "some time before the next Ice Age." |
Celeste Fegi
|
Posted - 2004.01.10 23:16:00 -
[6]
What about a system which distinguished splash damage from direct fire? Allow friendly corps to register their alliance, which causes splash damage from one ally to another to be regarded as acceptable, but targeting an ally would continue to be unacceptable. Of course, that also leads to possible future stronger types of alliances.
|
Baldour Ngarr
|
Posted - 2004.01.11 01:19:00 -
[7]
Quote:
What about a system which distinguished splash damage from direct fire? Allow friendly corps to register their alliance, which causes splash damage from one ally to another to be regarded as acceptable, but targeting an ally would continue to be unacceptable. Of course, that also leads to possible future stronger types of alliances.
Seems like a good idea.
_______
"Soon" is an ancient Icelandic word meaning "some time before the next Ice Age." |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |