| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Bradstone
BRADNETT
   |
Posted - 2007.06.05 14:54:00 -
[1]
Not surprised about the drake getting a shield recharge rate nerf as it come on :) it was the first useful PVP Caldari ship! cant have that!
Anywho I think its a shame they have seen fit to nerf the nighthawk along with it, i'll keep using it as its the best ship I know, and I donÆt use it for pvp so its shame that due to some far off battle it got this nerf because some n**b in a battleship didnÆt know what a NOS or EW was.
It seems to me that a 4 month old player in a domi attacks say a 3 year old player in a nighthawk, the 4 month player screams that the drake and nighthawk is too powerful, so after many people moan, it has a nerf, quite rightly to with the drake LOL.
But it seems to be that account for skills and know how is no longer entering into the battlefield, it seems like this "I am in a bigger ship I should win" attitude has appeared. I would hope to god I could win in my max trained Nighthawk to a 4 month raven player! It seems that nerfs are taking place to lower high skilled players to a lower level so its more of a fight for the younger players... so whatÆs the point in skill training these ships to death if your going to be lowered not by skill but by the ships capability.
Even though i shall never see the battlefield in pvp action again, I felt that I should say something for those nighthawk pilots who do fight in pvp, because it seems to me that their skill advantage is being taken away from them.
Anywho! IÆve changed to Gallente command ships now so IÆll be waiting for the nerf on them to quickly follow 
IÆll wait to see how many insulting replies I get from this and add them to my collection  
"As a good friend once said - Its a Game"
|
Igualmentedos
|
Posted - 2007.06.05 14:59:00 -
[2]
Yeah, it's a damn shame that the babies who can't destroy a caldari ship automatically assume it needs to be nerfed. Pathetic CCP.
|
Pottsey
Gallente
Enheduanni Foundation
|
Posted - 2007.06.05 15:04:00 -
[3]
ôAnywho! IÆve changed to Gallente command ships now so IÆll be waiting for the nerf on them to quickly followö Its already hit the same nerf effects Gallante Command ships. This nerf hurts Gallante just as much if not more then Caldari. BC needed a nerf Command Ships didnt.
Passive shield tanking guide click here |
Bradstone
BRADNETT
|
Posted - 2007.06.05 15:08:00 -
[4]
 Originally by: Pottsey
ôAnywho! IÆve changed to Gallente command ships now so IÆll be waiting for the nerf on them to quickly followö Its already hit the same nerf effects Gallante Command ships. This nerf hurts Gallante just as much if not more then Caldari. BC needed a nerf Command Ships didnt.
agreed
|
F90OEX
|
Posted - 2007.06.05 15:09:00 -
[5]
Yep,
And on top of that a Tech 1 ship made for armor tanking (Myrm) does better shield tanking then a drake or sometimes a Nighthawk, something wrong there ..
|
Scaramunga Scaramai
Amarr
Infinitus Odium
|
Posted - 2007.06.05 15:23:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Bradstone
I donÆt use it for pvp so its shame that due to some far off battle it got this nerf because some n**b in a battleship didnÆt know what a NOS or EW was.
i lol'd tbh NOSing a PASSIVE TANK yeh good idea that. on a side note - lets all fly amarr and be equally crap! oh no wait...
|
Bradstone
BRADNETT
|
Posted - 2007.06.05 15:26:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Scaramunga Scaramai
Originally by: Bradstone
I donÆt use it for pvp so its shame that due to some far off battle it got this nerf because some n**b in a battleship didnÆt know what a NOS or EW was.
i lol'd tbh NOSing a PASSIVE TANK yeh good idea that. on a side note - lets all fly amarr and be equally crap! oh no wait...
aaa unless they use active hardeners  that would be funny.
|
Berlina
Caldari
KillaSquad
|
Posted - 2007.06.05 15:32:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Berlina on 05/06/2007 15:31:55
The nighthawk, aww man how bad are ccp gna ruin this, STICK TO THE NERFING OF BCS
the nighthawks a t2 toy, its designed to pack a punch
|
Pottsey
Gallente
Enheduanni Foundation
|
Posted - 2007.06.05 15:52:00 -
[9]
ôAnd on top of that a Tech 1 ship made for armor tanking (Myrm) does better shield tanking then a drake or sometimes a Nighthawk, something wrong there ..ö
WhatÆs wrong with the race that invited passive tanking have a better passive tank then Caldari BCÆs that are made for active tanking?
Passive shield tanking guide click here |
Klavayne
Pack Of Shadows
|
Posted - 2007.06.05 16:03:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Pottsey
ôAnd on top of that a Tech 1 ship made for armor tanking (Myrm) does better shield tanking then a drake or sometimes a Nighthawk, something wrong there ..ö
WhatÆs wrong with the race that invited passive tanking have a better passive tank then Caldari BCÆs that are made for active tanking?
The fact that those ships have a bonus to help shield tanking (a bonus to active and passive). Yet the ship with a bonus to armour tanking still beats it at shield tanking.
Personally, it doesnt bother me they are nerfing the Drake, that needed it. And enough with the drake nerf threads please.
|
Gee Lok
|
Posted - 2007.06.05 16:08:00 -
[11]
Historically battlecruisers were designed to be midway between battleships (armament and armour at the cost of speed and agility) and cruisers (speed and agility at the cost of armament and armour).
The were intended to be as fast and maneouverable as cruisers, but either have the armour to tank cruisers, or the guns to outrange them.
The Drake has an armamant only slightly better than a caracal, but has a battleship sized tank. I can't see what is wrong with that.
|
Badhands
Gallente
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2007.06.05 16:13:00 -
[12]
I heard that although t1 BCs are getting their shield recharge rate increased, t2 BCs are staying the same. Can anyone confirm or deny?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statement on dev misconduct:
for the record, Darkstar1 has 3 pos in game only, both are and have always worked fine |
Pottsey
Gallente
Enheduanni Foundation
|
Posted - 2007.06.05 16:22:00 -
[13]
ôThe fact that those ships have a bonus to help shield tanking (a bonus to active and passive). Yet the ship with a bonus to armour tanking still beats it at shield tanking.ö
ThatÆs because the BC came out as active shield tanks. The shield bonus although it benefits passive tanking is not a passive tanking bonus and does not mean the ship is meant to passive tank. Its clear the Caldari BCÆs where made to be active shield tanks not passive. Gallente have always been a dual tank race, they favour amour tanking but have always done both shield and amour.
All passive tanking bonusÆs where stripped from none faction ships a while ago. If CCP are still following that rule then the Gallante BC cannot have a passive tank bonus which explains why it has an amour bonus. A passive tanking bonusÆs is either +hitpoints or + shield recharge.
Passive shield tanking guide click here |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |