EVE Search - HOBO Accepts Mercenary Contract against 7-K Region

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

HOBO Accepts Mercenary Contract against 7-K Region

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Lady Weaksauce	Posted - 2007.06.27 23:25:00 - [31] why ppl post these contract results here, i see only succesfull contracts why the not so succesful contracts aren't posted, would be much more interesting read than dull stats
Phelaen Under the Wings of Fury	Posted - 2007.06.27 23:36:00 - [32] i rather like these stats... but thats just me -=Piew Piew=- accepting contracts, contact Phelaen or Abbel Nightroad
Xalorn Butcherbirds	Posted - 2007.06.27 23:38:00 - [33] Originally by: Lady Weaksauce i see only succesfull contracts why the not so succesful contracts aren't posted I wouldn't be surprised if unsuccessful contracts have gotten posted as 'completed successfully'.
Jane Spondogolo NoobWaffe	Posted - 2007.06.27 23:58:00 - [34] Edited by: Jane Spondogolo on 27/06/2007 23:58:00 edit: damn.posted on wrong character. You failed your objective, and regardless I doubt the south are just going to let this go. ______ Unrepentant Southern Federation Cheerleader.
Abbel Nightroad Under the Wings of Fury	Posted - 2007.06.28 00:28:00 - [35] Considering that the outpost wasn't the primary objective (we're not dumb we know we can't hold it against goonswarm) this was a pretty successfull operation.
Ryo Jang Central Defiance Terror In The System	Posted - 2007.06.28 00:43:00 - [36] Edited by: Ryo Jang on 28/06/2007 00:43:44 Originally by: Virtuozzo Omg you couldn't even fight >.< You had to stage an internal coup :P Station recaptured. I'm a bit confused however, as through the internal coup Ethereal Dawn got reduced to one baddie corp, and the rest are with the support of the rest of the regions reforming by downtime as a new alliance, does this mean you will stick to the original contract and shoot the poor lone corp left in ED after the coup? :P Hilarious tbh. sounds like a legitimate tactic tbh, and a refreshing one too. ED got what they deserved by the sounds of it. well done on this contract guys.
jeffb GoonFleet	Posted - 2007.06.28 01:54:00 - [37] Originally by: Ryo Jang sounds like a legitimate tactic tbh, and a refreshing one too. ED got what they deserved by the sounds of it. well done on this contract guys. They achieved nothing.
LordLoki	Posted - 2007.06.28 02:04:00 - [38] I think I know why they consider this successful.. A while back UWOF was upset that they could not get ATROX alliance name back after leaving ED.. thus now they feel they have stolen the ED name. If this is success then..... well.. maybe we all should have such low standards... we'd live much happier lives.. Ohh and please... DO tell how we lost 20 bil+ in assets.. thats absurd.
Jane Spondogolo NoobWaffe	Posted - 2007.06.28 03:54:00 - [39] Wait. You know you know you cant take on the goons, or RA, or any of the other big powers that have an interest in friendly forces there. Yet you pick a fight that directly pees in their pocket. What on earth thinks you have a right to declare it 'over'? Its over when the RA or the goons declare it over. Not you. You havent earned that right. ______ Unrepentant Southern Federation Cheerleader.
Muro Deez GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.06.28 04:54:00 - [40] Originally by: LordLoki I think I know why they consider this successful.. A while back UWOF was upset that they could not get ATROX alliance name back after leaving ED.. thus now they feel they have stolen the ED name. If this is success then..... well.. maybe we all should have such low standards... we'd live much happier lives.. Ohh and please... DO tell how we lost 20 bil+ in assets.. thats absurd. i know i lost at least 2m in fuel
Vile rat GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.06.28 05:10:00 - [41] Originally by: Huitz Quiling Edited by: Huitz Quiling on 27/06/2007 23:24:32 Edited by: Huitz Quiling on 27/06/2007 22:19:59 Client(s): UWOF Target(s): Ethereal Dawn Alliance System(s): R-6 Asset Damages Inflicted: 20+ Billion Payment: Classified Operational Time Windows: Seven(7) Days Current Status: Contract Complete Launch Date: June 24th Start of Contract End Date: June 27th (no new sov map atm but no more ED) Reasons Stated: ED owes UWOF 2 Dreads (as stated by our client) Contractual Guidelines: This was to be a purely covert operation. Minimization of casualties at all costs. Disruption of ED daily activities, claiming of assets, and recovery of UWOF assets lost in alliance separation were the prime objectives. Both parties all met and agreed upon a common goal and work began on the contract June 24th, 2007. As of June 27th, 2007 HOBO has been in contact with it's clients and confirmed 100% satisfaction in asset recovery and loss to Ethereal Dawn. Although from the outside looking in it would appear our intentions were otherwise, this was rather part of our contrct to throw things off balance. There were no plans to hold the station / alliance space longer then 24hrs. Assets were secured and pulled out, ED is more then aware of what they have lost, we need not state it publicly, unless they choose to do so. As for us, we consider this a great success for a contract of such caliber / request. We do regret we could not please all the masses of EVE with a "Pew Pew" story. Thank you for your time Contract Complete, Closed. -Huitz Quiling Addicted to Drop I guess if you can't reach your goals it's legitimate to move the goalposts. Congrats on something I guess?
Huitz Quiling HOMELESS.	Posted - 2007.06.28 05:31:00 - [42] Originally by: Huitz Quiling Edited by: Huitz Quiling on 27/06/2007 23:24:32 Assets were secured and pulled out, ED is more then aware of what they have lost, we need not state it publicly, unless they choose to do so. As stated Above, and if ED is not aware, I would say that explains why we were so successful in fulfilling this contract. If they are aware they are not announcing such loss publicly because it would be... an extreme embarassment. This is our Final statement, Enjoy your pet corp GOON. Nice Region. Thank you for your time Contract Complete, Closed. -Huitz Quiling Addicted to Drop
Thor Xian EarthForce E.A.R.T.H. Federation	Posted - 2007.06.28 05:36:00 - [43] Well, if this were any other game, having to reroll the alliance would be a devastating defeat...but alas, this is Eve, galaxy of transience. ________________________________________ ~Fleet Admiral Thor Xian, Strategic Commander Meet the Overlord
Muro Deez GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.06.28 05:42:00 - [44] Originally by: Huitz Quiling words
Vile rat GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.06.28 05:55:00 - [45] Originally by: Huitz Quiling Originally by: Huitz Quiling Edited by: Huitz Quiling on 27/06/2007 23:24:32 Assets were secured and pulled out, ED is more then aware of what they have lost, we need not state it publicly, unless they choose to do so. As stated Above, and if ED is not aware, I would say that explains why we were so successful in fulfilling this contract. If they are aware they are not announcing such loss publicly because it would be... an extreme embarassment. This is our Final statement, Enjoy your pet corp GOON. Nice Region. Thank you for your time Contract Complete, Closed. -Huitz Quiling Addicted to Drop But you didn't actually do anything. You staged a coup with the executor corp and kicked out all the member corps. You took the stations and declared victory but you didn't happen to claim any of the sov holding pos's. The corps that got kicked out reformed under a new name, took control of the towers, and retook te stations. If the contract was to secure the name Ethereal Dawn then you succeeded but aside from that you didn't really accomplish anything.
Allan Picard Best Path Inc.	Posted - 2007.06.28 07:08:00 - [46] Edited by: Allan Picard on 28/06/2007 07:09:15 I and corp im in was in ED for couple of months. Story that is being told by UWOF and HOBO may be true or not. But from my perspective, people who i was fighting along and pretend to be friends stabbed me and my corp mates in back. U fell proud? To have grudge against couple people and betray 100 others, that is real heroism. U are no better than people u are acusing!!!!
Thresh Avery Best Path Inc.	Posted - 2007.06.28 17:17:00 - [47] Edited by: Thresh Avery on 28/06/2007 17:17:27 Originally by: Huitz Quiling Originally by: Huitz Quiling Edited by: Huitz Quiling on 27/06/2007 23:24:32 Assets were secured and pulled out, ED is more then aware of what they have lost, we need not state it publicly, unless they choose to do so. As stated Above, and if ED is not aware, I would say that explains why we were so successful in fulfilling this contract. If they are aware they are not announcing such loss publicly because it would be... an extreme embarassment. This is our Final statement, Enjoy your pet corp GOON. Nice Region. Thank you for your time Contract Complete, Closed. -Huitz Quiling Addicted to Drop Huitz, you have no idea what you're talking about. How in any way would being stolen from be an "extreme embarrasment?" Unless you are saying we should be embarrassed that we ever trusted HOBO. If that's the case then maybe we should, because as you clearly had this planned since you joined the alliance, which is seriously dishonourable. As for UWOF, the real people you have a problem with left the game. Yes, you are still angry at Suuji and Fade which is something i can understand if your account of the situation between the two of you is to be believed, but there are less cowardly ways to settle matters like this. Did it ever cross your minds that you could have settled this matter by renegotiating with the new leadership? Obviously not. --------------------------
Lord Quad Ever Flow FREGE Alliance	Posted - 2007.06.28 17:55:00 - [48] Am I the only one who doesnt see the point in all of this?? Was there any lasting change of note??
Abbel Nightroad Under the Wings of Fury	Posted - 2007.06.28 18:00:00 - [49] Quote: Did it ever cross your minds that you could have settled this matter by renegotiating with the new leadership? Obviously not. Yes I did and i got politely refused what ED was owing us, while i can understand why you told me that my corporation still had to make up for it's investment, there has been no low blow here i clearly mentioned to Ralian that we wouldn't let it go.
Muro Deez GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.06.28 18:19:00 - [50] Originally by: Lord Quad Am I the only one who doesnt see the point in all of this?? Was there any lasting change of note?? ED are now called BLA, that's about it afaik.
OrangeAfroMan Minmatar Queens of the Stone Age Anarchy Empire	Posted - 2007.06.28 19:20:00 - [51] Glad to see Phel and Abel still around kicking ass. I'll be in contact soon >: D Nos - Time for a Change
Patch86 Di-Tron Heavy Industries Atlas Alliance	Posted - 2007.06.28 19:37:00 - [52] Originally by: Lord Quad Am I the only one who doesnt see the point in all of this?? Was there any lasting change of note?? According to the OP, they got some assets too. God knows what though. 20+ billion seems ridiculously too much; how many alliances even have 20 billion isk's worth of assets just lying around? --------
Oprah Winfreed Fraggle Roxxorz	Posted - 2007.06.28 19:44:00 - [53] From what it sounds like they must have recovered capitals or some other assets equivalant to the capitals + some. Has anyone asked them directly in-game?
Elenia Kheynes Caldari Avatars of Doom Apocalyptica.	Posted - 2007.06.28 20:20:00 - [54] Just out of curiosity... What exactly happened and how did they manage to do it? Dear friendly customer... Can I have your money ?
Daedal Virtu GALAXIAN Rule of Three	Posted - 2007.06.28 21:40:00 - [55] I think you will find this situation will change soon. Rule of Three Peon or maybe not...:P <No tree's were harmed during this transmission. However, a great number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced>
Phelaen Under the Wings of Fury	Posted - 2007.06.28 22:07:00 - [56] ED screwed us, so we got even... the switch of staton and taking the alliance name was just an added bonus it was cash we were after and in the form of assets we got some.. enough to cover my corp losses. also the former ED leadership scewed us out of our old alliance name (atrocitas) when we asked nice to get the unused name back they refused. taking their name seemed like a nice way to thank them for that.. in short eye for eye ..... moving along -=Piew Piew=- accepting contracts, contact Phelaen or Abbel Nightroad
Chib Rampage Eternal Ka-Tet	Posted - 2007.06.29 04:56:00 - [57] Originally by: Patch86 Originally by: Lord Quad Am I the only one who doesnt see the point in all of this?? Was there any lasting change of note?? According to the OP, they got some assets too. God knows what though. 20+ billion seems ridiculously too much; how many alliances even have 20 billion isk's worth of assets just lying around? that has to be a lie.......i dunno em that well but when we all mobilised to fight kraftwerk at the time im pretty confident there wasnt 20+ bil lying around ---------------------------------------------
Vile rat GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.06.29 05:31:00 - [58] Originally by: Phelaen ED screwed us, so we got even... the switch of staton and taking the alliance name was just an added bonus it was cash we were after and in the form of assets we got some.. enough to cover my corp losses. also the former ED leadership scewed us out of our old alliance name (atrocitas) when we asked nice to get the unused name back they refused. taking their name seemed like a nice way to thank them for that.. in short eye for eye ..... moving along Oh Phelaen
Star Maximus Caldari	Posted - 2007.06.29 06:10:00 - [59] Rumor Mill has it they got station parts.
Carbis Gallente Aristotle Enterprises Black Lotus Alliance	Posted - 2007.06.30 02:03:00 - [60] Well, well, a lot has been said, a lot has been claimed, and some rather humorous remarks have been made from all sides, I must say. Now, down to business. Only the parties involved will truly know the extent of the damage done, and only the parties involved can really appreciate the extent of the damage done. Yes, Homeless was, at one time, a trusted member of the Ethereal Dawn alliance, and claiming that they had no qualms with us, they chose to leave the alliance. Homeless was not forced out, Homeless received no ill words, and we actually wanted to remain within good standings. The claims of taking our alliance name are true, so are the claims of a temporary holding of one of our outposts, and so is the fact that some assets were taken. Other than that, there has been no long-lasting damage, and is alliance remains strong. This alliance remains on its feet. This alliance will continue to move forward in the direction that it has always moved. If anybody would like to contact the leadership of this alliance and question us personally, we would be more than happy to answer all of your questions. The drama we receive because of incidents such as this does nothing but strengthen our resolve. Thank you, for everyone who has posted on our behalf, and thank you to our enemies, who has posted as well. Yes, we are thinking our enemies, as they always manage to show us a side of ourselves that our friends will not. Cordially, Carbis, Alliance Secretary

Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.