I personally have no issues with the isk/hr given by incursions, what I don't like is that there is an UNLIMITED NUMBER of sites that players can farm to their hearts content at ALL TIMES.

You can do incursions for an infinite number of sites per day, the sites are always the same with little variation or diversity, making them easy to and quick to do.

No other pve gets that. Nullsec, Lowsec, Wormholes all have sites that can be done only once before they disappear, leaving you the rest of the day to do nothing.

Incursions can be run all day long, never ending until the incursion runners decide to kill the mom site, which requires a significant fleet to do.

What I propose is that there should be a limit of the number of sites given per day.

Make incursions so that there is only one incursion for each security level of space.

1 each for highsec, lowsec, and nullsec.

Make it so that incursions only of have a certain number of each type of sites. If there are no more vanguards then the players must do HQ's and Assaults in order to make money.

Nerf high sec Incursions somehow

Some changes are needed.

So what you propose is the massive overcrowding of incursion site (not sites) in each security zone and Imply they are run solo.

You really don't think these things through do you?

Very poor troll with very poor common sense.

-9/10

If I remember correctly multiple fleets can go in the same incursion site and whichever fleet is the most effective wins the reward. Yes it would be crowded in highsec but you could still get a fleet up and run an incursion normally. You just wouldn't be guaranteed that it would always pay out all of the time.

I have seen a lot of "lets move carebears into lowsec" threads and I think incursions are a perfect way to do that. Reduce highsec to one incursion region every once in a while and make lowsec the place where there are two to three constant incursions up at a time.

So what you propose is the massive overcrowding of incursion site (not sites) in each security zone and Imply they are run solo.

You really don't think these things through do you?

Very poor troll with very poor common sense.

-9/10

I personally have no issues with the isk/hr given by incursions, what I don't like is that there is an UNLIMITED NUMBER of sites that players can farm to their hearts content at ALL TIMES.

You can do incursions for an infinite number of sites per day, the sites are always the same with little variation or diversity, making them easy to and quick to do.

No other pve gets that. Nullsec, Lowsec, Wormholes all have sites that can be done only once before they disappear, leaving you the rest of the day to do nothing.

Incursions can be run all day long, never ending until the incursion runners decide to kill the mom site, which requires a significant fleet to do.

What I propose is that there should be a limit of the number of sites given per day.

Make incursions so that there is only one incursion for each security level of space.

1 each for highsec, lowsec, and nullsec.

Make it so that incursions only of have a certain number of each type of sites. If there are no more vanguards then the players must do HQ's and Assaults in order to make money.

You're just mad because you're probably a big incursion carebear. The problem with highsec vanguard incursions are that it trivializes the much more dangerous ways of making isk in low/null/wh space.

Highsec incursions are simply unbeatable when it comes to isk/hr to the risk involved.

Logi's disconnect? Well what your logi disconnects in a WH site? What if your mission ship disconnects while taking heavy fire. This is an invalid excuse for risk.

Gankers, Griefers? In Non-highsec areas there is NO CONCORD, therefore You can be killed and griefed with much greater ease than highsec. There are Griefers and Gankers in ALL SPACE, this excuse is therefore invalid.

Which means that there is VIRTUALLY NO RISK in highsec incursions for the fairly high isk/hr.

Therefore highsec vanguard incursions should be limited or made more dangerous.

AAAANND! Alliances NAP it up in 0.0 space and lock down their systems (excluding the occasional afk cloaker) and run mining sites and sanctums with.... (drumroll) NO FREAKING RISK!!!!

Shut up. You're an idiot of most epic proportions.

Explain that to White Noise.

You're just mad because you're probably a big incursion carebear. The problem with highsec vanguard incursions are that it trivializes the much more dangerous ways of making isk in low/null/wh space.

Highsec incursions are simply unbeatable when it comes to isk/hr to the risk involved.

Logi's disconnect? Well what your logi disconnects in a WH site? What if your mission ship disconnects while taking heavy fire. This is an invalid excuse for risk.

Gankers, Griefers? In Non-highsec areas there is NO CONCORD, therefore You can be killed and griefed with much greater ease than highsec. There are Griefers and Gankers in ALL SPACE, this excuse is therefore invalid.

Which means that there is VIRTUALLY NO RISK in highsec incursions for the fairly high isk/hr.

Therefore highsec vanguard incursions should be limited or made more dangerous.

Explain that to White Noise.

AAAANND! Alliances NAP it up in 0.0 space and lock down their systems (excluding the occasional afk cloaker) and run mining sites and sanctums with.... (drumroll) NO FREAKING RISK!!!!

Shut up. You're an idiot of most epic proportions.

So alliances actively maintain and defense sovereignty and SHOULDN'T reap the best rewards?

Put together a group and go out there and contest some if you've got a problem with their mining and ratting. From experience, it doesn't take many people to drop some SBUs and put a pretty big slope in an alliance's PVE activities.

In nullsec, you're free to stop anybody from doing anything. That's not the case with highsec incursions, and you bloody well know that. Stop making foolish arguments.

I suggest Heading out to "Vale of the silent"

Should't be hard for you to carve a niche out of WN. space. :)

*going with floppies ever logical suggestion thought train*

You're just mad because you are getting too many riches off the WNDOT campaign