| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
LF9000
   |
Posted - 2007.07.29 22:11:00 -
[1]
Edited by: LF9000 on 29/07/2007 22:21:04
Edited by: LF9000 on 29/07/2007 22:20:55
Edited by: LF9000 on 29/07/2007 22:13:50
Edited by: LF9000 on 29/07/2007 22:11:40
It's a module that makes the targeted ship unable to use his drones (i.e. sitting there doing nothing) for 5 minutes.There is a 25% chance that this will happen, That mean if you're attacking a barge, dominix, arbitrator, vexor, carrier, etc, they will almost be rendered useless if it suceeds. It can only fit on command ships or motherships. You can only fit one on a ship and it takes a 8 minute cooldown.
There's a Remote Ecm Burst Variant called Remote Drone Control Computer Disruptor. It does the same thing as Drone Control Computer Disruptor, except it works on all ships in the targeted ship's radius (6 km). Takes 10 min for cool down and can only fit 1.
|
Jongo Fett
Caldari
Dark Entropy
|
Posted - 2007.07.29 22:13:00 -
[2]
WORST IDEA EVER
|
Elipsis
Gallente
The Mission Guys
|
Posted - 2007.07.29 22:17:00 -
[3]
Sounds overpowered.
More reasonable would be a "drone link disruptor" or something that would have a percentage chance to reduce drone range or otherwise inhibit their control.
-...
CEO and Founder of the Mission Guys |
Onwyn Orbatsuu
International Multi-Player Consortium
Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2007.07.29 22:31:00 -
[4]
we don't need a module to do what drones are already doing.
fix drones before making them harder to use!
|
Valandril
Caldari
Resurrection
R i s e
|
Posted - 2007.07.30 00:14:00 -
[5]
 Originally by: Jongo Fett
WORST IDEA EVER
+1
---
Not replying to alts, post with ur main or STFU |
i take
|
Posted - 2007.07.30 02:19:00 -
[6]
hehe i LOVE the idea of a drone jamming device:P
but 5minutes is a bit over the top, say 30-1min sec for each succes, much like the normal jamming device and a bit longer becouse drone's where never meand as prime weaponry.
should ofcouse be a balance against carriers. so if you said that each succes would jam 5 drones (then was stackable, then you would have balance there to ;) )
OW the flaming :P WHAAT!!!!! ARE YOU ACTUALLY SUGGESTING TO NERF SOMETHING TOTALLY AND REDICULESLY OVERPOWERING?!?!?!!?! YOU MOST BE CRAZY!!! I DIDN'T TRAIN GELLENTE NOT TO BE OVERPOWERED IN ANY PVP ASPECT OF THE GAME!!! hmpf :P (sarcasm 
|
Harkwyth Mist
Caldari
The Black Ops
|
Posted - 2007.07.30 04:30:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Elipsis
"drone link disruptor"
A better idea, but as a drone user if it was ingame i'd hate it.
Reduced Control Radius
Reduction in Damage Boost
Reduction in Speed Boost
are all reasonable possible effects that could be applied, but an effect that knocks drones into 'Inactive' is over the top.
|
Reggie Stoneloader
Teikoku Trade Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2007.07.30 04:39:00 -
[8]
I'd like an EW module that reduces drone reaction time when used on the drone's owner. When they get a new order, it takes five or ten seconds for them to react. That way, you can kill the drones without them zipping back and recharging as soon as your first volley touches them, but they aren't useless.
|
Jurgen Cartis
Caldari
Interstellar Corporation of Exploration
|
Posted - 2007.07.30 05:05:00 -
[9]
Don't drones do that already, Reggie?
--------------------------------------------------
ICE Blueprint Sales |
Random Incarnate
Australia and New Zealand Eve Corp
Ekliptika
|
Posted - 2007.07.30 11:02:00 -
[10]
I'd personally like some form of protection from drones. EW boat vs drones. Who will win? An ECM burst or smartbomb, might fix it...but seriously...EW on drones ftw.
|
Valandril
Caldari
Resurrection
R i s e
|
Posted - 2007.07.30 11:34:00 -
[11]
Edited by: Valandril on 30/07/2007 11:37:46
Originally by: Random Incarnate
I'd personally like some form of protection from drones. EW boat vs drones. Who will win? An ECM burst or smartbomb, might fix it...but seriously...EW on drones ftw.
So fit a smartbomb ? Its bad enought for drone users u whiners.
Most funny part is that would work on carriers =D
---
Not replying to alts, post with ur main or STFU |
Eleana Tomelac
Gallente
Defcon One
|
Posted - 2007.07.30 12:07:00 -
[12]
Drones are already not following orders, they suicide themselves time to time...
Well, something disrupting totally the drones for 5 minutes is way way overpowered.
Such thing doesn't exist for guns, missiles or ships themselves... The remote ECM burst of carriers is 20 secs long...
You know, doomsdays devices kills drones too... Maybe you search for something like that.
What can be done is disrupting the communications between the ship and the drones, but drones have AI, so, they will continue doing exactly what the AI tells them to do.
There could be a "drone link dampener" or "drone link jammer" working much like the sensor dampener on the drone control range or like an ECM on the drone link.
PS : the "drone link randomizer" which tells drones to mess around on other targets already exists.
--
Pocket drone carriers (tm) enthousiast !
The Vexor Navy Issue is much more fun than the Myrmidon !
|
Garthran
Gallente
Peregrin Avionics
|
Posted - 2007.07.30 18:58:00 -
[13]
My reply to your initial idea to have mod that stops drones dead- just no.
My idea in response to this- maybe a module that temporarily breaks the link to drones for just a few microseconds, resulting in their backup AI kicking in and returning them to their owner. That way they're not sitting dead in space, but there's still some way to counter them.
Although, to be quite honest, I agree with many of the previous posters. They need to make drone control easier/less buggy before they start making it harder.
|
Petrothian Tong
Gallente
|
Posted - 2007.07.30 20:19:00 -
[14]
Edited by: Petrothian Tong on 30/07/2007 20:19:57
Sure,
you can have that when I get modules that will shut down your guns, missiles, reppers and such...
oh and yeah, let me blow off your guns too...
btw, smart bombs are ebil vs drones...
or your own light drones =P
btw: drones are already very buggy as it is.. the AI can be very naughty at times...
-Siggi-
""PvP" isn't only direct person to person combat, it can be very indirect. Selling an item on the market which somebody buys from you is resulting in another guy not getting a sale." Oveur |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |