Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Shu Me
|
Posted - 2007.07.31 03:13:00 -
[1]
Would it be a good time for a new larger hauler class with a setup like a freighter. But smaller, maybe half the size cargo, with a single high-slot and able to fit a cov-ops cloak.
This would be useful in bringing market goods out into low sec and 0.0 to get players to build the market up more.
|

Taevin
Gallente Warriors of the Einherjar Fimbulwinter
|
Posted - 2007.07.31 03:21:00 -
[2]
Solution exists: Carrier + T2 Cargo expanders + cloak. --
|

Shu Me
|
Posted - 2007.07.31 03:26:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Shu Me on 31/07/2007 03:27:22
Originally by: Taevin Solution exists: Carrier + T2 Cargo expanders + cloak.
That's not the same thing is it though? You can't warp cloaked in that setup and it needs a totally different, more time-consuming skill set than haulers/ freighters.
|

Taevin
Gallente Warriors of the Einherjar Fimbulwinter
|
Posted - 2007.07.31 03:32:00 -
[4]
You can jump a good 14 or so light years at a time though... If you don't mind going a shorter distance per jump you can also get very high cargohold capacity in a Dreadnought. --
|

BluOrange
Gallente Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
|
Posted - 2007.07.31 03:36:00 -
[5]
I think it would be good to fill the size gap between the deep space transport and the freighter. But the t2 haulers are plenty difficult to catch already, a covert ops hauler would be ridiculously overpowered.
Recruitment FAQ |

Shu Me
|
Posted - 2007.07.31 03:41:00 -
[6]
Originally by: BluOrange But the t2 haulers are plenty difficult to catch already...
Do you think so? Not when 15 bs are waiting to gank you in high sec. This would force them to bring along a fast locking frigate to stop you cloaking and would make their job tougher.
|

Ryas Nia
Minmatar Fimbulwinter Pharmaceuticals
|
Posted - 2007.07.31 03:44:00 -
[7]
Maxed carrier 30k of cargo hold + 10k corp hanger + 500k Ship hanger going from Amamake to Hysera in 1 jump or do 16 jumps in a freighter going 1AU per second that whole way...
Your call but i can tell you which is a better use of my time if i dont need to haul 900k worth of stuff.
Recruiting Terrorists |

Taevin
Gallente Warriors of the Einherjar Fimbulwinter
|
Posted - 2007.07.31 03:47:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Ryas Nia ...freighter going 1AU per second that whole way...
0.6 AU/s actually, but I'm sure he'd propose that the cov-ops cloak ability also increases warp speed to 13.6 to be just as fast as the cov-ops frigs :P --
|

Lowanaera
Amarr Paladin Imperium Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.07.31 03:51:00 -
[9]
What's really needed is to give T2 haulers more cap or less mass. Impel being limited to 60AU per warp with Warp Drive Operation III is a bit silly.
|

Dred'Pirate Jesus
Amarr Ministry of War
|
Posted - 2007.07.31 03:51:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Shu Me Edited by: Shu Me on 31/07/2007 03:27:22
Originally by: Taevin Solution exists: Carrier + T2 Cargo expanders + cloak.
That's not the same thing is it though? You can't warp cloaked in that setup and it needs a totally different, more time-consuming skill set than haulers/ freighters.
Warping cloaked isn't an issue when you cyno.. And the skill set needed to make a cargo Carrier (it *is* called a Carrier after all.. ) is in line with its superb usefulness.. So nah no real need for a cov-ops indy though to be fair I'd buy one in an instant if CCP made one available..
Originally by: David Hackworth ò If you find yourself in a fair fight, you didn't plan your mission properly.
|
|

Frug
Zenithal Harvest
|
Posted - 2007.07.31 03:54:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Lowanaera What's really needed is to give T2 haulers more cap or less mass. Impel being limited to 60AU per warp with Warp Drive Operation III is a bit silly.
Cap battery.
But I still agree.
- - - - - - - - - Do not use dotted lines - - - - - - - If you think I'm awesome, say BOOO BOOO!! - Ductoris Neat look what I found - Kreul Hey, my marbles |

Drunken Cajun
F.R.E.E. Explorer EVE Animal Control
|
Posted - 2007.07.31 04:38:00 -
[12]
Going into low sec should have risks. Those risks can be worked around in other ways than this.
laissez les bon temps rouler |

Vitrael
Warriors of the Einherjar Fimbulwinter
|
Posted - 2007.07.31 04:45:00 -
[13]
I would say something sarcastic about moving 500,000m3 of items in a ship with enormous HP and a covops cloak being a good idea but I'm too tired. No. This is an awful idea.
|

murder one
Gallente Death of Virtue FreeFall Securities
|
Posted - 2007.07.31 04:51:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Shu Me Would it be a good time for a new larger hauler class with a setup like a freighter. But smaller, maybe half the size cargo, with a single high-slot and able to fit a cov-ops cloak.
This would be useful in bringing market goods out into low sec and 0.0 to get players to build the market up more.
LOL! Again, I say LOL! And people think **I** come up with crazy stuff.       
Seriously. Can't stop laughing over here.
Originally by: Goumindong it is at the point where it is impossible to determine whether or not you are trolling or if you area really out of your freaking mind.
|

Elite Marksman
|
Posted - 2007.07.31 05:42:00 -
[15]
I can't believe I'm writing this, but I actually agree with murder for once...
Would something to fill the gap between freighters and transports be nice? Yes. Should said ship fit a covops cloak? No.
|

Shu Me
|
Posted - 2007.07.31 11:55:00 -
[16]
Originally by: murder one LOL! Again, I say LOL! And people think **I** come up with crazy stuff.       
Seriously. Can't stop laughing over here.
I'm glad someone found my joke funny. Hope it took your mind off the NOS nerf for 5 mins.
Fun reading all the serious replies though. Tx. 
|

Sazkyen
|
Posted - 2007.07.31 13:40:00 -
[17]
Don't forget to add a large drone bay so it can accomodate the fighters...
|

Cipher7
OldBastardsPub SMASH Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.07.31 13:53:00 -
[18]
So you're basically asking for an unkillable hauler.
That fits into the game how exactly?
If 15 BS are camping the gate in Jita waiting to gank you, then you should die and drop nice stuff.
They ganked a BoB Titan. Who are you that you should be immune from ganking?
|

Elite Marksman
|
Posted - 2007.07.31 14:46:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Shu Me
Originally by: murder one
Seriously. Can't stop laughing over here.
I'm glad someone found my joke funny. Hope it took your mind off the NOS nerf for 5 mins.
Remind me never again to read eve-o forums at 5:00 am local...
|

heheheh
Singularity. Fallen Souls
|
Posted - 2007.07.31 14:57:00 -
[20]
Edited by: heheheh on 31/07/2007 14:58:27 Sorry OP but i cant really find this very amusing. beats NOS threads though, your right.
|
|

Xoria Krint
5th Avenue
|
Posted - 2007.07.31 15:05:00 -
[21]
Haha :)
What is needed is a Pirate-Hauler with bonus +2.0 secstatus bonus per lvl [8)
|

Alski
Gallente Di-Tron Heavy Industries Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.07.31 16:26:00 -
[22]
i'll /signed this just because carriers need to not be the default empire <> 0.0 hauler. -
(combat) Patch belonging to CCP hits your drones, wrecking their liberty and freedom. |

Alora Venoda
Caldari GalTech
|
Posted - 2007.07.31 16:44:00 -
[23]
what we need is a capital hauler that is purely designed for transporting cargo. i think it would be fair with 1/2 the capacity of a freighter, slightly less tanking ability than a carrier, and very weak offensive options.
~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ Take away the risk and it would make flying around in space utterly pointless.
Take away the flying around part and you make EVE into a space themed spreadsheet application. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |