| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Death Kill
Caldari
direkte
   |
Posted - 2007.08.03 14:13:00 -
[1]
EVE2?
I'd like stacking free modules and I dont want 'fights to last longer'
Caldari and proud |
Death Kill
Caldari
direkte
|
Posted - 2007.08.03 14:52:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: MotherMoon
Originally by: Sazkyen
Consensual PvP
never go back to WoW.
And I have one problem your idea op. have you ever played a RTS before? have you SEEN mammy in C&C try to kill a lone rocket unit? it can't kill the small unit becuase it is a big tank fitted to deal with other tanks.
C&C is ultra-mega-giga rubbish when it comes to that type of thing. YOu should play Blitzkreig II instead. It ****es on all other RTS's.
Caldari and proud |
Death Kill
Caldari
direkte
|
Posted - 2007.08.03 15:59:00 -
[3]
Originally by: MotherMoon
[
sure, but one question, in that game do tanks pawn all units?
No, not really. but its very complex. Light tanks cant kill a heavy tank because they simply dont have enough firepower, while a heavy tank pwns light and medium ones. Infantry are deadmeat when faced with a tank as tanks have both machine guns and a gun turret.
Theres no logic behind a tank not being able to kill infantry.
Caldari and proud |
Death Kill
Caldari
direkte
|
Posted - 2007.08.03 16:02:00 -
[4]
Originally by: MotherMoon
do the tanks have tracking speed then? can small units run around it? tanks turrets move really slow in real life and hit things up close.. at all.
they can't aim down to hit anything that's within 20 feet and shorter than the tank.
I'll stick with starcraft for my RTS gaming then. I don't liek games where ten of unit makes you unstopable. I liek starcraft, where you make 20 of a unit to get them owned by 4 of nother unit.
maybe eve could do a system like this instead. kinda like how a battkeship sucks when trying to hit a bomber but the bombers missile *****the battleships face.
Tanks are super slow, so the lighters a unit is the more it can mmanouver. If infantry gets to close the tank just use its machine guns.
Artiallry has never been so fun and so intimidating as in this game. you send out scouts, and if you find enemy grid locations you can bombard them from the other side of the (large) map. Ofcorse artillary is sitting ducks for anything with a pointy stick or better.
Then theres bomber planes and fighter planes, aa guns etc etc.
Its a very realistic RTS, and you dont build a base and produce stuff instead you rely on reinforcements...and you can chose what type you want...tanks, infantry, artillary, planes etc.
Caldari and proud |
Death Kill
Caldari
direkte
|
Posted - 2007.08.03 16:05:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Death Kill on 03/08/2007 16:05:29
Originally by: Tarminic
Yes there is - a tank can't hit infantry with it's primary weapon because it's designed for firing at vehicles from long range, and it's visibility in close quarters is very poor. The only way that gun is effective is if there's someone on top of the tank manning it, which is about the same as having infantry anyway.
Infantry may be dead mean if they're running across a football field toward a tank without any cover, but that's beside the point. 
Nonsense. Ever heard about high explosive shells?
And the machine gun is located inside the tank, with a crewman operating it.
Heres my favorite tank in the game. slow as hell but good range and firepower.
Linkage
Caldari and proud |
Death Kill
Caldari
direkte
|
Posted - 2007.08.03 19:17:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Shadowsword
Originally by: MotherMoon
[and by the way I'll check out the game for sure, I'm an RTS fan.
C&C 3 has a good solo campaign, but for multiplayer SupCom pwn them all.
Now can we please stop derailing the thread? 
C&C3 is utter rubbish, its plain crap.
Caldari and proud |
| |
|