| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Allestin Villimar
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 15:17:00 -
[1]
I see a lot of calls for sweeping nerfs and massive improvements, but I don't see many threads devoted to smaller things that wouldn't drastically effect game balance.
So here's some things I'd like to see:
T2 tractors with 30 km range. Wrecks in L3 and 4 missions to last 2 hours. Salvager drones or a ship designed to salvage. A little less delay between when your ship gets blown up and when you take control of your pod. Defender missiles to actually do something when used by players. As far as I can tell if you use multiples they all go for the first incoming missile and stop working after it's been blown up, leaving the rest of a volley to come at you.
Mostly PvE stuff but I haven't done enough pvp yet to say anything about it.
|

Cypherous
Minmatar Liberty Rogues
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 15:19:00 -
[2]
EVE needs more boobies and i'm sure hammerhead would agree ^^ ---------
Liberty Rogues Website
|

N1fty
Amarr Galactic Shipyards Inc HUZZAH FEDERATION
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 15:21:00 -
[3]
I want all the 20k or so active players who joined in the last couple of years to go away so the forums can stop being a string of nerf-whines.
After that I would settle for less lag. ============================================
|

Kimiko Kurosawa
The Krugerrand Groupies
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 15:22:00 -
[4]
I'll be stealing someone elses thunder, but... Space Whales?
|

Jim McGregor
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 15:22:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Allestin Villimar
T2 tractors with 30 km range.
I dont see the downside of having them do 40 or 50 km. Why must everything in Eve be such a pain to do? Sometimes its like "Ok, lets put in this module, but lets make people work hard to use it".
---
Originally by: CCP Wrangler You're not supposed to feel like you're logging in to a happy, happy, fluffy, fluffy lala land filled with fun and adventures, thats what hello kitty online is for.
|

Tarminic
Black Flame Industries
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 15:25:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Tarminic on 17/08/2007 15:25:48
Originally by: Allestin Villimar T2 tractors with 30 km range.
Very much signed.
Quote: Wrecks in L3 and 4 missions to last 2 hours.
They do in Amarr space!
Quote: Salvager drones or a ship designed to salvage.
Signed in triplicate
Quote: Defender missiles to actually do something when used by players. As far as I can tell if you use multiples they all go for the first incoming missile and stop working after it's been blown up, leaving the rest of a volley to come at you.
Also signed, they could use a buff.
Some of my personal desires: 1. Some more non-empire (ORE, other independant factions) ships 2. More pirate faction ships, maybe even pirate faction haulers (Battle badgers anyone? ) 3. An interesting blend of hauler and combat ship - some kind of heavily-tanked ammunition ship that can fit large guns, anyone? Hehe 4. No more desync...not because it affects me, but so people just ******* shut up about it 5. More diverse missions and more ways to accomplish them! Insead of just blowing everything up, do something like sensor damp a sentry tower to sneak past the enemies, then hack the acceleration gate and the container with the objective in it. 6. Tactical environments 7. In the event that a node crash is imminent, a black hole opens up at the center of a system and sucks every single ship into it.  ------------ Whiners - Unite! Tarminic - 26 Million SP in Forum Warfare. |

Exor Roch
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 15:39:00 -
[7]
A concorde task force moving around and attacking reds. Capital mining and industrial ships. Civilian ships.Opens up new agents? Fix drone interface. Dont reset camera after jump. Bookmarks for the overwiew.Perhaps more than 1 overwiew. Cans blow after 3months without interaction.( a countdown in the can that you have to manualy reset)
Sorry for bad spelling.
|

Tarminic
Black Flame Industries
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 15:45:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Exor Roch
Capital mining and industrial ships. ... Dont reset camera after jump.
Both are in the next major patch.  ------------ Whiners - Unite! Tarminic - 26 Million SP in Forum Warfare. |

Destiny Calling
Amarr Veto. Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 15:51:00 -
[9]
Alot more development of the Pirate factions, but content that is only available when you being putting the work in for a year.
Cry me a river, new people.
thats right I need a new sig |

Mamarto
Minmatar Dead Pirates' Society
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 15:54:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Allestin Villimar a ship designed to salvage.
Yeah, I'd really like something like the ORE barges. Except maybe it should be a Thukker salvvager instead, Thukker just seems appropriate somehow. 
|

Vertigo Ren
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 17:57:00 -
[11]
after seeing the rorqual transform, I want to see the other cap ships transform when dropping into siege mode.
|

Xanja
2H Industries
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 18:02:00 -
[12]
Edited by: Xanja on 17/08/2007 18:03:44 Edited by: Xanja on 17/08/2007 18:02:40
Omnidirectional Tracking Link II
Scram Drones
----------------- |

Sharupak
Minmatar Knights Of the Black Sun
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 18:06:00 -
[13]
someone posted about the stock market...that would be pretty cool _______________________________________________ RuntimeError: ChainEvent is blocking by design, but you're block trapped. You have'll have to find some alternative means to do Your Thing, dude. |

Theo Samaritan
Gallente Galactic Savings and Investments
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 18:08:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Vertigo Ren after seeing the rorqual transform, I want to see the other cap ships transform when dropping into siege mode.
Rorqual? ______________________________ A Request About Lag Discussion |

Kazuma Saruwatari
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 18:09:00 -
[15]
Edited by: Kazuma Saruwatari on 17/08/2007 18:10:36 What do I want to see in EVE?
-Ability to access market, corp/alliance, POS/outpost, chat, and maybe even EVEvoice and skillchange on a PDA/cellphone-based EVE online client. -Amarr boosted and Gallente nerfed. -
NPC Vendetta system, Local rehash, Probe decoys |

Praesus Lecti
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 18:21:00 -
[16]
1. Complete 360 degree motion of the camera along all 3 axes. The artificial gimbal annoys me. 2. Removal of the habit of ships to return to the default "right side up" orientation to the plane of the system, allowing ships to maintain their position and heading in space when motionless.
3. Line of Sight for all guns, projectiles and missiles to allow for strategic use of celestial objects, ships and other solid masses. Naturally, this would mean that the object in the LoS of the target would take the damage, thus even asteroids would be destroyable via guns/missiles.
|

Hayah Theos
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 18:23:00 -
[17]
Play balance!
There is no path to economic power that has a snowballs chance in hell of competing with the existing large alliances in zero.
A new player, corporation or even alliance (supposing you could bring a 1000 friends) even after two years of play, cannot affect the power structure in eve because of an inability to control the major resource points in the game that are already in the BORG's pocket.
Now will come the flamers (the BORG and uninformed idiots) who will deny this is true. They are doing nothing but flapping their pie-holes because to admit the truth is to admit that the real reason their dominant group in zero is dominant is the fact that they were there first.
IT IS TRUE, the relative size of individual player's isk wallets is not relevent to who controls space, but it is ALSO TRUE, that eve is economic warfare at it's core.... and he who can generate the most isk consistently and CAN UTILIZE IT VIA HIGH SKILLED PILOTS WILL DOMINATE. Only the ego defending BORG will deny this.
|

MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong Namtz'aar k'in
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 18:26:00 -
[18]
a rebuild of the warp strength and warp scram systems.
A frigate should not be able to scram a battleship, a EW frigate should be able to easily.
see where I'm going with this? ----------------------------------- I'm working my way through college target CCP
Quote: Why didn't we use them 80 man-years to fix bugs?
Well, that's simple. We can't. These are visual ar
|

Sharupak
Minmatar Knights Of the Black Sun
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 18:36:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Praesus Lecti 1. Complete 360 degree motion of the camera along all 3 axes. The artificial gimbal annoys me. 2. Removal of the habit of ships to return to the default "right side up" orientation to the plane of the system, allowing ships to maintain their position and heading in space when motionless.
3. Line of Sight for all guns, projectiles and missiles to allow for strategic use of celestial objects, ships and other solid masses. Naturally, this would mean that the object in the LoS of the target would take the damage, thus even asteroids would be destroyable via guns/missiles.
Amen Brother
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////signed! _______________________________________________ RuntimeError: ChainEvent is blocking by design, but you're block trapped. You have'll have to find some alternative means to do Your Thing, dude. |

MrJordanIOI
Minmatar The Lantern Mining Corporation
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 18:49:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Hayah Theos Play balance!
There is no path to economic power that has a snowballs chance in hell of competing with the existing large alliances in zero.
A new player, corporation or even alliance (supposing you could bring a 1000 friends) even after two years of play, cannot affect the power structure in eve because of an inability to control the major resource points in the game that are already in the BORG's pocket.
Now will come the flamers (the BORG and uninformed idiots) who will deny this is true. They are doing nothing but flapping their pie-holes because to admit the truth is to admit that the real reason their dominant group in zero is dominant is the fact that they were there first.
IT IS TRUE, the relative size of individual player's isk wallets is not relevent to who controls space, but it is ALSO TRUE, that eve is economic warfare at it's core.... and he who can generate the most isk consistently and CAN UTILIZE IT VIA HIGH SKILLED PILOTS WILL DOMINATE. Only the ego defending BORG will deny this.
QFT + consider joining up with Star Fraction's Jericho Fraction. They are still out there, trying to teach those BORG a lesson or two about restricting space that belongs to all.
IOI
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=567889&page=1#8..I just checked the subscription numbers, |

Xanja
2H Industries
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 19:42:00 -
[21]
oh yeah, nearly forgot: get that damn PDA/Windows Mobile client finished!!!111

----------------- |

Jiggs Casey
Minmatar Asguard Security Service Angels Of Discord
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 20:37:00 -
[22]
Edited by: Jiggs Casey on 17/08/2007 20:37:17 Cloaking 'bubbles' Phalanx guns to replace defender missiles. Salvage drones.
|

Diekraft
Minmatar Incorporated Inc LTD Blood Raiders Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 20:37:00 -
[23]
Cormack's Modified 1600 Steel Plate 
|

JonnyWarhawk
Renovatio Industries Combined Planetary Union
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 20:49:00 -
[24]
I'd like to see a few things.
1) Larger playerbase: I would love to see the game become more popular and put up a good fight against such lame games such as WoW. 2) Graphics update: This is coming out soon so they have this covered. 3) 3D Avatars: They are also in the process of developing this. 4) Something on the side: I'd like to see there be something on the side to do in EVE for fun that either doesn't have the consequences as large as seen in the PvP and is just meant as something to do when you are a bit bored.
Hopefully #2 and #3 work out well.
|

000Hunter000
Gallente Magners Marauders
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 20:50:00 -
[25]
afk setting for corp channel.
CCP, let us pay the online shop with Direct Debit!!! Magners is now recruiting, evemail me or Dagazbo ingame.
|

Jim McGregor
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 20:51:00 -
[26]
Edited by: Jim McGregor on 17/08/2007 20:54:30
Please, for the love of god, give us a customizable GUI some time in 2008. 
Or actually, do like you did before - have a thread where people can suggest their top 10 ideas for new Eve Features (or fixes). I remember those threads getting tons of replies, so I guess you got some nice info on what the majority of players think is important.
Not that I think that you should always do what the majority wants... then we'll end up with dancing elfs soon, no doubt. Use your judgment like you always has. :)
---
Originally by: CCP Wrangler You're not supposed to feel like you're logging in to a happy, happy, fluffy, fluffy lala land filled with fun and adventures, thats what hello kitty online is for.
|

Thommy
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 21:17:00 -
[27]
- T3 designable modules Created in a balanced way not just a 15x damage mod gun but increasing this means a penalty there kind of way, the idea what was given once by an dev i think which means an "thommy's modified <module / ship>" would be possible (probably a very hard task to not cause an huge inbalance here).
- More cosmos / deadspace / faction modules There are gaps in some of the items where there is an item but it does not actually excist. 10mn afterburners for example, yes i know plenty of people HATE to fast ships but with the (possible) new mass adding what is it named this should not matter as much anymore if its range is long enough (probably turnes that fancy not to mention expensive module into an regular T2 burner as far as efficiency is concerned).
- Special drops (not officer or in 0.0 space only) T1 spider drones, harvester drones etc They must stay rare so not every single person can just whip up 5 spiders for example and would hurt more when lost.
- Rework on wreck system Ability to have your wrecks to "private" state (default) or public accesible so you can choose to let other people do what they want with your wrecks (only works for new created wrecks after setting has been changed to one or the other). Also after 30 minutes or 1 hour whatever works best the wrecks should be public access anyway so they are (or can be) cleaned up more easely.
- Rework on T1 (named) - T2 modules Some T2 modules worse or same as T1 while creating work for ccp here lets add another thing  Total module revamp which i think should work out nicely assuming the following model
- Standard T1 modules
- Low tier faction modules (4 faction variants of each module with 2 low tier / 2 high tier)
- Named T1 modules
- High tier faction modules
- Cosmos modules
- Standard T2 modules
- Deadspace modules
- Named T2 (if it excists / is plausible)
- Officer modules
- T3 if / when it will come although it should be equal to officer mods at most i think
And there is alot more i could think of but ill keep it to this for now.
Guide to fix eve problems. Patch day recommendations |

Some Caldari
Caldari Perkone
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 22:01:00 -
[28]
Customizable ship paint/appearance maybe a set of preset paint jobs that from the LP store (like pirate ones) or fully editable I don't care if only I'd be able to see it to save us from the scary lag monster it'd still be cool.
Civilian ships that are indipentant from the empire (like ORE).
Blackholes or other space disasters (at least at the EvE gate). ------------
I'm a guy with a female character get over it, and for god's sake stop jerking off. It's creepy. |

Gendis
Bunny Rabbit Corp
|
Posted - 2007.08.17 22:10:00 -
[29]
Nekkid womans
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |