Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Motoko Moon
|
Posted - 2007.09.08 19:09:00 -
[1]
Here is a direct quote from GM SPARKLE in responce to an on going petition "We don't support reimbursement claims for loss ships caused by massive lag because of heavily populated systems."
So if you don't have the highest end PC with uber video cards and you don't have the fastest connection NO FLEET BATTLES FOR YOU. Never get a chance to ever see your ship you just lock up and relog on into a pod? Too bad soo sad it seems. Who needs fair game play anyway?
CCP could have a new moto from me free of charge " CCP= Customers service? Can Pis-off"
|

Kahor
Minmatar Coreli Corporation Exuro Mortis
|
Posted - 2007.09.08 19:12:00 -
[2]
IBTL
Unfortunatly, you're right, welcome to fleet battles in eve. ---------------- An eye for an eye make a whole world blind.
|

Cheese999
Minmatar Australia and New Zealand Eve Corp Ekliptika
|
Posted - 2007.09.08 19:13:00 -
[3]
No one cares that you lost your CNR to lag in Motsu. Go whine else where. -----
There is no Spoon Minmatar: Bending over for Tux since RmR
Originally by: Outa Rileau bring a nosdomi to a fleet, and your fc will most likely call you primary.
|

Tarminic
Black Flame Industries
|
Posted - 2007.09.08 19:13:00 -
[4]
If there was a place that I wanted to go to die when fighting a war in empire, Jita would be it. GTFOOJ? ------------ Whiners - Unite! | Posting and You Tarminic - Forum Warfare Specialist. |

Senator Martin'Lefouret
|
Posted - 2007.09.08 19:16:00 -
[5]
I do have top off the line computer, so do most of my corp members. Large fleet battles lag us ourt as much as the people who don't have top off the line computers cause the lag is..... omg dare i say it.... server side
You know when you go into such battles or highly populated systems that lag will be bad. the risk you take, the risk you choose. And besides lag or no lag, if you're primary you're dead anyway.
|

ToxicFire
Phoenix Knights Dark Nebula Galactic Empire
|
Posted - 2007.09.08 19:21:00 -
[6]
Its common sense like don't park your expensive flashy car in a bad neighbour hood you don't take your costly ship to a system where it will be exposed to unnecessary risk, CCP can't reimburse carelessness Sig removed as it lacks EVE-related content. Mail [email protected] if you have questions. -Hango
|

fire 59
Destructive Influence Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.09.08 19:33:00 -
[7]
Originally by: ToxicFire Its common sense like don't park your expensive flashy car in a bad neighbour hood you don't take your costly ship to a system where it will be exposed to unnecessary risk, CCP can't reimburse carelessness
This
|

Ask Unbeatable
Gallente HighTech Marines Ltd. FREGE Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.09.08 19:34:00 -
[8]
NEWSFLASH
Originally by: CCP Zulupark
My armory is full of smack, but this ******* profanity filter stops it all.
|

lofty29
Reikoku Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.09.08 19:35:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Cheese999 No one cares that you lost your CNR to lag in Motsu. Go whine else where.
Who said it was lag?  ---
Project Mayhem 2 |

Tortun Nahme
Minmatar Heimatar Services Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2007.09.08 20:51:00 -
[10]
Lost your ship to Lag? WE DON'T CARE EITHER!!! Why there should be a breathalyzer to login to Eve-Forums:
Quote: Smacking my own alt in a nerf-thread while drunk, he was irritating a Hauler full of tech II n00bs, Oops.
|
|

dor amwar
Foundation R0ADKILL
|
Posted - 2007.09.08 21:30:00 -
[11]
lag is one thing, desync is another but you get the same response. game mechanics require you bring many ships to take out a pos. there is no other way without spending 8-10 hours, especially if there is a cyno jammer. the real fun is in the same battle a few will get reimbursed, most will not. it's like there is a quota.
|

Kyreax
Deepspace Exploration Biscuit Repair Associates
|
Posted - 2007.09.08 21:39:00 -
[12]
Originally by: lofty29 Who said it was lag? 
Do have have a lag-generator module now, Cap'n? ---------------------------------------------------
It's a Templar, an Amarr Fighter used by Carriers. |

Surfin's PlunderBunny
Minmatar Sicarri Covenant
|
Posted - 2007.09.08 21:59:00 -
[13]
Number of ships I have lost to lag... 5
Number of times I've cried like a little ***** to CCP about it.... 0
I am with CCP on this one... /hands Motoko a tissue
Originally by: Liz Kali Tic Toc Tic Toc , time is ticking
Originally by: TheDagda *click* For the love of the jovians stops necroing
|

prathe
Minmatar Omega Enterprises Mostly Harmless
|
Posted - 2007.09.08 22:08:00 -
[14]
ccp deosn't care and neither do i
life sucks, be a man
|

metalic
Onyx Brotherhood M. PIRE
|
Posted - 2007.09.08 22:13:00 -
[15]
CCP should have realised by now via the community and threads such as this that their "super" server cannot handle the style of combat they are trying to impliment, it is impossible to have meaningfull battles without lag occuring. If they want people to fight in huge gangs against POS or Outposts or more importantly each other and encourage this in the way they develop the game hardware should be there to support this and it isnt, that is the fault of CCP alone. Its like running software on a computer below the basic requirements for gameplay, yes it is normally possible but it hardly works smoothly.
|

Jenny Spitfire
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.09.08 22:14:00 -
[16]
I feel for you and this is really a bad experience. I wonder if we could start up some kind of community fund for players by players who have lost their ships in lag.
Would be the next best thing in a community project. --------- Technica impendi Caldari generis. Pax Caldaria!
Kali is for KArebearLIng. I 100% agree with Avon.
Female EVE gamers? Mail Zajo or visit WGOE.Public in-game. |

Ishtar1
Paradox v2.0 Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2007.09.08 22:18:00 -
[17]
Dont worry man everyone gets it
Can you imagine the petition line if you got your ship replaced due to lag?
|

Valkrider
|
Posted - 2007.09.08 22:27:00 -
[18]
My response on this to the topic starter is find another game. If more people did that, CCP would start feeling the pain in the wallet, where it really matters. I know the thread starters pain, I used to run missions out of "The Citadel", mostly Saila. CCP should be providing a lag-free gaming enviroment, but they do not, and they will not EVER do this because they are not feeling the pain of loosing customers. I will tell you this, the DEV's and GM's of this game care nothing about your problems and only about your making your monthly payments to CCP. I can say this without ever being screwed over by them, but I know plently of people that have yet they still continue to play the game.
It is a known fact that CCP's customer service is one of the worst in the world, end of story...
|

Vele Nori
Amarr
|
Posted - 2007.09.08 23:40:00 -
[19]
Edited by: Vele Nori on 08/09/2007 23:41:59
Look at it this way. You knew that by going to a heavily populated system you will be exposing yourself to lag which may cause the loss of your ship and you being unable to respond to aggression. So being fully aware of that you still took your ship into a laggy system. Why? I think that in the first place it isn't CCP but you who should care more for your ships and accept the consequences of what you do with them. The game isn't perfect and yes currently a lot of people in same system cause lag. Either play around it and quit whining or quit the game (and give me all your stuff :P).
|

Tortun Nahme
Minmatar Heimatar Services Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2007.09.08 23:48:00 -
[20]
omg I drove in down town toronto, got stuck in traffic and was late for my job, then i got fired! The government should pay me my wages for the next year because they should have fixed traffic! Why there should be a breathalyzer to login to Eve-Forums:
Quote: Smacking my own alt in a nerf-thread while drunk, he was irritating a Hauler full of tech II n00bs, Oops.
|
|
|

Valorem
Amarr Forum Moderator

|
Posted - 2007.09.09 00:37:00 -
[21]
Please never post GM correspondence on the forums.
Valorem
forum rules | CAOD Rules | [email protected] | Our Website |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |