| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Tagg'net
   |
Posted - 2007.09.12 04:51:00 -
[1]
Amarr cruiser 5.. no longer needs to be trained it seems.. I dont care for neuts , I want a nos curse :(
bring back the nos domi! bring back NOS!!
do ya hear me! :)
|
Haffrage
Sharks With Frickin' Laser Beams
Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 04:52:00 -
[2]
Jesus ******* christ no.
T2 Tier 2 Battlecruisers | Eve GUI Tweaks |
agent apple
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 04:58:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Haffrage
Jesus ******* christ no.
This
|
RedLion
Caldari
Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 04:58:00 -
[4]
I want it, but we won't get it
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The Gallenteans must be destroyed
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
Captian Internet
Lead Bricks
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 04:59:00 -
[5]
You nos *****s are all the same all suck and no style
Local Thread 107-b,War ,Navigation Shortcuts |
Kazuma Saruwatari
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 04:59:00 -
[6]
wow, it took people this long to whine about the Nos change?
Seriously, Nos needed the nerf so bad it wasnt funny. Be thankful they didnt remove Nos entirely.
-
Odd Pod Out, a blog of EVE Online |
Nyphur
Pillowsoft
Total Comfort
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 05:02:00 -
[7]
My nosdomi works just fine. In fact, it works BETTER since the patch because it's immune to counternos.
Eve-Tanking.com - We're sorry, something happened. |
Feng Schui
Minmatar
The Ninja Coalition
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 05:19:00 -
[8]
the curse works fine, the pilgrim however 
The Beginning <-- crap quality, need to redo, sorry :( |
aUTOKILL
Gallente
Slacker Industries
Exuro Mortis
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 05:25:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Haffrage
Jesus ******* christ no.
~~~~~~
|
Draygo Korvan
Merch Industrial
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 06:28:00 -
[10]
I say re-nerf it (undo the nerf and then nerf it more appropriately)
The current nerf is pretty terrible from the stand point that it doesnt interact with other game mechanics and that better ship setups (higher cap recharge rate, higher cap capacity) benifit much less from nos.
Nos should act on sig radius, not cap % compared to your own. Making it less effective if your opponents cap starts getting low is fine, but your cap level should have nothing to do with that. The max drain needs to be based on the sig radius of ships so that a heavy nos cant sap a frigate to nothing in one pull.
Essentially in my opinion, it wasnt that nos didnt need to be nerfed, it was nerfed in the wrong way.
|
fire 59
Destructive Influence
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 06:31:00 -
[11]
Nah it's great now, needed a fix and it is now fixed. Simple as
|
Haffrage
Sharks With Frickin' Laser Beams
Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 06:55:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Draygo Korvan
I say re-nerf it (undo the nerf and then nerf it more appropriately)
The current nerf is pretty terrible from the stand point that it doesnt interact with other game mechanics and that better ship setups (higher cap recharge rate, higher cap capacity) benifit much less from nos.
Nos should act on sig radius, not cap % compared to your own. Making it less effective if your opponents cap starts getting low is fine, but your cap level should have nothing to do with that. The max drain needs to be based on the sig radius of ships so that a heavy nos cant sap a frigate to nothing in one pull.
Essentially in my opinion, it wasnt that nos didnt need to be nerfed, it was nerfed in the wrong way.
If you have a high cap recharge rate and can sustain cap...you don't need a ******* nos. If you're fitting it to kill someone's cap get a neut. If you're fitting it to sustain your own cap use a nos. If your cap can sustain you don't need nos.
It's pretty simple 
T2 Tier 2 Battlecruisers | Eve GUI Tweaks |
anister
Black Omega Security
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 06:56:00 -
[13]
*our
___
|
omiNATION
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 07:09:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Draygo Korvan
I say re-nerf it (undo the nerf and then nerf it more appropriately)
The current nerf is pretty terrible from the stand point that it doesnt interact with other game mechanics and that better ship setups (higher cap recharge rate, higher cap capacity) benifit much less from nos.
Nos should act on sig radius, not cap % compared to your own. Making it less effective if your opponents cap starts getting low is fine, but your cap level should have nothing to do with that. The max drain needs to be based on the sig radius of ships so that a heavy nos cant sap a frigate to nothing in one pull.
Essentially in my opinion, it wasnt that nos didnt need to be nerfed, it was nerfed in the wrong way.
I like this idea, but still doesn't stop full on Domi NOS fleets nosing their way through nossingham... nos.
I admit, took a bit more teeth out of the NOS than it should have tho, they're practically useless, even as a defensive tool. Maybe if they crippled your target's recharge rate too. So it doesn't take more cap than you have, but it prevents them from regaining cap.
|
Cornucopian
Gallente
Dutch Omega
United Freemen Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 07:14:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Captian Internet
You nos *****s are all the same all suck and no style
for ONCE I actually agree with you megatroll!!! QFT!
-----------------------------------------------
"post with your main. delete your alt, you sad little exploiting metagamer."
Originally by: Royaldo
complete win by Cornucopian!
|
Bellum Eternus
Gallente
Blood Corsair's
The Red Skull
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 07:18:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Cornucopian
Originally by: Captian Internet
You nos *****s are all the same all suck and no style
for ONCE I actually agree with you megatroll!!! QFT!
Yep. Can you hear that? It's the sound of ice forming in the streets of Hell lol...
[Video]Blood Corsairs - Day One |
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
Namtz'aar k'in
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 07:32:00 -
[17]
no thanks
-----------------------------------
I'm working my way through college
target CCP
need...more room... |
Kalazar
Amarr
Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 07:45:00 -
[18]
Definitely not. Nos was just too overpowered in it's previous incarnation. Now maybe smaller ships will stand a chance against larger ships once more... Without having the severe dampener of being insta-drained by the standard 3-4 heavy nos battleship setups.
----------------------------------------------
|
Amuko
Amarr
Happy Little Roid Huggers
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 08:07:00 -
[19]
People who used NOS sucked, in two ways...
|
tla gnillortmurof
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 08:25:00 -
[20]
Adapt more, whine less.
|
Lord WarATron
Amarr
Black Nova Corp
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 08:30:00 -
[21]
Neuts are the new NOS. Also, I hear these Launcher Slots on a Curse is fun as well.....
--
Billion Isk Mission |
Granmethedon III
High4Life
SMASH Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 08:33:00 -
[22]
Originally by: omiNATION
I admit, took a bit more teeth out of the NOS than it should have tho, they're practically useless, even as a defensive tool. Maybe if they crippled your target's recharge rate too. So it doesn't take more cap than you have, but it prevents them from regaining cap.
I disagree, I think nos now is excellent, especially for small ships both to preotec them from a large nos draining them completely, and for them using it too.
Fit something like a Jaguar with a nos and MWD and you have a pretty good heavy tackler, and using nos in the way I think its intended; leeching cap from a larger ship to sustain your own, but without ever really completely draining your target.
|
Sirial Soulfly
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 08:36:00 -
[23]
The public has spoken, now off with his head! 
|
Sokratesz
Paradox v2.0
Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 08:41:00 -
[24]
No?
|
MOS DEF
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 08:47:00 -
[25]
It got way more scary out there in space now that people who nosed switched over to neuts really.
Adapt or die.
|
Najenna
Minmatar
Caldari Deep Space Ventures
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 08:55:00 -
[26]
 QFT
Can i have your stuff
Once you get this Robotech thing in your blood its there to stay... |
Zephyr Zhang
the united
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 08:57:00 -
[27]
Nos is workign great now cause it aint :)
Means that smaller ships are coming into there own
Zephyr Out
---------------------------------------
|
Sinder Ohm
Infinite Improbability Inc
Mostly Harmless
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 09:20:00 -
[28]
NONONONO!!!
Suck it up dont play
Originally by: Karanth
Wimps play empire. Real men play in 0.0. Hardcore masochists live out in drone space.
|
Jennai
The Silent Rage
R0ADKILL
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 09:29:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Granmethedon III
I disagree, I think nos now is excellent, especially for small ships both to preotec them from a large nos draining them completely, and for them using it too.
Fit something like a Jaguar with a nos and MWD and you have a pretty good heavy tackler, and using nos in the way I think its intended; leeching cap from a larger ship to sustain your own, but without ever really completely draining your target.
also it adds some depth to cap boosters - if you're in a cruiser with like 1100 total cap and you're using 800s, a nos boat is going to grab a good bit of that before you can use it. if you're using 400s, your cap/second isn't as high but you won't lose as much to nos.
|
Sheriff Jones
Amarr
Please Enter Password
|
Posted - 2007.09.12 11:34:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Tagg'net
Amarr cruiser 5.. no longer needs to be trained it seems.. I dont care for neuts , I want a nos curse :(
So..what about HACs, command ships, logistics and such? No more cruiser V need for them? Yei! 
My opinions represent the opinions of my corporation completely. I'm the CEO damnit. |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |