| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Paranoidandroid
   |
Posted - 2004.02.13 13:04:00 -
[1]
just want to know what people think about this.. please say yes or no to variouse options :)not what i would wish for btw.
1. that ccp removed all possbility of pvp from 0.1-0.4
2. removed the possiblity of a stronger ship attacking a weaker like a bs cant attack a frigate its to much below its strength.
3. pvp is only possible if both targets agree to it, like a duel
|
Torvus
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 13:14:00 -
[2]
err.... no, no, and thrice no
cheers!
_____________________________________________________________
War is much too serious a matter to be entrusted to the military.
Georges Clemenceau (1841 - 1929)
|
Astrid Tron
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 13:16:00 -
[3]
I like Radiohead too, but I dont like any of the three options.
---------------------------------------------
When you have to kill a man, it takes nothing to be polite |
John Zeppe
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 13:17:00 -
[4]
1. No!
2. Erm so that a group of frigates can kill battleships very easily, since they can't attack the frigates back?
3. Yeah, kill piracy even more.
/Non-pirate
|
GeoNoSiS
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 13:21:00 -
[5]
no no and no
-----------------------------------------------
(\_/)
(O.o)
(> <) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world |
Scorpyn
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 13:22:00 -
[6]
1. No
2. No
3. That might be an option in some special training areas, where you can't lose your pod and there are no asteroid fields and similar.
(Training area could be implemented with simulation - 2 ppl dock at the same station, go into simulation mode together (in a completely empty system, or with spectators who can't interact but unly watch or something similar) and then undock somewhere in a "virtual environment" (a safespot in a training system), and you will keep the ship if it's blown up. The problem might be to make ppl understand the concept of simulating actions within a game.)
|
Deloup Drakar
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 13:25:00 -
[7]
I'd rather NOT have Eve-Online turn into EQ-Online
no, it's low security for a reason
no, too exploitable, unless a frigate cannot in any way affect a BS....which is a hunk of <explicit deleted>
no, see first line on my post, this is a pvp game, deal with it or leave
|
Chai N'Dorr
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 13:31:00 -
[8]
None of the above... I'll go play Freelancer with me buddies if I only want NPC bad guys.
|
Joviah
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 13:37:00 -
[9]
Paranoid -- you bought the wrong game.
Anything can happen anywhere and at anytime, much like IRL. I refer you to the back of the EVE box, or even the front page of this website explaining what it is this game is about.
It's PvP. Those who can't handle it have a tendancy to leave. Survival of the fittest my friend, evolution's oldest law.
Joviah
Director, Cirrius Technologies
|
DirtyHarry
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 13:42:00 -
[10]
No, no & no
-Havo
-------------------
Sig: Mirus Crosius <3
DirtyHarry ~ Havocide - WoWing It Up, Not Givin A F**k |
|
|
Ichabod Dirange
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 13:42:00 -
[11]
Actually evolution has shown time and again that there is nothing like law to it, only probabilities.
|
Jayad
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 13:52:00 -
[12]
Three No's to the questions,
Comments:
1. pvp should be easier with less restriction, pvp in 0.4 or below should be kept, lets even remove the sentrys.
2. it would be a rediculous game if battleships couldnt destroy smaller craft, however it would be nice if ship size was a factor on tracking. ie making the Battleship pilots diversify on weapon size, not just large.
3. Totally rediculous mechanic for the therd question. Have a separate server for this kind a thing.
|
Ylang Star
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 14:43:00 -
[13]
I do not PVP yet but wish to as soon as possible, so:
No, no, no.
"I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy every minute of it." |
RagnarH
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 14:50:00 -
[14]
NO !!!!!!!!!!!! u mad ? 
This char is perm banned on forums :S |
Aerick Dawn
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 14:52:00 -
[15]
NO NO NO NO..doh...
NO NO NO
there thats better.
______________________
What Aerick has been up to lately.. |
Achec
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 14:57:00 -
[16]
 To bad we cant give the person who wrote this a rating. And if someones rating got too low they would be muted for a month.
Also im wondering why the original poster hasnt said anything back (like an apology for eating paint chips when he was younger)
|
cypriss
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 16:05:00 -
[17]
i think they should make a sister game, say yes to all 3 of those points, call it evette-online and in every box you get a free carebear doll. 
other than that...NO WAY
|
Koda
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 16:28:00 -
[18]
Edited by: Koda on 13/02/2004 16:29:42
Edited by: Koda on 13/02/2004 16:28:37
No to all three.
(1) The possibility of gate campers in systems under .5 gives the game an edge. Taking it out would render the security rating system useless as there would be only be two ratings: 0.0 and non 0.0.
(2) This could be interesting as it would force BS's to have cruiser/frigate escorts to keep from getting owned by packs of frigate pirates but it ultimately makes no sense.
(3) No, consensual combat renders pirating useless. "Let me think, pay 5 million or agree to you podding me? Nope, don't think so." The essence of pirating is taking something by force against the target's will .
--------------
Share the love in the SNIGG Forums
|
Skillz
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 16:38:00 -
[19]
Yes yes yes and then I press cancel, like the rest of the mud.
Keep on flaming, lamers.
|
Wild Rho
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 16:38:00 -
[20]
no no no, enough said.
I have the body of a supermodel. I just can't remember where I left it... |
|
|
Alessandra
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 16:44:00 -
[21]
One comment on the 'remove-gate-guns from .4 to .1!' point; the only difference between low-security Empire space and no-security space would be that pirates take security hits hunting in Empire -- and most of them honestly don't seem to care..?
Rather, I'm in favor of a less-steep gradiation, as regards PvP in low-security; torpedo or cruise-missile pods at gates in .3 or above to prevent gate-hunting, but allow blockades of stations or attacks in belts, with the present state of affairs reigning in .2 and below. This way, one doesn't step from "completely safe" to "very nearly completely unsafe" with a drop of 1/10th in security level.
Otherwise, I think PvP's implementation in EVE is grand. ;p
|
Robskiwarrior
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 16:47:00 -
[22]
Edited by: Robskiwarrior on 13/02/2004 16:50:03
one of the best things about eve is the freedom, no? why take that away?
|
McWatt
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 16:53:00 -
[23]
Edited by: McWatt on 13/02/2004 16:54:15
no, no, no.
and i ll allow myself to add an extra NO for further suggestion of this guy. (me, being kind of paranoid...)
|
Viceroy
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 16:57:00 -
[24]
no
no
no
k
thx
bye
-
|
Galmore
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 16:59:00 -
[25]
1)No  - But id be fine with makeing PvPing only in .8 or Lower ... unless at war in which Splash would not effect any not at war with you --- but Eh!!
2)No (I Think) The role for a freg is to target and lock the Bs down before it can target any other ship
3)No Um ya thats realistic ... [Thug]:"Sir may I kill you and everyone you are with?" [EveryoneWithABrain]:"no" 
Ambition is a poor excuse for not having enough sense to be lazy. |
Lao Tzu
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 17:35:00 -
[26]
err....let me think
NO!
|
Phoenixgurl
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 17:38:00 -
[27]
1- No why?? lol its fun pvp
2- No why?? Just maybe make targeting time longuer...
3- No, freaking never. PvP ain't concentual, never change that!! I don't want this game to be Earth and beyond.. here a group can't control the event, cause they might get killed... E&B u could control epics cause there wasnt a way to stop them. |
Halseth Durn
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 17:59:00 -
[28]
I think its safe to say that we all think your ideas are very, very bad. |
Jivan Kennoren
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 18:21:00 -
[29]
No to all three.
As for battleships versus frigates, I do like the idea of it being harder for larger ships to hit frigates, but I am against nerfing on all levels. Make the frigates faster and more maneuverable (with skills.. not asking for joystick control here). Keep BS's the same. That would be my only suggestion.
|
Dust Puppy
|
Posted - 2004.02.13 18:34:00 -
[30]
 Quote:
I think its safe to say that we all think your ideas are very, very bad.
No New Kids on the Block was a very, very bad idea... this is a whole new level of badness.
But you guys talking about muting this guy that is just bull****. If he decided to post 6 new topics with this idea I would gladly vote for muting him.
__________
Capacitor research |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |