| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
JC Anderson
Noir.
Noir. Mercenary Group
162
   |
Posted - 2012.01.21 03:17:00 -
[1] - Quote
Brick squad you are meaniehead baddies.
Anyhow... Isn't the entire point to destroy the mothership? I haven't run any incursions so I guess I could be mistaken. I guess its entirely possible that it's there to sell ice cream to the local children. |
JC Anderson
Noir.
Noir. Mercenary Group
163
|
Posted - 2012.01.21 03:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
Xolve wrote:1-Up Mushroom wrote:Xolve wrote:The only thing in this thread that got 'sorted out' is your name. ..and your signature  Didn't want that signature anyway.
Great... Now I'm curious as to what the original one was. |
JC Anderson
Noir.
Noir. Mercenary Group
164
|
Posted - 2012.01.21 06:03:00 -
[3] - Quote
Brock Nelson wrote:Please guys, don't kill the mom. I need the isk to repair my protuting prostate
Protuting does not sound very pleasant. |
JC Anderson
Noir.
Noir. Mercenary Group
169
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 03:21:00 -
[4] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:How dare null sec have more resources than high sec.
Oh the horror! |
JC Anderson
Noir.
Noir. Mercenary Group
171
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 14:54:00 -
[5] - Quote
So it seems that the incursion runners found a workaround or loophole to farm ISK by drawing out the incursions as long as possible. Likewise, this was not an intended mechanic, and CCP/CSM are discussing a way to fix the issue.
It is not a nerf.... It's a "fix" to correct an oversight on their part and bring incursions back in line with the original working concept that their were implemented under in the first place.
Hey guys, remember when a group of creative capsuleers found a work-around and were able to get entire incursion fleets massacred by concord through creative use of logistics and GCC flags? Remember when CCP fixed that in order to prevent it from happening as it was simply an oversight on their part and was not working as intended?
Oh yeah, and remember when a whole bunch of players raged at the slightest mention of fixing that workaround that allowed sites to be farmed non stop as isk faucets? It was that time when a whole bunch of self righteous and arrogant forum warriors decided that they were entitled to special privileges allowing them to skirt around the game mechanics with impunity. You know, I think those were the very same people that cried wolf to CCP and prompted the fix to prevent their incursion fleets from being Concorded! Apparently, CCP is only allowed to take action and fix something if it doesn't stand against what THEY WANT.
Oh wait, that's whats going on right now! My mistake. |
JC Anderson
Noir.
Noir. Mercenary Group
172
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 16:51:00 -
[6] - Quote
Can we please ban the word "iskies" on the forums? |
JC Anderson
Noir.
Noir. Mercenary Group
174
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 18:22:00 -
[7] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Grumpy Owly wrote:Then by the same token can you provide supporting evidence that supports the claim that incurions ARE the main problem over other areas of the game. I'm not making that claim. Quote:I have done a previous exercise with someone else's claimed figures before in a previous thread that demonstrated based on the figures provided what the contribution was. GǪand the result (and source) wasGǪ? Quote:But unlike your other null slaves I dont jump around to address your whims when you click your fingers. What on earth are you on about? 
Apparently Tippia, you are a null sec overlord with throngs of slaves following you around and begging for candy. |
JC Anderson
Noir.
Noir. Mercenary Group
174
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 19:05:00 -
[8] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Tippia wrote:Ok, I've changed my mind. Because of Ruby here, the candy is cancelled. Instead, there will be severe whippings for all (and I'm being kind here GÇö no punishment is severe enough for what just happened). Oooh, Whip it Good.
Devo isn't nearly as bad as having to listen to the first song you linked after I had finally scrubbed my mind clean of it many many many years ago.
LOL I had a chipmunks album (yes vinyl) where they covered Whip It. ;) |
JC Anderson
Noir.
Noir. Mercenary Group
174
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 19:14:00 -
[9] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Tippia wrote:JC Anderson wrote:Apparently Tippia, you are a null sec overlord with throngs of slaves following you around and begging for candy. Wow. Great. The things you miss if you don't pay attention.  Could my slaves please show themselves so I know whom to order around? Candy will indeed be provided. Also, could someone please show me what part of nullsec I'm overlord of? I want Candy!
I'll see your Candy and raise you a Mika. |
JC Anderson
Noir.
Noir. Mercenary Group
175
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 02:26:00 -
[10] - Quote
Brumi Viri wrote:Tak McMonagle wrote:Incursions are funny. A lot of the people that run them are the same types that are hardcore raiders in other games. They raid to get gear to raid to get gear to.....you get the idea. Incursions are no different, except it's isk for mods/ships for isk for mods/ships. Honestly, Eve isn't a very good place with that sort of player. Most of us that play Eve play it for the ability to do whatever they want. Consequences or no. The raider types can't handle it when someone's fun gets in their way, directly or indirectly.
Also, what's wrong with killing the mom when its there? IMO, CCP should make the incursions harder the longer the mom is spawned and just left there, with no increase in rewards. Seriously, incursions are supposed to be Sansha offensives. Why do they just sit around idling while their **** gets blowed up? Raider types can and do handle it. Point of Reference the Massive Massive Ban List that BTL has. High Sector Incursions have never been safe. http://www.g4mer.net/blist/index.phpThere has been Griefing since day one. But there is a huge difference between dying while participating in an Incursion VS being denied the Incursion environment altogether.But ruining the weekend play to thousands fo High sector players because a selected few feel that all players should play in the bitter world they live in that is an Incursionless world is not the right approach. I hope CCP give perma bands as they are costing real memberships from the game. Whenever a high sector player decides he wants his ship to be blown up all he as to do is set auto pilot to the nearest 0.0 gate.
LOL A lot of the people that are on that list have reasons listed as : Starting or posting in "griefer" threads on the forums... And not actually doing any griefing in-game. |
JC Anderson
Noir.
Noir. Mercenary Group
176
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 09:12:00 -
[11] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:Sicex wrote:Callous Jade wrote:
Congratulations, I think youve really stumbled onto something here!
Wait a second...nope that happens every sunday night because people have jobs you moron.
OMG! Current server pop is down to 21k! What have you done CCP??? THE SKY IS FALLING!!!! I bet it will be about 12-13k after downtime too... thats truly a terrible number of logged in users.... ohwait
Yeah and just wait until downtime itself! I bet even less people will be logged in then! Seeing as they are all so mad about incursions. |
JC Anderson
Noir.
Noir. Mercenary Group
176
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 11:13:00 -
[12] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:Jo Hei wrote:Elisha Starkiller wrote:
so i did a couple lvl4's instead and dam lvl4's are boring... no one to talk to no fun, i was out of eve and back into BF3 in no time.....
This is my point. Instead of letting new or casual players enjoy the game the way they want to, the griefers killing off incursions are culling genuine interest in this game and so are preventing its growth. Mostly it is out of attention-seeking, "oh look at us, we're special!", but honestly, Dear BrickSquad, its time for you guys to stop crying about game features. Either play something else or HTFU. Well, given that its currently being controlled by an 'elite' cliche that utterly control who can run incursions, and will ban you for agreeing that just perhaps, they should be ended when the mom spawned because, well, thats how its supposed to happen(or the mom wouldn't spawn for days) who are utterly disrupting peoples homes for an extended period because they are deliberately prolonging the penalties to people who aren't incursion runners... Thats rather a problem, when you can be banned from this activity for disagreeing with someone.
Guy has a valid concern.
As I pointed out earlier in the thread, that mega BTL ban list has people on it with reasons listed as starting or taking part in forum threads that they don't approve of! Not just for in-game infractions. |
JC Anderson
Noir.
Noir. Mercenary Group
180
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 09:39:00 -
[13] - Quote
You know, it is pretty cool that they at least came up with something and TRIED it... Regardless of how effective or ineffective it was.
IMHO much better than the constant complaining about griefers and lack of action to do anything about it that I expected.
http://www.evenews24.com/2012/01/26/game-on-incursion-bears-strike-back-at-incursion-greifers/ |
| |
|