Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Psilocin
Amarr GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:16:00 -
[181]
Originally by: Avon
Originally by: Elder Bob
Otherwise it might look like the Devs are favouring you guys, allowing you to cheat .. and I am sure you wouldn't want that ruining your crusade.
Much like your alliance
FOFOFOOOOO! |
pershphanie
Generals Of Destruction Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:17:00 -
[182]
Originally by: Johnny ReeRee
CAOD needs some BoB Eve-obsessives to start stalking the forums again, like goonies do. Yazoul Sameilee or whatever just isn't up for the job. Avon does okay, but he's kind of out there by himself. Where's the backup?
Where's DigitalCommunist when you need him?
Nah. Those days are over. COAD is now just just Something Awful part 2. Bob's old forum posters required people who read the forums to think about what they were writing. Now it's all just thoughtless smack and stupid one liners.
------>PҼſϚի<------
|
Martin VanBuren
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:18:00 -
[183]
Originally by: Avon
Originally by: Elder Bob You've been in Eve to realise that GMs don't have a clue what's cheating and what's not, the result of a petition depends solely on what the GM in question had for breakfast that morning.
So, we should leave it to the Devs to decide, because, like, they have been proven to be, like, totally honest and stuff.
I'll take my GM response over a claimed Dev "okay". Otherwise it might look like the Devs are favouring you guys, allowing you to cheat .. and I am sure you wouldn't want that ruining your crusade.
Holy god you are the worst poster I have ever seen and I post on the same forum as Arghy Steelwill and Hydrosan.
|
Orangir
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:23:00 -
[184]
Originally by: Avon even though most right thinking people can see how unfair it is to tar everyone in BoB with the same brush.
Originally by: Avon, from around the time of the BoB jihad against Goons If they fail to disassociate themselves from cause, then they are seen as condoning it, and so it is perfectly fair to hold each and every member equally responsible.
Hey Avon you still haven't explained the cognitive dissonance between these two posts. I have it filed under "you're an idiot" right now, but I'm sure as someone who smugly prides himself on being smarter than everyone else, you'd have an explanation, right?
|
Elder Bob
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:25:00 -
[185]
Originally by: pershphanie Now it's all just thoughtless smack and stupid one liners.
Why don't you form a joke of an alliance about it?
|
Avon
Caldari Black Nova Corp Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:26:00 -
[186]
Originally by: Orangir
Originally by: Avon even though most right thinking people can see how unfair it is to tar everyone in BoB with the same brush.
Originally by: Avon, from around the time of the BoB jihad against Goons If they fail to disassociate themselves from cause, then they are seen as condoning it, and so it is perfectly fair to hold each and every member equally responsible.
Hey Avon you still haven't explained the cognitive dissonance between these two posts. I have it filed under "you're an idiot" right now, but I'm sure as someone who smugly prides himself on being smarter than everyone else, you'd have an explanation, right?
Actually it was explained much earlier on. How the Goons become what they hate ... ?
The only thing worse then my forum posting is your forum reading tbh.
The Battleships is not and should not be a solo pwnmobile - Oveur
|
Avon
Caldari Black Nova Corp Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:27:00 -
[187]
Originally by: Orangir
Originally by: Avon OMG, Goons talking to their secret dev contacts. :tinfoil: Well, the GM's say it is cheating, so I guess you will just petition yourself and get yourself banned, right? Shame, I'll miss ya.
The portrait pack has been petitioned before and the answer from the GMs and devs has always been the same: it's fine. Keep trying though.
Not the reply I got. Keep trying though.
The Battleships is not and should not be a solo pwnmobile - Oveur
|
Martin VanBuren
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:28:00 -
[188]
Edited by: Martin VanBuren on 26/09/2007 23:30:24
Originally by: pershphanie
Originally by: Johnny ReeRee
CAOD needs some BoB Eve-obsessives to start stalking the forums again, like goonies do. Yazoul Sameilee or whatever just isn't up for the job. Avon does okay, but he's kind of out there by himself. Where's the backup?
Where's DigitalCommunist when you need him?
Nah. Those days are over. COAD is now just just Something Awful part 2. Bob's old forum posters required people who read the forums to think about what they were writing. Now it's all just thoughtless smack and stupid one liners.
I'm sure BoB would have the same forum presence today that they did a year ago if they were winning
Edit: Avon you are seriously trying to argue the equivalent of a supreme court decision because your local sheriff told you otherwise. Just get out before you say something really stupid and goons start using it as sigs and quoting it endlessly for the next 3 years.
|
Elder Bob
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:30:00 -
[189]
Originally by: Avon
Originally by: Orangir
Originally by: Avon OMG, Goons talking to their secret dev contacts. :tinfoil: Well, the GM's say it is cheating, so I guess you will just petition yourself and get yourself banned, right? Shame, I'll miss ya.
The portrait pack has been petitioned before and the answer from the GMs and devs has always been the same: it's fine. Keep trying though.
Not the reply I got. Keep trying though.
Well, I'm sure that no-one has ever petitioned a goon for using it, right? As it's apparently an exploit according to the GMs, maybe you should start a charge for people to petition everyone in Goonswarm you think might be using it, and see who gets banned.
Hint: It's no-one.
|
TWD
Evolution Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:31:00 -
[190]
Looks like we're outnumbered here Avon, by****gots.
|
|
Avon
Caldari Black Nova Corp Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:33:00 -
[191]
Originally by: TWD Looks like we're outnumbered here Avon, by****gots.
Heh, good job we don't work for CCP, otherwise they might try to gain our favour through promises of homosexual acts ... or was that a secret?
The Battleships is not and should not be a solo pwnmobile - Oveur
|
Schlieren Altiprlayle
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:35:00 -
[192]
still waiting on news about my bff... about my sputti.. |
Psilocin
Amarr GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:36:00 -
[193]
Originally by: TWD Looks like we're outnumbered here Avon, by****gots.
I'm not sure wether you're talking about CAOD or your own Alliance, honestly.
FOFOFOOOOO! |
Orangir
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:36:00 -
[194]
Edited by: Orangir on 26/09/2007 23:36:48
Originally by: Avon
Originally by: Orangir
Originally by: Avon even though most right thinking people can see how unfair it is to tar everyone in BoB with the same brush.
Originally by: Avon, from around the time of the BoB jihad against Goons If they fail to disassociate themselves from cause, then they are seen as condoning it, and so it is perfectly fair to hold each and every member equally responsible.
Hey Avon you still haven't explained the cognitive dissonance between these two posts. I have it filed under "you're an idiot" right now, but I'm sure as someone who smugly prides himself on being smarter than everyone else, you'd have an explanation, right?
Actually it was explained much earlier on. How the Goons become what they hate ... ?
The only thing worse then my forum posting is your forum reading tbh.
Ok, I guess if you can't give me an explanation I'll keep it filed under "you're an idiot".
|
Pnuka
Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:36:00 -
[195]
Originally by: TWD Looks like we're outnumbered here Avon, by****gots.
???
|
Avon
Caldari Black Nova Corp Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:37:00 -
[196]
Originally by: Elder Bob
Hint: It's no-one.
If you say so.
If that is true, however, that tends to imply that CCP allow you to break the rules, and you are happy for them to do so, non?
Or is it that this hack is almost impossible to detect (unless people are stupid enough to incriminate themselves .. so, considering the focus group here..), and therefore almost impossible to prosecute?
Which do ya think?
The Battleships is not and should not be a solo pwnmobile - Oveur
|
Elder Bob
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:37:00 -
[197]
Originally by: TWD Looks like we're outnumbered here Avon, by****gots.
Homophobe.
|
dastommy79
Di-Tron Heavy Industries Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:37:00 -
[198]
Originally by: TWD Looks like we're outnumbered here Avon, by****gots.
When the goons are done, can i have the sexeh with you?
I driks alots |
Martin VanBuren
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:37:00 -
[199]
Originally by: Avon
Originally by: TWD Looks like we're outnumbered here Avon, by****gots.
Heh, good job we don't work for CCP, otherwise they might try to gain our favour through promises of homosexual acts ... or was that a secret?
No. Holy god you are terrible at this. You're trying to discredit the internet equivalent of Steve-o with embarrassing childhood photos.
|
Avon
Caldari Black Nova Corp Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:40:00 -
[200]
Originally by: Orangir
Ok, I guess if you can't give me an explanation I'll keep it filed under "you're an idiot".
It was clear enough in meaning. If it was the words that were giving you trouble I really can't help, remedial english isn't my thing. I'm sorry if you think that makes me look like an idiot, but it looks very different from where I am sitting.
The Battleships is not and should not be a solo pwnmobile - Oveur
|
|
Phelan Driscoll
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:41:00 -
[201]
Originally by: Avon
If that is true, however, that tends to imply that CCP allow you to break the rules, and you are happy for them to do so, non?
Considering CCP makes the rules, you can't really say that they "allow" you to break them?
See: POS Bowling. Obviously not something the dev's intended (I had a GM tell me this), obviously dumb, but totally legal and not "breaking the rules" until CCP said otherwise. Because they make 'em.
So if CCP says the Portrait Pack is okay, then it is not breaking the rules. __________________________ Are GoonSwarm ever going to be allowed to build up in any way in 0.0 space again? No.
|
Avon
Caldari Black Nova Corp Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:43:00 -
[202]
Originally by: Elder Bob I think that even the people who posted screenshots of themselves using it haven't met repercussions, so that CCP have proclaimed it not a problem.
Not punishing people who post screenshots of themselves using it wouldn't surprise me, due to CCP twisted logic about using screenshots in petitions. However, it is quite a stretch to then claim that means CCP endorse it.
The Battleships is not and should not be a solo pwnmobile - Oveur
|
Pnuka
Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:45:00 -
[203]
Originally by: Avon
Originally by: Elder Bob I think that even the people who posted screenshots of themselves using it haven't met repercussions, so that CCP have proclaimed it not a problem.
Not punishing people who post screenshots of themselves using it wouldn't surprise me, due to CCP twisted logic about using screenshots in petitions. However, it is quite a stretch to then claim that means CCP endorse it.
Yet you claiming goons hack isn't a stretch?
|
HydroSan
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:46:00 -
[204]
Originally by: Avon If you say so.
If that is true, however, that tends to imply that CCP allow you to break the rules, and you are happy for them to do so, non?
Or is it that this hack is almost impossible to detect (unless people are stupid enough to incriminate themselves .. so, considering the focus group here..), and therefore almost impossible to prosecute?
Which do ya think?
It's not hard to figure out how it works and CCP could have changed it a looooong time ago if they had any problems with it. And they obviously don't, because in Revelations 1, they implemented a built-in version (standings automatically beside portraits) which has made most goons stop using the pack to free up resources.
CCP could easily implement something to disable the portrait pack and they haven't. The so-called "hack" is so amazingly trivial and you can do it with just about any image editor. Just poke around the /portraits/ folder of your cache and you should be able to figure it out in like thirty seconds if you aren't an idiot.
I also fail to see how a little icon in local telling you the same information the standings icon (hostile, neutral, friendly) and right click -> show info tells you is on the same level as a lead developer in control of your capital ship fleet spawning free T2 blueprints worth billions of ISK.
Quote: Heh, good job we don't work for CCP, otherwise they might try to gain our favour through promises of homosexual acts ... or was that a secret?
blammo
|
Avon
Caldari Black Nova Corp Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:46:00 -
[205]
Originally by: Phelan Driscoll
So if CCP says the Portrait Pack is okay, then it is not breaking the rules.
Except they don't.
The Battleships is not and should not be a solo pwnmobile - Oveur
|
Tenebrys
Promethean Industries R0ADKILL
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:49:00 -
[206]
Originally by: Avon
Originally by: Phelan Driscoll
So if CCP says the Portrait Pack is okay, then it is not breaking the rules.
Except they don't.
proof or stfu
plz
|
Phelan Driscoll
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:49:00 -
[207]
Originally by: Avon
Originally by: Phelan Driscoll
So if CCP says the Portrait Pack is okay, then it is not breaking the rules.
Except they don't.
Yes they did. ______________________________ Are GoonSwarm ever going to be allowed to build up in any way in 0.0 space again? No.
|
Havoc GunStar
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:49:00 -
[208]
Originally by: Kola XXX "What part of the Titan nerf or Threadnaughts are using the same tactics against us? Titans were all yours, threadnaughts were all ours and fighters were initially yours until we adopted them post-thread campaign."
stupid me, expecting goons to read between te lines.. here...simplified.....goons blob,goons blob,goons blob,goons blob, now there is a blob you can't kill...you are outblobbed so carriers are broken...cuz jumping into 500 pilots in 25% in nob ships or shuttles doesn't lag... I like aso how goons try to justify their massive pressence on these boards sayin "bob did this to ascn" ..well. log a titan with aggro or make crazy claims then get the snot kicked out of you,that is what will happen.. on the other hand goons will make a thread about nothing and blob it as long as it's anti bob.. Become what you hate much ?? mybe you should not take a game so serious . . .. . . . BTW some goons plz justify the GOON cheats in the thread.. i wanna hear all about it. . . ..cuz we get to hear about a non bob player making some crap bpo's ..bob must be ***** right
We need an Eve-O forum for mythbusting.
1. The shuttle incident. Back during our campaign against D2 in Outer Ring, over a year ago, before Warp to 0, insta sets were very popular. ONE goon grabbed ONE shuttle from a POS, looked in the hold, didn't see anything, and tried to go from XZH back to S-U. He was ganked, the can was full of Bookmarks, because the shuttle had a copy of the pipe bookmarks between S-U and XZH.
When he looked in the hold, the folder was lagged, so ne never saw the contents. He didn't know they were there. It was probably less than 200 bookmarks. That goon was banned for 2 weeks as a result. Since none of us are fond of 2 week or perma bans, there was a 'holy crap, double check your hold' thread on our internal forums, and no more of that. There is no other basis for this bookmark lag bomb claim. Lag screws us over just as much as everyone else. We don't do it. It only affects the person who opens the can anyway.
2. Noob ships. Pretty rare when even ONE of these is found anywhere. We DO bring T1 tackling frigates, which are not noobships. If we were bringing 25% noob ships or shuttles, surely your doomsdays would SHOW that on your killboard. You are perpetuating a lie. Making you a liar. Good job. Look at your own killboard. There will be a tiny few here and there, mostly ganked traveling somewhere, but not no freakin 25% IN FLEET OPS. Another Eve-O urban legend. We got that big lie in JV1V for the titan abortion. I have a Where's Waldo screenshot of our gate blob of about 800 people. There are no noobships to be found. T1 frigates are not noobships.
3. As for cheats, I'm afraid I can't help you there. You should petition it if you think we are doing something against the rules.
|
Avon
Caldari Black Nova Corp Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:50:00 -
[209]
Originally by: HydroSan
I also fail to see how a little icon in local telling you the same information the standings icon (hostile, neutral, friendly) and right click -> show info tells you is on the same level as a lead developer in control of your capital ship fleet spawning free T2 blueprints worth billions of ISK.
The point is, it doesn't matter if you think this is a harmless, okay, nice, funny cheat, it is a cheat, and not allowed. Besides, it is probably just the tip of the iceberg right? Isn't that what you all claimed about T20?
The Battleships is not and should not be a solo pwnmobile - Oveur
|
Avon
Caldari Black Nova Corp Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.09.26 23:51:00 -
[210]
Originally by: Tenebrys
Originally by: Avon
Originally by: Phelan Driscoll
So if CCP says the Portrait Pack is okay, then it is not breaking the rules.
Except they don't.
proof or stfu
plz
Except we all know I can't quote my petition response.
The Battleships is not and should not be a solo pwnmobile - Oveur
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |