Originally by: Christari Zuborov

---

Originally by: Laboratus

---

Better yet, remove concord

---

I agree with this guy. Concord doesn't do what it what the players feel it should, it's a failure. Instead of waisting time programming the AI in hopes of creating some perfect officer, it should be done away with altogether. You can't program what people are smart enough to do themselves.

We can provide security for ourselves. We can have player provided police forces, earning pay from killing thugs via transferable kill rights system +bounties from those kill rights. These players could receive faction fitted police ships, scan for smugglers, etc. Their rank within the Police force could determine what size ship they're provided for free to help curb abuse, you'd have to be a proven peace officer to get the largest of ships.

---

Originally by: Christari Zuborov

---

Originally by: Laboratus

---

Better yet, remove concord

---

I agree with this guy. Concord doesn't do what it what the players feel it should, it's a failure. Instead of waisting time programming the AI in hopes of creating some perfect officer, it should be done away with altogether. You can't program what people are smart enough to do themselves.

We can provide security for ourselves. We can have player provided police forces, earning pay from killing thugs via transferable kill rights system +bounties from those kill rights. These players could receive faction fitted police ships, scan for smugglers, etc. Their rank within the Police force could determine what size ship they're provided for free to help curb abuse, you'd have to be a proven peace officer to get the largest of ships.

---

Originally by: Liz Kali

---

Tic Toc Tic Toc , time is ticking

---

Originally by: CCP John Proctor

---

Gates made from your nearest scrap yard can only be so space effecient

---

Originally by: CCP kieron

---

While this is an interesting idea, it is simply not feasible for Empire space. Player assumption of law enforcement responsibilities can and eventually will be abused, not all systems would be covered 23/7 as needed, etc.

Nobody is denying there is room for improvement, but it is the best option available and we will make it even better.

---

Originally by: EliteSlave

---

Originally by: CCP kieron

---

While this is an interesting idea, it is simply not feasible for Empire space. Player assumption of law enforcement responsibilities can and eventually will be abused, not all systems would be covered 23/7 as needed, etc.

Nobody is denying there is room for improvement, but it is the best option available and we will make it even better.

---

Then why not just make it so u cant fire on other players unless war decc'd or aggro timer such as ore thieving?

---

Originally by: EliteSlave

---

Then why not just make it so u cant fire on other players unless war decc'd or aggro timer such as ore thieving?

---

Originally by: Free Politics

---

Originally by: EliteSlave

---

Then why not just make it so u cant fire on other players unless war decc'd or aggro timer such as ore thieving?

---

Now that would just make eve boring...

---

Originally by: EliteSlave

---

Originally by: Free Politics

---

Originally by: EliteSlave

---

Then why not just make it so u cant fire on other players unless war decc'd or aggro timer such as ore thieving?

---

Now that would just make eve boring...

---

It already is boring...

Ive never been suicided, but i still disagree with insurance payouts due to concordokken

---

Originally by: CCP Morpheus

---

Post with your alt.

---

Originally by: Kirjava

---

How about modding the interface for a players that are like the ISD, make the tactical overlay akin to a RTS allowing control of multiple ships at once to moniter a system or 2 at a time.
Maybe even make the Concord Battleship an uber solopwn machine for enforcement puropses and have 10 per persn in several systems, fully fitted with 250km range webbers/scramblers insta lock ect.

---

Originally by: MotherMoon

---

Originally by: Kirjava

---

How about modding the interface for a players that are like the ISD, make the tactical overlay akin to a RTS allowing control of multiple ships at once to moniter a system or 2 at a time.
Maybe even make the Concord Battleship an uber solopwn machine for enforcement puropses and have 10 per persn in several systems, fully fitted with 250km range webbers/scramblers insta lock ect.

---

tell me what players want to be on 23/7 waiting only to fight when a player attacks someone else?

---

Originally by: CCP Morpheus

---

Post with your alt.

---

Originally by: Kirjava

---

Originally by: MotherMoon

---

Originally by: Kirjava

---

How about modding the interface for a players that are like the ISD, make the tactical overlay akin to a RTS allowing control of multiple ships at once to moniter a system or 2 at a time.
Maybe even make the Concord Battleship an uber solopwn machine for enforcement puropses and have 10 per persn in several systems, fully fitted with 250km range webbers/scramblers insta lock ect.

---

tell me what players want to be on 23/7 waiting only to fight when a player attacks someone else?

---

Have a rota?
I'm suggesting the option to take over from concord in select systems and then they revert to AI when noone has control.

---

Originally by: CCP kieron

---

While this is an interesting idea, it is simply not feasible for Empire space. Player assumption of law enforcement responsibilities can and eventually will be abused, not all systems would be covered 23/7 as needed, etc.

Nobody is denying there is room for improvement, but it is the best option available and we will make it even better.

---

Originally by: Kazuma Saruwatari

---

I'm all for removing insurance when CONCORDed. It should have been done months ago

---

Originally by: CCP kieron

---

While this is an interesting idea, it is simply not feasible for Empire space. Player assumption of law enforcement responsibilities can and eventually will be abused, not all systems would be covered 23/7 as needed, etc.

Nobody is denying there is room for improvement, but it is the best option available and we will make it even better.

---

Originally by: hellsknights

---

Originally by: CCP kieron

---

While this is an interesting idea, it is simply not feasible for Empire space. Player assumption of law enforcement responsibilities can and eventually will be abused, not all systems would be covered 23/7 as needed, etc.

Nobody is denying there is room for improvement, but it is the best option available and we will make it even better.

---

You speak of abuse, not that i tink this idea is any good but i've heard stories
of GM and Dev abuse, is that any better?

The only thing i will abuse is my wifes body "if ya know what i mean"

---

Originally by: Free Politics

---

Originally by: EliteSlave

---

Then why not just make it so u cant fire on other players unless war decc'd or aggro timer such as ore thieving?

---

Now that would just make eve boring...

---

Originally by: Kazuma Saruwatari

---

Originally by: CCP kieron

---

While this is an interesting idea, it is simply not feasible for Empire space. Player assumption of law enforcement responsibilities can and eventually will be abused, not all systems would be covered 23/7 as needed, etc.

Nobody is denying there is room for improvement, but it is the best option available and we will make it even better.

---

Kieron, CONCORD is the embodiment of abuse. They blow the guy who blew up the newbie after newbie clicks "Terminate" and cancels account, and then allows for insurance to be paid to the pewpew-guy.

In RL, such a police force would have been disbanded, let alone burnt to the ground.

Whilst I'm not against suicide ganking, I am against actions that detract from new players learning the game at their pace and not get blown up 5 seconds out the station (yes, I've taken the liberty of testing this in an empty hauler. Suicided right at the next gate).

I'm all for removing insurance when CONCORDed. It should have been done months ago

---

Originally by: Feng Schui

---

I just wish someone could buy a bounty hunting license from concord for a week (maybe something like 5 mill ISK per week), where it will allow you to kill someone for a week.

Maybe have a max of 2 licenses active at any one time so its not abused as much.

---

Originally by: MotherMoon

---

is a magic beam of bull**** stopping my weapons??
I don't think so, CCP is smart, and they won't turn this into WoW in space.
you are never safe in eve.

---

Originally by: Ryas Nia

---

Ahh brilliant idea, now we just need some name for it and a basic mechanic... i know we can call them war decelerations.

---

Originally by: Kazuma Saruwatari

---

Originally by: CCP kieron

---

While this is an interesting idea, it is simply not feasible for Empire space. Player assumption of law enforcement responsibilities can and eventually will be abused, not all systems would be covered 23/7 as needed, etc.

Nobody is denying there is room for improvement, but it is the best option available and we will make it even better.

---

Kieron, CONCORD is the embodiment of abuse. They blow the guy who blew up the newbie after newbie clicks "Terminate" and cancels account, and then allows for insurance to be paid to the pewpew-guy.

In RL, such a police force would have been disbanded, let alone burnt to the ground.

Whilst I'm not against suicide ganking, I am against actions that detract from new players learning the game at their pace and not get blown up 5 seconds out the station (yes, I've taken the liberty of testing this in an empty hauler. Suicided right at the next gate).

I'm all for removing insurance when CONCORDed. It should have been done months ago

---

Originally by: Kazuma Saruwatari

---

Originally by: CCP kieron

---

While this is an interesting idea, it is simply not feasible for Empire space. Player assumption of law enforcement responsibilities can and eventually will be abused, not all systems would be covered 23/7 as needed, etc.

Nobody is denying there is room for improvement, but it is the best option available and we will make it even better.

---

Kieron, CONCORD is the embodiment of abuse. They blow the guy who blew up the newbie after newbie clicks "Terminate" and cancels account, and then allows for insurance to be paid to the pewpew-guy.

In RL, such a police force would have been disbanded, let alone burnt to the ground.

Whilst I'm not against suicide ganking, I am against actions that detract from new players learning the game at their pace and not get blown up 5 seconds out the station (yes, I've taken the liberty of testing this in an empty hauler. Suicided right at the next gate).

I'm all for removing insurance when CONCORDed. It should have been done months ago

---