| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Kwint Sommer
Incoherent Inc
Otaku Invasion
   |
Posted - 2007.10.23 08:52:00 -
[1]
Signed
Sig removed. Please keep sigs to 400x120 pixels and 24000 bytes in size or less. -Kaemonn |
Kwint Sommer
Incoherent Inc
Otaku Invasion
|
Posted - 2007.10.29 04:15:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Naviset
Please lock this thread. Flogging the dead horse? Read the devblogs.. not nerfed yet. Complain later when they announce something.
Do you understand why topics are locked? Either because they're inappropriate, duplicates or out of date. This certainly isn't the first two and since they still plan to change carriers it's still quite relevant. If we don't complaint now they will change them and use our silence to call it a "reasonable compromise." Thanks to the continuation of this thread they'll have to either acknowledge their players or admit that they don't care what the community thinks.
Sig removed. Please keep sigs to 400x120 pixels and 24000 bytes in size or less. -Kaemonn |
Kwint Sommer
Incoherent Inc
Otaku Invasion
|
Posted - 2007.11.04 20:02:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Arlenna Molatov
Gee, look at all these posts made by characters in noob corps less than 3 months old. Makes ya wonder how many ACTUAL players are here posting and how many alts just to inflate the numbers.
......
I'll admit to signing a second time but with my fully trained year-old "alt" representing my second account. I would bet that among these 63 pages are at least 800 distinct people and at least 1400 paying accounts representing almost the entire capital ship community which is to say a very large portion of the veteran players and while the veteran players may represent a small percentage of the community, ignoring their collective pleas to not make drastic game changes requires a level of stupidity and arrogance not seen since SOE shot themselves in the foot.
Sig removed. Please keep sigs to 400x120 pixels and 24000 bytes in size or less. -Kaemonn |
Kwint Sommer
Incoherent Inc
Otaku Invasion
|
Posted - 2007.11.28 07:24:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Nyack
not signed! carriers needs a good nerfing.. they deploy far to fast and can hit smaller ships to good without support.. i want to be able to use BS in 0,0 again.. no way people will use t2 bs when a carrier can own a whole fleet of them and carriers gets insurance payout.. im jsut tired of people dropping 5 moms on a 15man destroyer gang..
(and ooh i got a carrier myself and alt char skilled with most carrier skill at lvl 5, prolly 1+year in skilling)
Buying a character that can fly a carrier hardly supports your argument and claiming that a carrier can "own a whole fleet" of T2 BS's goes a long way towards discrediting you. Also, why shouldn't 5 moms or 1 for that matter be able to demolish a "15man destroyer gang?" Should 15 noob ships -once bubbled- be able to survive a super capital? Do you know what you're talking about? Is there really any answer save a chorus of No's?
6 months ago I would have agreed that specializing carriers such that they're no longer such jack-of-all-trades is good for EVE. Now all I can say is that the dev's don't play their own game and that if they thought Zulupark's ideas were wise they shouldn't be let anywhere near carriers. Hence, signed.
___________________________________________
5% Mining Implants & 5% Manufacturing Implants *From 110M to 150M |
| |
|