EVE Search - Why the Carrier Nerf?

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Why the Carrier Nerf?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Wolfgang Jager Caldari Caldari Independent Navy Reserve	Posted - 2007.10.23 22:23:00 - [1] Edited by: Wolfgang Jager on 23/10/2007 22:26:21 Seriously wtf is CCP thinking here? I spent MONTHs of training and billions of ISK to fit out and fly a combat ship, not a goddamn glorified logistics cruiser. What is the issue soo broken that they have to basically remove any reason to be flying one of these? I'm not normally one for hysterics, but this is ridiculous. If this nerf goes live and given the way they keep pushing any significant content back I may be done. Stop screwing with game mechanics that work and make some progress on faction war already. PS IF you don't like it or don't agree with me, don't friggin read it - no one is making you. Like it or not, flooding the damn forums with complaints seems to be about the only thing CCP listens to these days.
Insidi Us Amarr Suicidal Mercenaries Pure.	Posted - 2007.10.23 22:24:00 - [2] This is a new idea, and I am glad to be the first person to read such an original post. -------------
NOK NOK Bounteous Immortals TALIONIS ALLIANCE	Posted - 2007.10.23 22:26:00 - [3] simple - they nerf carriers im leaving.. and i want a refund of all the money i spent on my character training for carrier.. as when i started training it and being able to fly one.. it was what i wanted 15 fighters or drones in combat.. now this is being changed, and not what i signed up for so give me my money back.. CEO of Bounteous Immortals Talionis Alliance Bounteous we are, Immortal you are not....
Lord Eremet	Posted - 2007.10.23 23:45:00 - [4] Because CCP sucks at coding and they figured the only thing they could do to improve the lag in game was to **** off half the playerbase so much that they leave. If this change goes through then we know this game is going down the same path like that of Star Wars Galactic and it will most likely be dead within 2 years time. But I won't stay to see that happen. I will leave when I feel I have no fun any more, unfortunately that day will be much closer if they nerf carriers. //Erem
Castar Twisted Attitude Executive Outcomes	Posted - 2007.10.24 08:27:00 - [5] Originally by: Lord Eremet If this change goes through then we know this game is going down the same path like that of Star Wars Galactic and it will most likely be dead within 2 years time. No, if they make everyone able to go for capitals from week one, that's when this game will do a good ol' SWG on us. Any nerf towards the annoyingly overabundant capitals atm is a good thing imho. 'Cause I don't have one and I feel inferior in every fleet battle sniffle - Fluffy Wuffy Bunny > Die, pig. * Fluffy Wuffy Bunny utterly destroys you in a bunnylike fashion. Fluffy Wuffy Bunny > Victory is mine!
CrusaderXENO Gallente The Holy Hand Grenades of Antioch	Posted - 2007.10.26 19:19:00 - [6] Edited by: CrusaderXENO on 26/10/2007 19:22:43 Edited by: CrusaderXENO on 26/10/2007 19:20:17 I see the carrier pilots life getting really boring if they cant do a job themselves. Noobs should stop whining about getting blown up by carriers and learn how to play the game and join people who have capitals or just stay in empire forever. I was training for a carrier and now i see this as a total waste of my drone skills and will probably ask for a refund. Several friends of mine have been training carrier 5 and will want refunds. 100% of the capital pilots that I have spoken to have said the same thing. So in my opinion, CCP will have trouble keeping its older members because this is punishing them for playing so long and new characters are losing the incentive to train for such ships. CCP might as well just remove the carrier and motherships from the game if they proposed this after listening to 10 noobs cry and not see 10,000 capital pilots get mad about it. The best fix is to just let the game play itself out and make people learn of the resources in the game to combat 5+ fighters. Its called interceptors and smart bombs people put one on your ship if you are going into a capital engagement. So should i start my long training again for a dread instead or are ya gonna nerf that too. Next we will see that ships cant fit smartbombs to counter act poor lone carriers, because the carrier pilots left, cant spit out enough drones to kill people. Get a clue people, the counters are already in the game!!!
Sokratesz Paradox v2.0	Posted - 2007.10.26 19:20:00 - [7] That.
Mag's MASS Ministry Of Amarrian Secret Service	Posted - 2007.10.26 19:21:00 - [8] Jeez, enough already. Mag's
Arvald Caldari House of Tempers	Posted - 2007.10.26 19:36:00 - [9] Originally by: Wolfgang Jager Edited by: Wolfgang Jager on 23/10/2007 22:26:21 Seriously wtf is CCP thinking here? I spent MONTHs of training and billions of ISK to fit out and fly a combat ship, not a goddamn glorified logistics cruiser. What is the issue soo broken that they have to basically remove any reason to be flying one of these? I'm not normally one for hysterics, but this is ridiculous. If this nerf goes live and given the way they keep pushing any significant content back I may be done. Stop screwing with game mechanics that work and make some progress on faction war already. PS IF you don't like it or don't agree with me, don't friggin read it - no one is making you. Like it or not, flooding the damn forums with complaints seems to be about the only thing CCP listens to these days. ........kan ah haz u stuffz --------------------------- Im in your forums derailing your threads
Arvald Caldari House of Tempers	Posted - 2007.10.26 19:37:00 - [10] Originally by: NOK NOK simple - they nerf carriers im leaving.. and i want a refund of all the money i spent on my character training for carrier.. as when i started training it and being able to fly one.. it was what i wanted 15 fighters or drones in combat.. now this is being changed, and not what i signed up for so give me my money back.. kan i haz u stuffz toooooo --------------------------- Im in your forums derailing your threads
Arvald Caldari House of Tempers	Posted - 2007.10.26 19:37:00 - [11] Originally by: Lord Eremet Because CCP sucks at coding and they figured the only thing they could do to improve the lag in game was to **** off half the playerbase so much that they leave. If this change goes through then we know this game is going down the same path like that of Star Wars Galactic and it will most likely be dead within 2 years time. But I won't stay to see that happen. I will leave when I feel I have no fun any more, unfortunately that day will be much closer if they nerf carriers. //Erem see my 2 above posts --------------------------- Im in your forums derailing your threads
Arvald Caldari House of Tempers	Posted - 2007.10.26 19:38:00 - [12] Originally by: Sokratesz That. seconded --------------------------- Im in your forums derailing your threads
Akat Slacker Industries Exuro Mortis	Posted - 2007.10.26 20:25:00 - [13] Although I don't agree that a carrier/MS should be resricted to using ony 5 "normal" drones, I have no issue in restricting carriers to "control" only 5 fighters at a time. Assigning fighters doesn't take that long, jesus. Carriers were intendned to provide support to and to be supported by a gang. They were never meant to act as a substitute for a gang.

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.