| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Kerfira
   |
Posted - 2007.10.26 12:40:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Kerfira on 26/10/2007 12:40:38
For those of you who might not regularly read the Game Dev. forum, here's a link for this, and a link for the discussion on Scrapheap Challenge.
This nerf is live on the test server, and is quite simple. You're no longer allowed to put ships containing any cargo into the ship maintenance bay of a carrier.
Now, I suppose this COULD (if you're really twisted...) make sense for industrial ships, but it also makes carrying replacement combat ships a big hazzle as you can no longer put ammo/etc. in their holds.
I suppose CCP wants us to use the jump freighters instead, but they have a LOT of obvious restrictions:
1. Low range
2. Stupid cost (saw an estimate of 8 billion ISK in the SH thread)
3. Requires Freighter 5 (as of last info)
4. Making ONE alledgedly requires a BPC copy which takes 1 month to make (from the SH thread).
5. They ain't there yet!
Lots of other problems with this lined up. Read the threads quoted for more.
 Originally by: CCP Wrangler
EVE isn't designed to just look like a cold, dark and harsh world, it's designed to be a cold, dark and harsh world.
|
Galactic reporter
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2007.10.26 12:43:00 -
[2]
I really dont get this nerf? They nerf carriers but still you can Jump Bridge freighters full of ships and mods all over 0.0 safely...
PEITION AGAINST THE CARRIER/MOTHERSHIP NERF!
|
Kuolematon
Space Perverts and Forum Warriors United
Cult of War
|
Posted - 2007.10.26 12:49:00 -
[3]
Oh dear god! When will this madness stop!? Oh wait .. I know! THIS IS EVE! 
It's great being Amarr isn't it.
|
Jehuty Vanricadia
Black Nova Corp
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.10.26 12:49:00 -
[4]
Interesting can someone calarify if this is just carriers ship maint. or all ships with a ship maint. array?
I personally carry more fuel around in a hauler in my mothership for when I run out... It seems rather stupid to stop any cargo being put in unless they increase the corp hangar.
One of the great things about motherships since the dictor bubble changes has been the logistics of them, being able to transport ammo, modules etc to the front lines; the corp hangar is simply too small to do this half of the time. If this goes through then they will be sitting at the pos watching and waiting, I really dont see any reason behind this change.
|
Macro Slasher
|
Posted - 2007.10.26 12:54:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Jehuty Vanricadia
Interesting can someone calarify if this is just carriers ship maint. or all ships with a ship maint. array?
I personally carry more fuel around in a hauler in my mothership for when I run out... It seems rather stupid to stop any cargo being put in unless they increase the corp hangar.
One of the great things about motherships since the dictor bubble changes has been the logistics of them, being able to transport ammo, modules etc to the front lines; the corp hangar is simply too small to do this half of the time. If this goes through then they will be sitting at the pos watching and waiting, I really dont see any reason behind this change.
Perhaps you could use some other ships... Should as well
|
TerrorWOLF
PURE Legion
Pure.
|
Posted - 2007.10.26 13:00:00 -
[6]
Carrirer on SiSi at the moment have 1.000.000 m3 ship maintenance bay capacity and still the same 10.000 m3 corporate hangar capacity
May Your Death Be Slow And Painful
|
Kuolematon
Space Perverts and Forum Warriors United
Cult of War
|
Posted - 2007.10.26 13:08:00 -
[7]
They will make you fit ship array module to enable ship transportation. So you have to choose eighter transport carrier or battle carrier.. not too bad thou. But to disable cargo spaces of ships inside your maintance array.. oh dear. Why?? 
It's great being Amarr isn't it.
|
Shinhan
Phoenix Knights
Dark Nebula Galactic Empire
|
Posted - 2007.10.26 13:25:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Macro Slasher
Perhaps you could use some other ships... Should as well
Like the Jump Freighter? The one that will cost 6 times more than a carrier and will require Freighter skill level 5? 
--
Selling apples, 1 signature each.
ѼѼѼѼѼѼѼ |
Jehuty Vanricadia
Black Nova Corp
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.10.26 13:33:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Macro Slasher
Originally by: Jehuty Vanricadia
Interesting can someone calarify if this is just carriers ship maint. or all ships with a ship maint. array?
I personally carry more fuel around in a hauler in my mothership for when I run out... It seems rather stupid to stop any cargo being put in unless they increase the corp hangar.
One of the great things about motherships since the dictor bubble changes has been the logistics of them, being able to transport ammo, modules etc to the front lines; the corp hangar is simply too small to do this half of the time. If this goes through then they will be sitting at the pos watching and waiting, I really dont see any reason behind this change.
Perhaps you could use some other ships... Should as well
Yes, I am sorry I forgot I spent 40b buying and kitting out my ship. Due to the state of the servers I cannot use it effectively in fleet combat. If this change goes through I will have a worthless ship with nice mods... Maybe its time to camp low sec, thats what ccp seems to want us ms pilots to do.
|
Brianna Talnor
|
Posted - 2007.10.26 13:33:00 -
[10]
You can fit modules to "un-nerf" this nerf fools.
Calm down.
|
Kerfira
|
Posted - 2007.10.26 13:39:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Brianna Talnor
You can fit modules to "un-nerf" this nerf fools.
Calm down.
Is that so? Show us those modules please.....
Originally by: CCP Wrangler
EVE isn't designed to just look like a cold, dark and harsh world, it's designed to be a cold, dark and harsh world.
|
|
CCP Wrangler
|
Posted - 2007.10.26 13:43:00 -
[12]
There's already a discussion on this in the sticky thread in EIP forum, please continue discussing there. 
Wrangler
Community Manager
EVE Online, CCP Games
Email/Netfang
"The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it." |
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |