EVE Search - recent game changes and previously announced changes to come soon

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

recent game changes and previously announced changes to come soon

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
SiJira	Posted - 2007.10.27 21:38:00 - [1] Edited by: SiJira on 27/10/2007 21:39:09 they are for the better part of the game the carrier change will reduce lag and balance carriers along with the hauling change currently in the test server amarr doesnt need a boost - instead all the overpowered ships of every other race are systematically being adjusted - the recent drone bandwidth change is good jump freighters that are coming will be taking over the role that has been run by carriers for too long the new t2 ships coming out are going to give us some creative choices heavy interdictors? i cant stop drooling blackops that can jump gates and jumpdrive while being able to bring other ships that have the right skills trained? oh yeea whiners unite! collectively cancel your accounts and leave this game because CCP does not listen to you CCP is balancing the game the way its meant to be ____ __ ________ _sig below_ devs and gms cant modify my sig if they tried! _lies above_ CCP Morpheus was here Morpheus Fails. You need colors!! -Kaemonn [yellow]Kaem
SiJira	Posted - 2007.10.27 21:39:00 - [2] reserved* ____ __ ________ _sig below_ devs and gms cant modify my sig if they tried! _lies above_ CCP Morpheus was here Morpheus Fails. You need colors!! -Kaemonn [yellow]Kaem
Clan MacGregor Gallente Army of the 12 Monkeys	Posted - 2007.10.27 21:41:00 - [3] Post with your main.... Silly Dev'
LemonHamster	Posted - 2007.10.27 21:47:00 - [4] You are the worst ***** poster and you have no clue how game mechanics work. What's more, you still haven't stopped trying to suck the devs*** in the vain hope they will acknowledge your existence. Decist immediately. _____________ NYAH ^_^
Fswd	Posted - 2007.10.27 21:50:00 - [5] So far he is right, look what happens when you try to take a 3yo's toy away. Sorry to say it, but your behavior is the same. ---
SiJira	Posted - 2007.10.27 21:51:00 - [6] Originally by: LemonHamster You are the worst ***** poster and you have no clue how game mechanics work. What's more, you still haven't stopped trying to suck the devs*** in the vain hope they will acknowledge your existence. Decist immediately. u mad? ____ __ ________ _sig below_ devs and gms cant modify my sig if they tried! _lies above_ CCP Morpheus was here Morpheus Fails. You need colors!! -Kaemonn [yellow]Kaem
SiJira	Posted - 2007.10.27 22:25:00 - [7] Originally by: Fswd So far he is right, look what happens when you try to take a 3yo's toy away. Sorry to say it, but your behavior is the same. i can only say truth ____ __ ________ _sig below_ devs and gms cant modify my sig if they tried! _lies above_ CCP Morpheus was here Morpheus Fails. You need colors!! -Kaemonn [yellow]Kaem
SiJira	Posted - 2007.10.28 00:25:00 - [8] stop whining kids ____ __ ________ _sig below_ devs and gms cant modify my sig if they tried! _lies above_ CCP Morpheus was here Morpheus Fails. You need colors!! -Kaemonn [yellow]Kaem
Jojo Yohan Gallente Cskillzone DAMAGE INC...	Posted - 2007.10.28 00:30:00 - [9] Originally by: SiJira they are for the better part of the game the carrier change will reduce lag and balance carriers along with the hauling change currently in the test server I can't tell if your trying to be sarcastic or not. I'm not sure who told you that the carrier changes will reduce lag because thats the biggest bull**** i've heard in a while. Its going to encourage larger "support fleets" (AKA "blobs") in order to command the fighters and protect the now gimped carrier. Should my ally need a new ship I'll spit out a nice one without ammo. Won't it be marvelous?
SiJira	Posted - 2007.10.28 00:57:00 - [10] Originally by: Jojo Yohan Originally by: SiJira they are for the better part of the game the carrier change will reduce lag and balance carriers along with the hauling change currently in the test server I can't tell if your trying to be sarcastic or not. I'm not sure who told you that the carrier changes will reduce lag because thats the biggest bull**** i've heard in a while. Its going to encourage larger "support fleets" (AKA "blobs") in order to command the fighters and protect the now gimped carrier. Should my ally need a new ship I'll spit out a nice one without ammo. Won't it be marvelous? so hell have to get the ammo before he shoots omg thats so hard any instance where i would call a group of ships a blob wont magically increase in number because of this change any small gang that turns from 3 to 8 is fine because this is a team game ____ __ ________ _sig below_ devs and gms cant modify my sig if they tried! _lies above_ CCP Morpheus was here Morpheus Fails. You need colors!! -Kaemonn [yellow]Kaem

SiJira	Posted - 2007.10.31 01:42:00 - [11] Originally by: LemonHamster You are the worst ***** poster and you have no clue how game mechanics work. What's more, you still haven't stopped trying to suck the devs*** in the vain hope they will acknowledge your existence. Decist immediately. teach us grandmaster ____ __ ________ _sig below_ devs and gms cant modify my sig if they tried! _lies above_ CCP Morpheus was here Morpheus Fails. You need colors!! -Kaemonn [yellow]Kaem
Kokob	Posted - 2007.10.31 01:47:00 - [12] I can't wait for the jump frieghters... sadly looks like the rorqual has been given a boost making it a much cheaper alternative. with rigs and expanders it can almost carry as much as the jump freighters at a much smaller cost.
SiJira	Posted - 2007.10.31 01:55:00 - [13] Originally by: Kokob I can't wait for the jump frieghters... sadly looks like the rorqual has been given a boost making it a much cheaper alternative. with rigs and expanders it can almost carry as much as the jump freighters at a much smaller cost. that is not what it is made for trust in the t2 freighter ____ __ ________ _sig below_ devs and gms cant modify my sig if they tried! _lies above_ CCP Morpheus was here Morpheus Fails. You need colors!! -Kaemonn [yellow]Kaem
MotherMoon Huang Yinglong Namtz'aar k'in	Posted - 2007.10.31 01:57:00 - [14] SiJira is a long time poster and player of eve. I love how someone called you an alt :P ----------------------------------- I'm working my way through college target CCP need...more room...
SiJira	Posted - 2007.10.31 02:04:00 - [15] Originally by: MotherMoon SiJira is a long time poster and player of eve. I love how someone called you an alt :P i have an alt that has 3 capital letters in it ____ __ ________ _sig below_ devs and gms cant modify my sig if they tried! _lies above_ CCP Morpheus was here Morpheus Fails. You need colors!! -Kaemonn [yellow]Kaem
Xiong Yoshi	Posted - 2007.10.31 02:10:00 - [16] Edited by: Xiong Yoshi on 31/10/2007 02:11:31 Just to say - it isn't the EOS or Myrm that are being nerfed. Most of the posters on this board have failed to realize that the ships are not getting nerfed: or well, maybe they are - but that might not be a bad thing if it brings balance to the game... The issue is really that Drones are getting nerfed. Prior to Bandwidth - players could reasonably expect to be able to use drones as a primary weapon... and there would be plenty of ships to choose from to support this play style, but as ships such as the EOS and Myrm get their options reduced - it isn't the ships that really get hurt, it is the players wanting to use Drones as the Primary weapon. Drones are different because they use Memory as the primary attribute. If someone were to train up rails - and then rails became less feasible as a primary weapon, the player could use the same attributes to train up lasers, or missiles, or other ships... But a player who specialized in Memory - is stuck with a high attribute that doesn't reallly lend itself to crosstraining. Ask all the 1 year old players who chose to maximize their Perception how they would feel if ship training became based off of Memory instead of Perception? That is how it feels to me - the primary weapons system has changed it's primary attribute from Memory (which I have a base 14 of) to Perception (which I have a base 5 of).. If CCP had wanted to balance the Myrm and the EOS - they would have dropped the number of turret hardpoints to reduce the Maximum DPS for the ships. simple. But instead they go after the Drone aspect. Don't get me wrong, I immediately switched from Myrm to harbinger; and am loving my new ship.. but I know that in the long run - my character will lag behind, and the long training times which I face by training guns will just lag the game play down for me. So, I'm loving the game right now - but have no plans to start a new character (as grinding the first 5mil SPs sux), and know that my current character is going to be gimped by the way CCP decided to nerf an attribute which I happened to choose as my primary.
Devious Syn	Posted - 2007.10.31 02:16:00 - [17] Just curious, what about the heavy dictors makes you drool? since the moment they do what they are suppose to they will get dropped.
SiJira	Posted - 2007.10.31 02:19:00 - [18] Originally by: Devious Syn Just curious, what about the heavy dictors makes you drool? since the moment they do what they are suppose to they will get dropped. good luck with that then ____ __ ________ _sig below_ devs and gms cant modify my sig if they tried! _lies above_ CCP Morpheus was here Morpheus Fails. You need colors!! -Kaemonn [yellow]Kaem
Devious Syn	Posted - 2007.10.31 02:22:00 - [19] Originally by: SiJira Originally by: Devious Syn Just curious, what about the heavy dictors makes you drool? since the moment they do what they are suppose to they will get dropped. good luck with that then Hmm... I'm honestly curious what makes ya say that... seriously, from what I read their resist arent all that, once they drop a bubble they cant be repped, and their speed goes to shat... so what am I missin that make them so tough to *****? (once they have done what they are suppose to do.... drop a bubble)
Stuart Price Caldari Havoc Inc	Posted - 2007.10.31 03:49:00 - [20] Because they're as hard to kill as a bloody drake. "I got soul but I'm not a soldier"

Vherokan	Posted - 2007.10.31 04:00:00 - [21] Originally by: MotherMoon SiJira is a long time poster and player of eve. I love how someone called you an alt :P Also a long time moron.
Moridin920 Gallente Capital One	Posted - 2007.10.31 04:43:00 - [22] Originally by: LemonHamster You are the worst ***** poster and you have no clue how game mechanics work. What's more, you still haven't stopped trying to suck the devs*** in the vain hope they will acknowledge your existence. Decist immediately. Why don't you explain why you think game mechanics will be screwed up? Or you can just flame. I can play that game, too. You spelled 'desist' wrong. Terribly wrong. Also, your grammer in your second to last sentence is terrible. Isn't flaming fun? =/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience our piracy may have caused you, but, we are pirates and, sadly, this is our way."
Devian 666 Igneus Auctorita GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.31 04:57:00 - [23] Originally by: SiJira whiners unite! collectively cancel your accounts and leave this game because CCP does not listen to you CCP is balancing the game the way its meant to be You have it there. CCP balance the game by ignoring the players. Though past history shows that excessive whining actually results in changes. Though the carrier nerf (which was only a discussion idea) was ill-considered and would not result in the reduction of lag, only the increase of frustration of flying a carrier. Overall the proposed nerfing of ships to bring everyone down to the amarr level will only encourage more blobbing. For a long time players have complained that their should be an edge for intelligent players so that they can engage large numbers of people and not need a counter blob. The heavy interdictor appears to be a multi-racial way of countering nano gangs assuming the webbing component is left in. The black ops bs is ok but won't be practical to use until the prices come down. The only significantly interesting addition is the t2 ewar frigs which I've waited for a long time. The rest of it doesn't interest me. Quote: "... I doubt they would have the skillpoints and cap fleet to take and make soverignty over a large established alliance like BoB."
Devian 666 Igneus Auctorita GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.31 04:59:00 - [24] Originally by: Moridin920 Originally by: LemonHamster You are the worst ***** poster and you have no clue how game mechanics work. What's more, you still haven't stopped trying to suck the devs* in the vain hope they will acknowledge your existence. Decist immediately. Why don't you explain why you think game mechanics will be screwed up? Or you can just flame. I can play that game, too. You spelled 'desist' wrong. Terribly wrong. Also, your grammer in your second to last sentence is terrible. Isn't flaming fun? =/ It appears that you're picking on someone's grammar because they have a different opinion to you. Why don't you pick on the OP who doesn't use capital letters at the start of sentances? Quote:** "... I doubt they would have the skillpoints and cap fleet to take and make soverignty over a large established alliance like BoB."
NerfBat Wack Gallente	Posted - 2007.10.31 05:26:00 - [25] NERF YOUR FACE, You don't know what's good for you! WHACK! Notify: you have been smacked by the nerf bat, you are now yet another worthless eve relic.
Kuolematon Space Perverts and Forum Warriors United Cult of War	Posted - 2007.10.31 05:29:00 - [26] I wonder if CCP had meetings like this while deciding what to nerf .. It's great being Amarr isn't it.
SiJira	Posted - 2007.10.31 19:15:00 - [27] Originally by: Devian 666 Originally by: SiJira whiners unite! collectively cancel your accounts and leave this game because CCP does not listen to you CCP is balancing the game the way its meant to be You have it there. CCP balance the game by ignoring the players. Though past history shows that excessive whining actually results in changes. wrong past history shows that what is overpowered gets nerfed what is not overpowered will not be nerfed no matter how many whines there are ____ __ ________ _sig below_ devs and gms cant modify my sig if they tried! _lies above_ CCP Morpheus was here Morpheus Fails. You need colors!! -Kaemonn [yellow]Kaem
Enve'la	Posted - 2007.10.31 19:51:00 - [28] Originally by: SiJira wrong past history shows that what is overpowered gets nerfed what is not overpowered will not be nerfed no matter how many whines there are Oh really troll? NOS and drones, while overpowered on specific ships(Dominix, Myrmidon), were not overpowered but essential on the majority of Amarr ships, which relied heavily on both to deal a respectable level of damage. Both were nerfs to these ships that were not overpowered.
SiJira	Posted - 2007.10.31 20:38:00 - [29] Originally by: Enve'la Originally by: SiJira wrong past history shows that what is overpowered gets nerfed what is not overpowered will not be nerfed no matter how many whines there are Oh really troll? NOS and drones, while overpowered on specific ships(Dominix, Myrmidon), were not overpowered but essential on the majority of Amarr ships, which relied heavily on both to deal a respectable level of damage. Both were nerfs to these ships that were not overpowered. only to those who dont actually fly them themselves and take others word for it woot ____ __ ________ _sig below_ devs and gms cant modify my sig if they tried! _lies above_ CCP Morpheus was here Morpheus Fails. You need colors!! -Kaemonn [yellow]Kaem
Sheriff Jones Amarr Please Enter Password	Posted - 2007.10.31 20:51:00 - [30] Aaaaah...waves hand at thread I dun care, where's my glass o whiskey? looks around takes a sip leans back What else is new? My opinions represent the opinions of my corporation completely. I'm the CEO damnit.



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.