Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Mister Kwong
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 08:46:00 -
[1] - Quote
I always thought it weird that the Ishtar (and Vexor) used small blasters. You would think that an Ishtar should use medium blasters. But the majority of the popular pvp fits on Battleclinic says otherwise. Why not use medium blasters? |

Roime
UNFRL Fleet Operations CONSORTIUM UNIVERSALIS
140
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 08:48:00 -
[2] - Quote
Battleclinic fits are bad.
Use medium blasters and fly for the win.
(they are hard to fit due to the pitiful CPU of Ishtar, that is all, you will need fitting mods/implants)
|

Wacktopia
Noir.
149
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 09:43:00 -
[3] - Quote
It's just not worth the fit-gimping you need to do in order to get the medium guns on there in most cases. Apparently we're getting censored now. |

Dorian Tormak
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
48
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 15:14:00 -
[4] - Quote
Roime wrote:Battleclinic fits are bad.
Use medium blasters and fly for the win.
(they are hard to fit due to the pitiful CPU of Ishtar, that is all, you will need fitting mods/implants)
Typical Eve forum moron reply.
Guess what, they have a rating system. The good fits tend to be rated pretty high.
And fitting medium blasters on an Ishtar is pretty stupid. Looks like you're the one whose fits suck. > Security Status: -9.93 > Threat Level: Mediocre Welcome to Eve, where asking a legitimate question recieves trollish comments like "trololol" or "m8". But our community is still better than WoW. Go back 2 WoW noob. |

mama guru
Evolution
23
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 15:40:00 -
[5] - Quote
Dorian Tormak wrote:Roime wrote:Battleclinic fits are bad.
Use medium blasters and fly for the win.
(they are hard to fit due to the pitiful CPU of Ishtar, that is all, you will need fitting mods/implants) Typical Eve forum moron reply. Guess what, they have a rating system. The good fits tend to be rated pretty high. And fitting medium blasters on an Ishtar is pretty stupid. Looks like you're the one whose fits suck.
Just because they have some silly +1 rep system does not mean the people posting those fits or the ones rating them know what they are talking about.
But yes, the ishtar has only 3 turrets, low powergrid and cpu coupled with a meagre 5% damage per level to medium hybrid turrets which makes it a waste of time. Only reason to put medium hybrids on an Ishtar is for ratting with some armor tanked setups. ______
EVE online is the fishermans friend of MMO's. If it's to hard you are to weak. |

Roime
UNFRL Fleet Operations CONSORTIUM UNIVERSALIS
142
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 15:47:00 -
[6] - Quote
Dorian Tormak wrote:
Typical Eve forum moron reply.
Guess what, they have a rating system. The good fits tend to be rated pretty high.
And fitting medium blasters on an Ishtar is pretty stupid. Looks like you're the one whose fits suck.
Did I somehow hurt your feelings so much that you need to resort to insults?
The BC rating system and browsing fits by rating causes ratings to accumulate to the most rated fits. Fits with lots of ratings are old. Old in the case of Gallente means dated. Anyone can rate fits. And popularity is never an indicator of objective value of anything.
In a post-Crucible world, fitting blasters on any hybrid bonused hull is anything but stupid. They have best damage and tracking of all turrets. Range with Null is almost equal to ACs. Fitting is much easier than before (you can easily fit ions on the Ishtar), cap usage of medium hybrids is absolutely neglible and ammo switching is fast.
Fit rails if you want, that is a matter of preference and piloting style, but fitting anything but bonused guns on Gallente boats is imho stupid nowadays.
|

Aestivalis Saidrian
SplitPush Mercantiles
22
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 16:04:00 -
[7] - Quote
To be fair, Autos on a myrm is a better idea then hybrids. Course, it can also be shield tanked epically too. So that might be an indicator of how badly the myrm needs help. |

Ravenesa
The Bastards The Bastards.
2
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 16:37:00 -
[8] - Quote
Aestivalis Saidrian wrote:To be fair, Autos on a myrm is a better idea then hybrids. Course, it can also be shield tanked epically too. So that might be an indicator of how badly the myrm needs help.
The only love a Myrm needs is more drone bandwidth, it is not a gunship. That being said current Myrms can still spit out over 500DPS and active tank with MWD web and scram without much of a problem. Laser Myrms work nicely hitting the weakest shield resist in most cases. |

Mister Kwong
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 17:03:00 -
[9] - Quote
Roime wrote:Dorian Tormak wrote:
Typical Eve forum moron reply.
Guess what, they have a rating system. The good fits tend to be rated pretty high.
And fitting medium blasters on an Ishtar is pretty stupid. Looks like you're the one whose fits suck.
Did I somehow hurt your feelings so much that you need to resort to insults? The BC rating system and browsing fits by rating causes ratings to accumulate to the most rated fits. Fits with lots of ratings are old. Old in the case of Gallente means dated. Anyone can rate fits. And popularity is never an indicator of objective value of anything. In a post-Crucible world, fitting blasters on any hybrid bonused hull is anything but stupid. They have best damage and tracking of all turrets. Range with Null is almost equal to ACs. Fitting is much easier than before (you can easily fit ions on the Ishtar), cap usage of medium hybrids is absolutely neglible and ammo switching is fast. Fit rails if you want, that is a matter of preference and piloting style, but fitting anything but bonused guns on Gallente boats is imho stupid nowadays.
To be fair, your initial comments were too simple and generalistic in nature. But these comments offer more context into your reasoning. I do agree that alot of those fittings on BC are dated. It just seems weird that a "heavy assault" ship is using blasters typically reserved for a 'lighter' ship like frigates. That, and the CPU is crappy in order to find a decent Ishtar medium blaster setup. Heck, I'd be better off using a autocannon Munnin and kite. Not to mention the hull value is cheaper as well.
PS- Yes, I'm well aware everyone prefers the sniper Munnin but there's no reason the Auto Munnin can't work in certain situations |

Renarla
20
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 17:51:00 -
[10] - Quote
Actual reply:
The Ishtar and Vexor do not have enough Powergrid/CPU to properly fit medium hybrids without gimping the entire ship, |
|

shal ri
Zanzibar Land
6
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 17:53:00 -
[11] - Quote
Aestivalis Saidrian wrote:To be fair, Autos on a myrm is a better idea then hybrids. Course, it can also be shield tanked epically too. So that might be an indicator of how badly the myrm needs help.
all the myrm needs is more drones its fine other wise. as for the ishtar, i think meb blasters would gimp the tank too much for it to be useful since pvp in low sec is all about gettin in and out fast due to blobs. that kind of fit would just not work the ishtar would pop fast due to weak tank and plus the range limit of blasters means u need to be rather close to apply blaster dps. that puts u in the 'get ganked zone'
a buffer fit ishtar moves at about 1.1k plus about 13k armor. if its rep fit its does a nice bit better on the speed, just let the drones do all the work. |

Mister Kwong
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 20:03:00 -
[12] - Quote
shal ri wrote:Aestivalis Saidrian wrote:To be fair, Autos on a myrm is a better idea then hybrids. Course, it can also be shield tanked epically too. So that might be an indicator of how badly the myrm needs help. all the myrm needs is more drones its fine other wise. as for the ishtar, i think meb blasters would gimp the tank too much for it to be useful since pvp in low sec is all about gettin in and out fast due to blobs. that kind of fit would just not work the ishtar would pop fast due to weak tank and plus the range limit of blasters means u need to be rather close to apply blaster dps. that puts u in the 'get ganked zone' a buffer fit ishtar moves at about 1.1k plus about 13k armor. if its rep fit its does a nice bit better on the speed, just let the drones do all the work.
Bring along a Falcon, Lach, or Arazu. Situational dependent ofc |

Hungry Eyes
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
355
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 02:16:00 -
[13] - Quote
been flying the Ishtar for about 4 years, this is my opinion:
Ishtar is generally nonviable in the current pvp meta.
- AHAC gangs: you cant retrieve your dps if you need to gtfo; if going with heavies instead of sentries, it takes forever to start applying said dps; Deimos is a better AHAC
- medium range gangs: not enough EHP; a properly flown BC can shred an Ishtar
- nano gangs: not enough EHP, and cant apply dps fast enough; Blastos owns this role over any Gallente ship.
- small gang/solo: dual rep tars work only if you have insane resources such as booster alts, pills, multiboxed covops scout, and implants
with 75k EHP, 2km/s speed + heat, and 600 dps (pure explosive or EM), the nano Gila wipes the floor with any Ishtar setup.
to address OP: a blaster Tar would have a little less dps than a Brutix or a properly fit Myrm, and way less EHP. that in itself is enough to make the Tar nonviable. use it in PVE where it belongs until HACs regain their role.
Ravenesa wrote:
The only love a Myrm needs is more drone bandwidth, it is not a gunship. That being said current Myrms can still spit out over 500DPS and active tank with MWD web and scram without much of a problem. Laser Myrms work nicely hitting the weakest shield resist in most cases.
i actually dont care for the drone role. even if it could field 4-5 heavies/sentries. drones suck. 425mm AC's on a shield tanked Myrm with a 2/2/1 drone setup can spit out about 700 near-instant dps (pure explosive or EM) 0-30km, which puts to shame any other Myrm setup. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
706
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 02:51:00 -
[14] - Quote
Hungry Eyes wrote: with 75k EHP, 2km/s speed + heat, and 600 dps (pure explosive or EM), the nano Gila wipes the floor with any Ishtar setup.
IMO the Ishtar is superior because it has better agility (and generally mobility). Also, why is your Ishtar so slow?
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren PVP Videos:-áhttp://vimeo.com/user9887127 |

Ireland VonVicious
Gurista Saints Assassin Confederacy
17
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 03:04:00 -
[15] - Quote
Roime wrote:Battleclinic fits are bad.
Use medium blasters and fly for the win.
(they are hard to fit due to the pitiful CPU of Ishtar, that is all, you will need fitting mods/implants)
^^^^^ This! |

Hungry Eyes
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
355
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 03:16:00 -
[16] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Hungry Eyes wrote: with 75k EHP, 2km/s speed + heat, and 600 dps (pure explosive or EM), the nano Gila wipes the floor with any Ishtar setup.
IMO the Ishtar is superior because it has better agility (and generally mobility). Also, why is your Ishtar so slow? -Liang
who said my Ishtar was slow? it just doesnt have the EHP to be competitive. you should always assume you'll get caught because Cyns, SFI's, Vagas, tier 3's, AF's are all faster. once you're scrammed (or not), your 45k EHP will melt too quickly. this is less than a nano Cane. nano shield Tars get shredded by just about everything. agility makes absolutely no difference when half the ships in the game are significantly faster than you. and without sentry rigs on the Tar, Gila does more dps anyway.
and if youre gonna play with the big boys at close-medium range, you better have at least 60k+ EHP if youre gonna be doing less than 600dps. 60k EHP armor Tars are bricks, and vastly outperformed by the Deimos in the AHAC role.
to give one example, my Gila of 75k EHP was scrammed by a friggy, and neuted by a Typhoon. I was able to stay alive and score top damage on all kills as we melted down the Typhoon, a Cyclone, a Cane, 2 Brutixes, and 1 more Brutix which also popped me in the end. 75k EHP buys you time. oops sorry, with heat on the hardeners, thats 86k EHP |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
707
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 03:33:00 -
[17] - Quote
It seems to me that the problem is you're trying to fit SDAs and a tank instead of focusing on damage mitigation and avoidance. For instance, you say that the Blastos is great but its mobility is actually worse than the Ishtar while having an inferior tank. Yeah, you're going to lose Ishtars (and Blastos!) to **** like Cynabals and Machs but that's not what you should be engaging - and with a nano ship you will almost always have the choice of what to engage.
You commented earlier about losing drones, but thats always been a problem with drone ships. Sometimes people will shoot them... sometimes you'll leave them behind. Sometimes you can come back and get them... and sometimes you can't. Honestly it sounds to me like you simply don't dig drones... and that's ok.
/shrug
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Hungry Eyes
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
358
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 03:50:00 -
[18] - Quote
but my whole point is you cant project damage with a drone ship. therefore, you dont GET TO choose what to engage. i play my Gila as a brawler and get tons of kills that way because people love it when i commit, and go "oh shi.." when they notice how much EHP ive got. thats because im basically playing a Drake.
for example, the Blastos gets to choose what it engages because it can actually do scary DPS at 30-40km. you cant engage **** in an Ishtar because you cant project dps, and you cant tank; while many ships can actually apply their dps on you when you try to kite them. the truth is, all tier 3's can basically shred you apart as you try to mwd around them. avoidance/mitigation only works when your dps is instant, i.e. you have to do something back, or when you can actually sustain your "mitigation tank."
what you speak of makes sense if your target is scrammed by your buddy, and youre zipping around at a safe distance as your drones chew at the target, and nothing can reach you. these scenarios are just...not a part of my EVE world, and i pvp a lot. in fact, i flew my nano Sentar and Snipetar this way. admittedly, while not completely useless, theyre just highly situational. whereas the Gila is good in just about every sub-BS engagement. tier 3's killed the Sentar. before, i was only afraid of Rokh's and mega pulse Apocs. now everything can tear me a new one at 70-100km.
not trying to be condescending, but if you think that Ishtar > Gila based on some fictitious or highly situational engagement, then you just havent flown them, or havent flown the Gila. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
707
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 04:05:00 -
[19] - Quote
That's my point - the Ishtar can sustain its mitigation tank while simultaneously dealing damage. The real weakness you're going to face is small fast **** coming in at you - but even then you're much less defenseless than the tier 3s you keep going on about. I'm looking back at Amamake Fun II ( http://vimeo.com/35131824 ) and I can't help but think that the Ishtar would have been somewhere between equivalent and superior. Certainly good enough to fly at any rate.
-Liang
Ed: BTW, in response to your Gila > Ishtar assertion: No. The Gila is both slower, less agile, and has fewer lows than the Ishtar. It is therefore worse. Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Aridir
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 11:32:00 -
[20] - Quote
I don't even fit guns on my Ishtar and I've been flying them since 07. Use T2 sentries and keep a flight or 2 of lights or ECM drones in case you get tackled. Also, people who sign every ******* post they make are pubby morons. |
|

Sicex
35
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 12:41:00 -
[21] - Quote
Hungry Eyes wrote:been flying the Ishtar for about 4 years, this is my opinion: Ishtar is generally nonviable in the current pvp meta. - AHAC gangs: you cant retrieve your dps if you need to gtfo; if going with heavies instead of sentries, it takes forever to start applying said dps; Deimos is a better AHAC - medium range gangs: not enough EHP; a properly flown BC can shred an Ishtar - nano gangs: not enough EHP, and cant apply dps fast enough; Blastos owns this role over any Gallente ship. - small gang/solo: dual rep tars work only if you have insane resources such as booster alts, pills, multiboxed covops scout, and implants with 75k EHP, 2km/s speed + heat, and 600 dps (pure explosive or EM), the nano Gila wipes the floor with any Ishtar setup. to address OP: a blaster Tar would have a little less dps than a Brutix or a properly fit Myrm, and way less EHP. that in itself is enough to make the Tar nonviable. use it in PVE where it belongs until HACs regain their role. Ravenesa wrote:
The only love a Myrm needs is more drone bandwidth, it is not a gunship. That being said current Myrms can still spit out over 500DPS and active tank with MWD web and scram without much of a problem. Laser Myrms work nicely hitting the weakest shield resist in most cases.
i actually dont care for the drone role. even if it could field 4-5 heavies/sentries. drones suck. 425mm AC's on a shield tanked Myrm with a 2/2/1 drone setup can spit out about 700 near-instant dps (pure explosive or EM) 0-30km, which puts to shame any other Myrm setup.
It's quality posts like this that should win threads more often. Experience, advice and reflection. Take note noobs. |

Wacktopia
Noir.
151
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 08:17:00 -
[22] - Quote
Hungry Eyes wrote:for example, the Blastos gets to choose what it engages because it can actually do scary DPS at 30-40km. you cant engage **** in an Ishtar because you cant project dps, and you cant tank; while many ships can actually apply their dps on you when you try to kite them. the truth is, all tier 3's can basically shred you apart as you try to mwd around them. avoidance/mitigation only works when your dps is instant, i.e. you have to do something back, or when you can actually sustain your "mitigation tank."
what you speak of makes sense if your target is scrammed by your buddy, and youre zipping around at a safe distance as your drones chew at the target, and nothing can reach you. these scenarios are just...not a part of my EVE world, and i pvp a lot. in fact, i flew my nano Sentar and Snipetar this way. admittedly, while not completely useless, theyre just highly situational. whereas the Gila is good in just about every sub-BS engagement. tier 3's killed the Sentar. before, i was only afraid of Rokh's and mega pulse Apocs. now everything can tear me a new one at 70-100km.
not trying to be condescending, but if you think that Ishtar > Gila based on some fictitious or highly situational engagement, then you just havent flown them, or havent flown the Gila.
In open space the Gila is a better choice because of its sustained agility and tank - armortar is too sluggish and nano doesn't have the same tank.
On a gate or station you can stick multi webs, sebo etc that make Ishtar a good boat on its own in those places where the Gila would struggle to hold a target.
That's my experience of it and both are as situational as each other. Apparently we're getting censored now. |

Bibosikus
Inside out. The G0dfathers
35
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 12:51:00 -
[23] - Quote
I've always thought that CCP kind of 'tagged on' the med blaster bonus for the 'tar. All other HACs have 4 bonuses that complement each other.
With the 'tar, it seems CCP rightly decided to create a superb drone platform, then realised the ship was one bonus short. So they simply stuck on the 5% turret damage as a compromise. It clearly is at odds with the rest of the design.
Far better would be another drone-related bonus such as speed. Ogres travelling at the speed of Hammers would certainly make for some interesting fits. The box said "Requires Windows-á2000 or better", so I installed Linux. |

King Rothgar
Autocannons Anonymous
162
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 15:03:00 -
[24] - Quote
The ishtar is best used for kiting. It is in effect, a sniper HAC. Unlike the other sniper HACs it has some unique abilities as a drone boat but it's still best to keep your distance with it. If you want to go point blank and face melt someone, I suggest the navy vexor. It does 1000-ish dps with ions, 4x ogre II's and a pretty solid cruiser tank (37k EHP no implants or links). |

Batelle
HOMELE55
3
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 17:01:00 -
[25] - Quote
Roime wrote:Battleclinic fits are bad.
Use medium blasters and fly for the win.
they are hard to fit due to the pitiful CPU of Ishtar, that is all
This. However I still put medium blasters on my ishtars. |

Hungry Eyes
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
360
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 17:32:00 -
[26] - Quote
King Rothgar wrote:The ishtar is best used for kiting. It is in effect, a sniper HAC. Unlike the other sniper HACs it has some unique abilities as a drone boat but it's still best to keep your distance with it. If you want to go point blank and face melt someone, I suggest the navy vexor. It does 1000-ish dps with ions, 4x ogre II's and a pretty solid cruiser tank (37k EHP no implants or links).
yea, this is exactly how i flew my Sentar. either with a snipe setup from 100km, or a shield buffer + nano from about 70km. the issue today is that tier 3's do about 30-40% more dps at the same range, and are almost as fast. in general, tier 3's completely killed sniper HAC's, whatever was left of them, and i moved on from my Sentar. |

Degren
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 02:18:00 -
[27] - Quote
Sicex wrote:Hungry Eyes wrote:been flying the Ishtar for about 4 years, this is my opinion: /snip It's quality posts like this that should win threads more often. Experience, advice and reflection. Take note noobs.
Was thinking the exact same thing as I read it. Many props, Hungry Eyes, and thanks for the insight as I attempt to pick a ship to shoot for.
|

Wacktopia
Noir.
157
|
Posted - 2012.02.02 15:54:00 -
[28] - Quote
Degren wrote:Sicex wrote:Hungry Eyes wrote:been flying the Ishtar for about 4 years, this is my opinion: /snip It's quality posts like this that should win threads more often. Experience, advice and reflection. Take note noobs. Was thinking the exact same thing as I read it. Many props, Hungry Eyes, and thanks for the insight as I attempt to pick a ship to shoot for.
Hey the three of you might wanna get a room or something... just sayin' Apparently we're getting censored now. |

Firh
Duct Solutions
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.03 01:51:00 -
[29] - Quote
For most people HACs are too expensive to be flown as brawlers, i.e. in blaster range. This is the main issue, really. |

Mister Kwong
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.03 02:32:00 -
[30] - Quote
Yeah. Ishtar needs a buff then. More CPU for the medium blasters |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |