EVE Search - Mass of modules increased? or bug?

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Mass of modules increased? or bug?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Dexion Slayer Minmatar Perpetual Dawn	Posted - 2007.12.07 02:28:00 - [1] Ive searched for similar posts about this but am not sure its a "Feature" or a bug, one can rly never tell actually. So heres what ive found out Enegized adaptive nano membrane = 5m3 prepatch 100m3 after patch?? T2 = still 5m3 Armor hardeners prepatch = 5m3 now = 20m3? Large smartbombs pre patch = 50m3 now = 150m3? Not found anything about this yet. Its not in the patch notes either. Am sure there more modules that had their size increased but i cant be arsed to post them all.
Dirk Magnum FinFleet Band of Brothers	Posted - 2007.12.07 02:29:00 - [2] One of the medium lasers is also 100 now. I'm sure it's all unintentional.
Ed Anger Weekly World News	Posted - 2007.12.07 02:31:00 - [3] capitol modules were being increased, dont know about others
d1v1n1ty	Posted - 2007.12.07 02:32:00 - [4] Someone else posted that the response from a petition was that this is intentional....
Br0ke Visual I.D GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.12.07 02:34:00 - [5] Module's volume is now a better representation of the reprocess amount. ------ Follow the Left Hand Path
SnakeByte86	Posted - 2007.12.07 02:34:00 - [6] Yes, this was intentional, i remember reading about it on forums a month or so ago. Its to stop hauling modules, instead of minerals. Once again. CCP nerfs something that doesn't need nerfed. FRACK you ccp.
Arana Tellen Gallente The Blackguard Wolves Knights Of the Southerncross	Posted - 2007.12.07 02:36:00 - [7] Originally by: SnakeByte86 Yes, this was intentional, i remember reading about it on forums a month or so ago. Its to stop hauling modules, instead of minerals. Once again. CCP nerfs something that doesn't need nerfed. FRACK you ccp. It stops compression, an unintentional side effect. Can I have your stuffs? --------------------------------- Oh noes!
Xioden Acap Lightspeed Enterprises Burning Horizons	Posted - 2007.12.07 02:37:00 - [8] "The volume of a selection of tech 1 player manufactured modules has been increased by varying factors to take into account the materials used to manufacture them."
Kazuma Saruwatari	Posted - 2007.12.07 02:43:00 - [9] Originally by: Xioden Acap "The volume of a selection of tech 1 player manufactured modules has been increased by varying factors to take into account the materials used to manufacture them." ^ this. soon as this boot.ini fiasco's all over, this'll be the whine-FOTM... - Odd Pod Out, a blog of EVE Online
Dexion Slayer Minmatar Perpetual Dawn	Posted - 2007.12.07 02:59:00 - [10] Edited by: Dexion Slayer on 07/12/2007 03:00:39 I can honestly say tha tif its the case that CCP meant to make modules bigger to represent the ammount of minerals they contain they have FAILED EPICALY...yet again :) Watchy: Armor explosive hardener I: 11k trit 4k pye + random small ammounts of poo = 20m3 N-type kinetic hardener I: 30k Trit 20k Pye +random poo =5m3 FAIL ^^ Energized adaptive nano membrane I: 4.5k trit 3k pye 1k mex +a lil =100m3?<yeh right ccp needs to unerf their calculaters >>:) Voltaic Nanite Regenerative Membrane I : 8k trit 5k pye + a lil =5m3 ehh i think summin really went wrong cus if they trully intended to make the modules as big as the required mins..they not done a great job :) Edit: "The volume of a selection of tech 1 player manufactured modules has been increased by varying factors to take into account the materials used to manufacture them." Am sorry eheh had this post on hold for 30 mins so didnt read that, if thats the case then meh still think some module are unreasonably big for the mins they use :)
SnakeByte86	Posted - 2007.12.07 03:08:00 - [11] Originally by: Dexion Slayer Edited by: Dexion Slayer on 07/12/2007 03:00:39 I can honestly say tha tif its the case that CCP meant to make modules bigger to represent the ammount of minerals they contain they have FAILED EPICALY...yet again :) Watchy: Armor explosive hardener I: 11k trit 4k pye + random small ammounts of poo = 20m3 N-type kinetic hardener I: 30k Trit 20k Pye +random poo =5m3 FAIL ^^ Energized adaptive nano membrane I: 4.5k trit 3k pye 1k mex +a lil =100m3?<yeh right ccp needs to unerf their calculaters >>:) Voltaic Nanite Regenerative Membrane I : 8k trit 5k pye + a lil =5m3 ehh i think summin really went wrong cus if they trully intended to make the modules as big as the required mins..they not done a great job :) Edit: "The volume of a selection of tech 1 player manufactured modules has been increased by varying factors to take into account the materials used to manufacture them." Am sorry eheh had this post on hold for 30 mins so didnt read that, if thats the case then meh still think some module are unreasonably big for the mins they use :) it only effected t1 items, because you could build stuff, then ship it out, and refine, basicly compressing minerals. But this makes it now even harder for the small corps to have a chance. Almost every change ccp makes screws the small corps, and only benifits the rich corps/alliances
Dexion Slayer Minmatar Perpetual Dawn	Posted - 2007.12.07 03:16:00 - [12] Ah well it doenst bother me too much but i initially thought it was a bug..couldnt find it in patch notes but heh i hate CCP for it for having me put 2 mor cargo expanders on my salvage cane :) 2000m3 base + 400m3 from can= nice salvage ship :)
Lincoln Armm	Posted - 2007.12.07 03:30:00 - [13] If you thiink this hurts small corps more then big ones you are very much mistaken. Min compression is used mainly to ship large amounts of mins out to 0.0. Not exactly a small corp activity. This is not being done to "hurt" anyone its to increase transport costs. This makes local mining more valuable and also mitigates the 0.0 suck of minerals from high sec. This in turn should hurt isk farming operations. It also will mean in particular that high volume minerals (i.e. Trit) will be especially costly to ship.
SnakeByte86	Posted - 2007.12.07 04:09:00 - [14] Originally by: Lincoln Armm If you thiink this hurts small corps more then big ones you are very much mistaken. Min compression is used mainly to ship large amounts of mins out to 0.0. Not exactly a small corp activity. This is not being done to "hurt" anyone its to increase transport costs. This makes local mining more valuable and also mitigates the 0.0 suck of minerals from high sec. This in turn should hurt isk farming operations. It also will mean in particular that high volume minerals (i.e. Trit) will be especially costly to ship. I am a small corp in 0.0, and i used this. We cant bring a freighter, or 20 down when ever we want like big alliances can. We are very limited to when we can move and we cant. Obviously, you are mistake.
Lazuran Gallente Time And ISK Sink Corporation	Posted - 2007.12.07 04:20:00 - [15] It seems to be intentional and it sucks ... 150m¦ smartbombs, so much for looting missions... "...been designed for one purpose and one purpose only. Imagine a handful of repair drones pouring from the carebear's mouth. Now imagine they have um, nothing." -Unknown Hel redesigner (2007)
SnakeByte86	Posted - 2007.12.07 04:43:00 - [16] Originally by: Lazuran It seems to be intentional and it sucks ... 150m¦ smartbombs, so much for looting missions... Yeah its not so much the mineral compression that bugs me, as much as it is looting, and transporting supplies with haulers is going to be even harder. Or shipping a bunch of named loot to empire. Once again alliances win, small corps lose.
Neslo Gallente DarkStar 1	Posted - 2007.12.07 04:47:00 - [17] This is a feature and has been known for months. From Ashes to Ashes... From Dust to Dust....
Chainsaw Plankton IDLE GUNS	Posted - 2007.12.07 04:49:00 - [18] just making sure everyone needs a jump freighter to pick up loots at the end of the day
Draxus Axelrodd	Posted - 2007.12.07 05:07:00 - [19] This game sucks more and more with each stupid design stunt designed to hurt players. This totaly blows for those of us that rat and loot. Another EPIC FAILURE on the part of CCP.
SnakeByte86	Posted - 2007.12.07 05:08:00 - [20] Originally by: Draxus Axelrodd This game sucks more and more with each stupid design stunt designed to hurt players. This totaly blows for those of us that rat and loot. Another EPIC FAILURE on the part of CCP. QFT Its just another way to make people train for new skills, or alts, and make sure we keep paying our accounts. Shame on you CCP SHAME
Toria Nynys Minmatar	Posted - 2007.12.07 06:31:00 - [21] Stop your whining. The new t2 battleships have huge cargo bays. Get the Paladin, honor tank it and you should be able to loot any mission or belt out there in no more than a trip or sixty. p.s. People still loot missions?

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.