EVE Search - Hehe, yeah.... monkeys rock!!!

All Channels

Out of Pod Experience

Hehe, yeah.... monkeys rock!!!

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Surfin's PlunderBunny Minmatar mUfFiN fAcToRy	Posted - 2008.01.05 09:49:00 - [1] Edited by: Surfin''s PlunderBunny on 05/01/2008 09:49:34 Especially the one in the picture! MONKEYS!!!! Originally by: Tarminic Okay, that's it. You are on the KOS list, and you better pray that I don't have access to a locater agent.
Kata Dakini An Eye For An Eye Rule of Three	Posted - 2008.01.05 10:51:00 - [2] Between this, and the monkeys that let the fruit ferment on the ground and have a drunken festival every year, is there really any point in arguing against evolution anymore? I mean really, how much proof do you need? For more enjoyment and greater efficiency, consumption is being standardized.
Surfin's PlunderBunny Minmatar mUfFiN fAcToRy	Posted - 2008.01.05 11:11:00 - [3] Edited by: Surfin''s PlunderBunny on 05/01/2008 11:11:21 Monkeys make booze? Take that, Creationism Originally by: Tarminic Okay, that's it. You are on the KOS list, and you better pray that I don't have access to a locater agent.
freejoaw	Posted - 2008.01.05 20:09:00 - [4] Edited by: freejoaw on 05/01/2008 20:17:40 Originally by: Surfin's PlunderBunny Edited by: Surfin''s PlunderBunny on 05/01/2008 11:11:21 Monkeys make booze? Take that, Creationism And from out of nowhere came life the universe and everything. take that darwinian muppet. you may laugh at creationism but the paradoxes your theory presents are far more hilarious tbqh. "Between this, and the monkeys that let the fruit ferment on the ground and have a drunken festival every year, is there really any point in arguing against evolution anymore? I mean really, how much proof do you need?" well considering that all your saying here is; we see the world is flat cause when we look forward it's just straight as far as the eye can see.. what more proof do we need? we need not look any further. the stars and the sky and our relative perspective and angle of approach are completely irellevant factors and in fact just worthless tools, we don't need any proof we just need generalizations based on assumptions and parallels. thank you captain truthstriker, please meet me on the bridge of darwinaward9000 for your space medal and mad props.
Surfin's PlunderBunny Minmatar mUfFiN fAcToRy	Posted - 2008.01.05 20:19:00 - [5] At least our theory can be tested Originally by: Tarminic Okay, that's it. You are on the KOS list, and you better pray that I don't have access to a locater agent.
freejoaw	Posted - 2008.01.05 20:24:00 - [6] Edited by: freejoaw on 05/01/2008 20:27:01 Originally by: Surfin's PlunderBunny At least our theory can be tested you fail to understand that things are not mutually exclusive. as a result you just see the surface of something and surface patterns and parallels, and go, there you go that's what it is, with no proof other than crude comparison and generalization. there's no fundamental difference between what you said in this thread and what people said back in the past when they claimed the earth was flat, same procedure, same way of thinking like ignoramuses. monkeys behaviour are cute i love them, and all animals in general, thanks for the clip, as for the rest? file that in the file cabinet under r for rubbish.
Surfin's PlunderBunny Minmatar mUfFiN fAcToRy	Posted - 2008.01.05 21:12:00 - [7] Edited by: Surfin''s PlunderBunny on 05/01/2008 21:13:38 Or people that burned you alive because you didn't worship the same invisible man in the sky that they did? And post with your main... being afraid of what people think of you so hiding behind an alt takes away all your credibility here Originally by: Tarminic Okay, that's it. You are on the KOS list, and you better pray that I don't have access to a locater agent.
freejoaw	Posted - 2008.01.05 22:08:00 - [8] Originally by: Surfin's PlunderBunny Edited by: Surfin''s PlunderBunny on 05/01/2008 21:13:38 Or people that burned you alive because you didn't worship the same invisible man in the sky that they did? And post with your main... being afraid of what people think of you so hiding behind an alt takes away all your credibility here i don't think you "get" mutually exclusive. it means that both theories are laughable when separated, and only work towards a synthesis model using data from both is meaningful. and ignoramous extremists occur of both. the validity of the information is all that matters. but then again you would rather have someone lie to you as long as they have the credentials you deem appropriate, so i don't expect you to understand that marinedude.
Kata Dakini An Eye For An Eye Rule of Three	Posted - 2008.01.05 22:34:00 - [9] Sure sure, it's all assumption, but how about this story? Two men, who have never met, suddenly do one day. They look at each other, and the resemblance is striking. Same face, same hair, same eyes, same voice, etc. Curious, these two men decide to investigate. They find out that they have the same ancestors by looking up old family trees and what not. So what is the best assumption here? That everything is simply a coincidence? Or is there something more, like the two men are brothers? On a related note, I found this theory to be more convincing (through the use of rational thought) than anything a religious scribe has proposed: Linkage For more enjoyment and greater efficiency, consumption is being standardized.
Surfin's PlunderBunny Minmatar mUfFiN fAcToRy	Posted - 2008.01.06 00:26:00 - [10] Originally by: freejoaw Originally by: Surfin's PlunderBunny Edited by: Surfin''s PlunderBunny on 05/01/2008 21:13:38 Or people that burned you alive because you didn't worship the same invisible man in the sky that they did? And post with your main... being afraid of what people think of you so hiding behind an alt takes away all your credibility here i don't think you "get" mutually exclusive. it means that both theories are laughable when separated, and only work towards a synthesis model using data from both is meaningful. and ignoramous extremists occur of both. the validity of the information is all that matters. but then again you would rather have someone lie to you as long as they have the credentials you deem appropriate, so i don't expect you to understand that marinedude. to tell you the truth, I really don't give a **... all that info doesn't pertain to me in the least, especially not in an online game forum. Now, let's keep this topic to how awesome monkeys are, thank you Originally by:** Tarminic Okay, that's it. You are on the KOS list, and you better pray that I don't have access to a locater agent.
Neon Genesis The Landed Gentry	Posted - 2008.01.06 01:12:00 - [11] Creationism cannot win on the internet. That is a fact at least. _
Sister Impotentata Elite Angels Of Death	Posted - 2008.01.06 01:37:00 - [12] Originally by: freejoaw i don't think you "get" mutually exclusive. it means that both theories are laughable when separated, and only work towards a synthesis model using data from both is meaningful. and ignoramous extremists occur of both. the validity of the information is all that matters. but then again you would rather have someone lie to you as long as they have the credentials you deem appropriate, so i don't expect you to understand that marinedude. I don't think I "get" what you're on about. Please use your words to construct sentences that have meaning. What you're doing right now is a whole bunch of Sound and Fury, Signifying Nothing. ----- TANSTAAFL Originally by: BB Lazy Lob and Crazy Cob are weaving webs to wind me. I am far more sweet than other meat, but still they cannot find me!

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.