| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Myrdyr
   |
Posted - 2008.01.06 06:00:00 -
[1]
Thanks CCP for making POS more a pain in the ass by nerfing how many towers you can deploy per system. POS spamming is certainly a problem in 0.0 but ONE tower per day is absolutely ridiculous -- this means many systems would take over a month for a corp to cover every moon!
Not to mention this shouldn't apply to low-sec at all, which is what really has my goat at the moment! 
There should be NO restriction on anchoring POS in low-sec and the limit in 0.0 is a complete hack workaround for a broken mechanic -- POS warfare! Fix POS warfare, don't implement crappy global non-fixes.
This is a serious WTF!
|
Tachypnea
Trinion Enterprises
|
Posted - 2008.01.06 06:39:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Myrdyr
Q_Q
|
Admiral Nova
Strike Team Nova
|
Posted - 2008.01.06 06:43:00 -
[3]
The one per day only applies if you don't have sov. Max 5 per day per alliance. If you have Sov you can anchor more (at least with sov I've done 4 the same day). And the 'nerf' came into affect about a year ago.
|
Johnathan Roark
Caldari
Quantum Industries
Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2008.01.06 06:46:00 -
[4]
This happened several patches ago and was in the patch notes. Just because you dont pay attention doesn't make it stealth
Personally, i think the entire idea is silly
Corporation Management Improvement |
Myrdyr
|
Posted - 2008.01.06 06:55:00 -
[5]
you can't hold sov in lowsec so it should be at least 5 per day there if it even applies at all.
but it's still ********, furthermore
|
Admiral Nova
Strike Team Nova
|
Posted - 2008.01.06 07:03:00 -
[6]
Why does it really matter in lowsec anyway, just go back there the next day...
|
Myrdyr
|
Posted - 2008.01.06 07:04:00 -
[7]
because i have 7 more pos to anchor in this system alone?
|
Myrdyr
|
Posted - 2008.01.06 07:06:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Admiral Nova
And the 'nerf' came into affect about a year ago.
proof plzkthx
|
Myrdyr
|
Posted - 2008.01.06 07:09:00 -
[9]
oh and does this stupid timer reset at downtime or 00:00?
|
Admiral Nova
Strike Team Nova
|
Posted - 2008.01.06 10:07:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Myrdyr
oh and does this stupid timer reset at downtime or 00:00?
Not sure but it will be DT or 24 hours, 00:00 is nothing special to eve.
|
Peter Kay
Space Monkeys
|
Posted - 2008.01.06 11:05:00 -
[11]
Just came across this, very anoying to say the least.
Tomorrow's a work day.
PK
|
Minerva Moore
|
Posted - 2008.01.10 14:22:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Myrdyr
Thanks CCP for making POS more a pain in the ass by nerfing how many towers you can deploy per system. POS spamming is certainly a problem in 0.0 but ONE tower per day is absolutely ridiculous -- this means many systems would take over a month for a corp to cover every moon!
What? Over a month to pos-spam every moon in a system? Why that's just horrible. How are you supposed to get a ton of free isk without working it you have to WAIT a bit. What if other ways of getting isk took time, how would that look, eh? Oh.... right... other ways of making isk DOES take time... hmmmm.
Originally by: Myrdyr
because i have 7 more pos to anchor in this system alone?
Ah, gotcha. You don't have to wait a month do you? You have to wait a week. And over that you had to start this miserable whining failed thread? Get a life dude.
|
Daelin Blackleaf
|
Posted - 2008.01.10 15:43:00 -
[13]
This has been about for awhile, but, as someone retired for 0.0 ping pong, lets see if I get this right.
If you have more corporations in your alliance than the opposing alliance you can take their systems faster than they can re-enforce them with towers of their own?
How many more reasons to spam POS on every moon do we need? 
|
III LightBringer
Okkelen Grave Robbers
|
Posted - 2008.01.10 16:26:00 -
[14]
why should low sec be any different from 0.0? There are low sec wars on influence as well, and the limit is nice to have, in both places.
|
Admiral Nova
Strike Team Nova
|
Posted - 2008.01.10 20:19:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Daelin Blackleaf
This has been about for awhile, but, as someone retired for 0.0 ping pong, lets see if I get this right.
If you have more corporations in your alliance than the opposing alliance you can take their systems faster than they can re-enforce them with towers of their own?
How many more reasons to spam POS on every moon do we need?
The limit is I believe 5 per alliance per system, the limit per corp is for non-alliance members. At least, when I had sov I could anchor 5 towers in one system within about an hour. Not sure what would have happened if I tried 6.
I think the limit per corp is there to stop corps from each anchoring 5 towers and then say... re-joining an alliance. This is a nerf to pos-spamming to take a system, not to pos-spamming to keep it. In reality these days the biggest alliances POS spamming is no longer a real issue, it's just more isk someone is throwing away. I imagine the smaller alliances that find it tougher to take down towers still hate it though.
|
Daelin Blackleaf
|
Posted - 2008.01.11 12:23:00 -
[16]
Well at least it's not as bad as I thought. Still, once again the little guy suffers.
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |