| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

PsychoBitch
Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo
188
|
Posted - 2012.03.11 01:40:00 -
[151] - Quote
Yes. However the ability to do alchemy to obtain the same materials NEEDS to be added. When the price of tech goes from 20k isk to over 100k isk per unit, something has gone sideways. While moon mining remains a mainly nullsec industry - especially for the most profitable moons - which is as it should be - there ought to be a lower return way of making moon mats in hisec. Nullsec alliances should not be able to control entire markets. This argument could also be applied to the question of whether or not to remove all ice from hisec - only the most basic ice can be found in hisec and, despite the likely activity of mining bots, it should remain. |

Darkstar Warrior
DarkstarRed
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.11 02:47:00 -
[152] - Quote
Please vote for PB - I need moar stuffs built!!!!! |

Ace'o Spades
Ava Grace Industries Northern Associates.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.11 06:22:00 -
[153] - Quote
Should 0.0 infrastructure should only be vulnerable to large fleets of organized players supported by (super)capital ships?
|

PsychoBitch
Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo
205
|
Posted - 2012.03.11 06:24:00 -
[154] - Quote
Disagree. Infrastructure should be available to be destroyed or damage by every size and shape of fleet in eve without discrimination. If they can actually do it is another question. I am NOT saying that you need to lower the hitpoints, and it is bad enough that something so important to your sovereignty should be left to players alone to defend instead of help from guns akin to pos guns. I think that if players want to attack iHubs with bombers, knock yourselves out.
|

Mad Hittle
Hello Kitty Rejects Dark Taboo
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.11 09:22:00 -
[155] - Quote
hes got my vote
and on a side note, almost surprised nobodies said 'and my axe' yet i almost feel a little let down if there were appropriate posts recent enough for me to make the comment myself i would have, but someone seems to be pulling the Q&A from the votematch thing(or whatever other 'original source of questions')
now somethin i dont think i seen asked yet,
How do you feel about the devblog released with the proposed POSSIBLE changes to ship skilles/reqs? (dest and bc skills become requirements, cutting the ties between t2frigs and t2 cruisers and t2 battlecruisers and the sort, creating 'ship lines' and 'line skills' to ballance out the field) any thoughts/opinions/questions/comments/concerns/bitches/moans/complaints in regards to what was being fielded as a possible solution?
*edit* link to said devblog, for those who may have not seen it and or need a refresher http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=9129 |
|

Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
2800
|
Posted - 2012.03.11 10:33:00 -
[156] - Quote
I think I saw a comment by you in another thread regarding bots, and I agree they should burn.
I'd like to know your views on this linkage though.
/c
|
|

Ace'o Spades
Ava Grace Industries Northern Associates.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.11 13:33:00 -
[157] - Quote
Should jump bridges and Titan bridges be nerfed to reduce power projection?
|

PsychoBitch
Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo
206
|
Posted - 2012.03.11 13:36:00 -
[158] - Quote
Disagree. Jump Bridges are fine. It is bad enough that the poor titan has gone from being a mobile outpost, to a limited tactical weapon with logistics, to a limp mobile jump bridge. The current state of the Dooms Day weapon is pale and unexciting. FFS, don't make come down there and beat you with a rake!
However, that said, it should be more difficult to attain. |

Shadowsmid
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.11 15:05:00 -
[159] - Quote
go go go Psychobitch ! ! ! bump bump bump CCP, 2003 Eve Gamer experience, willing to represent us ! ! ! We Players independent, free of all big coalitions. Vote for Psychobitch ! ! !
  
|

Greyhound Slarkson
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.11 16:59:00 -
[160] - Quote
Vote for this guy! |

Eyes Solo
Emperor's Legions Dark Taboo
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.11 22:31:00 -
[161] - Quote
Bump |

Ace'o Spades
Ava Grace Industries Northern Associates.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.12 00:51:00 -
[162] - Quote
Does CCP need to change game mechanics so that blobbing is no longer effective?
|

PsychoBitch
Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo
221
|
Posted - 2012.03.12 00:53:00 -
[163] - Quote
No. Blobbing is a bunch of friends playing the game together We're not in the business of punishing people for having friends. EVE rewards team work. If you're having trouble competing then maybe you should change your play style.
|

vision impaired
DarkstarRed
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.12 19:52:00 -
[164] - Quote
PsychoBitch wrote:No. Blobbing is a bunch of friends playing the game together We're not in the business of punishing people for having friends. EVE rewards team work. If you're having trouble competing then maybe you should change your play style.
"team work"........... is that like taking an orca out with your hulk on a mining op?
Vote for PsychoBitch - he da man!!! |

PsychoBitch
Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo
238
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 03:33:00 -
[165] - Quote
vision impaired wrote:PsychoBitch wrote:No. Blobbing is a bunch of friends playing the game together We're not in the business of punishing people for having friends. EVE rewards team work. If you're having trouble competing then maybe you should change your play style.
"team work"........... is that like taking an orca out with your hulk on a mining op? Vote for PsychoBitch - he da man!!!
Thx dude, have a beer on me... |

PsychoBitch
Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo
238
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:53:00 -
[166] - Quote
I also don't believe that existing ships should get clearly defined, useful roles before new ships are introduced to EVE There are roles for multipurpose ships as well as the well-defined roles of the specialization ships. I believe the specialized ships are well represented. But, there are always new roles and ships to be added :)
|

Admiral Weatheral
Perkone Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 02:05:00 -
[167] - Quote
I like the blob, +1 to you! |

Fragwit
Tellurian Works Dark Taboo
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:55:00 -
[168] - Quote
I would like to say I have offered my vote to psychobitch for iskies, I'm not so proud to admit I can be bought. PB however has refused to have truck with such an idea, you could say he is incorruptible which is a good thing for a csm. Personally I just think he is extremely tight. |

PsychoBitch
Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo
238
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 08:25:00 -
[169] - Quote
Needless to say, the bounty system need an overhaul!!!!!!!!! |

PsychoBitch
Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo
238
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:21:00 -
[170] - Quote
Yes, I said bounties, lol |

Greyhound Slarkson
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:26:00 -
[171] - Quote
I have a question about Titans:
For the last couple of days PL have camped gates in Amamake with several titans and supercarriers. I dont condone them for their action, I think it was quite comical.
BUT:
This is a perfect example for me that Titans are too easily obtainable in the game. Whereas my thought, and the initial idea of Titans, was for them to be extremely powerful but on the other hand extremely rare. What are your thoughts on Titans (and maybe Supercaps) in terms of obtainability and power?
Edit: h3h3 "bounties" |

Frying Doom
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:38:00 -
[172] - Quote
Greyhound Slarkson wrote:I have a question about Titans:
For the last couple of days PL have camped gates in Amamake with several titans and supercarriers. I dont condone them for their action, I think it was quite comical.
BUT:
This is a perfect example for me that Titans are too easily obtainable in the game. Whereas my thought, and the initial idea of Titans, was for them to be extremely powerful but on the other hand extremely rare. What are your thoughts on Titans (and maybe Supercaps) in terms of obtainability and power?
Edit: h3h3 "bounties" I must say an interesting question. The proliferation of Titans and Super Caps in the game is largely through the use of Bots, So they would probably go back to there original rarity if the botting was stopped.
On a more fun note for stopping botting I think it would be funnier if the bots when found lost their Concord protection and have their assets frozen. Giving us all something fun to shoot at for 24 hours. Then ban the accounts. Vote Issler Dainze for CSM7! http://community.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=470
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge. |

PsychoBitch
Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo
238
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:29:00 -
[173] - Quote
I couldn't agree more! They were suppose to be these things that you would be LUCKY to ever see in the game, now every joe-blow has one. |

Ace'o Spades
Ava Grace Industries Northern Associates.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 15:37:00 -
[174] - Quote
I could not agree with you more! |

Ace'o Spades
Ava Grace Industries Northern Associates.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 18:23:00 -
[175] - Quote
Yes, the cap ships stituation is waaaaay out of hand. |

PsychoBitch
Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo
238
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 19:58:00 -
[176] - Quote
Yes, it is actually a perfect timeline for how CCP has befuddled their vision of Eve. One can only hope I can knock sense into them under my reign. STEP 1: FIRE CCP SOUNDWAVE - Goon Stooge. |

Baldur Smart
Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 21:19:00 -
[177] - Quote
bump |

PsychoBitch
Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo
238
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 01:36:00 -
[178] - Quote
With the CSM coming to a close, I would ask that people look into their hearts and vote for the person who is your only savior.....
M E |

Adam O'Flyne
Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 21:23:00 -
[179] - Quote
It would be time for a change.. don't think your vote doesn't count, vote PB! |

PsychoBitch
Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo
238
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 22:12:00 -
[180] - Quote
It is indeed a time for a change. The fail past members of the CSM should be dismissed without a second thought.
M A K E Y O U R V O I C E H E A R D
Vote PsychoBitch |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |