Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

mrkaczor
Grey Toxic Sword Inver Brass
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 14:05:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hello,
As we all know MAC OS (and Linux) has the same problems with lack of testing (Linux with wine and MAC with crossover support). I want to get to CSM and focus on technical issues that both communities have - especially with your input!
Thanks :)
PS. Post to like if you agree in JSC: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=69467&find=unread |

Adrenalinemax
High Tech Industries
8
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 23:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
We already have one on CSM6
It won't matter, until Mac OSX share is MUCH higher and it HURTS their pocket book, the OSX client will suck donkey **** |

mrkaczor
Grey Toxic Sword Inver Brass
19
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 17:00:00 -
[3] - Quote
I have simmilar problems with Linux - did some1 tried wine for OSX? I would like to know more about MAC OS client :) |

Manssell
OmiHyperMultiNationalDrunksConglomerate
21
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 18:51:00 -
[4] - Quote
mrkaczor wrote:Hello, As we all know MAC OS (and Linux) has the same problems with lack of testing (Linux with wine and MAC with crossover support). I want to get to CSM and focus on technical issues that both communities have - especially with your input! Thanks :) PS. Post to like if you agree in JSC: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=69467&find=unread
To be fair, the CSM did bring up the Mac client performance in a summit meeting. I think it was two summits ago (the one after the emergency summit). I don't have time to check the notes, but if I remember correctly it went something like this. The CSM brought up the horrible Mac performance, CCP then basically said that since it involves wine..ect, that yea it sucks and there is nothing they can/will do about it so just accept it sucks, and the CSM all nodded and said O.K. and that was that. |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E. Comic Mischief
449
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 23:10:00 -
[5] - Quote
That does not seem like a reason to give up. We should continue to pound on CCP for better performance.
No surrender. I am running for the CSM https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=779668#post779668 |

Ntrails
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 00:29:00 -
[6] - Quote
every Nietzsche needs a representative! |

Adrenalinemax
High Tech Industries
8
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 01:35:00 -
[7] - Quote
I cancelled 9 of my 10 accounts, and as soon as my training for my Titan holder finishes i will inactivate the last account
On the off chance the mac client stops sucking, I can come back easier with this training complete
Vote with your wallets, that is the only thing the schmucks at CCP listen too. |

Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
168
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 20:39:00 -
[8] - Quote
Posting in the hope for a candidacy view on the following: Bounty Hunting
"All griefers are lazy cowards with the current climate of broken player policing systems." |

mrkaczor
Grey Toxic Sword Inver Brass
33
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 07:12:00 -
[9] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:That does not seem like a reason to give up. We should continue to pound on CCP for better performance.
No surrender.
Yea, thats right!! :)
My opinion is that CCP is using bad model for creating MAC/Lin client. They should give up cooperation with 3rd parities and start to cooperate with wine community. Bug submitting and fixing and later maybe some install script would involve very little afford and would bring nice results (my opinion) also good PR ;) |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
953
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 08:42:00 -
[10] - Quote
If you want someone who actually plays the game using a Mac to be on CSM7, support and vote for Trebor Daehdoow. |
|

Ian Grimshaw
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 10:06:00 -
[11] - Quote
AFAIU he was on CSM6. Did he made anything for Mac players? He doesn't have a sole word about Mac players in that post you're referring to. What's the point in voting for him?
|

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
1631
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 13:48:00 -
[12] - Quote
Ian Grimshaw wrote:AFAIU he was on CSM6. Did he made anything for Mac players? He doesn't have a sole word about Mac players in that post you're referring to. What's the point in voting for him? I play on a Mac, I'm always pushing for more love for the Mac client behind-the-scenes, and I've also consistently pushed for improvements to the bug-reporting system (which is a disaster in general, and a nightmare for Mac-related bugs).
I've been a Mac-user and programmer since *before* the Mac was released -- I beta-tested the Mac 128k -- and found the first major bug in the ROM. Re-Elect Trebor to the CSM - because I have not yet plumbed the depths of my inherent masochism!
My CSM Blog |

Ian Grimshaw
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 15:11:00 -
[13] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Ian Grimshaw wrote:AFAIU he was on CSM6. Did he made anything for Mac players? He doesn't have a sole word about Mac players in that post you're referring to. What's the point in voting for him? I play on a Mac, I'm always pushing for more love for the Mac client behind-the-scenes, and I've also consistently pushed for improvements to the bug-reporting system (which is a disaster in general, and a nightmare for Mac-related bugs). I've been a Mac-user and programmer since *before* the Mac was released -- I beta-tested the Mac 128k -- and found the first major bug in the ROM. So after releasing Crucible Mac client became worse (constant freezes, lost avatars, broken patches). And that's after you were elected for previous CSM. How does this prove that you were "pushing for more love for the Mac client"? Is there any documented incentives which prove that you personally made Mac client better (even if so far Mac client became worse)? |

mrkaczor
Grey Toxic Sword Inver Brass
34
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 15:27:00 -
[14] - Quote
I would like to get elected because of of support of MAC and Linux users and focus on the technical issues that have (not only but it will be the most important stuff for me). |

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
1634
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 17:59:00 -
[15] - Quote
Ian Grimshaw wrote:So after releasing Crucible Mac client became worse (constant freezes, lost avatars, broken patches). And that's after you were elected for previous CSM. How does this prove that you were "pushing for more love for the Mac client"? Is there any documented incentives which prove that you personally made Mac client better (even if so far Mac client became worse)? Bluntly, the Mac client is not a high-priority item for CCP, and there's a lot more that can go wrong with it because of the extra emulation layer.
I was in fact pointing out some annoying Mac client issues to CCP just this morning. Like the fact that typing quickly while composing an evemail can switch your focus to the chat window (which itself has annoying pauses).
But the real core issue is that the EVE bug reporting system is broken, and that's where I've put in a lot of work. CCP can't fix bugs if they don't know about them, and the EVE bug reporting system is an exercise in futility and masochism. For Mac bugs, it's even worse.
My favorite UI bug, for example, was repeatedly filtered as non-reproducible despite the fact that at one point I included a video showing the bug! I finally demoed it live during a summit session just to point out the problems with the bug reporting system.
Re-Elect Trebor to the CSM - because I have not yet plumbed the depths of my inherent masochism!
My CSM Blog |

Temba Ronin
130
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 01:58:00 -
[16] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Ian Grimshaw wrote:So after releasing Crucible Mac client became worse (constant freezes, lost avatars, broken patches). And that's after you were elected for previous CSM. How does this prove that you were "pushing for more love for the Mac client"? Is there any documented incentives which prove that you personally made Mac client better (even if so far Mac client became worse)? Bluntly, the Mac client is not a high-priority item for CCP, and there's a lot more that can go wrong with it because of the extra emulation layer. I was in fact pointing out some annoying Mac client issues to CCP just this morning. Like the fact that typing quickly while composing an evemail can switch your focus to the chat window (which itself has annoying pauses). But the real core issue is that the EVE bug reporting system is broken, and that's where I've put in a lot of work. CCP can't fix bugs if they don't know about them, and the EVE bug reporting system is an exercise in futility and masochism. For Mac bugs, it's even worse. My favorite UI bug, for example, was repeatedly filtered as non-reproducible despite the fact that at one point I included a video showing the bug! I finally demoed it live during a summit session just to point out the problems with the bug reporting system. So CCP does not prioritize bug repairs for Mac client users according to a Mac using CSM6 member. Could you please request a one time buyout of Mac client users from CCP? If they refund the money i've invested in their game i'll write off the time spent as lessons learned, when a company advertises it's product/ game is playable on multiple systems saying they don't prioritize addressing HUGE problems on some systems is unacceptible. This is a harbinger of things to come for Dust I hope Sony is paying attention to their partner CCP.
I will not vote for you because failure to get the job done for Mac users is no reason to get my votes, yes votes i have several paid accounts like most players. Unlike most players none of mine are stable and playable today. |

mrkaczor
Grey Toxic Sword Inver Brass
44
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 12:26:00 -
[17] - Quote
You have the point! I started playing EVE Online BECAUSE it had Linux support ... and then they dropped (I agree - it was ****** and all ppl played on WIne) |

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
1639
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 13:31:00 -
[18] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:I will not vote for you because failure to get the job done for Mac users is no reason to get my votes, yes votes i have several paid accounts like most players. Unlike most players none of mine are stable and playable today. Sorry to hear that, but the blunt fact of the matter is that getting CCP to do things is a long-term exercise involving multiple rounds of bashing your head into a brick wall.
Fortunately, I have a thick head, so I'll keep at it as long as the voters let me. Re-Elect Trebor to the CSM - because I have not yet plumbed the depths of my inherent masochism!
My CSM Blog |

Ian Grimshaw
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 14:15:00 -
[19] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Temba Ronin wrote:I will not vote for you because failure to get the job done for Mac users is no reason to get my votes, yes votes i have several paid accounts like most players. Unlike most players none of mine are stable and playable today. Sorry to hear that, but the blunt fact of the matter is that getting CCP to do things is a long-term exercise involving multiple rounds of bashing your head into a brick wall. Fortunately, I have a thick head, so I'll keep at it as long as the voters let me. You'd rather wrote at least a word about Mac users in your "please re-elect me" post you've linked before. Also, you would look better, if you wrote there that you're aiming to bring to CPP the fact that users are leaving the game because of CPP lying about "supporting" Mac platform. Do something before you're re-elected, otherwise it looks like you don't have enough votes and browse different forums begging for spare votes and making false promises. |

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
1644
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 17:03:00 -
[20] - Quote
Could I trouble you to move the trolling to my re-election thread? The bumps will be most welcome!  Re-Elect Trebor to the CSM - because I have not yet plumbed the depths of my inherent masochism!
My CSM Blog |
|

Temba Ronin
131
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 17:45:00 -
[21] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Temba Ronin wrote:I will not vote for you because failure to get the job done for Mac users is no reason to get my votes, yes votes i have several paid accounts like most players. Unlike most players none of mine are stable and playable today. Sorry to hear that, but the blunt fact of the matter is that getting CCP to do things is a long-term exercise involving multiple rounds of bashing your head into a brick wall. Fortunately, I have a thick head, so I'll keep at it as long as the voters let me. Trebor can you use your influence to help organize a riot? CCP only responds when they have to obviously. I will vote for leadership and boldness please demonstrate these attributes when our fellow Mac users are in such dire need.
Power To The Players! |

Manssell
OmiHyperMultiNationalDrunksConglomerate
22
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 17:48:00 -
[22] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Ian Grimshaw wrote:So after releasing Crucible Mac client became worse (constant freezes, lost avatars, broken patches). And that's after you were elected for previous CSM. How does this prove that you were "pushing for more love for the Mac client"? Is there any documented incentives which prove that you personally made Mac client better (even if so far Mac client became worse)? Bluntly, the Mac client is not a high-priority item for CCP, and there's a lot more that can go wrong with it because of the extra emulation layer. I was in fact pointing out some annoying Mac client issues to CCP just this morning. Like the fact that typing quickly while composing an evemail can switch your focus to the chat window (which itself has annoying pauses). But the real core issue is that the EVE bug reporting system is broken, and that's where I've put in a lot of work. CCP can't fix bugs if they don't know about them, and the EVE bug reporting system is an exercise in futility and masochism. For Mac bugs, it's even worse. My favorite UI bug, for example, was repeatedly filtered as non-reproducible despite the fact that at one point I included a video showing the bug! I finally demoed it live during a summit session just to point out the problems with the bug reporting system.
Thank you for the work on the bug reporting I stopped filling them out last year when two of mine that I filled after a patch stayed opened and unfiltered right up through the next patch three months latter. It's pointless!
But the "Mac client is not a high-priority item for CCP" is really not an excuse. Just a heads up, but a lot of people (not just on the mac forums) are stating to see through the "not a high-priority item for CCP" excuse the CSM members use now for things they or the CSM doesn't care to push. The CSM has no problems pushing for some things, while saying they can't push for others. It's becoming quite obvius.
Such as, your thread on PI, something that CCP doesn't seem to care much about anymore. "I thought I'd write them down and see what support they generated; if it's sufficient, I'll write up a CSM proposal and start bri... er, lobbying the devs. Your CSM tax ISK at work, etc., etc." So you'll lobby for PI improvements, but can't lobby for the MAC client?
From your re-elect thread
"I will in particular continue to push for improvements in the User Interface, for iterations on widely-used parts of the game (such as Trade, Industry, and Mission gameplay), for increased resources to be devoted to game performance issues (both on the server and in the client)"
From you own blog. "All in all, these tidbits are great news. As long as players and the CSM keeps the pressure on, I think we're going to see interesting stuff on SiSi in the coming months." I think what the MAC users are asking for is a little "pressure" love from the CSM on the state of the MAC client.
Look, Trebor, please don't feel i'm attacking you here, that is not my intent. Frankly all the CSM members are doing this and I could point out the contradictions they do as well. I'm just saying you guys need to stop blaming CCP for things the CSM doesn't care about. If SOV warfare, or PI improvements are more important to you fine, just say so. Hell I might even agree. But don't act like your hands are tied on some things, and miracle workers on others.
The simple fact is the MAC client is fundamentally broken for many people and it's frustrating! The crashes, and freezes Crucible brought have been going on now for what three months now. Konflict has done a great job, but it seems like he's the only one working on the MAC side at times. I see more de-bugging by users on the forums than I do CCP. Just the the other night I was getting "space lonely" and really started missing the old small gang I used to fly with when I realized the gang broke up because most of the guys where on MACs and could no longer play the damn game after last summer. There's some sort of "butterfly effect" reference here but I think we all get the point that the MAC client is ruining the game experience not just for the people it directly effects. I would think that would be an easy thing to convey to CCP. |

Temba Ronin
131
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 17:52:00 -
[23] - Quote
Manssell wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Ian Grimshaw wrote:So after releasing Crucible Mac client became worse (constant freezes, lost avatars, broken patches). And that's after you were elected for previous CSM. How does this prove that you were "pushing for more love for the Mac client"? Is there any documented incentives which prove that you personally made Mac client better (even if so far Mac client became worse)? Bluntly, the Mac client is not a high-priority item for CCP, and there's a lot more that can go wrong with it because of the extra emulation layer. I was in fact pointing out some annoying Mac client issues to CCP just this morning. Like the fact that typing quickly while composing an evemail can switch your focus to the chat window (which itself has annoying pauses). But the real core issue is that the EVE bug reporting system is broken, and that's where I've put in a lot of work. CCP can't fix bugs if they don't know about them, and the EVE bug reporting system is an exercise in futility and masochism. For Mac bugs, it's even worse. My favorite UI bug, for example, was repeatedly filtered as non-reproducible despite the fact that at one point I included a video showing the bug! I finally demoed it live during a summit session just to point out the problems with the bug reporting system. Thank you for the work on the bug reporting I stopped filling them out last year when two of mine that I filled after a patch stayed opened and unfiltered right up through the next patch three months latter. It's pointless! But the "Mac client is not a high-priority item for CCP" is really not an excuse. Just a heads up, but a lot of people (not just on the mac forums) are stating to see through the "not a high-priority item for CCP" excuse the CSM members use now for things they or the CSM doesn't care to push. The CSM has no problems pushing for some things, while saying they can't push for others. It's becoming quite obvius. Such as, your thread on PI, something that CCP doesn't seem to care much about anymore. "I thought I'd write them down and see what support they generated; if it's sufficient, I'll write up a CSM proposal and start bri... er, lobbying the devs. Your CSM tax ISK at work, etc., etc." So you'll lobby for PI improvements, but can't lobby for the MAC client? From your re-elect thread "I will in particular continue to push for improvements in the User Interface, for iterations on widely-used parts of the game (such as Trade, Industry, and Mission gameplay), for increased resources to be devoted to game performance issues (both on the server and in the client)" From you own blog. "All in all, these tidbits are great news. As long as players and the CSM keeps the pressure on, I think we're going to see interesting stuff on SiSi in the coming months." I think what the MAC users are asking for is a little "pressure" love from the CSM on the state of the MAC client. Look, Trebor, please don't feel i'm attacking you here, that is not my intent. Frankly all the CSM members are doing this and I could point out the contradictions they do as well. I'm just saying you guys need to stop blaming CCP for things the CSM doesn't care about. If SOV warfare, or PI improvements are more important to you fine, just say so. Hell I might even agree. But don't act like your hands are tied on some things, and miracle workers on others. The simple fact is the MAC client is fundamentally broken for many people and it's frustrating! The crashes, and freezes Crucible brought have been going on now for what three months now. Konflict has done a great job, but it seems like he's the only one working on the MAC side at times. I see more de-bugging by users on the forums than I do CCP. Just the the other night I was getting "space lonely" and really started missing the old small gang I used to fly with when I realized the gang broke up because most of the guys where on MACs and could no longer play the damn game after last summer. There's some sort of "butterfly effect" reference here but I think we all get the point that the MAC client is ruining the game experience not just for the people it directly effects. I would think that would be an easy thing to convey to CCP. Well said sir! |

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
1644
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 22:46:00 -
[24] - Quote
This was an excellent post; lots to comment on.
Manssell wrote:Thank you for the work on the bug reporting I stopped filling them out last year when two of mine that I filled after a patch stayed opened and unfiltered right up through the next patch three months later. It's pointless! I 100% agree, and I've had experiences with it that makes yours look like a cakewalk. I had a repeatable Mac UI bug repeatedly filtered for something like 18 months and then "closed due to age".
Quote:The CSM has no problems pushing for some things, while saying they can't push for others. It's becoming quite obvious. I would love to get more effort put into the Mac client, but I have to face the reality of the CCP development process. During their everyday development process, CCP targets and tests the Windows client. That's why -- for example -- there isn't a Mac version of the latest SiSi client; it's a secondary issue.
From their perspective, this is an efficient use of their resources. Whatever we would like, the fact is that the Mac client is the Windows client bolted onto a Cider emulator, and if that combination is causing a bug, they don't have a lot of resources available to track stuff down and find a fix that works both on native Windows and Mac. And sometimes the problem is being caused by Cider and can only be fixed by TransGaming.
This is why, in my judgment, the "Mac client needs much more love" argument, whatever we as Mac users might think of its merits, isn't going to fare well in the vicious PvP that is CCP resource allocation.
After I got on the CSM in 2010, it quickly became obvious to me that this was the case (and this was in the dark days when even FiS couldn't get a lot of love!), so I stepped back and looked at the situation more globally. One thing that quickly becomes clear is that the bugginess of the Mac client is in part a symptom of the sh*tstorm of fail that is the bug reporting system -- which actively prevents devs from getting the information they need to efficiently fix things -- Windows and Mac bugs alike, but Mac bugs in particular.
So I decided the best bang for the buck in terms of my lobbying time was to lobby for improvements to bug-reporting -- in particular, public bug reporting so players can cooperate to provide good test cases -- and use the problems with the Mac client as a case-study on why it was important. In my estimation, throwing a lot more resources (devs) at the Mac client without providing them with a good source of feedback to work from isn't efficient, and won't fare well in the allocation wars.
It's easy for a space politician to say "The Mac Client needs more love!". There, I've said it! But the hard part is trying to figure out how to get something done that actually does help it out.
Quote:Such as, your thread on PI, something that CCP doesn't seem to care much about anymore. "I thought I'd write them down and see what support they generated; if it's sufficient, I'll write up a CSM proposal and start bri... er, lobbying the devs. Your CSM tax ISK at work, etc., etc." So you'll lobby for PI improvements, but can't lobby for the MAC client? Read the entire thread; the whole point of that proposal was that it was a micro-fix that could be wedged in somewhere if a dev had some spare time -- a "stocking stuffer" if you will. Those kind of things have a shot at getting picked up on the spur of the moment -- totally different from a big project like fixing the bug-report system.
(continued) Re-Elect Trebor to the CSM - because I have not yet plumbed the depths of my inherent masochism!
My CSM Blog |

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
1644
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 22:46:00 -
[25] - Quote
Quote:Look, Trebor, please don't feel i'm attacking you here, that is not my intent. Nor is it my perception.
Quote:Frankly all the CSM members are doing this and I could point out the contradictions they do as well. I'm just saying you guys need to stop blaming CCP for things the CSM doesn't care about. If SOV warfare, or PI improvements are more important to you fine, just say so. Hell I might even agree. But don't act like your hands are tied on some things, and miracle workers on others. I don't. Others on the CSM are very good at taking credit for fixing EVE, and spend a lot of their time doing so. I prefer to spend my time trying to push to get CCP's priorities more in line with reality, because that way more stuff gets done that improves the game for more players.
Quote:The simple fact is the MAC client is fundamentally broken for many people and it's frustrating! I absolutely agree (since I use it every day!) Our only disagreement is on what's the most efficient way to achieve the desired result. Re-Elect Trebor to the CSM - because I have not yet plumbed the depths of my inherent masochism!
My CSM Blog |

Temba Ronin
132
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 10:17:00 -
[26] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Temba Ronin wrote:I will not vote for you because failure to get the job done for Mac users is no reason to get my votes, yes votes i have several paid accounts like most players. Unlike most players none of mine are stable and playable today. Sorry to hear that, but the blunt fact of the matter is that getting CCP to do things is a long-term exercise involving multiple rounds of bashing your head into a brick wall. Fortunately, I have a thick head, so I'll keep at it as long as the voters let me. Trebor can you use your influence to help organize a riot? CCP only responds when they have to obviously. I will vote for leadership and boldness please demonstrate these attributes when our fellow Mac users are in such dire need. Power To The Players! Dear CSM member and candidate Trebor Daehdoow, your lack of response in either the affirmative or the negative to my very limited specific question speaks volumes as to your desire to address the needs of your constituents.
I went to your re-election site and was impressed by your back ground ..... however ignoring direct requests is exactly what is wrong with CCP in regard to a multitude of player issues and you seem fully inline with their tactics.
As a last resort do you have any suggestions as to how MAC players might be able get CCP's attention long enough for them to address our legitimate well documented issues that cut to the core of basic playability?
Power To The Players! |

Adrenalinemax
High Tech Industries
10
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 01:10:00 -
[27] - Quote
How the hell are we supposed to riot???
I can barely stay connected long enough to swap skills |

Temba Ronin
132
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 02:51:00 -
[28] - Quote
Adrenalinemax wrote:How the hell are we supposed to riot???
I can barely stay connected long enough to swap skills I have to admit being unable to stay logged in really makes rioting problematic. lol .... my frustration level is pretty high with this situation. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |