| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Razzor Death
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
49
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 13:00:00 -
[31] - Quote
Sasha Azala wrote:So you're part of the growing group of vigilantes and being a vigilante makes you feel special
I have no idea what you're talking about but it sounded pretty gay |

Razzor Death
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
49
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 13:03:00 -
[32] - Quote
Lady Vella wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:The official Hulkageddon manager has disappeared since a while. Despite that, Goonswarm have formed a team dedicated to continued exhumers mass destruction that more than replaces Hulkageddon. In fact, while the original Hulkageddon was something for the "wanna be average Joe ganker" and its balance and prizes were adequate to that, Goonswarm have basically endless funding, quite the grip over a lot of content of the game (some markets, vast 0.0 areas...) and therefore can afford a true, never ending carpet bombing strategy (without discerning between bots and not bots). How do you feel about this? Good for the game, because it removes many bots? Bad because non bots are killed and podded as well? Good or bad because it sort of pushes ice mining more to 0.0? (if the carpet bombing keeps being as thorough as is now)? Good because more ships will be made? Bad because nobody in hi sec can defend from an endless funds huge alliance? This "different Hulkageddon" poses several philosophical and game design questions. If they perma-keep the carpet bomb runs (I hope so!), basically this will remove hi sec ice mining for good. I see it as one of those "exploits" that must be repeated till large playerbase enough quits and the developers wake up off their slumber. (not really exploit in the "illegal" sense of the term, they are fully entitled to this). Hi sec dwellers are too helpless and fragmented to ever form an effective "counter" and they are against a mammoth, not the usual "average Joe" tears fuelled suicide gankers. Also there's no real defense against an organization that can just bring N + 1 ships whatever buffs / tank you fit (and Macks are not known for their survivability at all). What tools does EvE give to counter / fight against this potentially (they have not confirmed or denied!) strong and continued initiative? I rewrite the hypothetical terms in short: 1) Unlimited funding for the operation. 2) Unlimited duration. 3) Unlimited and thorough belts carpet bombing. You can see the same players killed multiple times a day, there's no "recoup the losses by mining more" factor. First time it happens and if Goons are smart they will keep this pressure for months. Long term consequences of the above on the playerbase (in general)? 0.0 consequences / monopoly? (yes I am baiting you 0.0 haters!) Choices left to the hi sec miners since whatever they do, they will die? I find all of this quite intellectually amusing (am I slowing goonizing myself?) They do nothing but run less than 5-10 jumps of jita/amarr - stay away from there n ur fine, our old corp is a massive mining corp n they lost nothing. Goons as fucktards
Challenge Accepted space friend o7 |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
274
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 13:05:00 -
[33] - Quote
Sasha Azala wrote: As you've not answered that yes or no question, I'll assume you don't.
You can't call for change if you don't even participate in that activity (health and safety does apply here) what gives you the right to ask for changes under that condition? You could argue but it might be more exciting and you would then mine, but the reality is it's never likely to be as exciting as combat can be. So the chances are you would not do it even if there were changes to it.
Hey, damn me for not spending my life hitting refresh on da interwebs and for having had a power outage lasted 2 hours!
I have mined more than you'll ever do in your life. I still have a mining subsidiary that can make billions a month.
Like 50% of my posts about markets analysis on Market Discussion are about isotopes. Does it ring a bell maybe?
Mara Rinn wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:You don't get it, do you?
You'll never make mining viable nor fun if not by making it impossible until the devs do something drastic. You don't get it, do you? The only people who want mining to be more fun are people who have never done it. Making mining more viable or fun is not going to stop bored Goons suicide ganking anything that moves or doesn't move, as the case may be.
Balls, I have mined in hi sec, low sec and even 0.0, in solo and in corp ops, with and without Orcas and Rorqual.
If mining was not so badly implemented to be undistinguishable from botting then it would attract less bots and would have dynamics that make people not alt tab to do something else.
If mining mechanics were not so obsolete then we'd have mechanisms for active protection. In low sec and 0.0 we'd have half a dozen guys camping the gates and eventually warning if something passed thru (they were corp ops). There's nothing like that in hi sec. What can a non bot miner do in hi sec, to avoid getting killed? The current mechanics certainly don't entice active piloting, the game tries to expand in cooperative gameplay (see incursions) and is PvP centered. What PvP (besides being popped) and cooperative gameplay is available to a miner beyond getting buffed by an Orca?
Only by having it brought under the spotlight could make CCP finally create a decent patch aimed at the old infrastructures.
Trading is in the same situation (but offtopic): bots, nauseating interface, tons-a-clicks-to-do-anything (hey invention too!), 1970 alike graphs and so on.
But since these features are not about ships pew pew they are left to rot forever. Until something like this happens. Maybe. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Sasha Azala
Blood and Decay
22
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 13:20:00 -
[34] - Quote
Razzor Death wrote:Sasha Azala wrote:So you're part of the growing group of vigilantes and being a vigilante makes you feel special I have no idea what you're talking about but it sounded pretty gay
Well, I don't actually know any gay people so I have no idea what they sounds like, in typed text. My guess is the same as anyone else.
Don't confuse considering others with being gay, that would not be exclusive to being gay.
Maybe you should consider others sometimes, or is that asking too much, or does the macho bs get in the way? |

Ohanka
The Lone Patrol Tactical Narcotics Team
13
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 13:23:00 -
[35] - Quote
i've said it before and i'll say it again
Hulkageddon just damages the real miners, does nothing to the botter scum. |

Razzor Death
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
49
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 13:32:00 -
[36] - Quote
Sasha Azala wrote:Razzor Death wrote:Sasha Azala wrote:So you're part of the growing group of vigilantes and being a vigilante makes you feel special I have no idea what you're talking about but it sounded pretty gay Well, I don't actually know any gay people so I have no idea what they sounds like, in typed text. My guess is the same as anyone else. Don't confuse considering others with being gay, that would not be exclusive to being gay. Maybe you should consider others sometimes, or is that asking too much, or does the macho bs get in the way?
Don't consider others ? the mighty Goonswarm Federation of the people is working tirelessly in the **** hole that is High Sec trying to make it a better place for man and woman and you demonise us ? in 5 days one single Corp has inflicted a fully fit titans worth of destruction against the hordes of EULA breakers.
What have you done for the people lately ? other than force people on eveo to have to read through your terrible posts of pointless drivel.
Vote Mittani for CSM, making the game a better place one less bot at a time. |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
952
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 13:37:00 -
[37] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:If mining mechanics were not so obsolete then we'd have mechanisms for active protection.
How do you actively protect anything in hisec?
No amount of remote repping can contend with the alpha of a few Tornadoes. You can't shoot first without losing your ship. You can't stop the other guy from shooting without losing your ship. The best you can do in hisec, to protect your highly valuable paper thin sessile spacecraft is to spam D-scan and warp out of the belt when you see non-mining ships on scan. Even paying that much attention to the game won't protect you from stealth bombers.
|

Razzor Death
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
49
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 13:41:00 -
[38] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:If mining mechanics were not so obsolete then we'd have mechanisms for active protection. How do you actively protect anything in hisec? No amount of remote repping can contend with the alpha of a few Tornadoes. You can't shoot first without losing your ship. You can't stop the other guy from shooting without losing your ship. The best you can do in hisec, to protect your highly valuable paper thin sessile spacecraft is to spam D-scan and warp out of the belt when you see non-mining ships on scan. Even paying that much attention to the game won't protect you from stealth bombers.
hey hey hey now, are you suggesting that people can mine in saftey is they play the game ? |

Raneru
Euphoria Released 0ccupational Hazzard
30
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 13:45:00 -
[39] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:If mining mechanics were not so obsolete then we'd have mechanisms for active protection. How do you actively protect anything in hisec? No amount of remote repping can contend with the alpha of a few Tornadoes. You can't shoot first without losing your ship. You can't stop the other guy from shooting without losing your ship. The best you can do in hisec, to protect your highly valuable paper thin sessile spacecraft is to spam D-scan and warp out of the belt when you see non-mining ships on scan. Even paying that much attention to the game won't protect you from stealth bombers.
You could try mining gravimetric sites, that would offer a higher degree of safety. Not sure if any grav sites have ice though. |

Jenshae Chiroptera
437
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 13:47:00 -
[40] - Quote
Razzor Death wrote:... hey hey hey now, are you suggesting that people can mine in saftey is they play the game ?
D-scan doesn't always save you in high sec. It can be filled with a lot of entries, missions can be run near belts or grav sites, so forth and so on.
Also, sitting there, pressing a button over and over again is the most demented way of expecting someone to "play" a game.  Ideas & stuff EVE - the game of sand castles, either building them or kicking them down. -á Status: Taking a break |

Razzor Death
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
49
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 13:53:00 -
[41] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Also, sitting there, pressing a button over and over again is the most demented way of expecting someone to "play" a game. 
you high sec guys say the funniest of things |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4924
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 14:02:00 -
[42] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:How do you feel about this? It's good because there is nothing bad about it. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Sasha Azala
Blood and Decay
24
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 14:09:00 -
[43] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:How do you feel about this? It's good because there is nothing bad about it.
Ok, what did you do with the real Tippia?
You used to be really active on the forums, now you just seem to be taking a bit of a back-seat.
These days your views are one sided in general to what they used to be (not necessarily this post but in general), or at least it seems that way.
Tippia was not sold to the Goons as a PR instrument was she? |

Cipher Jones
301
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 14:16:00 -
[44] - Quote
Jafit wrote:It's interesting how Moon mining and PI are other forms of resource gathering in this game introduced since belt mining, and they're passive in nature rather than requiring players to sit in a ship and shoot at something. I like to think that this is because CCP realised how bad mining gameplay is, but that probably isn't the reason.
As for bots, any activity that is boring and monotonous, and which requires no thought or creativity can and will be botted. This goes for mining, ratting, missions, and Jita 0.01 isk undercutting market PvP. Bots are a symptom of a bad game with boring gameplay. People complain about CCP not banning bots, instead you should complain about the gameplay, and make gameplay that requires human thought and creativity to play, then the bots will go away on their own.
Out of interest does anyone know of any bots that can do probing? If not then that's a step in the right direction.
I was going to like you post till I finished reading it.
Every single online game has bots, bar none.
Quote:Vote Mittani for CSM, making the game a better place one less bot at a time.
For every billion made by hisec mining bots 10 bil is made by nullsec ratting bots, whom goons have standing orders to not report.
See what happens when fat neckbeards try to ride little ponies? The ponies die. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4924
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 14:19:00 -
[45] - Quote
Sasha Azala wrote:Ok, what did you do with the real Tippia? You used to be really active on the forums, now you just seem to taking a bit of a back-seat. I'm trying to finish my thesisGǪ contrary to popular belief, this actually takes a bit of time away from things like EVE. 
Quote:These days your views are one sided in general to what they used to be (not necessarily this post but in general), or at least it seems that way. Nah. They're the same-sided as they've always been (unless you count the first 3-4 months when I was still learning): they're still the views that highsec needs to be far more risky than it is and that players need to learn/be taught how to make use of the myriad of tools at their disposal to create their own security. This, more than anything short of a completely game-breaking removal of all threats, is the only way to actually make people as safe as they would like to be.
Additionally, these kinds of campaigns activate the market like few other things, and there is quite literally nothing that could even remotely be considered detrimental about that kind of activity. This game lives and dies by the amount of destruction that is going on, and the market activity that is generated by that destruction. It needs to be encouraged in every way possible GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Cajunspitfire
CAJUN BAYOU INC. Opprimo Vox
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 14:25:00 -
[46] - Quote
Death to all the strippers, er bots. It is obvious that there will be more botters due to the requirements from fuel cells. The prices have risen a lot over the past month and that wasn't due to Goonageddon. It was heading that way long before this. I sit in my ice belt and watch not two but three ice bots mining for 23/7 without recourse. How is it they get away with it. Good on the Goons and that sexy voice Mittens. Maybe he can bring balance to the force.
Vote Mittani for CSM . He has cookies |

Sasha Azala
Blood and Decay
24
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 14:29:00 -
[47] - Quote
Cajunspitfire wrote:Death to all the strippers, er bots. It is obvious that there will be more botters due to the requirements from fuel cells. The prices have risen a lot over the past month and that wasn't due to Goonageddon. It was heading that way long before this. I sit in my ice belt and watch not two but three ice bots mining for 23/7 without recourse. How is it they get away with it. Good on the Goons and that sexy voice Mittens. Maybe he can bring balance to the force.
Vote Mittani for CSM . He has cookies
You actually watch them 23/7, I'm sure you did not literally mean that. |

Taiwanistan
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
162
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 15:15:00 -
[48] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:Jafit wrote:It's interesting how Moon mining and PI are other forms of resource gathering in this game introduced since belt mining, and they're passive in nature rather than requiring players to sit in a ship and shoot at something. I like to think that this is because CCP realised how bad mining gameplay is, but that probably isn't the reason.
As for bots, any activity that is boring and monotonous, and which requires no thought or creativity can and will be botted. This goes for mining, ratting, missions, and Jita 0.01 isk undercutting market PvP. Bots are a symptom of a bad game with boring gameplay. People complain about CCP not banning bots, instead you should complain about the gameplay, and make gameplay that requires human thought and creativity to play, then the bots will go away on their own.
Out of interest does anyone know of any bots that can do probing? If not then that's a step in the right direction. I was going to like you post till I finished reading it. Every single online game has bots, bar none. Quote:Vote Mittani for CSM, making the game a better place one less bot at a time. For every billion made by hisec mining bots 10 bil is made by nullsec ratting bots, whom goons have standing orders to not report.
vote for the mittani for pro-choice and higher mineral prices wis: a roman orgy of all-you-can-eat social /dance o7m8 dressup, unrestrained do ask do tell out and proud at the space bar dollhouse, all the evolving new and exciting things you've ever wanted.
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
274
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 15:28:00 -
[49] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:If mining mechanics were not so obsolete then we'd have mechanisms for active protection. How do you actively protect anything in hisec? No amount of remote repping can contend with the alpha of a few Tornadoes. You can't shoot first without losing your ship. You can't stop the other guy from shooting without losing your ship. The best you can do in hisec, to protect your highly valuable paper thin sessile spacecraft is to spam D-scan and warp out of the belt when you see non-mining ships on scan. Even paying that much attention to the game won't protect you from stealth bombers.
I posted a suggestion in the past, about implementing the so called "guard mechanic" other MMOs got. Basically a non mining ship could actively protect the exhumer with a module that sends a protective barrier (lasts 20 secs, 10 mins cooldown maybe with stront usage, makes immune to scram only in hi sec) around it. If a gank boat attacks the mining ship, the damage goes 90% to the "tank" ship and 10% to the exhumer (numbers subject to be adapted to intended max survivable alpha) while Concord still does its job. The exhumer has those 20 secs to GTFO.
This gives a non afk tank AND a non AFK miner a chance to react and defend, without breaking ancient EvE mechanics all around.
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Razzor Death wrote:... hey hey hey now, are you suggesting that people can mine in saftey is they play the game ? D-scan doesn't always save you in high sec. It can be filled with a lot of entries, missions can be run near belts or grav sites, so forth and so on. Also, sitting there, pressing a button over and over again is the most demented way of expecting someone to "play" a game. 
It might be demented but guess what you are forced to do when you leave hi sec and go PvE / mine etc. around?
Ofc D-scan whack-da-button is also something I'd love to see burn in a flame and replaced with something less cruel. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

NECROFIN
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 15:31:00 -
[50] - Quote
Everytime I see that last shiver of structure disappear from a caught Mack or a Hulk it just fills my blackened soul with such glee, oh my jesus satan god I'm gonna murder them ALL untill my wallet runs dry or my gonads explode!! (not likely with all the t2 salvage those wrecks yield!) aaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!11 |

Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
3120
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 15:34:00 -
[51] - Quote
Cool the industrial and civie hp bump I suggested will happen.
|

NECROFIN
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 15:41:00 -
[52] - Quote
You worthless meatbags, adapt or die!
Expecting CCP to fix the game to represent your own complete lack of effort and ability to play the game is so pathetic I just want to murder you bitches so hard (in game) its beyond words!
RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHH |

Corina Jarr
Spazzoid Enterprises Purpose Built
573
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 15:47:00 -
[53] - Quote
I thank everyone involved if this causes prices to raise, and my profits, as I will continue to mine when I feel like it.
Though my actual goal is to make gankers lose money by failing. I like ganker tears (yes, they exist). The isk is just a bonus.
And for the record, with a little bit of work you can be 99% safe in HS (percent made up for purpose of hyperbole). And it doesn't involve clicking dscan even once. |

doyilooki
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 15:58:00 -
[54] - Quote

I donGÇÖt do this for the tears, I do it for the security status. 
If you think you have been killed/podded in error you should fill out the ship reimbursement forum.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dFZzS0lTaXpSejVQb1AwTUhxQmFVNmc6MQ
The dispute payouts are done at the end of the weekly cycle. I also want to add that if you name the offending pilot/pilots they may soon get kicked as the directors are going crazy over the blatant disregard of the operations goal of bot hunting.
Vote The Mittani CSM!!!
|

Zimmy Zeta
Battle Force Industries Tactical Invader Syndicate
830
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 16:01:00 -
[55] - Quote
Cajunspitfire wrote:Death to all the strippers, er bots. It is obvious that there will be more botters due to the requirements from fuel cells. The prices have risen a lot over the past month and that wasn't due to Goonageddon. It was heading that way long before this. I sit in my ice belt and watch not two but three ice bots mining for 23/7 without recourse. How is it they get away with it. Good on the Goons and that sexy voice Mittens. Maybe he can bring balance to the force.
Vote Mittani for CSM . He has cookies
Although I welcome any kind of carnage because it makes me as a trader profit - have you ever considered that most of the miners mine afk and are thus sitting ducks for gankers while bots are quite clever nowadays and know when to GTFO? I fear your campaign will kill of all the human miners and will let only the bots survive. Not that I would care... just a thought... -.- |

oustade Habalu
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 16:14:00 -
[56] - Quote
Tippia wrote: It's good because there is nothing bad about it.
This...
Some capsulers will just write trash about Goons no matter what!!
This time around you have to admit, this is a good thing. |

Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
2826
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 16:19:00 -
[57] - Quote
You used the wrong article - it should be 'a', not 'an', as the 'h' is voiced.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4927
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 16:19:00 -
[58] - Quote
Zimmy Zeta wrote:have you ever considered that most of the miners mine afk and are thus sitting ducks for gankers while bots are quite clever nowadays and know when to GTFO? Of course they have.
That's why the blindingly obvious suggestion is to not mine AFK and why people crying about getting killed only gets laughed at. It's also why hulkageddon is a good thing: it teaches people safety behaviour (whether they choose to actually adopt it or not is a different questionGǪ). GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Ehn Roh
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
25
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 16:28:00 -
[59] - Quote
I approve of barge destruction if only because it might teach some people to pay attention. |

Zimmy Zeta
Battle Force Industries Tactical Invader Syndicate
831
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 16:31:00 -
[60] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Zimmy Zeta wrote:have you ever considered that most of the miners mine afk and are thus sitting ducks for gankers while bots are quite clever nowadays and know when to GTFO? Of course they have. That's why the blindingly obvious suggestion is to not mine AFK and why people crying about getting killed only gets laughed at. It's also why hulkageddon is a good thing: it teaches people safety behaviour (whether they choose to actually adopt it or not is a different questionGǪ).
Yes Hulkageddon IS a good thing, and I really do not care if I sell my strip miners to humans or to bots... BUT: Most dedicated miners I have met are multiboxing, mostly afk or at least semi-afk. I don't think that it is easy to watch many different barges all the time. So mining while not afk and being aware of your surrounding would most likely mean that a miner cannot field 5-6 characters, but only 2 or 3, maybe even only one. So they would lose money. Money is the only thing that drives a miner, easy afk money. So if they couldn't get this money anymore- they would not change their playstyle, they would just use bots instead.
-.- |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |