| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Rodj Blake
Amarr PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
|
Posted - 2008.02.12 17:15:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Rodj Blake on 12/02/2008 17:16:37 Edited by: Rodj Blake on 12/02/2008 17:15:18
Protons are in no way the smallest of the sub-atomic particles, and are themselves made up of smaller things.
Elements heavier than hydrogen are synthesised in the cores of stars though nuclear fusion - it's a well-documented concept with plenty of evidence to back it up.
Big bang theory does not say that atoms were created in the explosion - nuclei came later once things had cooled down a bit.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori.
|

Rodj Blake
Amarr PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
|
Posted - 2008.02.12 17:27:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Roxanna Kell it happen. It is fair to say that micro organism are very different from animals & humans, we hardly share any characteristics, they are part of us at times.
In genetic terms, humans are shockingly similar to micro-organisms. It's just the expressions of those genes which are different.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori.
|

Rodj Blake
Amarr PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
|
Posted - 2008.02.13 12:05:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Stephen HB
So take it from me that much of the 'evidence' for macro-evolution consists entirely of bombastic denunciations of anyone who does not subscribe to the hegemony of thought. Note also that I (and for that matter virtually all Creationist scientists) do not dispute the existence and operation of Mutation/Natural Selection (which was by the way conceived by a creationist before Darwin used it in his works). The oft referenced adaptations of bacteria to antibiotics are an example of this 'micro-evolution', a term coined to blur the line between adaptation of existing information structures and generation of new information. The resistance of Golden Staph (MRSA) to *cillin drugs = mutation and selection of variants of beta-lactamase... one protein in thousands, and through it all it remains S.aureus.
Are you saying that evolution allows minor changes in individual species, but does not create new species?
If so, how do you explain the speciation of cicadas that's been observed?
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori.
|

Rodj Blake
Amarr PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
|
Posted - 2008.02.13 12:37:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Rodj Blake on 13/02/2008 12:38:06 Edited by: Rodj Blake on 13/02/2008 12:37:27
Originally by: Roxanna Kell Edited by: Roxanna Kell on 13/02/2008 12:24:21
Originally by: Rodj Blake
Originally by: Stephen HB
So take it from me that much of the 'evidence' for macro-evolution consists entirely of bombastic denunciations of anyone who does not subscribe to the hegemony of thought. Note also that I (and for that matter virtually all Creationist scientists) do not dispute the existence and operation of Mutation/Natural Selection (which was by the way conceived by a creationist before Darwin used it in his works). The oft referenced adaptations of bacteria to antibiotics are an example of this 'micro-evolution', a term coined to blur the line between adaptation of existing information structures and generation of new information. The resistance of Golden Staph (MRSA) to *cillin drugs = mutation and selection of variants of beta-lactamase... one protein in thousands, and through it all it remains S.aureus.
Are you saying that evolution allows minor changes in individual species, but does not create new species?
If so, how do you explain the speciation of cicadas that's been observed?
the answer is you can't, YET.
He can't, but I can 
It's all down to natural selection causing the emergence of different traits between different age groups who can't interbreed with each other due to the cicada's odd life cycle.
Pretty classic Darwinian evolution, in other words.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori.
|

Rodj Blake
Amarr PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
|
Posted - 2008.02.13 13:03:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Roxanna Kell
If you say so.
Don't just take my word for it.
Google "cicada speciation" and read up 
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori.
|
| |
|