EVE Search - Jita has sold out of Armageddons

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Jita has sold out of Armageddons

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Vincent La Merch Industrial GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.03.06 04:51:00 - [1] The true nature of JihadSwarm becomes apparent
facialimpediment Amarr GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.03.06 04:55:00 - [2] Infidels :(
techzer0 IDLE GUNS	Posted - 2008.03.06 05:02:00 - [3] Hahah.. yes make people go to hentogaira to buy them. Make sure they fly them unfit and stabbed through the lowsec next door on their way out too please ------------ Originally by: CCP Mitnal It's great being a puppetmaster
Marcus TheMartin Gallente Deadly Addiction Un-Natural Selection	Posted - 2008.03.06 05:09:00 - [4] All is lost
Lithalnas Amarr Headcrabs	Posted - 2008.03.06 05:12:00 - [5] THE END IS NEIGH THE ANTICRIST HAS COME TO WALK AMONG US ------------- fixed for greater eve content
Freya Runestone Minmatar Brutor tribe	Posted - 2008.03.06 05:19:00 - [6] BS's next, then cruisers. sooner or later jihad swarm will be suiciding in rookie frigates. how many civilian gatling guns would it take to suicide a hulk?
Marcus TheMartin Gallente Deadly Addiction Un-Natural Selection	Posted - 2008.03.06 05:59:00 - [7] Originally by: Freya Runestone BS's next, then cruisers. sooner or later jihad swarm will be suiciding in rookie frigates. how many civilian gatling guns would it take to suicide a hulk? As many as it would take licks to get to the tootsie roll center of a tootsie pop
Quelque Chose Gallente	Posted - 2008.03.06 06:12:00 - [8] Originally by: Marcus TheMartin Originally by: Freya Runestone BS's next, then cruisers. sooner or later jihad swarm will be suiciding in rookie frigates. how many civilian gatling guns would it take to suicide a hulk? As many as it would take licks to get to the tootsie roll center of a tootsie pop One... Two- hooo! Ah- thrrreeee. So ya ovahstan dat mek tree. ______________________________ "Eve Online is a massively multiplayer game about trolling in outer space."
Dirk Magnum Spearhead Endeavors	Posted - 2008.03.06 06:17:00 - [9] Edited by: Dirk Magnum on 06/03/2008 06:23:44 You guys do know that in Trinity 1.1 Concord isn't going to respond to rookie ships aggressing in High Sec right? If I remember right it's because there was a lot of complaints over the years, especially now that the player base is increasing at its most rapid rate yet, that new players shouldn't be penalized for hitting the fire switch and ignoring the warning. It's something CCP has been analyzing I guess, and they've found that Concordokken isn't a MAIN reason for new players not subscribing after the trial, but it does at least factor into that decision for some. Personally I think it's an open doorway to exploitation by anyone who can get together a gigantic gang of newb ships (i.e. Goonswarm) and grief people, but what do I know? Still, how many newbs really get that butthurt over getting iced by Concord? Friggin WoW players all, no doubt.
Rawr Cristina Caldari Naqam	Posted - 2008.03.06 06:18:00 - [10] Excellent <something happened>
techzer0 IDLE GUNS	Posted - 2008.03.06 06:19:00 - [11] Originally by: Dirk Magnum You guys do know that in Trinity 1.1 Concord isn't going to respond to rookie ships aggressing in High Sec right? If I remember right it's because there was a lot of complaints over the years, especially now that the player base is increasing at its most rapid rate yet, that new players shouldn't be penalized for hitting the fire switch and ignoring the warning. It's something they've been analyzing I guess. Personally I think it's an open doorway to exploitation by anyone who can get together a gigantic gang of newb ships (i.e. Goonswarm) and grief people, but what do I know? If this is true.... My 140dps velator of doom is rejoicing at hearing this ------------ Originally by: CCP Mitnal It's great being a puppetmaster
Drachtul Tun'Dull	Posted - 2008.03.06 06:30:00 - [12] Originally by: techzer0 Originally by: Dirk Magnum You guys do know that in Trinity 1.1 Concord isn't going to respond to rookie ships aggressing in High Sec right? If I remember right it's because there was a lot of complaints over the years, especially now that the player base is increasing at its most rapid rate yet, that new players shouldn't be penalized for hitting the fire switch and ignoring the warning. It's something they've been analyzing I guess. Personally I think it's an open doorway to exploitation by anyone who can get together a gigantic gang of newb ships (i.e. Goonswarm) and grief people, but what do I know? If this is true.... My 140dps velator of doom is rejoicing at hearing this Yeah. Anyone know if you can fit a warp scrambler or a webber on a noobship? I bet we find out 5 minutes after that patch goes live.
Vitrael Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction	Posted - 2008.03.06 06:32:00 - [13] Originally by: Dirk Magnum Edited by: Dirk Magnum on 06/03/2008 06:23:44 You guys do know that in Trinity 1.1 Concord isn't going to respond to rookie ships aggressing in High Sec right? If I remember right it's because there was a lot of complaints over the years, especially now that the player base is increasing at its most rapid rate yet, that new players shouldn't be penalized for hitting the fire switch and ignoring the warning. It's something CCP has been analyzing I guess, and they've found that Concordokken isn't a MAIN reason for new players not subscribing after the trial, but it does at least factor into that decision for some. Personally I think it's an open doorway to exploitation by anyone who can get together a gigantic gang of newb ships (i.e. Goonswarm) and grief people, but what do I know? Still, how many newbs really get that butthurt over getting iced by Concord? Friggin WoW players all, no doubt. Proof please.
Surfin's PlunderBunny Minmatar GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.03.06 06:37:00 - [14] Originally by: Lithalnas THE END IS NEIGH THE ANTICRIST HAS COME TO WALK AMONG US I been here for years Originally by: Avaricia look a goon lol
Dirk Magnum Spearhead Endeavors	Posted - 2008.03.06 06:50:00 - [15] Originally by: Vitrael Proof please. If this had lasted a few more pages I'd have said the proof is right here.
Khanid Kutie I R Teh Poasting Alt Corp	Posted - 2008.03.06 06:58:00 - [16] Originally by: Dirk Magnum Edited by: Dirk Magnum on 06/03/2008 06:23:44 You guys do know that in Trinity 1.1 Concord isn't going to respond to rookie ships aggressing in High Sec right? If I remember right it's because there was a lot of complaints over the years, especially now that the player base is increasing at its most rapid rate yet, that new players shouldn't be penalized for hitting the fire switch and ignoring the warning. It's something CCP has been analyzing I guess, and they've found that Concordokken isn't a MAIN reason for new players not subscribing after the trial, but it does at least factor into that decision for some. Personally I think it's an open doorway to exploitation by anyone who can get together a gigantic gang of newb ships (i.e. Goonswarm) and grief people, but what do I know? Still, how many newbs really get that butthurt over getting iced by Concord? Friggin WoW players all, no doubt. lol wut? proof? ____________________________________________ Originally by: Thargat They should change the name of CAOD to EvE Zoo. Please to not feed the animals.
Adunh Slavy Ammatar Trade Syndicate	Posted - 2008.03.06 07:03:00 - [17] Originally by: Dirk Magnum You guys do know that in Trinity 1.1 Concord isn't going to respond to rookie ships aggressing in High Sec right? Don't belive it, might be fun though. The Real Space Initiative - V5 (Forum Link)
Siigari Kitawa Gallente The Aduro Protocol	Posted - 2008.03.06 07:08:00 - [18] Trolls, all of you. Even the OP. Even me. No.. not me. I never troll.
Rawr Cristina Caldari Naqam	Posted - 2008.03.06 07:37:00 - [19] Originally by: Siigari Kitawa Trolls, all of you. Even the OP. Even me. No.. not me. I never troll. You're the worst troll EVE has ever known Jenny Spitfire :facepalms: at your lack of trolling quality every time you post ... Rocket.Assisted.Wombat.Recoil ...
Summer's End Caldari Intel 7	Posted - 2008.03.06 07:42:00 - [20] Damnit. >> When you can't run, you crawl, and when you can't crawl - when you can't do that...You find someone to carry you.
Roy Batty68 Caldari Immortal Dead	Posted - 2008.03.06 08:07:00 - [21] Originally by: techzer0 If this is true.... My 140dps velator of doom is rejoicing at hearing this Lies! You're talking about Jenk's Honda no doubt. Sig removed, inappropriate content. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint
Plave Okice Gallente Red. Red Republic	Posted - 2008.03.06 09:52:00 - [22] Originally by: Dirk Magnum You guys do know that in Trinity 1.1 Concord isn't going to respond to rookie ships aggressing in High Sec right? This can't be right? There'll be a lot of RvB pilots smiling if it is. Red CEORed Vs Blue
Malcanis R.E.C.O.N. Black-Out	Posted - 2008.03.06 11:08:00 - [23] Originally by: Siigari Kitawa Trolls, all of you. Even the OP. Even me. No.. not me. I never troll. Who cares what you do? CONCORD provide consequences, not safety; only you can do that.
N1fty Amarr Galactic Shipyards Inc HUZZAH FEDERATION	Posted - 2008.03.06 11:53:00 - [24] Originally by: Vincent La The true nature of JihadSwarm becomes apparent So demand for Geddons has gone up. I should imagine industrial types will move to fill the damand. This will increase demand for minerals. Mineral prices rise. Mining becomes more profitable [yet risky as long as the jihadswarm continues]. I'm seeing risk / reward, carry on. Originally by: CCP Eris Discordia I usually close my eyes and just beg, out loud added with a lot of squealing. I swear it helps.

Chribba Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire	Posted - 2008.03.06 12:34:00 - [25] Originally by: Dirk Magnum Edited by: Dirk Magnum on 06/03/2008 06:23:44 You guys do know that in Trinity 1.1 Concord isn't going to respond to rookie ships aggressing in High Sec right? If I remember right it's because there was a lot of complaints over the years, especially now that the player base is increasing at its most rapid rate yet, that new players shouldn't be penalized for hitting the fire switch and ignoring the warning. It's something CCP has been analyzing I guess, and they've found that Concordokken isn't a MAIN reason for new players not subscribing after the trial, but it does at least factor into that decision for some. Personally I think it's an open doorway to exploitation by anyone who can get together a gigantic gang of newb ships (i.e. Goonswarm) and grief people, but what do I know? Still, how many newbs really get that butthurt over getting iced by Concord? Friggin WoW players all, no doubt. Except you left out the part where you won't be able to fly rookie ships if you are on a non-trial account... Secure 3rd party service ■ Do you Veldspar?

Daelin Blackleaf Naqam	Posted - 2008.03.06 13:02:00 - [26] Counter-trolling: Now in veldspaar flavor.
Euriti Gallente Caritas Subsidium	Posted - 2008.03.06 14:12:00 - [27] Originally by: techzer0 Originally by: Dirk Magnum You guys do know that in Trinity 1.1 Concord isn't going to respond to rookie ships aggressing in High Sec right? If I remember right it's because there was a lot of complaints over the years, especially now that the player base is increasing at its most rapid rate yet, that new players shouldn't be penalized for hitting the fire switch and ignoring the warning. It's something they've been analyzing I guess. Personally I think it's an open doorway to exploitation by anyone who can get together a gigantic gang of newb ships (i.e. Goonswarm) and grief people, but what do I know? If this is true.... My 140dps velator of doom is rejoicing at hearing this Velator of Doom
Black Scorpio	Posted - 2008.03.06 14:20:00 - [28] What's happening if this is true ofc, is that whoever has blueprints are just withholding building or selling them until the patch comes live, so they can up the price with 20-40mil..
Malcanis R.E.C.O.N. Black-Out	Posted - 2008.03.06 14:24:00 - [29] Originally by: Euriti Originally by: techzer0 Originally by: Dirk Magnum You guys do know that in Trinity 1.1 Concord isn't going to respond to rookie ships aggressing in High Sec right? If I remember right it's because there was a lot of complaints over the years, especially now that the player base is increasing at its most rapid rate yet, that new players shouldn't be penalized for hitting the fire switch and ignoring the warning. It's something they've been analyzing I guess. Personally I think it's an open doorway to exploitation by anyone who can get together a gigantic gang of newb ships (i.e. Goonswarm) and grief people, but what do I know? If this is true.... My 140dps velator of doom is rejoicing at hearing this Velator of Doom Ouch! I thought he was kidding about the 140DPS part. With commandship support those could be really scary in numbers. CONCORD provide consequences, not safety; only you can do that.
Siddy Minmatar Evolution Band of Brothers	Posted - 2008.03.06 14:27:00 - [30] all going acording to plan :gendoikari:

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.