| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
3rdD Dave
Deadly Addiction
Un-Natural Selection
   |
Posted - 2008.03.26 07:16:00 -
[1]
Which is better, a lv3 Q10 agent or a lv4 -17 agent?
Can i talk to the agent, see what his mission is then decline it without taking a hit?
|
Venkul Mul
Vikramaditya
DO JAJA Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.03.26 08:56:00 -
[2]
Q: Which is better, a lv3 Q10 agent or a lv4 -17 agent?
A: If you can do level 4 missions, the level 4 agents is better. In high level missions the largest % of the pay is in the targets bounties, not the agent pay. The only exception is R&D agents where a 3 +10 is better than a 4 -17.
Q: Can i talk to the agent, see what his mission is then decline it without taking a hit?
A: if you haven't accepted a mission, but only asked for a job, you can refuse a job with that agent without standing hits every 4 hours.
If you want to refuse a second job you need to waith 4 hours if you don't want standing hits. You can go to another agent in the emantime.
|
syphurous
Center for Advanced Studies
|
Posted - 2008.03.26 09:39:00 -
[3]
If you have good social skills and know how to find good agents, the mission reward difference at lvl4 can be 1 mil.
 Originally by: GM Faolchu
People salvaging your missions npcs or the player you just blew up are doing nothing wrong.
|
3rdD Dave
Deadly Addiction
Un-Natural Selection
|
Posted - 2008.03.26 23:08:00 -
[4]
So i can just read the journal detail about the mission then do nothing if i wish not to do it?
And also, would an ishtar be okay for lv4 Q-17 missions?
|
Tranka Verrane
Public Venture Enterprises
Safe And Fun Environment
|
Posted - 2008.03.27 10:41:00 -
[5]
Originally by: 3rdD Dave
So i can just read the journal detail about the mission then do nothing if i wish not to do it?
And also, would an ishtar be okay for lv4 Q-17 missions?
You would have to actually turn it down, if you merely do nothing you will get a standing loss when it times out.
The quality of the agent has no bearing on the difficulty of the missions.
And doubtful.
Ingame: Channels & Mailing lists>Channels>Join>PVE>OK
|
Arazel Chainfire
KDM Corp
Firmus Ixion
|
Posted - 2008.03.28 01:59:00 -
[6]
Originally by: 3rdD Dave
...
And also, would an ishtar be okay for lv4 Q-17 missions?
If you know what your doing - yes. You can use an ishtar on any lvl 4 mission. However, mission difficulty isn't affected by the quality of the agent. Only the quality of the rewards is.
-Arazel
Originally by: Tsanse Kinske
Mutual Incomprehension is one of the Four Horsemen of most internet arguments, I guess, along with Unfettered Hostility, Overwhelming Vagueness, and Lack of Evidence.
|
notaway
Republic Military School
|
Posted - 2008.03.28 13:40:00 -
[7]
In regular missions, it's always better to have the highest rank with the best quality possible.. So a negative lvl 4 will always be better than the highest Q lvl 3.
However, with R&D agents this is not true...They are based upon Quality..Thus, a lvl 3 Q18 agent will give u more research points than a lvl 4 -17 agent..U can see the actual rp's provided by the agents using agent finder and plugging in the corp and the skill involved--like mechanical engineering etc...
|
Jurgen Cartis
Interstellar Corporation of Exploration
Nex Eternus
|
Posted - 2008.03.29 06:47:00 -
[8]
The L4 is probably better. The bounties on the rats are much richer in L4s.
As for the Ishtar, it's a fine ship. Just be careful with it, make use of the mission guides to know what's going to happen beforehand.
--------------------
ICE Blueprint Sales
FIRST!! -Yipsilanti
Pfft. Never such a thing as a "last chance". ;) -Rauth |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |