EVE Search - my hat is off to Idle Miners

All Channels

Crime and Punishment

my hat is off to Idle Miners

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Aeryn D'Argo Racketeers	Posted - 2008.03.27 18:13:00 - [31] Originally by: ReaperTox PS- Someone in RAK could please teach Denis08 to fit a Drake? Some people are saying that we fake killmails >.< We are trying. Personally, trying to get him to stick with a frig/cruiser.
Sol'Kanar Racketeers	Posted - 2008.03.27 18:37:00 - [32] Originally by: ReaperTox Oh my god...a thread talking about IDLE... damn it! That said we are not doing a good job being IDLE... As IDLE guns representative already said , IDLE guns and IDLE Miners are diferent corps (except in IDLEness in the name). Meurtriez Vous, Thanks for the compliment. Concerning us losing the war.. not sure about that but time will tell;-) It has been fun but we would have prefered that Dockateers...ehr..sorry Racketeers would undock more and be able to fight outside the shadow of their stations homebase. So the one's that say that RAK can't PVP that's a lie...some RAK do and others are learning. And they do it very well near their station...I wonder that if outside it they also know how to do it... Again time will tell. Nevertheless we already had some fun moments. @ooTunado: Thanks for the compliment and see you around...together or against it's always fun to fly with you :-) To all the others: Don't worry Be IDLE :-) Cheers ReaperTox PS- Someone in RAK could please teach Denis08 to fit a Drake? Some people are saying that we fake killmails Now now, let's keep this in perspective. Throughout both of these wars, IDLE has set up shop to camp in our home system. Because of this, roaming isn't necessary - you guys are on our front porch. PS - We like Dennis just the way he is. You should have your corp spy relay how he sounds on vent, it's a trip. :)
negatox Idle Miners	Posted - 2008.03.27 19:50:00 - [33] I just want to head home and mine some Veldspar... Great war RAK o/
Cael Ironstaff Idle Miners	Posted - 2008.03.27 19:56:00 - [34] The facts from the last war (declared by RAK). 72 ships killed 18 ships lost http://mykillboard.net/idle-miners/?a=cc_detail&ctr_id=4 In terms of isk, we lost by a battleship, and was only in the last hours of war that one of our corp members undocked at Soba alone and was "blobed" this -> http://www.eve-racketeers.info/Killboard/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=7600 shows their own surprise. All the major battles that happened ended either with RAK expensive ships docking (running) as it can be seen here -> http://mykillboard.net/idle-miners/?a=kill_related&kll_id=450 here -> http://mykillboard.net/idle-miners/?a=kill_related&kll_id=464 and here -> http://mykillboard.net/idle-miners/?a=kill_related&kll_id=518 They got a pretty good catch on one of our command ships. From my personal point of view it was quite boring to be in soba trying to catch something. Hence the name Dockateers. I remember one episode that we had 5 pilots on station camping with almost 14 rak, one of ours fall asleep. That was the past war. This war (that we declared) we had, until now, only one major fleet engagement that happened after 5 hours waiting and with most of our guys logging because of RL. Based on that specific, anyway very interesting fight, the Rak appear on the forum saying that we are loosing the war. It was in fact a great moral boost for their corp after being locked down monday. I respect the RAK pilots, and understand their rule on compulsory smack, its their role in the game and they feel happy with it. One of their excuses for not undocking was the huge flood of young players. Since I'm also a new player I understand their problems and wish them the best luck in future fights. War stats until now: 29 kills 11 losses I hope that we all continue to have fun, and see you all in space. p.s. sorry for my english, its not my native language p.s.2 We camp Soba because after almost 1 week of the 1st war none of the RAK appeared near our usual systems shoot kill win
Cael Ironstaff Idle Miners	Posted - 2008.03.27 20:00:00 - [35] Edited by: Cael Ironstaff on 27/03/2008 20:00:04 Originally by: o0TuNa0o IDLE are a decent set of pilots. Had a few skuffles with them in low sec o/ Tuna! Very nice cat and mouse we played there! As soon as this ends we will do that again (even if on the same side). Fly safe m8 shoot kill win
Sol'Kanar Racketeers	Posted - 2008.03.27 20:32:00 - [36] Originally by: Cael Ironstaff The facts from the last war (declared by RAK). lots of words Cael, while I can appreciate your attempt at rationalizing your corps loss in the first war, the fact remains that you guys did lose it. Both corps had players making really stupid blunders which padded killboard stats. It just so happens that through luck or skill, RAK pulled a win out of it. Currently, you guys are again losing this war. Whether or not it changes in the future, has no effect on stating that you're losing right now. Calling us "Dockateers" really means nothing. I'm sorry we don't come out to play whenever you feel like we should.
Octave Zedarr State War Academy	Posted - 2008.03.27 20:33:00 - [37] Yeah, really close wars. First one, RAK-52% efficiency, this one we're currently ahead with a 54% efficiency. Ship numbers don't really matter, personally, I'd gladly trade 5 frigates/cruisers for a command ship. Anyway, great fun, hope for another fleet engagement soon.
Aeryn D'Argo Racketeers	Posted - 2008.03.27 20:36:00 - [38] Yeah, really close wars. First one, RAK-52% efficiency, this one we're currently ahead with a 54% efficiency. Ship numbers don't really matter, personally, I'd gladly trade 5 frigates/cruisers for a command ship. Anyway, great fun, hope for another fleet engagement soon.
alzare Idle Miners	Posted - 2008.03.27 21:14:00 - [39] Cael even tough the kill diference the isk is the real measure in this war. So by this time Racketeers still wining the War iskwise. I must say im prety much enjoying some parts of this war, there were some good ganks in our side, and there was some good ones in their side. I hope i continue to have fun during the war and so the rest of my guys. Alzare
Valgren IDLE GUNS	Posted - 2008.03.27 22:29:00 - [40] Wait wait...what? Someone is defiling our fine name by taking out the guns and adding miners? This just can not be allowed to continue. Idle Guns war dec's Idle Miners! Oh, wait..we're all -10. Nevermind. Val
Flaming sambuka IDLE GUNS	Posted - 2008.03.27 23:13:00 - [41] Who the hell are idle miners and why is everyone copying our name?!?! my lips are burning with tabasco hothot!! WE PLAY WITH OUR MEMBERS
Lavraen Black Podding	Posted - 2008.03.28 11:45:00 - [42] Originally by: ReaperTox Originally by: Lavraen Although Idle miners and Grey Templars had superior numbers Racketeers swung it by their use of disposbale ECM. Just a small correction: RAK had greater numbers and disposable ECM and neutrals repairing them. They never go out unless outnumber the opponent. Which is by to way, a perfectly fair and effective tactic. Cheers ReaperTox I have to admit I didn't see any repping going on, but I did see about three RAK BB wrecks. I'm not flaming anyone here, just saying I was really surprised the IDLE/Templars fleet didn't have any ECM. Anyway, it looked a great fight from 150km away. Just like the Chelsea Tottenham game the other day, great for the neutral. Lavraen
Lars Vegaz Mercenary Forces	Posted - 2008.03.28 12:01:00 - [43] it looked a great fight from 150km away. Just like the Chelsea Tottenham game the other day, great for the neutral. You need better seats mate
Meat Missle IDLE GUNS	Posted - 2008.03.28 17:59:00 - [44] We were originally going to make a mining corp for mining alts WAY back in 07. We were very close to wardeccing IDLE miners to steal their name. We eventually fell victim to our own lazy nature and made corps with different names instead. And yes, having people think you suck IS a deffinite advantage.. amarr FTW. Your signature is too large. Please resize it to a maximum of 400 x 120 with the file size not exceeding 24000 bytes. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] - Mitnal
MirrorGod Heretic Army DeStInY.	Posted - 2008.03.28 18:20:00 - [45] Originally by: Meat Missle And yes, having people think you suck IS a deffinite advantage.. amarr FTW. ^This, but shh, let people keep whining so I keep getting boosted. Recruitment: [ANTI]
ReaperTox Idle Miners	Posted - 2008.03.29 23:41:00 - [46] Originally by: Flaming sambuka Who the hell are idle miners and why is everyone copying our name?!?! o/ Flaming, there are 10 corps with IDLE in their names... The first (created in 2003) is IDLE Threats that seems desactivated. IDLE GUNS are about 3 months older than IDLE miners. But I think no relation was intended... at the time of corp cretion they were a bunch of idle carebears only that joined in for mining together... nowadays we diversified a bit Have fun and fly safe Cheers ReaperTox
ReaperTox Idle Miners	Posted - 2008.03.29 23:43:00 - [47] Originally by: Lavraen Originally by: ReaperTox Originally by: Lavraen Although Idle miners and Grey Templars had superior numbers Racketeers swung it by their use of disposbale ECM. Just a small correction: RAK had greater numbers and disposable ECM and neutrals repairing them. They never go out unless outnumber the opponent. Which is by to way, a perfectly fair and effective tactic. Cheers ReaperTox I have to admit I didn't see any repping going on, but I did see about three RAK BB wrecks. I'm not flaming anyone here, just saying I was really surprised the IDLE/Templars fleet didn't have any ECM. No flame found Lavraen... but if people are watching maybe we, RAK and IDLE, should profit by selling tickets to the fights... Have fun ReaperTox
Malcanis R.E.C.O.N.	Posted - 2008.03.29 23:51:00 - [48] Originally by: Po3tank Quote: Having people think you suck is an advantage. you just explained the amarr in one sentance Alas, people dno't ignore ravens any more... CONCORD provide consequences, not safety; only you can do that.
Aldrad	Posted - 2008.03.31 15:01:00 - [49] Yeah, RAK comprised a well structured fleet during that battle. My hat goes off to them. Shame about the Guardian, though. Following the ill-conceived war dec against Templars, then the surprising retraction, I've yet to find out the reason behind the initial war deccing.

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.