| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dust Puppy
   |
Posted - 2004.04.21 11:11:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Dust Puppy on 21/04/2004 14:40:28
Edited by: Dust Puppy on 21/04/2004 11:23:06
Ok I have incursus, navigation level 4 standard 1mn mwd and acceleration control level 3. The incursus have 285m/s base speed and with navigation level 4 it gives 342m/s. I should get 5.75x boost from an mwd with acceleration control level 3 and if we factor in the mass (1,100,000kg) I should have effective boost
5.75*1,000,000/1,100,000 = 5.227x which gives
1788m/s max speed.
Now the problem is I now my incursus can reach higher speed than 2000m/s so what¦s missing. Does agility reduce the mass or am I just doing this wrong.
Edit: wrong acceleration control level 
__________
Capacitor research |
Karmic
|
Posted - 2004.04.21 11:13:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Karmic on 21/04/2004 11:46:17
Sorry about that :)
- - - - - - - - -
|
Dust Puppy
|
Posted - 2004.04.21 11:23:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Dust Puppy on 21/04/2004 11:25:27
pressed enter when I had finished making the subject.
Edit: and why in gods name did I put this in the skills forum
Could some nice moderator move this into the Ships and modules forum 
__________
Capacitor research |
Karmic
|
Posted - 2004.04.21 11:54:00 -
[4]
No I don't think agility reduces the mass. Also you mention acceleration control 2 in the first part of your statement and acceleration control 3 in the end part of your statement. Which one is it ?
As for the rest I just hunting around to see if I noted down any formula about speed calculations from when it changed to the 1/10/100 mn ab's & mwd.
- - - - - - - - -
|
WhiteTiger
|
Posted - 2004.04.22 04:30:00 -
[5]
I am not sure of the extact formula's but how about this:
285*1.2*(1+5.0*1.15)*1000000/1100000= 2098.6 m/s
This anywhere close?
If you think about your formula without the extra 1+ you would go slower with an afterburner not faster.
|
Dust Puppy
|
Posted - 2004.04.22 11:31:00 -
[6]
That actually is very close White, thanks.
__________
Capacitor research |
Silverlancer
|
Posted - 2004.04.23 12:25:00 -
[7]
Yeah, the problem is the fact that you multiplied the speeed by 575%, not ADDED to it by 575%.
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |