| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sprite Can
82
   |
Posted - 2012.02.29 02:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
I'm not sure why or how you come to the conclusion that the Ibis deserved a complete overhaul but the Velator did not. It is almost identical to the current one, minus the Gallente's trademark organic, mostly symmetric look and frankly just flat out looks worse. Please consider scrapping it and starting over. It is by far the ugliest ship in the game, and I still can't believe that it gets a redo that makes it worse.
Refreshing Lemon-Lime~ |
Siigari Kitawa
Push Industries
Push Interstellar Network
121
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 09:59:00 -
[2] - Quote
I agree, way too sharp to be called Gallente.
Need stuff moved? Push Industries will handle it.
Servicing highsec and lowsec - and we do it faster and more reliably than anyone else.
Ingame channel: PUSHX |
Galphii
Furnulum pani nolo
THE SPACE P0LICE
27
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 11:13:00 -
[3] - Quote
It's not that bad - actually something of an improvement, but yeah I'm not a fan of the layout. The design principles are sound though. |
Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron
Legion of xXDEATHXx
247
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 13:11:00 -
[4] - Quote
The new Velator is a cross between the Catalyst and the Talos. It's leaning more towards art-deco rather than the organic, though still definitely Gallente in design and a great improvement on the old model.
The ugliest ship in EVE title will always belong to the Imicus. Nothing else can touch it. |
Sprite Can
82
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 13:19:00 -
[5] - Quote
Imicus and Velator are both pretty similar in design imo, both are hideous. The Velator may not be flat-out the worst ship but when thinking of contenders for the ugliest ship it is definitely one of the first ones that comes to mind. It's just baffling for the ship to be up for a redo and to have it almost unchanged.
Refreshing Lemon-Lime~ |
Moonaura
The Dead Rabbit Society
126
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 13:37:00 -
[6] - Quote
Haters gonna hate I guess.
I think they all look like great remodelling efforts. It is impossible to make everyone happy. Im sure if they did it how you'd expected it, somebody else wouldn't like it. Moving on...
Caldari focused fleet PvP
Fly Caldari? We are recruiting:
www.thedeadrabbitsociety.com |
poisoned rose
Poisoned Petals
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.21 21:20:00 -
[7] - Quote
ccp....
why not add a tab with a list of all the ships and theyre model versions
by default the latest model ship
if someone dosant agree with the improvement they can pick one of the older versions |
Solhild
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
689
|
Posted - 2012.05.22 05:17:00 -
[8] - Quote
Sprite Can wrote:I'm not sure why or how you come to the conclusion that the Ibis deserved a complete overhaul but the Velator did not. It is almost identical to the current one, minus the Gallente's trademark organic, mostly symmetric look and frankly just flat out looks worse. Please consider scrapping it and starting over. It is by far the ugliest ship in the game, and I still can't believe that it gets a redo that makes it worse.
I understand your pain but the prize for the worst ship design in EVE goes to the Reaper. |
Autonomous Monster
Paradox Interstellar
45
|
Posted - 2012.05.22 08:02:00 -
[9] - Quote
poisoned rose wrote:ccp....
why not add a tab with a list of all the ships and theyre model versions
by default the latest model ship
if someone dosant agree with the improvement they can pick one of the older versions
Because those older versions would have to be maintained as the engine is iterated on, tying up resources that should really be used for other things. |
poisoned rose
Poisoned Petals
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.22 16:39:00 -
[10] - Quote
Autonomous Monster wrote:poisoned rose wrote:ccp....
why not add a tab with a list of all the ships and theyre model versions
by default the latest model ship
if someone dosant agree with the improvement they can pick one of the older versions Because those older versions would have to be maintained as the engine is iterated on, tying up resources that should really be used for other things.
in wat way ?
it cant be the geometrical data , they are similar to nowerdays models
it cant be the textures or shaders , converting it to nowerdays shaders can be done with 3 clicks on a button and a batch repeating it for every ship
it might be computer resources but thats extremely limited caus most is consumed by planetary surfaces , stations and other colosal objects
and it cant be interfearing with the *smoothness of running it or net trafic , caus its local , the only thing the eve server needs to send is wat ship it is and the client does an if statement between the models , a process that takes wat ? 0.00000001 sec
so wat kined of recources might this consume that its not even worth considering ? |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |