| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Bienator II
madmen of the skies
610
|
Posted - 2012.03.05 18:36:00 -
[31] - Quote
well, this was a good decision. try to explain somebody that you have to pay a "cover charge" for a free2play game while looking serious.
a eve-style bounty system https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=359105 You fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail to jump because you are cloaked |

Henry Haphorn
Aliastra Gallente Federation
215
|
Posted - 2012.03.05 18:39:00 -
[32] - Quote
boseo wrote:ITT: Lots of whining, and people showing their lack of ability to read or research the subject they are complaining about.
Personally seeing most of the articles about this it seems like a good plan, as putting a subscription on a console game is a bad idea due to the nature of the way people like to game on consoles (like to not be tied down to a game which a subscription would do) It also looks like it should not affect people who don't want to put RL money into the game, due to the way paid items can be sold for isk (much like plex in eve)
Also being free you are more likely to get people going "oh I wonder what this is about? oh its free *download*" than if they had to pay a cover fee. Why? because it cost nothing but time. and I already know a few guys who upon reading that it will be free have said "I will have a look at it" and knowing these guys they will most probably spend some cash while playing .. so profit.
This^^ Welcome to Eve Online. Don't expect people to be nice to you. |

Vertisce Soritenshi
Varion Galactic Tragedy.
1175
|
Posted - 2012.03.05 18:52:00 -
[33] - Quote
This whole thread is one massive failure. They will make their money off of microtransactions for Aurum. It is not hard to figure out. And no this is not the same as Pay to Win. I won't buy a single thing in DUST with real money but I guarantee I will likely kick your ass everytime anyway. EvE is not about PvP.-á EvE is about the SANDBOX! - CCP!-á Open the door!!! |

Riggs Droput
Born-2-Kill 0ccupational Hazzard
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.05 19:01:00 -
[34] - Quote
F2P Dust looks like a MMO version of TF2.
Will play, won't pay, will still win. I would rather die on my feet, than live on my knees |

Tekashi Kovacs
Golfclap Inc
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.05 19:27:00 -
[35] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:eve has been ftp since the introduction of Plex... sure some poor shmuck has to buy the plex in the first place and put up sell order in the first place... but if you dont want to have to pay for eve you dont have to...
I feel sorry for you and your time being worth nothing. Reminds me of "I mined veld myself so its free" mentality.
|

Burseg Sardaukar
Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance
102
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 03:54:00 -
[36] - Quote
Brilliant idea, and probably the only way they'll hit the "millions" of players estimate they originally claimed... if they up the Advertising that is.
One of the stats I was reading said that Quantum Rise was one of the most successful expansions (by player-count increase), and the only thing it can be attributed to is the small ad that CCP ran during Battlestar Galactica, because, frankly, I can't remember a thing that was remarkable about that expansion to warrant such a high success rate.
So: Free2play = excellent perk for those that already know about the game or sit around on the playstation store for the "newest stuff, but Ads = broader knowledge of the game and potentially hitting that "several million" player estimate. We have a blog, it is terrible. How to fix Bounty Hunting |

Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
3374
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 04:01:00 -
[37] - Quote
Dust 514 needs an advertisement campaign
|

Gabriel DiCozza
Epsilon Lyr Controlled Chaos
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 10:53:00 -
[38] - Quote
This announcement is part of the campaign.
I have a blog post about this. Basically, I think Sony is fighting a difficult battle against other gaming platforms such as PC, iPhone and Facebook. They need to build passageways to the rest of the gaming world (invasion ramps or escape lanes). They want to have this PSN community built on excellent hardware and software, and keep lines of communication open. They did not have any F2P FPS, now they can reach more people. For CCP, the primary business goal is certainly to find another source of revenue, because having only one breadwinner is a critical risk as proved last year with all the ruckus. I guess they analyzed F2P as the most efficient way to secure enough players to build revenue and also to provide a vibrant partner in the "connection feature". Achernar (blogging stuff) |

Ptraci
StoneWall Metals Productions Bloodbound.
394
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 11:43:00 -
[39] - Quote
CCP have chosen to make a deal with that steaming pile of dung (my opinion) called Sony. CCP is free to make deals and partner with whoever it wants. Sony is free to be hacked and lose unreleased music and credit card info whenever it wants. They are not free to install rootkits whenever they want but they do it anyway.
Well, I won't be playing DUST until it comes out on another platform. But that's just my personal opinion. |

Baneken
Hyvat Pahat ja Eric The Polaris Syndicate
77
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 12:49:00 -
[40] - Quote
Thing that bothers me is the 'aurum' as we still cannot currently trade it, so are we EVE-players going to help the dusties if we cannot give them funding or even equipment and they pay all their stuff with aurums ?
Anyway cash shop can work 3 ways: - They either ruin the game with (massively) over priced must have in PvP items (allods anyone). - They sell stuff that no one really cares to spend cash on and the game goes bust. - They sell stuff that that people like to buy but are not just for progressing in the game such as premium accounts such as earlier access to horses, more bag space, no gold limit, monster play (pvp arena) etc. as in LOTRO.
And I so hope that CCP doen't F***k with the cash shop because if they do the game will be dead in a few months. So do put those 1000 things in the cash shop instead of 6 that no one gives a damn, like we had in EVE.
|

Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
422
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 13:01:00 -
[41] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:CCP has not made it's reputation by being a follower or a copy cat. It steps outside the MMO box and dares to tread where the big boys won't.
I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it. Judging by the Eurogamer article it would seem that they are not consciously deploying DUST as a P2W game:
"It's very important as we take steps into this topic to unambiguously state that it is not a pay to win game," Laurino pressed on. "There is no micro-transaction that you can do that gives you an unfair advantage over someone who hasn't paid anything."
However, CCP does not deploy DUST as a community service. They fully expect to earn lots of money from a well-stocked micro-transaction store "We already have hundreds upon hundreds [of micro-transaction items]. We have a cache of nearly a thousand different things at this point" A store which also include weapons and combat gear. And lets face it, Console FPS players are probably less inclined to grind for ISK than a PC RPG player.
So, CCP expect people to pay GÇô offering Aurum credits that can be bought in currency bundles that range from $1, $2 or $10 up to $20, $50 or $100. You would think that this means that CCP expects high player turn-over, like what happens in World of Tanks.
But what kind of player loyalty are CCP really expecting? Well, by copying the EVE online skill training method, access to a persistent virtual world and encouraging DUST and EVE players to share corporations and alliances, they clearly see the average DUST player as a stayer. A loyal customer playing DUST for months and years. I donGÇÖt know about you, but I donGÇÖt know anybody that would be willing to endure a P2W game for years. None. |

Zowie Powers
Hole in the wall
52
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 13:08:00 -
[42] - Quote
A lot of people getting very confused.
It's no real surprise, because the word "free" is involved, it baffles people like no other word can. The world has a lot of things that are... "free".
Free minutes on your phone. Free texts. Free data. Free Internet. Free to play. Free updates to Eve.
So if everything is Free why are you spending money?
The answer is more simple than you can hope to imagine, so simple in fact you will reject it and call me names.
It's not free. It never was and it never will be. There will be a cost and a price and it will be met or you will receive nothing.
Just because you cannot see the cost or the price does not mean it's not there, it just means you don't know about it or don't care about it.
Dust will be as free as Eve. ie, paid for. |

Velicitia
Open Designs
738
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 13:18:00 -
[43] - Quote
The way I read the excerpt is that "we have a few hundred/thousand MT sparklegear items" not "you're gonna have to get the MT gear to be viable" |

Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
422
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 13:34:00 -
[44] - Quote
Velicitia wrote:The way I read the excerpt is that "we have a few hundred/thousand MT sparklegear items" not "you're gonna have to get the MT gear to be viable"
They definitly will offer combat gear, not to be viable, but as an alternative to the grind. Personally I dont see the console FPSer want to grind too much, so the "easy option" is gonna be much more appealing than to us PC grunts who are used to it. |

Henry Haphorn
Aliastra Gallente Federation
215
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 13:45:00 -
[45] - Quote
Velicitia wrote:The way I read the excerpt is that "we have a few hundred/thousand MT sparklegear items" not "you're gonna have to get the MT gear to be viable"
That's how I understood it. I don't see what's the big deal about playing a free-to-play game. I played WoT* and I progressed just fine on my own.
Zowie Powers wrote:A lot of people getting very confused.
It's no real surprise, because the word "free" is involved, it baffles people like no other word can. The world has a lot of things that are... "free".
Free minutes on your phone. Free texts. Free data. Free Internet. Free to play. Free updates to Eve.
So if everything is Free why are you spending money?
The answer is more simple than you can hope to imagine, so simple in fact you will reject it and call me names.
It's not free. It never was and it never will be. There will be a cost and a price and it will be met or you will receive nothing.
Just because you cannot see the cost or the price does not mean it's not there, it just means you don't know about it or don't care about it.
Dust will be as free as Eve. ie, paid for.
Interesting, isn't it? How people react differently to a free game that allows you to progress on your own free time compared to a game that forces you to cough up money up front to play it.
* In regards to my comment about World of Tanks, I just like to point out that the only reason I stopped playing it is because first, it lacked social interaction among players. I mean, do you have any idea how difficult it was to coordinate with a bunch of kids who just want to run in like lemmings wanting to be slaughtered? It's like looking at a bunch of morons jumping a gate when an FC told them not to jump. On top of that, I didn't feel like I made impact at all on how the game progressed. You either teamed [randomly] with either veterans or noobs and you have no control which way to choose.
With Dust, I can see a lot of social potential in this as players will be required to be more careful with their soldiers. Just like chess, you will have to plan and strategize. This means coordinating with other players to achieve a goal. I see this quite often with Halo fans who love doing team slayer. In fact, Halo fans might be among the first to actually try this out. I have a friend who is a dedicated Halo fan who is interested in trying it out because of the level of interaction it brings.
In addition, the fact that players can influence the outcome of the Eve Online battlefield and its in-game economy means that this game has some serious replayability potential, which is what a lot of game developers for first-person shooters aim for. Welcome to Eve Online. Don't expect people to be nice to you. |

My Neutral Toon
Knights Who Til Recently Said Ni
18
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 14:17:00 -
[46] - Quote
Ender Black wrote:My Neutral Toon wrote:F2P but P2W so it balances out... in CCP's wallet anyway. Yes, I'm still going to get my pew pew on in Dust when it comes out anyway.  How is it P2W? Double SP isn't P2W. P2W is when you can't receive item or service necessary to continue or compete without paying for the service or item. If it is achievable through time investment then it is not P2W. I swear gamers are the cheapest things that crawl the surface of the earth.
If i can pay for some sort of tactical advantage (double sp is a tactical advantage) then it is pay-to-win.
CCP had tossed this idea around last year about eve. it was a part of the fuel behind the Jita Riots. When CCP realized they wouldnt be able to do it in eve, they decided to do it with Dust.
I was born and raised a business man. My dad was, my grandfather was and so on... So I can't blame CCP for doing it. ...Can't. Tell. If ...Troll? Or Serious.... |

Henry Haphorn
Aliastra Gallente Federation
215
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 14:37:00 -
[47] - Quote
My Neutral Toon wrote:Ender Black wrote:My Neutral Toon wrote:F2P but P2W so it balances out... in CCP's wallet anyway. Yes, I'm still going to get my pew pew on in Dust when it comes out anyway.  How is it P2W? Double SP isn't P2W. P2W is when you can't receive item or service necessary to continue or compete without paying for the service or item. If it is achievable through time investment then it is not P2W. I swear gamers are the cheapest things that crawl the surface of the earth. If i can pay for some sort of tactical advantage (double sp is a tactical advantage) then it is pay-to-win. CCP had tossed this idea around last year about eve. it was a part of the fuel behind the Jita Riots. When CCP realized they wouldnt be able to do it in eve, they decided to do it with Dust. I was born and raised a business man. My dad was, my grandfather was and so on... So I can't blame CCP for doing it.
Double skill points mean nothing if you don't know how to use it. Besides, this seems to bear some similarity to the character bazaar in which players buy characters with ISK, which can be acquired through PLEX which is generated by a converted GTC bought with cash. See what I did here?
Even in games like WoT, players who spent money on buffed up tanks were still overwhelmed by the vast number of players who decided to progress without paying. Welcome to Eve Online. Don't expect people to be nice to you. |

Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
3374
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 14:46:00 -
[48] - Quote
Zowie Powers wrote:A lot of people getting very confused.
It's no real surprise, because the word "free" is involved, it baffles people like no other word can. The world has a lot of things that are... "free".
Free minutes on your phone. Free texts. Free data. Free Internet. Free to play. Free updates to Eve.
So if everything is Free why are you spending money?
The answer is more simple than you can hope to imagine, so simple in fact you will reject it and call me names.
It's not free. It never was and it never will be. There will be a cost and a price and it will be met or you will receive nothing.
Just because you cannot see the cost or the price does not mean it's not there, it just means you don't know about it or don't care about it.
Dust will be as free as Eve. ie, paid for.
You clearly havent lived in an era where they made you pay for these things one at a time.
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
1089
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 16:45:00 -
[49] - Quote
Henry Haphorn wrote:My Neutral Toon wrote:Ender Black wrote:My Neutral Toon wrote:F2P but P2W so it balances out... in CCP's wallet anyway. Yes, I'm still going to get my pew pew on in Dust when it comes out anyway.  How is it P2W? Double SP isn't P2W. P2W is when you can't receive item or service necessary to continue or compete without paying for the service or item. If it is achievable through time investment then it is not P2W. I swear gamers are the cheapest things that crawl the surface of the earth. If i can pay for some sort of tactical advantage (double sp is a tactical advantage) then it is pay-to-win. CCP had tossed this idea around last year about eve. it was a part of the fuel behind the Jita Riots. When CCP realized they wouldnt be able to do it in eve, they decided to do it with Dust. I was born and raised a business man. My dad was, my grandfather was and so on... So I can't blame CCP for doing it. Double skill points mean nothing if you don't know how to use it. Besides, this seems to bear some similarity to the character bazaar in which players buy characters with ISK, which can be acquired through PLEX which is generated by a converted GTC bought with cash. See what I did here? Even in games like WoT, players who spent money on buffed up tanks were still overwhelmed by the vast number of players who decided to progress without paying.
Indeed. A skill point boost or stat respec is NOT pay-to-win... no more so that buying a PLEX to get some learning implants or a buy a new character. Especially when you can accellerate your training (to a degree) through game play as you can in DUST.
I know you don't mean it as an overly negative point, but people use the term without understanding what it is all the time. When I check troll in the dictionary, it has a photo shopped picture of you standing somewhere in the vicinity of a point.
Also, I can kill you with my brain. |

My Neutral Toon
Knights Who Til Recently Said Ni
18
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 16:50:00 -
[50] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Henry Haphorn wrote:My Neutral Toon wrote:Ender Black wrote:My Neutral Toon wrote:F2P but P2W so it balances out... in CCP's wallet anyway. Yes, I'm still going to get my pew pew on in Dust when it comes out anyway.  How is it P2W? Double SP isn't P2W. P2W is when you can't receive item or service necessary to continue or compete without paying for the service or item. If it is achievable through time investment then it is not P2W. I swear gamers are the cheapest things that crawl the surface of the earth. If i can pay for some sort of tactical advantage (double sp is a tactical advantage) then it is pay-to-win. CCP had tossed this idea around last year about eve. it was a part of the fuel behind the Jita Riots. When CCP realized they wouldnt be able to do it in eve, they decided to do it with Dust. I was born and raised a business man. My dad was, my grandfather was and so on... So I can't blame CCP for doing it. Double skill points mean nothing if you don't know how to use it. Besides, this seems to bear some similarity to the character bazaar in which players buy characters with ISK, which can be acquired through PLEX which is generated by a converted GTC bought with cash. See what I did here? Even in games like WoT, players who spent money on buffed up tanks were still overwhelmed by the vast number of players who decided to progress without paying. Indeed. A skill point boost or stat respec is NOT pay-to-win... no more so that buying a PLEX to get some learning implants or a buy a new character. Especially when you can accellerate your training (to a degree) through game play as you can in DUST. I know you don't mean it as an overly negative point, but people use the term without understanding what it is all the time.
RMT for any type of in-game advantage is pay to win. How would it not be? Just because I am too dumb to take proper advantage of the things I just bought doesnt negate the concept that I was trying to pay-to-win.
edit: spelling > me ...Can't. Tell. If ...Troll? Or Serious.... |

Anastasia Shimaya
Viziam Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 17:04:00 -
[51] - Quote
Ah yes.... gotta love the "DUST will work stfu" comments, reminds me of the "INCARNA will work stfu" comments.... wonder what happen to those guys?
What you MMO nerds (DUST will workers) don't get is that you are looking at this from a MMO perspective, and not a instant gratification FPS standpoint. Not even MW3 or Battlefield 3 could do what Dust is about to do..... charge people real money to play on a console AND expecting them to give a damn about what happens in a internet spaceship game they probably never heard of.
And seeing how its just gonna be fights over planets there's not much incentive for EVE players to give damns about the Dust players other then grief them out of the game.
Someone at CCP should just say "Lets stop this idea now, its not gonna work" |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
1089
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 17:12:00 -
[52] - Quote
Quote:RMT for any type of in-game advantage is pay to win. How would it not be? Just because I am too dumb to take proper advantage of the things I just bought doesnt negate the concept that I was trying to pay-to-win
If I pay for a special silver 1-shot-1-kill bullet, but shoot them all into the ground. that was still P2W, I just failed as a P2W player..
edit: spelling > me
Pay to Win is purchasing an advantage that cannot be gained via other in game means. I don't care what you do with your silver bullets, if I can obtain them through other means than spending cash then that is not Pay to Win. When I check troll in the dictionary, it has a photo shopped picture of you standing somewhere in the vicinity of a point.
Also, I can kill you with my brain. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
1089
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 17:16:00 -
[53] - Quote
Anastasia Shimaya wrote:Ah yes.... gotta love the "DUST will work stfu" comments, reminds me of the "INCARNA will work stfu" comments.... wonder what happen to those guys?
What you MMO nerds (DUST will workers) don't get is that you are looking at this from a MMO perspective, and not a instant gratification FPS standpoint. Not even MW3 or Battlefield 3 could do what Dust is about to do..... charge people real money to play on a console AND expecting them to give a damn about what happens in a internet spaceship game they probably never heard of.
And seeing how its just gonna be fights over planets there's not much incentive for EVE players to give damns about the Dust players other then grief them out of the game.
Someone at CCP should just say "Lets stop this idea now, its not gonna work"
Alternatively, you might spend some time and actually understand what DUST will be and how it will tie into EVE.
By the way, the pro Incarna crowd went "Whoa, you're screwing this up. Take it back to the drawing board and do it right this time."... which is exactly what is happening.
When I check troll in the dictionary, it has a photo shopped picture of you standing somewhere in the vicinity of a point.
Also, I can kill you with my brain. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |