| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kerdrak
3B Legio IX
Atlas Alliance
   |
Posted - 2008.05.22 17:33:00 -
[1]
This ships have lots of low losts and 3 rigs (capable of 3 polycarbon) so they reach easily +4000 m/s (Stabber Fleet Issue reach 6300 with 3 polys and mixed overdrives/nanofibers).
Nanoempyrean Age? 
________________________________________
|
Kerdrak
3B Legio IX
Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.05.22 17:33:00 -
[2]
This ships have lots of low losts and 3 rigs (capable of 3 polycarbon) so they reach easily +4000 m/s (Stabber Fleet Issue reach 6300 with 3 polys and mixed overdrives/nanofibers).
Nanoempyrean Age?
________________________________________
|
Deva Blackfire
D00M.
|
Posted - 2008.05.22 18:40:00 -
[3]
If you are willing to pay 100m for cruiser (even lets say 50m for tier1) and 180mil for polys? Who stops you - its as vulnerable to killing as 5mil cruiser.
|
Toolivus
Verdant Inquiries
|
Posted - 2008.05.22 18:50:00 -
[4]
Kinda suggests that nanos are not such an issue?
Or at that they've acknowledged that gank and tank is obsolete on the sub bc level.
|
Waxau
The Fated
Odyssey.
|
Posted - 2008.05.22 23:22:00 -
[5]
tbh, im also somewhat concerned in this area. Although obviously not your average implant setup (snakes) with a full t2 fit (t1 polys, mwd, nanos etc) and no faction gear, i was able to get a CN Osprey (which i hereby copyright 'NanOsprey') to 9kms. 100m for a cruiser is nothing - And even more so if the said pilot doesnt need all the hac skills to achieve such a speed. Nanohacs are annoying and somewhat overpowered - But atleast they is a specialisation to them. These ships require no specialisation.
|
Gimpb
|
Posted - 2008.05.22 23:48:00 -
[6]
Perhaps the real idea is make it possible for people to play in the nano realm w/o T2 cruiser investments/skills.
Obviously inties are fairly accessible and can reach that speed, but you'd need quite the swarm to take down a group of HACs.
|
z0de
The Bastards
|
Posted - 2008.05.22 23:48:00 -
[7]
Nano-sprey sounds better.
|
Deva Blackfire
D00M.
|
Posted - 2008.05.22 23:48:00 -
[8]
 Originally by: Waxau
tbh, im also somewhat concerned in this area. Although obviously not your average implant setup (snakes) with a full t2 fit (t1 polys, mwd, nanos etc) and no faction gear, i was able to get a CN Osprey (which i hereby copyright 'NanOsprey') to 9kms. 100m for a cruiser is nothing - And even more so if the said pilot doesnt need all the hac skills to achieve such a speed. Nanohacs are annoying and somewhat overpowered - But atleast they is a specialisation to them. These ships require no specialisation.
So without snakes its around 6km/s. And how does it beat your average interceptor? Coz i can bet i can kill one of those ospreys in my t2 fit malediction :)
Also its 200m for cruiser+polys, around 250m for sth that can die to 2-3 well placed shots from battleship. Tell me why you dont see poly fleet stabbers everyday? And comparing this thing to HAC is not even worthy - its not speed that kills but damage - that nanoosprey can prolly deal damage of a frig (did i guess it right?).
|
Ashina Sito
Center for Advanced Studies
|
Posted - 2008.05.23 03:42:00 -
[9]
Navy Vex.
3 mids. So, x1 LSE, MWD, Scram. No cap. Don't work so well.
|
Rawr Cristina
Naqam
Project Alice.
|
Posted - 2008.05.23 04:33:00 -
[10]
the Navy Osprey might see a lot of use as a much lighter and faster Cerb, but I dread to think the kind of cap issues I'm going to run into... 
...
|
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
FOUNDATI0N
|
Posted - 2008.05.23 07:32:00 -
[11]
why would I want to move that fast when I can sit at the beacon and tank and still move 3000m/s?
I mean you can't go out of range if I understand correctly.
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |