| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Plutonian
Plutonian Shore
   |
Posted - 2008.05.30 21:27:00 -
[1]
I would like to determine the interest of community and our CSM Member's responses to the following issue: The B*tch-Slap
Let's face it: there are times when we really need to B*tch-Slap someone. Perhaps it is a war target who refuses to undock... or a corp member who blew the ambush... or a rival trader. Regardless of the circumstance, I believe we all see the need for a quick 'correction' to another players' thought process. With the upcoming Ambulation Project, it seems possible we could finally have the tools to promote clear thinking.
What I propose is simply the B*tch-Slap tag. For instance, if I am outside my private hangar and arguing with someone who, time after time, fails to see reason, I may simply enter the tag to obtain the required action. In this case, I would enter [b*tchslap] and my avatar would then B*tch-Slap some sense into the fool I am currently speaking to.
The more advanced version would be the Comment B*tch-Slap. In this version, I may enter text which would be transmitted during the slap animation. For instance:
[b*tchslap]You cannot mine during Empire wars!![/b*tchslap]
While the B*tch-Slap would cause no permanent harm, it must be carefully regulated. One can have too much of a good thing. Just imagine a Jita 4-4 common area filled with people B*tch-Slapping each other. It might look something like this.
(Actually... that's not half bad. Might make the place a bit more fun. Though obviously if we're to have the Two-finger Eye-poke we must according provide the defense (Hand on Nose).)
Anyway...
As mentioned, the B*tch-Slap should be regulated. I propose:
1.) Players may utilize only a single B*tch-Slap between downtimes. In this manner they must carefully determine the target of their daily B*tch-Slap. B*tch-Slaps do not roll over; one per day, if carefully planned, should be enough (dependent upon your alliance).
2.) Directors and CEO's are allowed 500 B*tch-Slaps per day versus member of their corporation (similar to the contract system).
3.) Alliance heads receive the CEO B*tch-Slap levels, but are additionally capable of performing the 'You've Really ****ed Me Off Now' Super B*tch-Slap twice a day versus any member of their organization. The Super B*tch-Slap is a quick 1-2-3 version of the standard B*tch-Slap. Stage 1 and 3 of the Super B*tch-Slap is standard, while stage 2 is the Backhand B*tch-Slap available only to Alliance leaders.
4.) Any member of an organization which is currently involved in a war with another organization may B*tch-Slap their opponents all day long. Only by retreating to their personal hangar can a WT avoid constant B*tch-Slaps.
5.) Additionally, now that we may form gangs while docked at a station, I propose that a Group B*tch-Slap might well be in order. In this instance, those in the fleet who are docked may, upon activation by the FC, all at once, B*tch-Slap a single war target... possibly leaving him incapacitated for a short length of time.
When you consider the PvP-centric nature of Eve Online, it becomes apparent that the B*tch-Slap is a logical, needed tool which promotes social growth and strengthens the abilities of our corporate leaders. It is the logical conclusion to the Ambulation Project.
Thank you for your time. 
|
ceyriot
Induseng Enterprises
R0ADKILL
|
Posted - 2008.05.30 21:51:00 -
[2]
Faction Store - Killboard |
Herschel Yamamoto
Bloodmoney Incorporated
|
Posted - 2008.05.30 21:53:00 -
[3]
You know, as much as this idea should be a joke, I'm not really sure it is. This would actually be a somewhat worthwhile addition.
------------------
Fix the forums! |
Cix Soldei
Grammaton CIerics
|
Posted - 2008.05.30 21:58:00 -
[4]
Well thought-out, well said. A necessary feature to be sure!
|
Dlardrageth
Eve University
Ivy League
|
Posted - 2008.05.30 23:08:00 -
[5]
Would add a totally new dimension for station-huggers during wars/conflicts. They can either undock or hide in their hangar or being *****-slapped to hell. Totally fits the "cruel and harsh environment" of EVE-O. Love it!
|
Sir Substance
|
Posted - 2008.05.31 00:52:00 -
[6]
i desire the ability to backhand someone with my steel glove.
|
Sir Substance
|
Posted - 2008.05.31 07:47:00 -
[7]
an idea occurs. could this be elevated to a new form of PvP?
after all, the war-decers are always complaining that when they dec someone that person just goes and hides in a station. in the lawless stations, where security is not-so-tight and weapon scanning devices are more rudimentary, why not make it possible to attack someone in station for example, you could attack someone with a knife. you wont get his ship, but you damn well got his implants!
|
Ameliorate
|
Posted - 2008.05.31 08:09:00 -
[8]
I support this simply because you wrote so much about it.
----
Train skills, check mail and pay bills from your mobile:
Support my CSM issue |
Jinx Barker
GFB Scientific
|
Posted - 2008.05.31 08:18:00 -
[9]
I also want an "Ass Squeeze" emote...
|
nomadeyes
Squirley Wrath
|
Posted - 2008.05.31 08:20:00 -
[10]
You sir have elevated the B*tch-Slap to an art form!
Good show! |
|
|
Buck Starchaser
|
Posted - 2008.05.31 08:45:00 -
[11]
Best thread I've read all night. No flaming required. Thank you for entertaining me. This is the only logical use I can think of for ambulation so far.... Besides strippers that is
|
Aurea SIbylla
Eve University
Ivy League
|
Posted - 2008.06.01 01:41:00 -
[12]
Edited by: Aurea SIbylla on 01/06/2008 01:41:24
 Originally by: Dlardrageth
Would add a totally new dimension for station-huggers during wars/conflicts. They can either undock or hide in their hangar or being *****-slapped to hell. Totally fits the "cruel and harsh environment" of EVE-O. Love it!
Concur this statment. This should be a mandatory feature.
|
Havohej
The Defias Brotherhood
DEFI4NT
|
Posted - 2008.06.01 05:06:00 -
[13]
Originally by: techzer0
I'm invincible until proven wrong
|
Beaverid Tesu
|
Posted - 2008.06.01 05:22:00 -
[14]
Edited by: Beaverid Tesu on 01/06/2008 05:23:17
*Beaverid Tesu rapes Plutonian...
thats a feature that needs to be impemented if this **** goes through.
i want a graphic depiction, also.
Enough said.
|
Beaverid Tesu
|
Posted - 2008.06.01 05:40:00 -
[15]
Or how about this?...
*Beaverid Tesu slices Plutonian's neck ear to ear, saws off her head, takes a sh!t in her mouth, urinates on the rest of her corpse and puts it in a public area of the station.
|
Plutonian
Plutonian Shore
|
Posted - 2008.06.01 07:09:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Beaverid Tesu
Or how about this?...
*Beaverid Tesu slices Plutonian's neck ear to ear, saws off her head, takes a sh!t in her mouth, urinates on the rest of her corpse and puts it in a public area of the station.
Sounds like someone has some personal problems. Trouble getting along with others perhaps?
It's okay. No one really thinks you're a social failure and wants you out of the corp. Killboard stats will most certainly gloss over any shortcomings.
Right? 
|
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
FOUNDATI0N
|
Posted - 2008.06.01 07:10:00 -
[17]
It needs some sort of combat.
doesn't have to mean death :)
But I would like to see something bad happen, like you wake up with beers on your tab.
|
Ethaet
Aliastra
|
Posted - 2008.06.01 13:18:00 -
[18]
EVE != a FPS.
Trying to make it into one will kill the game on so many levels.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Seriously, we need some kind of separation between the post and signature.
There you go. Now that wasn't so hard  |
Garr Anders
Eve University
Ivy League
|
Posted - 2008.06.01 14:59:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Ethaet
EVE != a FPS.
Trying to make it into one will kill the game on so many levels.
Where is he taking about making it an FPS? He just want the visual emote, not damage done to the other character as a public humiliation for his bad understanding.
Funny as it is, it probably doesn't fit the evil dark mood of Eve, so highly likely not going to happen.
Still I support it, as that a high number of visiual emotes between characters should be integrated into ambulation.
-----
Garr Anders
"The only winning move is not to play" is about the best damn advice anyone can get regarding arguing over the internet.
- referring to the Movie WarGames 1983
|
Adonis 4174
|
Posted - 2008.06.02 08:52:00 -
[20]
One time on EveTV Stavros said that he'd heard a dev confirm this would be included. Anyone remember where/when?
----
Infiniband can do more than just prevent lag |
|
|
Plutonian
Plutonian Shore
|
Posted - 2008.06.03 05:53:00 -
[21]
Originally by: Garr Anders
Funny as it is, it probably doesn't fit the evil dark mood of Eve, so highly likely not going to happen.
Agreed. While I was curious to see how the CSM's would respond, this was something of a lark... not to be taken too seriously.
|
QwaarJet
hirr
Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2008.06.03 08:20:00 -
[22]
I fully endorse this.
|
Amarr Holymight
Bat Country
Aegis Militia
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 18:38:00 -
[23]
Yeh why not.
|
Amarr Holymight
Bat Country
Aegis Militia
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 18:40:00 -
[24]
I fully endorse larking especially when it secretly disguises wants and needs.
|
Mister Xerox
|
Posted - 2008.07.23 13:18:00 -
[25]
Ambulation is a schtic anyway... not even relevant or necessary in the game at all.
It's just going to become SecondLife in Station (tm), which is a majorly bad move.
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |