| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Neddy Fox
Paxton Industries
   |
Posted - 2008.06.07 18:28:00 -
[31]
I fully support this message!
|
Phantom Slave
Mozzaki United
|
Posted - 2008.06.07 18:43:00 -
[32]
____________________
Trinity is beautiful! I love you CCP!!! |
Baron Erique
Paxton Industries
Paxton Federation
|
Posted - 2008.06.07 18:48:00 -
[33]
/signed |
Riu Stuka
GeoCorp.
Paxton Federation
|
Posted - 2008.06.07 18:49:00 -
[34]
/signed
-----------------------------------------------
|
Hugh Hefner
Paxton Industries
Paxton Federation
|
Posted - 2008.06.07 20:10:00 -
[35]
Edited by: Hugh Hefner on 07/06/2008 20:17:21
This is vital.
|
Elmis
Paxton Industries
Paxton Federation
|
Posted - 2008.06.07 21:42:00 -
[36]
While obviously in the minority - this is a critical issue for those trying to operate under NRDS. (Hence why I am guessing many people posting support for it will be based in Providence...) |
Aralis
Imperial Dreams
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.07 22:11:00 -
[37]
|
MastaRob
Ascendant Strategies Inc.
Paxton Federation
|
Posted - 2008.06.07 22:47:00 -
[38]
More please CCP!!!
|
sh4rp ov3rvolt
Hikage Corporation
Paxton Federation
|
Posted - 2008.06.07 22:56:00 -
[39]
|
The Crushah
Paxton Industries
Paxton Federation
|
Posted - 2008.06.07 23:26:00 -
[40]
Signed
|
Akrezak
Paxton Industries
|
Posted - 2008.06.07 23:50:00 -
[41]
This signed is sponcered by PXF.
|
Puffjelo
Paxton Industries
Paxton Federation
|
Posted - 2008.06.08 00:27:00 -
[42]
 Originally by: Puffjelo
Signed. 
I'm stoopid. Forgot to check the "I support this" box. 
|
KaiTech
Polaris Project
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.08 12:36:00 -
[43]
I Support this too !
What if it would be made so that the "Standings List" would be like an object that could be created by a Corp or Alliance and then be traded with the standings info in it.
This would enable to trade one of U'r corp/alliance made standing Lists to a new corp in an area and they would then have the possibility to "load up" that "Standings List" into their Corp network. They now would have adopted the standings of the loaded up "Standings list".
Would save alot of grind for corp directors needing to set standings ...
cya in game soon
Your signature exceeds the maximum allowed filesize of 24000 bytes -Kreul Intentions ([email protected]) |
Tokra Jolona
GeoCorp.
Paxton Federation
|
Posted - 2008.06.08 15:46:00 -
[44]
/signed
|
2CatsSlade
Ascendant Strategies Inc.
Paxton Federation
|
Posted - 2008.06.08 18:12:00 -
[45]
|
Aes ZXV
AngelCor
Paxton Federation
|
Posted - 2008.06.08 22:14:00 -
[46]
Totally agree with more slots.
|
Ravn Silverclaw
Paxton Industries
Paxton Federation
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 07:55:00 -
[47]
Signed
|
YPSer
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 15:42:00 -
[48]
|
Matrixcvd
Rionnag Alba
|
Posted - 2008.06.12 19:13:00 -
[49]
HOLY SWEET JESUS BATMAN.
This is absolutely ridiculous. CCP SHOULD REDUCE THE NUMBER OF STANDINGS SLOTS NOT INCREASE
I can't believe the nonsense and ridiculousness by RP NRDS people, of course CVA and paxton buddies are all for this to keep people from shooting them.
The problem with 0.0 in this game is the napfailtrain, 300-400 man super gangs of failure. Blues should be extremely restricted based on alliance size. If you can't get what you want done on your own or with a proportionate amount of "friends" you shouldnt be able to wither up and call on every failtard out there to serve your interests
the servers can't handle, the player base cant stand the lag, and if there were a simple overview change to limit NAPs from being removed, these nod crashing lamegangs wouldn't happen.
Good thing the CSM has no power other than to act like a internet beauracracy. |
Sokratesz
Rionnag Alba
|
Posted - 2008.06.12 20:26:00 -
[50]
I'm with matrix. Cut the ******* naptrains already, *LESS* standings slots. |
Hardin
|
Posted - 2008.06.13 09:17:00 -
[51]
Edited by: Hardin on 13/06/2008 09:18:03
To the Rionnag Alba guys above. If you know anything about CVA then you would know that it is not a lack of blue slots which is the problem - but the lack of red ones 
Our policy is that everyone in Providence is neutral - unless they have been set red for piracy or terroristic actions. We therefore DO NOT NEED blue slots.
The CVA is probably the most 'nap-less' alliance in 0.0. Apart from our Holders, Sylph and IAC we are pretty much red to the entire universe including BoB, -A-, TCF, Goons, Red Alliance and the majority of the Northern alliances.
This issue is not about 'napfests' it IS about giving alliance adminstrators proper ability and options to manage their diplomatic relations. The current system was appropriate when it was first implemented but since then the number of coorporations and alliances that need to be 'tracked' has mushroomed exponentially and it is time standing slots reflected this.
Do you really think that NRDS as a system should be ruled out as a genuine 'playstyle' and option for space holding alliances simply because they don't have the standings slots to properly managed their 'Reds'?
This change is a small tweak which requires little to no 'programming' effort on the part of CCP and provides alliance adminstrators around the galaxy with a lot more flexibility in managing how they interact with other corporations and alliances.
The current standing slot limit appears to be arbitrary and if CCP are reluctant to make what appears to be a commonsense change then I would certainly like to know their reasoning why.
It's possible that they have a very good reason which they just haven't told us yet
|
Faekurias
Black Legion Command
Red Dawn Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.13 11:24:00 -
[52]
Edited by: Faekurias on 13/06/2008 11:25:20
Edited by: Faekurias on 13/06/2008 11:24:01
Originally by: RedLion
Aye!
Also
Let alliance set standing to individual players,
Let alliances be able to share standings with other alliances.
This.
ALSO:
Maybe make it so that you can have more red slots, make red/blue slots separate.
Supreme Legion Commander of the Black Legion Fleet
We're recruiting.
Hitmeup ingame. |
Sokratesz
Rionnag Alba
|
Posted - 2008.06.13 11:29:00 -
[53]
@ Hardin:
Give alliances 5 blue slots to other alliance, 5 to separate corps and infinite reds or so then..
*numbers arbitrary, but should be low for blues. |
Hardin
|
Posted - 2008.06.13 12:23:00 -
[54]
Originally by: Sokratesz
@ Hardin:
Give alliances 5 blue slots to other alliance, 5 to separate corps and infinite reds or so then..
*numbers arbitrary, but should be low for blues.
Seems like a reasonable suggestion to me - but as I not someone responsible for managing standings slots - would be interested in getting some further input into this as I am not sure what consequences your proposal could have.
I have put this on the agenda for Sunday meeting and need to create an issue template by then - so happy if people want to feed more views into this...
-----
Alliance Creation/Corp Expansion Services
Advert |
Pezzle
Imperial Dreams
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.13 13:02:00 -
[55]
I am trying to keep this issue as simple as possible. My own belief is against hundreds of blues, but that is my game play. If some group wants hundreds of blues that is their business. We should not hard code against legitimate play styles (even if we personally disagree). You cannot force people to fight with each other.
This proposal advocates an increase in the hard limits placed on corporations. A larger standings pool means more possibilities. Possibilities are good! |
LaFond
Gradient
Electus Matari
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 16:34:00 -
[56]
|
Arkady Sadik
Gradient
Electus Matari
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 16:38:00 -
[57]
Standings in-game are a reflection of negotiations out of game. You can not restrict negotiations, and all in-game restrictions will do is make the life harder for everyone, but it won't prevent the dreaded "no one shoots each other" (whyever that is dreaded I have no idea).
Supporting more standing slots.
Not supporting arbitrary limit on blue slots vs. red slots or somesuch to enforce your play style in the sandbox that is EVE.
|
Isobel Mitar
Gradient
Electus Matari
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 16:59:00 -
[58]
/signed
However, please no limits on how the slots are used. |
Niding
Polaris Project
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 17:39:00 -
[59]
Idea supported. |
Marina Charnatie
Celestial Janissaries
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.16 13:45:00 -
[60]
Edited by: Marina Charnatie on 16/06/2008 13:52:21
As a part of this issue if CCP could help provide a system that allows better cleaning of standing slots. Many times corporations/alliances merge/break up. As it stands it is very difficult to track such information. A person spends hours "getting info" on each corp when house cleaning. We're pulling a great deal of unnecessary information. When it comes to standings we need active members and if a corp is member within an alliance. Other thoughts welcome.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |