In fact why call all kinetic dealing missiles "trauma" or whatever it is now. I'd be more happy with "Kinetic Heavy missile" "kinetic rocket" ect.

If you want to argue facts and insult people, at least get the numbers right.....It's YEAR.....

meh can't be perfect you know?
But Ill be level headed enough to say, yup screwed up by 12x.

There are alot of numbers out there though and even worse estimates such as Eve possibly nearing the 400k sub mark which is alot better than the quater billion spent into the sinking mmo ship known as ToR which requires minmal 500k subs to operate according to BW and all indicators are saying they're are projected to go below that very soon as the 3 month 2 month subs are up and the desperation to the free to play weekend (whcih is rather shorter than eves 60 day offers at time then again both games are at different time scales.)

Bottom line about the name change complaints though is mostly unfounded.

We got them to change names twice and according to chaos test server we got a partial comprimise going on.
Which basically changes alot of items to have a meta prefix for a name now.

We understood the need to get rid of meta guessing.
We understood the need for uniformity.
We understood that renaming items isnt a form of dumbing down the game it doesnt boost anything it doenst nerf anything and the names ultimately still doesnt effect how well an idiot can fail with said module when its used wrong.
We didnt like how flavor was being taken now the new chaos changes indicate we won there and falvor names are staying.
We didnt like turma missile names for some reason, thus scourge changes.
We loved the new implant renames.

Thus progress in some areas not so much in others there are about 10k items it will take a while to rename them all.

I really wonder if CCP is going back to the old Incarna days now. So much messing around and acting as if they knew everything better.

For the renames. Yeah hey, might be nice, if they had a structure to it and the new names were actually making more sense. But for me they dont.

WE did? No you did.

I could care less about the renaming, other than the fact that it's causing more confusion than is really required.

I think many of us however, are scratching are heads at the incredible RUSH to get this stuff done, when so many other game play issues could use attention.....

Thats how I feel!

And well, the trolls here are almost a real nuisance, but thats how kids act these days... Go to reddit and l2troll!

I agree that all the renaming is getting a tad silly. Took me about 10 seconds to figure out what was what again but still, what's the point of all the renaming?

THIS IS A CHANGE AND CHANGE SCARES ME!

This troll is getting old and isn't even funny anymore

Ahem


I BELIEVE This was all announced in a dev blog few weeks ago.

http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=9130 Here is the link for everyone who missed the discussion on the renaming of modules.

They could be naming planets in all high sec and the moons if they where really running out of stuff to do.

Nope - I see no mention at all of Invulnerability Fields.


I could cope with Adaptive Invulnerability Fields if there were also Non-adaptive Invulnerability Fields, but as yet I've been unable to find any.

Why don't they just put the meta level/max meta level in the bottom icon's corner or something..

Ps: If you insist on renaming things, please rename the SMART BOMB to something that actually makes a lick of sense. Who came up with calling the most totally indescriminate, unaimed, unguided area of effect weapon in the game SMART? It will attack friend, foes, neutrals, deployables, structures even. It almost guarantees random collateral damage.

It's about as smart as a brain damaged, epileptic, stoned monkey with a handgrenade.

Sorry, had to get that off my chest.