EVE Search - CSM Options?

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

CSM Options?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Terminal Insanity Convex Enterprises Unprovoked Aggression 281	Posted - 2012.03.16 23:35:00 - [1] - Quote Doesn't appear to be many. If you... Exclude all the PvE content candidates... Exclude all the people who say "we're all unhappy with eve and we'll change it...." without even hinting at how... Exclude Mintrollo because.... obviously. it leaves pretty much just Seleene and The Mittani. Maybe Alekseyev Karrde, but he's relatively unheard of. Are these the only options we have? Most of the candidates just say crap like: "Vincent Athena" wrote: My goal is to find solutions to issues that help everyone, no matter what part of the game you play or "Korvin" wrote: Vote for the good game balance! Vote for only finished game features! Vote for our clear future in game! How about a vote for a clear campaign platform? Seriously. Personally, i want someone who will focus CCP on the PvP. - Expanding PvP Options / Opportunities - Introduce and/or fix forced-pvp mechanics (Pos/Poco and stuff like that) - New mechanics to encourage/push more players into PvP situations In the not-so-pvp things that i'm interested in: - Newbie's 'first steps'. Many newbs quit eve, this needs to change. - Overview settings are still overly messy and confusing. - Eve <> Dust interactivity. I really hope CCP goes all-out on this, and doesn't take the ***** road. I want to see heavy Dust integration -Continue cleaning up 'the little things' (CCP has done an amazing job at this in crucible, i want it to continue) Who should a PvP'er vote for? Some of these other candidates must have more detailed plan then just "we'll fix it all!"
masternerdguy Inner Shadow NightSong Directorate 1	Posted - 2012.03.16 23:40:00 - [2] - Quote I could potentially run for CSM one day. I'd advocate lots of pvp content. But until then, Mitanni is the best bet.
Sir Substance Tactical Knightmare 504	Posted - 2012.03.17 00:07:00 - [3] - Quote Terminal Insanity wrote: How about a vote for a clear campaign platform? Seriously. Anyone who offers a clear campaign platform should not be voted for, because they do not understand the CSM. The CSM is not a political position, where the candidates go in, push laws through, make changes they desire and leave. The CSM is a sounding board for CCP. CCP gives limited fucks about the CSM's ideas for some specific theory-crafted change to some specific form of 0.0 warfare or w/e. They are vastly more interested in what the CSM thinks of THEIR ideas. Any CSM candidate who goes in saying "I SWAR TO IMPLEMENT HIGHLY SPECIFIC FEATURE X" is going to let down his voters, because unless its a god damn smashing idea, which it rarely is, CCP is going to say "that's nice honey, I'll think about it, now what do you think of this?". Vote for someone who does the same things you do in game, and that way they will have the same concerns as you in mind when CCP asks them their opinion of a feature. All that said, SKIPPERMONKEY FOR SPACE EL PRESIDENTE! Ishtar Starfire: As a pure caldari pilot i feel that with the deployment of the new tier 3 battlecruisers you have given an unfair advantage to everyone except caldari pilots. an example would be like giving a fat kid a whole cake while the skinny kid has to watch and get nothing.
Karn Dulake Souls Must Be Trampled The.Alliance 459	Posted - 2012.03.17 00:11:00 - [4] - Quote The real truth is that 95% of the player base would turn down a position on the CSM as its just a computer game I dont normally troll, but when i do i do it on General Discussion.
Terminal Insanity Convex Enterprises Unprovoked Aggression 281	Posted - 2012.03.17 00:14:00 - [5] - Quote Sir Substance wrote: Vote for someone who does the same things you do in game, and that way they will have the same concerns as you in mind when CCP asks them their opinion of a feature. Fair enough, but just saying Quote: My goal is to find solutions to issues that help everyone, no matter what part of the game you play Still gives you no idea what he does in game / What he stands for They need clear platform otherwise they say vague **** and nobody knows what he stands for. How am i to know if he'll react to CCP's ideas in the way i would? Its still important to have a clear campaign platform.
Karn Dulake Souls Must Be Trampled The.Alliance 459	Posted - 2012.03.17 00:18:00 - [6] - Quote Terminal Insanity wrote: Sir Substance wrote: Vote for someone who does the same things you do in game, and that way they will have the same concerns as you in mind when CCP asks them their opinion of a feature. Fair enough, but just saying Quote: My goal is to find solutions to issues that help everyone, no matter what part of the game you play Still gives you no idea what he does in game / What he stands for They need clear platform otherwise they say vague **** and nobody knows what he stands for. How am i to know if he'll react to CCP's ideas in the way i would? Even if he isnt running to change specific things, Its still important to have a clear campaign platform to let people know where you stand. yeah thats true. I read all of the proposals and most of them just said vote for me and ill do stuff I dont normally troll, but when i do i do it on General Discussion.
Mohr Cowbell Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 287	Posted - 2012.03.17 00:20:00 - [7] - Quote Terminal Insanity wrote: Who should a PvP'er vote for? Some of these other candidates must have more detailed plan then just "we'll fix it all!" Based on your concerns, I think you should vote for Dovinian.
The Mittani GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 6156	Posted - 2012.03.17 00:22:00 - [8] - Quote Well, if you want rapid and full-scale DUST integration, you shouldn't vote for me; I think it should be handled carefully and in baby steps, because I flat out don't trust anything produced during CCP's period of irrational exuberance. Basically everyone supports 'more little things' and 'better UI', that's like saying the sky is blue. Most nullsec candidates are hardcore PvP guys. hth~ The Mittani, CSM7: Vote Here - One EVE. One Vote. One Chairman The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues
Terminal Insanity Convex Enterprises Unprovoked Aggression 281	Posted - 2012.03.17 00:25:00 - [9] - Quote Mohr Cowbell wrote: Terminal Insanity wrote: Who should a PvP'er vote for? Some of these other candidates must have more detailed plan then just "we'll fix it all!" Based on your concerns, I think you should vote for Dovinian. His "Ship balancing" stuff is what scares me. He doesnt really go into detail about it, just says "ships need to be changed" Personally i want to see titans get their ability to DD subcaps restored. I realize thats not going to happen, but i see more threads discussing further titan nerfs and that combined with this vague "balance chips" makes me wary The Mittani wrote: Well, if you want rapid and full-scale DUST integration, you shouldn't vote for me; I think it should be handled carefully and in baby steps, because I flat out don't trust anything produced during CCP's period of irrational exuberance. Basically everyone supports 'more little things' and 'better UI', that's like saying the sky is blue. Most nullsec candidates are hardcore PvP guys. hth~ Tbh i see Dust as mainly just interacting with the PI ****. PI is relatively new and i've always expected it to drastically change. I wouldn't mind watching CCP destroy PI several times trying to get it right.
Terminal Insanity Convex Enterprises Unprovoked Aggression 281	Posted - 2012.03.17 00:51:00 - [10] - Quote Fon Revedhort seems like another good choice. I like his small gang / casual gaming position. I know several people who login a few times a week and rarely see action because they don't dedicate 5 hours a day to waiting for it
Karn Dulake Souls Must Be Trampled The.Alliance 459	Posted - 2012.03.17 00:52:00 - [11] - Quote The Mittani wrote: Well, if you want rapid and full-scale DUST integration, you shouldn't vote for me; I think it should be handled carefully and in baby steps, because I flat out don't trust anything produced during CCP's period of irrational exuberance. Basically everyone supports 'more little things' and 'better UI', that's like saying the sky is blue. Most nullsec candidates are hardcore PvP guys. hth~ Be honest Mittans if it wasn't for that CCP employee the CSM would not exist. No one cares for it and does this company really need to be told what to do by the playerbase. I dont normally troll, but when i do i do it on General Discussion.
Doc Fury Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 542	Posted - 2012.03.17 00:59:00 - [12] - Quote You could vote for me, but I'm not running. Players who are not running or who are, and don't get elected, have about as much influence on CCP as those who are elected. /CSM is meaningless except to serve as an ongoing PR stunt for CCP.. The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'no.'
Terminal Insanity Convex Enterprises Unprovoked Aggression 281	Posted - 2012.03.17 01:13:00 - [13] - Quote Doc Fury wrote: /CSM is meaningless except to serve as an ongoing PR stunt for CCP.. Not so sure about that, but even if it is, it just adds to the depth of the game, gives it something else interesting to do. And they give a bunch of people free trip to iceland =P

CCP Spitfire C C P C C P Alliance 1384	Posted - 2012.03.17 08:46:00 - [14] - Quote Moved from "EVE General Discussion". CCP Spitfire \| Russian Community Coordinator @ccp_spitfire

Pheusia Vanishing Point. The Initiative. 26	Posted - 2012.03.17 09:17:00 - [15] - Quote Karn Dulake wrote: The Mittani wrote: Well, if you want rapid and full-scale DUST integration, you shouldn't vote for me; I think it should be handled carefully and in baby steps, because I flat out don't trust anything produced during CCP's period of irrational exuberance. Basically everyone supports 'more little things' and 'better UI', that's like saying the sky is blue. Most nullsec candidates are hardcore PvP guys. hth~ Be honest Mittans if it wasn't for that CCP employee the CSM would not exist. No one cares for it and does this company really need to be told what to do by the playerbase. Given some of the tin-eared, foot-in-mouth, bull-in-a-china-shop things that CCP have said and done when they specifically decided not to consult the CSM, then I'd say that Hell Yes! they do need input from the playerbase.
Issler Dainze Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord 1243	Posted - 2012.03.17 09:47:00 - [16] - Quote Terminal Insanity wrote: Doesn't appear to be many. If you... Exclude all the PvE content candidates... Exclude all the people who say "we're all unhappy with eve and we'll change it...." without even hinting at how... Exclude Mintrollo because.... obviously. it leaves pretty much just Seleene and The Mittani. Maybe Alekseyev Karrde, but he's relatively unheard of. Are these the only options we have? Most of the candidates just say crap like: "Vincent Athena" wrote: My goal is to find solutions to issues that help everyone, no matter what part of the game you play or "Korvin" wrote: Vote for the good game balance! Vote for only finished game features! Vote for our clear future in game! How about a vote for a clear campaign platform? Seriously. Personally, i want someone who will focus CCP on the PvP. - Expanding PvP Options / Opportunities - Introduce and/or fix forced-pvp mechanics (Pos/Poco and stuff like that) - New mechanics to encourage/push more players into PvP situations In the not-so-pvp things that i'm interested in: - Newbie's 'first steps'. Many newbs quit eve, this needs to change. - Overview settings are still overly messy and confusing. - Eve <> Dust interactivity. I really hope CCP goes all-out on this, and doesn't take the ***** road. I want to see heavy Dust integration -Continue cleaning up 'the little things' (CCP has done an amazing job at this in crucible, i want it to continue) Who should a PvP'er vote for? Some of these other candidates must have more detailed plan then just "we'll fix it all!" PvP is not me, the clear PvP candidate is Alekseyev Karrde. If I wasn't running myself I'd vote for him, The fact you didn't mention him is a clear indication this is not a serious post. If exploding folks in space is your focus vote Alekseyev Karrde!!! issler Dainze Not a PvP candidate A supporter of Alekseyev Karrde Also a CSM 7 Candidate for high sec, mining and a balanced approach t improving Eve
Revolution Rising Gentlemen of Better Ilk 112	Posted - 2012.03.17 10:49:00 - [17] - Quote Hans Jagerblitzen is more a low-sec guy, not highsec and if you read the PDF he put out, you'll see he has some real content there regarding how to fix it. Trebor likewise has a great deal to say about game mechanics of all kinds. My EVE YouTube Channel
Akrasjel Lanate Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance 651	Posted - 2012.03.17 15:09:00 - [18] - Quote
Andski GoonWaffe 3188	Posted - 2012.03.17 15:12:00 - [19] - Quote Akrasjel Lanate wrote: oh how you've managed to outdo yourself in terms of worthless attempts at contributing to a thread "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012
Johnny Marzetti GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 332	Posted - 2012.03.17 15:25:00 - [20] - Quote Terminal Insanity wrote: Fon Revedhort seems like another good choice. I like his small gang / casual gaming position. I know several people who login a few times a week and rarely see action because they don't dedicate 5 hours a day to waiting for it You might want to take a very careful look at his thread. There are a lot of things CCP mods have deleted that reveal certain real world views that, while not directly relevant to the game, seem to get brought up by Fon in game related discussions, that you might find completely repellent if you are like most people. You can still find it if you look carefully. That's all I can say, and even then this will probably get deleted. vOv
Weaselior GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 2823	Posted - 2012.03.17 19:04:00 - [21] - Quote Terminal Insanity wrote: Fon Revedhort seems like another good choice. I like his small gang / casual gaming position. I know several people who login a few times a week and rarely see action because they don't dedicate 5 hours a day to waiting for it only if you like voting for an actual neo-**** not even trolling here
Weaselior GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 2823	Posted - 2012.03.17 19:06:00 - [22] - Quote he is a literal irl racist who thinks the nazis had some pretty good ideas and really hates jews and loves david duke again, not joking, but ccp has decided that this will be censored on the boards rather than bouncing the neo-nazi candidate and banning him for the many and varied racist things he has posted here because apparently ccp's cool with it
Kai Tel State War Academy Caldari State 3	Posted - 2012.03.17 19:09:00 - [23] - Quote Weaselior wrote: he is a literal irl racist who thinks the nazis had some pretty good ideas and really hates jews and loves david duke again, not joking, but ccp has decided that this will be censored on the boards rather than bouncing the neo-nazi candidate and banning him for the many and varied racist things he has posted here because apparently ccp's cool with it I am glad you posted that. It does impact my vote choices and is a consideration. So TY.
Fon Revedhort Monks of War DarkSide. 658	Posted - 2012.03.17 19:22:00 - [24] - Quote Terminal Insanity wrote: Fon Revedhort seems like another good choice. I like his small gang / casual gaming position. I know several people who login a few times a week and rarely see action because they don't dedicate 5 hours a day to waiting for it Vote for me than. On top of promoting someone with proper PvP vision you'll also make tards (see above) angry. Fon Revedhort for CSM 7
Weaselior GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 2824	Posted - 2012.03.17 19:31:00 - [25] - Quote i enjoy trolling the **** out of bad candidates but everything I'm saying about fon is 100% true and not exaggerated in any way: feel free to ask two step, who was the first one to link me to the posts where when discussing game balance fon just feels the need to throw in his views on race
Grumpy Owly 338	Posted - 2012.03.17 20:05:00 - [26] - Quote Weaselior wrote: i enjoy trolling the **** out of bad candidates but everything I'm saying about fon is 100% true and not exaggerated in any way: feel free to ask two step, who was the first one to link me to the posts where when discussing game balance fon just feels the need to throw in his views on race I dont support racism. I find it hypocritical that Goons would adopt to take the moral high ground when their ongoing behaviour regarding people with mental health and behavioural issues are equally deplorable and something they don't seem to have tamed completley. Why should your own predjudice be ignored as a result? Especially when less than a month or so ago, Goons were threadnoughting these hate messages all over the forum. So whilst you may have a valid point to help support your character assasination of a candidate, don't forget how hypocritical it makes you look at the same time. Bounty Hunting for CSM 7 Stop EvE Apathy
Macon Chalaise Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation 19	Posted - 2012.03.17 20:37:00 - [27] - Quote His name anagrams to: Nerd Vet Fro Ho Me, I think it's a secret message revealing the dark secret of his TRUE nature. Or perhaps it's a secret code that means "I <3 Clayton Bigsby" Clayton Bigsby MMOs often feel like clearing houses for persons not only vigilant for offense but ready to embrace said offense with the greatest enthusiasm as a crack addict embraces the rock. -áThese persons seek not for resolution of the issues for which they express concern as much as for the feeling of the emotions themselves, emotions they are usually loath to relinquish.
Andski GoonWaffe 3216	Posted - 2012.03.18 16:36:00 - [28] - Quote Grumpy Owly wrote: Weaselior wrote: i enjoy trolling the **** out of bad candidates but everything I'm saying about fon is 100% true and not exaggerated in any way: feel free to ask two step, who was the first one to link me to the posts where when discussing game balance fon just feels the need to throw in his views on race I dont support racism. I find it hypocritical that Goons would adopt to take the moral high ground when their ongoing behaviour regarding people with mental health and behavioural issues are equally deplorable and something they don't seem to have tamed completley. Why should your own predjudice be ignored as a result? Especially when less than a month or so ago, Goons were threadnoughting these hate messages all over the forum. So whilst you may have a valid point to help support your character assasination of a candidate, don't forget how hypocritical it makes you look at the same time. "goons suicide gank miners in hisec they have no right to talk down to neonazis" "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012
Skippermonkey Tactical Knightmare 861	Posted - 2012.03.19 16:48:00 - [29] - Quote vote for skippermonkey because he has a cool blue and yellow bobble hat! VOTE SKIPPERMONKEY FOR CSM - TERRIBAD AT EVE BUT GREAT AT FORUMS show your support for me here

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

Copyright © 2006-2025, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,05s, ref 20251006/0725
EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.