EVE Search - [IDEA] Ambulation: let us play instruments

All Channels

Assembly Hall

[IDEA] Ambulation: let us play instruments

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
LaVista Vista	Posted - 2008.08.04 23:27:00 - [91] Originally by: Fahtim Meidires It depends on if they vote high or low. It depends on how they prioritize it. So far all that's decided is if it's on the list, not where on the list. Exactly. What is the point of bringing up and issue if you already know it's a low-priority issue? I personally think that is the case here.
Fahtim Meidires Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.08.04 23:36:00 - [92] Originally by: LaVista Vista Originally by: Fahtim Meidires It depends on if they vote high or low. It depends on how they prioritize it. So far all that's decided is if it's on the list, not where on the list. Exactly. What is the point of bringing up and issue if you already know it's a low-priority issue? Because we don't already know this, if I'm not mistaken. This gets a lot more positive support than other issues so it may yet be determined by the CSM that this is important to the player base, which is why there will be a vote. Quote: I personally think that is the case here. There are 9 CSM delegates. There are thousands of players. You are one opinion. Don't damage your (pretty decent IMO) reputation by trying to block this (pretty decent IMO) idea.
Bane Glorious	Posted - 2008.08.04 23:37:00 - [93] Originally by: LaVista Vista Originally by: Fahtim Meidires It depends on if they vote high or low. It depends on how they prioritize it. So far all that's decided is if it's on the list, not where on the list. Exactly. What is the point of bringing up and issue if you already know it's a low-priority issue? I personally think that is the case here. Because it's cool and there's no way to tell if CCP would implement something like this on their own, or if they'd notice it without the CSM.
Darius JOHNSON	Posted - 2008.08.05 01:41:00 - [94] Originally by: Jade Constantine Originally by: Wendat Huron What I don't get is all but the other goons not choosing to abstain. It's not a bad idea to have fluff in the game, it's just not anywhere near the top of issues you should be voting on and putting forth to CCP. So whereas not a completely moronic idea it had no place on the table and the other non-hive minds on the CSM should've opted to abstain or vote it down to demonstrate its low level priority. I'll explain my reason. Musical instruments in ambulation won't break the game for anybody and some people might enjoy it. + hoped that by supporting one of their ideas it might make them more responsive to some of the 0.0 sovereignty suggestions that would improve the game for people currently looking at the mind-deadening horror of lagfest pos dogpiles and perhaps get us a chance to promote a visionary idea (of the kind that CCP did ask for) to the next formal meeting. Part of committee work is horsetrading and barter - but on this occassion the compromise was all one-sided - still you have to try right? A MAJORITY OF THE CSM DOESN'T SUPPORT MY HORRIBLE AND TRANSPARENT EFFORTS TO TURN 0.0 INTO FACTIONAL WARFARE SO I CAN BE A "POWER" IM GOING TO POST IN EVERY THREAD ABOUT IT LIKE A BIG BABY! Originally by: Jade Constantine You might be a big man on the internets Darius but prepare to be laughed at quite a lot in Europe. -- Illaria's CSM
Darius JOHNSON	Posted - 2008.08.05 01:44:00 - [95] Edited by: Darius JOHNSON on 05/08/2008 01:44:45 Originally by: Red Thunder can the csm please concentrate on more important issues like the nano nerf etc first please? When there is a nano nerf in game to address I'll be happy to. For now CCP's asked for player input on what they have in testing. If you want to have an impact I'd recommend TESTING and providing FEEDBACK rather than blaming the CSM for something that's not its place to address. CCP's given you the outlet for this angst. Use it. ***ing about the CSM instead of following the proper course will get you nowhere and leave only yourself to blame. Originally by:** Jade Constantine You might be a big man on the internets Darius but prepare to be laughed at quite a lot in Europe. -- Illaria's CSM
Wendat Huron Stellar Solutions	Posted - 2008.08.05 01:57:00 - [96] Originally by: Fahtim Meidires Originally by: Wendat Huron Originally by: Fahtim Meidires Originally by: LaVista Vista Originally by: Jade Constantine I'll explain my reason. Musical instruments in ambulation won't break the game for anybody and some people might enjoy it. + hoped that by supporting one of their ideas it might make them more responsive to some of the 0.0 sovereignty suggestions that would improve the game for people currently looking at the mind-deadening horror of lagfest pos dogpiles and perhaps get us a chance to promote a visionary idea (of the kind that CCP did ask for) to the next formal meeting. Part of committee work is horsetrading and barter - but on this occassion the compromise was all one-sided - still you have to try right? But how would you prioritize this idea on a low to high scale? I guess that depends on how you vote on it. Not really, a vote is an either or, not a sliding scale. It depends on if they vote high or low. It depends on how they prioritize it. So far all that's decided is if it's on the list, not where on the list. That does not compute. There is no high or low votes, stop trolling goon, this is not SA. These forums are FUBAR, upgrade this decade!
Fahtim Meidires Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.08.05 02:25:00 - [97] Originally by: Wendat Huron That does not compute. There is no high or low votes, stop trolling goon, this is not SA. Not a troll, I think there is definitely a level of prioritization that will occur regardless if it is specifically outlined in the CSM guidelines. It has been mentioned numerous times by delegates. Also I'm not a member of SA. Figure that out before you make another assumption, then shut up.
LaVista Vista	Posted - 2008.08.05 02:36:00 - [98] Originally by: Fahtim Meidires Originally by: Wendat Huron That does not compute. There is no high or low votes, stop trolling goon, this is not SA. Not a troll, I think there is definitely a level of prioritization that will occur regardless if it is specifically outlined in the CSM guidelines. It has been mentioned numerous times by delegates. Also I'm not a member of SA. Figure that out before you make another assumption, then shut up. That is completely correct. CCP wants us to do a prioritization of all the issues. Thus, there's the 2 factors to consider: Should the issue be escalated?(Yes/No) How important is the issue(Low/Medium/Medium-High/High)
Wendat Huron Stellar Solutions	Posted - 2008.08.05 03:08:00 - [99] Edited by: Wendat Huron on 05/08/2008 03:08:53 Originally by: Fahtim Meidires Originally by: Wendat Huron That does not compute. There is no high or low votes, stop trolling goon, this is not SA. Not a troll, I think there is definitely a level of prioritization that will occur regardless if it is specifically outlined in the CSM guidelines. It has been mentioned numerous times by delegates. Also I'm not a member of SA. Figure that out before you make another assumption, then shut up. Really, when did goons abolish membership of Something Awful as a mandatory requirement for joining Goonfleet? As for bringing personal agendas to the table I'd have a lot more respect for any CSM member if they brought up a cause they've championed for a long time prior, not some spur of the moment brainfart they concocted during their last bio break. These forums are FUBAR, upgrade this decade!
Fahtim Meidires Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.08.05 03:17:00 - [100] Originally by: Wendat Huron Really, when did goons abolish membership of Something Awful as a mandatory requirement for joining Goonfleet? Since you could be sponsored. Entrapment is way more fun than trolling. Look how dumb you look.
Chainsaw Plankton IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE	Posted - 2008.08.05 03:18:00 - [101] Originally by: Herschel Yamamoto This...is a far better idea than I would have expected. You'd get a bit of a different demographic, and you'd get a lot of people doing odd things with it. I want to see this happen just for the people busking in Jita 4/4, and to see what griefers would do with it. The intersection of those two cases sounds fun as well. Now, the real question is, who's in for making Guitar Hero a minigame? that's exactly what I thought when I read the title
Eternal Error Exitus Acta Probant	Posted - 2008.08.05 04:24:00 - [102] Sounds cool.
Wendat Huron Stellar Solutions	Posted - 2008.08.06 02:57:00 - [103] Originally by: Fahtim Meidires Originally by: Wendat Huron Really, when did goons abolish membership of Something Awful as a mandatory requirement for joining Goonfleet? Since you could be sponsored. Entrapment is way more fun than trolling. Look how dumb you look. I'm not the goon, you are. These forums are FUBAR, upgrade this decade!
Serj Darek Minmatar Mentally Unstable Enterprises	Posted - 2008.08.06 06:17:00 - [104] You are not supposed to be docked all the time! Stop inventing new ideas to not undock! First!
Argian	Posted - 2008.08.08 06:13:00 - [105] This idea doesnt have an EvE feel to it, so i'm not supporting it. If it goes through the only way for it to work is to let it become totally optional (mute music) or everyone gets free kill rights on lousy musicians.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.