EVE Search - Things for CCP to do b4 Shiva.

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Things for CCP to do b4 Shiva.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Dreez	Posted - 2004.05.27 04:24:00 - [1] 1: Reduce the number of Concord at gates in higher empire because they alone creates alot of jumpin lagg. 2: Reduce the number of Sentrys in empire to reduce lagg. 3: Remove the drones graphics, we dont need it. Beeing able to see each drone firing is not needed. 4: Remove the ability to stay docked at a POS owned by enemies. 5: Remove the ability to retake stations directly after been taken by enemies. 6: Fix the graphical bug with the Scorpion. 7: Fix the graphical bug that places shipskins on you. 8: Fix drones infinite tracking and range. 9: Fix the bug where webbfield dont show on frigates. 10: Remove sentrys in 0.0 space, NO security. 11: Give caracal a usefull shipbonus. Any other idÚas ?. 'Trying to argue logically with Evol is like trying to teach a pig to dance. It only makes you look foolish and really annoys the pig ' - Duke Droklar [OC]
Bubba1977	Posted - 2004.05.27 04:36:00 - [2] 12. Fix the gang bug. __________________________________________________
Enraku Reynolt	Posted - 2004.05.27 04:42:00 - [3] turn the +0.1 sec recovery back on ------------------------------------------------ Do not let the world change you. Change the world Here's everything I know about war: somebody wins, somebody loses, and nothing is ever the sa
XuevranLed	Posted - 2004.05.27 04:59:00 - [4] 1,2. No because that owuld just encourage more gate camping. 3. Drones should still have a graphic, though making it a much simpler polygon might be a good compromise. 4. Agrt provided the players ships would not be killable until they return. 5-9. agrt 10. Dunno. I could see sentries on a gate leading to empire space (might take care of the gatecamper issue) but not on gates leading deeper into 0.0. 11. Agrt, especially since if the missle nerfs are implemented unchanged, caracal (and other missile boats) are gonna be screwed. Mine: 13. Add a few more player-owned stations in 0.0. Spread em out too... Also add more stations in the empire-side gateway systems, so that each gateway has at least one.
Drakxter	Posted - 2004.05.27 05:52:00 - [5] Quote: 1: Reduce the number of Concord at gates in higher empire because they alone creates alot of jumpin lagg. 2: Reduce the number of Sentrys in empire to reduce lagg. 3: Remove the drones graphics, we dont need it. Beeing able to see each drone firing is not needed. 4: Remove the ability to stay docked at a POS owned by enemies. 5: Remove the ability to retake stations directly after been taken by enemies. 6: Fix the graphical bug with the Scorpion. 7: Fix the graphical bug that places shipskins on you. 8: Fix drones infinite tracking and range. 9: Fix the bug where webbfield dont show on frigates. 10: Remove sentrys in 0.0 space, NO security. 11: Give caracal a usefull shipbonus. 1: No, high sec space is secure space, and thus there should be a good amount of CONCORD/police/navy ships there. 2: Look above... Tell me? Are you a pirat that just wants to move into high sec space and "gank" players there? 3: Why not also remove ships, planets and stations moduls as well. Why not just make eve text based. 4: Fair enough I guess. 5: Also seems fair. 6: I thought you did not like eye candy in the game and would not care if the things look wrong?? 7: You mean ship modules right.. 8: Now thats a good thing to get fixed. 9: No no it will make lag.. errr I mean, yes fix that. 10: Why? If its empire 0.0 it makes sense, and whats wrong with stations wanting defence. 11: Dont use it so I dont know if it needs anything.. ------------- Most tired of thing atm: - Mods on the forum saying: "Please use the bug report page to submit bugs, the forum is not the place to post them." and then closing a topic.
Dreez	Posted - 2004.05.27 05:55:00 - [6] CCP needs to restructure the whole idÚa about POS, because today they are to easely retaken. My suggestion would be a monthly based ownership where the corporation that has the longest time on "owning" the station at hand, gets to own the station for a month. Then the timer restarts. Ofcourse this would meen that the stations most valuable would be faught for the hardest , making it more fun. Lets say Corp:A Takes and holds station for 2 days, then Corp:B moves in and takes the station from Corp:A and holds it for 1 day untill Corp:A muster enough forces to run Corp:B away. At the end of the week, it showes that Corp:B was the winner through long siege and devotion. Corp:A Lost the station because they could not rally enough forces enough times the majority of the week to take and defend the station. Any thoughts ? 'Trying to argue logically with Evol is like trying to teach a pig to dance. It only makes you look foolish and really annoys the pig ' - Duke Droklar [OC]
Shogo	Posted - 2004.05.27 05:57:00 - [7] Remove gate sentries because some fool ***es about them. Remove Concord at gates because some fool *es about them. Remove people that camp in stations because some fool *es about them. Remove insta jumps because some fool *es about them. Remove jet cans because some fool *es about them. Remove secure cans because some fool *es about them. Remove missiles because some fool *es about them. Remove safe spots because some fool *es about them. Remove local chats because some fool *es about them. Remove trade channels because some fool *es about them. Remove pirates because some fool *es about them. Remove mining because some fool *es about them. Remove tanking ships because some fool *es about them. Remove POS because some fool *es about them. Remove bookmarks because some fool *es about them. Remove Escrow markets because some fool *es about them. Remove in game lotteries because some fool *es about them. Remove all RP aspects because some fool *es about them. Remove all references to slavery because some fool *es about them. Remove chain spawn hunting because some fool *es about them. Remove gate campers because some fool *es about them. Remove battleships mining in empire because some fool *es about them. Remove battleships from the game because some fool *es about them. Remove cruisers from the game because some fool *es about them. Remove frigates from the game because some fool *es about them. Remove elite frigates from the game because some fool *es about them. Remove industrials from the game because some fool *es about them. Remove all ammo because some fool *es about them. Remove MWDs because some fool *es about them. Remove agents because some fool *es about them. Remove mines because some fool *es about them. Remove petitions because some fool ***es about them. I'm sure I've missed a few of the other elements of this game, that were flogged to death by know-it-all gamers. Remove tools like Dreez and others, that always seem to think they have a better way of doing things. Get a grip. Shogo
Fritz Ionar	Posted - 2004.05.27 06:02:00 - [8] 14. Put back the jumpcount column in "people and places" bookmark tab.
Pandora Panda	Posted - 2004.05.27 06:23:00 - [9] 1&2 Apply to .5+ empire space where 6 concord ships and 8 sentry guns are at every gate it seems. This absolutely creates jump-in lag for no reason, since concord will just warp in and gank any agressors anyway. 3-7 Yes please 8 HELL YES PLEASE 9 Yes please 10 Get rid of all the 0.0 space thats got a positive security rating (i.e. empire 0.0). Theres no real point to 0.0 space with security hits and sentry guns, its just a horrible trap for the unwary. Either make all empire 0.0 into real 0.0, or into 0.1 11. Yes please -------------------------------------------- CONCORD: Kneecapping Pilots for Misdemeanors Since 2003
Severus Trajan	Posted - 2004.05.27 06:38:00 - [10] Originally by: Shogo ... I'm sure I've missed a few of the other elements of this game, that were flogged to death by know-it-all gamers. He shoots, he scores. Best post I've seen on these boards in ages, Shogo!
Yamato	Posted - 2004.05.27 07:04:00 - [11] Originally by: Shogo I'm sure I've missed a few of the other elements of this game, that were flogged to death by know-it-all gamers. Remove tools like Dreez and others, that always seem to think they have a better way of doing things. Get a grip. Shogo STICKY!!! I say lets remove the General Discussion Forums cuase Shogo summed up (in one post) 98% of the threads! I'm so unlucky that if I was to fall into a barrel of nipples I'd come out sucking my thumb.
Arnt	Posted - 2004.05.27 08:24:00 - [12] Originally by: Shogo I'm sure I've missed a few of the other elements of this game, that were flogged to death by know-it-all gamers. Remove tools like Dreez and others, that always seem to think they have a better way of doing things. Get a grip. Shogo All is fine, everyone is happy, the world is marvelous, everyone is kind, hey wait, no, no not the yellow pills !!!
Deadflip2	Posted - 2004.05.27 12:07:00 - [13] put the sort on unread option back with mails... --- "this song reminds me of the girl i met on a schooltrip, she was really nice, and she really liked me. I forgot to ask her her phone number" - Nelix trist OMG im a pretzel!!!
Kulach	Posted - 2004.05.27 12:30:00 - [14] Nice to see that alt's like Shogo can act mature.... O'well, I suppose a mature answer to Dreez post was to much to ask for... Just because something is fixed doesn't mean you can't break it

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.