| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Shinri Kyo
   |
Posted - 2008.07.28 22:34:00 -
[931]
Edited by: Shinri Kyo on 28/07/2008 22:37:37
Against
|
Battalier
eXceed Inc.
eXceed.
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 22:34:00 -
[932]
Sux big time - Time to start looking for a new game. There appears to be no point what so-ever in this game to train for specific skills as the minute people do become profficient CCP in their infinite stupidity totally negate any benefits that the time you have spent have given you.
|
Arutha Danan
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 22:36:00 -
[933]
Against - totally
|
Heikke Ahtisaari
eXceed Inc.
eXceed.
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 22:38:00 -
[934]
Against. - Emphatically
Your Signature exceeds the max filesize limit of 24,000 bytes. Mail us if you have questions -Eldo |
Davey Oaks
Shade.
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 22:50:00 -
[935]
The seriously high speed ships could do with looking at - but this is waaaay over the top. |
Galvatr0n
Gallente
LEGI0N
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 23:17:00 -
[936]
Against. Although I wonder, will CCP even give a shit? If the MWD nerf and the WEB nerf go through I will end my subscription. No you can't have my stuff. I may come back if they ever unnerf this stupid shit.
WE ARE LEGI0N. WE DO NOT FORGIVE. WE DO NOT FORGET. EXPECT US. |
Hehulk
Black Sea Industries
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 23:18:00 -
[937]
Do Not Want.
----------
It's great being minmatar, ain't it |
Afjab
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 23:22:00 -
[938]
Bad
|
Femaref
Armageddon Day
Brotherhood of armed traders
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 23:24:00 -
[939]
against
|
Der Fangzahn
Breed of Malakka
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 23:26:00 -
[940]
AGAINST
Try to shoot a cruiser in near orbit with your BS (incl. web). -> Fail
Try to shoot a frig in near orbit with your Cruiser (incl. web). -> Fail
This is not only a nano Nerf, this a missile buff and a great turret nerf.
-- I'm the Pest -- |
IVI430
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 23:52:00 -
[941]
 Originally by: Der Fangzahn
AGAINST
Try to shoot a cruiser in near orbit with your BS (incl. web). -> Fail
Try to shoot a frig in near orbit with your Cruiser (incl. web). -> Fail
This is not only a nano Nerf, this a missile buff and a great turret nerf.
i totally agree
|
Labho1
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 23:52:00 -
[942]
Fail CCP, against
|
Alex Eclipse
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 00:15:00 -
[943]
Rock Paper Scissors.
|
Ghostthor
Demonic Retribution
Un-Natural Selection
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 00:16:00 -
[944]
Rock Paper Scissors.
|
AntarisIX
Thundercats
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 00:19:00 -
[945]
long live nano
|
Ronan Ko'dred
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 00:32:00 -
[946]
I read countless of posts so far on this topic
I flew a lots of hours till today
I spend months of training time
I lost millions of isk to nanos
I lost another millions of isk in nanos
against !¦
taking away lots of gameplay fun *thx
|
Halsoy
Shade.
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 00:36:00 -
[947]
Edited by: Halsoy on 29/07/2008 00:36:31
This reall, really, really, really, oh, wait, did I say really sucks?
Signed.
Surely there is a better way to work around it, as discussed in corp, make a bloody scripted web, one with long range but low web and a short range with good web or something. Don't knock down on everything ffs.
|
Pip Warchild
North Star Networks
Black Hand.
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 01:13:00 -
[948]
AGAINST
Fine get the speeds down a tad, but dont remove small gang warfare.
|
MD Dawg
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 02:25:00 -
[949]
The nano nerf can lick the hind of my ishtar's body which you can call its rear end.
|
Dalla
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 02:25:00 -
[950]
Against Nano MWD Web Scrammbler Nerf
|
Cirax
Escuadron Federal de Asalto
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 02:28:00 -
[951]
I support this. Excesive changes at the same time.
|
Eacham Graeme
Caldari
AWE Corporation
Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 02:38:00 -
[952]
Signed
|
Essque
Starlancers
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 03:07:00 -
[953]
Originally by: James Lyrus
I think it's telling how many votes this topic got before the changes even got as far as the test server.
It suggests there's a whole lot of people who are prepared to condemn something without any clue whatsoever how it'll bear out.
I hope CCP takes this into consideration, when they start looking at voting.
I don't need to jump from a high building head first in order to know it's a bad idea. A basic understanding of physics and a wee bit of imagination will tell me what it will happen.
I'd appreciate if you'd think before you post. Thank you.
|
Tucan SonOfSam
Otakus Society
Revolution Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 03:38:00 -
[954]
Against. This is a really stupid idea overall. You are removing the efforts of hundreds if not thousands of invested training hours per person and vast somes of isk that people have invested in order to be able to have some amazing ships which should be the right of people who have played long enough and invested a lot of real money in subscription fee's. This is just as R E T A R D E D as the carrier nerf and just as bad. Maybe you should add new modules instead that work to counter nano set up's instead of nullifying people's hard fought investments.
CCP = EPIC FAIL.
|
El Polako
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 05:19:00 -
[955]
against
|
Pticu
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 05:20:00 -
[956]
Against the nerf.
|
Xavras
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 05:21:00 -
[957]
Against the nerf
|
Azazel Ardi
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 05:22:00 -
[958]
Against the nerf
|
Daan Sai
HAZCON Inc
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 05:24:00 -
[959]
I'm against it *as it stands now*. The changes are far too complex and far reaching for something that is just supposed to slow things down a bit. I'd be prepared to re-look at a simpler model.
|
Quinnolite
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 05:24:00 -
[960]
Against!!
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |