| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Draconta
   |
Posted - 2008.07.28 08:15:00 -
[1]
Instead of nerfing the webbers down to 50% 60%, How about making the effects of webbers be based on the weight/size of the ship. The more a ship weighs the harder it should be to hold, and slow down.
I think this would allow you to tune Frigates as the top speed/acceleration ships like in your ideas and susceptible to webbers, giving those speedy cruisers Still a worthy cause in the eve universe even after the speed nerf. Cruisers and bigger weigh more so they should be more resilient to webbing effects, creating a sort of blockade runner Build.
|
Haffrage
Sharks With Frickin' Laser Beams
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 08:30:00 -
[2]
And here I thought they were nerfing webs because inside 10km was the death zone for small ships.
|
Jaketh Ivanes
Amarr
Imperial Servants
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 09:29:00 -
[3]
Draconte, I guess you fly a lot of cruisers? 
If you read the dev blog, you would see they want webbers NOT to so "If webbed, your dead". It counts for all ships, not just cruisers.
|
Flamewave
Crimson Moon Society
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 09:29:00 -
[4]
I always wanted to see it based on sig radius, where the larger the sig the more effective the web. It'd make afterburners more viable, give frigates and cruisers more survivability in close range against larger hulls, and make the Halo implants a bit more useful.
__________
|
Draconta
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 10:17:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Draconta on 28/07/2008 10:19:33
My point is 50-60% is r-tared versus frigates, its like a double negative. They want to slow frigs down but at the same time nerf the things that already try to slow them down? End result = The same?
Battlecruisers sometimes, but I don't fly nano if thats what you're asking.
Just heard alot of people crying over their vagabonds thought this idea would bring something positive for them? :P
|
Arana Tellen
Gallente
Mercenary Forces
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 10:37:00 -
[6]
 Originally by: Draconta
Edited by: Draconta on 28/07/2008 10:19:33
My point is 50-60% is r-tared versus frigates, its like a double negative. They want to slow frigs down but at the same time nerf the things that already try to slow them down? End result = The same?
Battlecruisers sometimes, but I don't fly nano if thats what you're asking.
Just heard alot of people crying over their vagabonds thought this idea would bring something positive for them? :P
No. They dont want to slow down frigates. They want to slow down HACs that go as fast as frigates.
---------------------------------
Oh noes!
Originally by: CCP Greyscale
*moderated - mother abuse - Mitnal*
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |